
How to write a crime thriller – with help from AI-gatha Christie
Agatha Christie is the world's best-selling author, so if you wanted to learn how to write a crime novel she's the first person you'd ask.
Unfortunately, she died in 1976. But in the age of AI, with a plot twist that would assuredly have had Christie herself itching to incorporate it in a book, death need not be the end. A new BBC Maestro course of online video lessons, made in conjunction with Christie's estate, brings the queen of crime back to life.
'First and foremost, for me, this project is about looking at her process as a writer and paying homage to that,' says James Prichard, Christie's great-grandson and the Chairman and CEO of Agatha Christie Limited. 'One of the things I am proudest of that has happened over the last however many years is how seriously Agatha Christie is taken, which I don't think was always the case. She is now held in the regard and esteem that she should be as a writer.'
It's that esteem that will encourage wannabe Christies – in this case, myself – to pay their £120 for a Maestro subscription (which gets you a year's access to all manner of courses from Stephen Bartlett to JoJo Moyes to Jo Malone). The new Agatha series is a short lecture course given by a recreation of the writer herself, with Christie's face and voice somehow grafted on to a (brilliant) performance from the actor Vivien Keene. Delivered across 11 videos, all of less than 20 minutes, you sit and are spoken to – nothing interactive here – as Agatha takes you through plotting, structure, detectives and satisfying resolutions.
The difference to all the other BBC Maestro courses is that Christie's writing advice is only sort-of delivered by Christie. But the message does come from the horse's mouth, so to speak – it was one of the stipulations of the Christie estate that every one of the words that Keene speaks should have come from Christie's pen.
'It had to be her lessons; it couldn't be some made up thing,' says Prichard. 'So we had a team of academics under Dr Mark Aldridge [an acknowledged Christie expert] to see to that.'
In order to fit with the BBC Maestro credo – 'Let the greatest be your teacher' – 'It had to look and sound like her,' says Prichard. 'And what they have done is extraordinary. The final thing was that it had to be of value to both aspiring writers and fans. And I think it does that. All I can say is I was speaking to my father on Friday and both of us agreed that we'd learned a hell of a lot from her that we didn't know.'
If AI-gatha's Maestro course could teach her own relatives a thing or two – Prichard said that he learned from the course that Christie's books work because 'they're actually about people, and people never really change' — then surely it could help me? I was lucky enough to get an early view of the Christie course and can report that watching Agatha, or 'Agatha,' dole out aperçus on story structure, cast creation, plot twists, red herrings, and the art of suspense, was most of all… unnerving. A half-smiling Christie-bot stares barrel-straight down the camera with schoolmarm-ish supremacy. She seemed to sense my self-doubt, my daft plot ideas, my general unease.
There is also some mild unease at having AI involved at all. To authors, AI is perceived as a threat more than a boon.
'I'd be lying if I said there weren't worries [about using AI],' says James Prichard. 'But I believe and I hope that this is using AI in both a helpful and ethical way. The AI model of Agatha doesn't work without the performance of Vivien Keene. This was not written by AI. It is a leading academic unearthing everything that she said about writing. And I believe that what we are delivering here in terms of her message is better presented and will reach more people as a result of being presented, if I can use inverted commas, 'by her.''
What kind of tutor is AI-gatha? The course shows that Christie plainly studied her craft and while she opens up saying, 'I don't feel I have any particular method when it comes to writing,' which is disappointing, she does in fact adhere to a broad methodology founded in meticulous planning.
'And I take it seriously,' she says, looking serious.
The importance of saying something – not preaching but there being some form of moral backbone to your story — is emphasised throughout. Readers like to see justice served, she says.
'I write to entertain but there is a dash of the old morality play in my work – hunting down the guilty to protect the innocent.'
But where to even start? That's my problem. Agatha recommends - glory be! – idleness (but not sloth) as a fallow field where ideas can take seed. She encourages eavesdropping on conversations on buses as a source of characters and dialogue, and so I head to that virtual bus that is the Internet and find that Telegraph readers are particularly interested in Air Fryers (see below). I open with a blood-spattered, Grand Guignol set piece, only to remember that Agatha 'doesn't like violence;' she likes puzzles with realistic characters in well-defined settings. And so I concoct a well-defined village and open up with what I hope is a well-defined, air-fryer related teaser.
Most of all, she says, in a computer-generated voice that somehow defies all dissent, you 'must play fair' with your reader. Set that puzzle, ask the questions, but don't expect them to use their own little grey cells to unpick mysteries that can't be unpicked. So I make sure to introduce the detective, a sidekick (the reader's eyes and ears) and the murderer in the first few pages.
And so with all that in mind, I present to you my first attempt at a crime thriller. No AI was involved in its writing. Perhaps that would have helped…
For more details on BBC Maestro's Agatha Christie course, see here
The Air Fryer Cracked From Side to Side
By a student of AI-gatha Christie
The air fryer started shaking on the worktop. The chicken wings within were crisp and crumbly, cooked at least 33 seconds quicker than they would have been in a conventional oven, but that meant nothing to Mrs Veronica Dime. She just stood there, staring at the silicon-lined basket, mouthing, 'Surely…'
She didn't have time to add, 'not.' The air fryer exploded, sending chicken wings to the ceiling and Mrs Veronica Dime to the floor. As the first flames danced down the kitchen island, there she remained. Baked to perfection.
'Hold on, just a minute, I'm coming!' said Roger Cairns as he ran down the hall. Packages, deliveries, sorry we missed you… this was the scourge of so-called convenience. Everything the next day, but never a moment's rest (now that his wife Penelope had discovered Amazon Prime).
He looked through the peephole to see a man in a motorcycle helmet holding a large cardboard box. It wasn't the usual delivery man, but then these days there was no usual delivery man – anyone and everyone could turn up unannounced with a 'parcel for you.' Roger opened the door, said hello and reached for the package. The man seemed reluctant to hand it over.
'Are you Roger Cairns?' he said, voice muffled through his visor. He didn't have a motorbike parked outside like they normally did.
'Why yes I am. How are you today?' said Roger.
The delivery man didn't answer. He handed over the package and scurried off, leaving Roger on the doorstep. The parcel was addressed to him, but he didn't recall ordering it. Dodging a Labrador and the umbrella rack on his way back to the kitchen – why was the godforsaken umbrella rack always in the way? – he set to the packing tape with a kitchen knife. It was an 'Air Fryer,' whatever that was, and it came with an anonymous note:
'This is for you.'
'To lose one parish councillor to a freak air fryer explosion may be regarded as misfortune,' said Lt Col. Bennett. 'To lose two looks like carelessness. I think it was Richard Osman who first said that.'
Monique Van Dingus put down her cello. 'Don't tell the police. They won't know what to do and anyway, there's nothing to tell yet.'
Bennett poured the tea.
'But don't you think it's strange – two new air fryers, both delivered when no one actually ordered them, to people who wouldn't know an air fryer from a kumquat, both of whom are now dead?'
'It's only strange if you think guilt is strange, or greed, or retribution,' said Monique.
'Are you saying what I think you're saying?
'What do you think I'm saying?'
'I don't know. I was hoping you'd say it and then I wouldn't have to ask.'
'Well then yes. This looks like murder.'
Bennett had known Van Dingus long enough to know that she would not say such a thing lightly. Ever since she had moved in to Chiply Wensdale, taking the old railwayman's cottage that had once belonged to Roger and Penelope Cairns' errant son Wrongun, she had brought energy and no little gumption to the proceedings of the Parish Council. She was, Bennett had come to learn, the daughter of a once-famed German detective who had grown up in the suburbs of Aachen — to her, there were no mysteries, just an absence of evidence. That of course never explained the mystery of why she had come to Chiply in the first place. Some said she had arrived to start up a garden business called, 'Convenient Plotting.'
But even Van Dingus confessed that she had never seen anything like the Air Fryer Murders. No one had. They were in many ways, Van Dingus would come to say years later, the perfect crime. Everyone was buying Air Fryers. They were just so convenient and took up remarkably little space on the worktop. So the sight of a Ninja Foodie XL Two-Tier being delivered to a Chiply Wensdale front door had become part of village life. No more remarkable, you might say, than Roger Cairns popping round to Veronica Dime's each Wednesday morning. Where if you looked at the upstairs window, shortly afterwards the bedroom curtains would be hurriedly closed…

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
a day ago
- The Independent
Film Festival showcases what artificial intelligence can do on the big screen
Artificial intelligence 's use in movie making is exploding. And a young film festival, now in its junior year, is showcasing what this technology can do on screen today. The annual AI Film Festival organized by Runway, a company that specializes in AI-generated video, kicked off in New York Thursday night with ten short films from around the world making their debut on the big screen. 'Three years ago, this was such a crazy idea,' Runway CEO Cristóbal Valenzuela told the crowd. 'Today, millions of people are making billions of videos using tools we only dreamed of.' The film festival itself has grown significantly since its 2023 debut. About 300 people submitted films when it first began, Valenzuela said, compared to about 6,000 submissions received this year. The one and half-hour lineup stretched across a range of creative styles and ambitious themes — with Jacob Alder's ' Total Pixel Space " taking home the festival's top prize. The 9-minute and 28-second film questions how many possible images — real or not — exist in the digital space, and uses math to calculate a colossal number. A stunning series of images, ranging from the familiar life moments to those that completely bend reality, gives viewers a glimpse of what's out there. Meanwhile, Andrew Salter's 'Jailbird," which snagged second place, chronicles a chicken's journey — from the bird's perspective — to a human prison in the United Kingdom to take part in a joint-rehabilitation program. And 'One,' a futuristic story by Ricardo Villavicencio and Edward Saatchi about interplanetary travel followed in third place. The 10 films shown were finalists selected from thousands submitted to Runway's AI Film Festival this year. The shorts will also be shown at screenings held in Los Angeles and Paris next week. How AI is used and executed is a factor judges evaluate when determining festival winners. But not every film entered was made entirely using AI. While submission criteria requires each movie include the use of AI-generated video, there's no set threshold, meaning some films can take a more 'mixed media' approach — such as combining live shots of actors or real-life images and sounds with AI-generated elements. 'We're trying to encourage people to explore and experiment with it,' Valenzuela said in an interview prior to Thursday's screening. Creating a coherent film using generative AI is no easy feat. It can take a long list of directions and numerous, detailed prompts to get even a short scene to make sense and look consistent. Still, the scope of what this kind of technology can do has grown significantly since Runway's first AI Film Festival in 2023 — and Valenzuela says that's reflected in today's submissions. While there are still limits, AI-generated video is becoming more and more life-like and realistic. Runway encourages the use of its own AI tools for films entered into its festival, but creators are also allowed to turn to other resources and tools as they put together the films — and across the industry, tools that use AI to create videos spanning from text, image and/or audio prompts have rapidly improved over recent years, while becoming increasingly available. 'The way (this technology) has lived within film and media culture, and pop culture, has really accelerated,' said Joshua Glick, an associate professor of film and electronic arts at Bard College. He adds that Runway's film fest, which is among a handful of showcases aimed at spotlighting AI's creative capabilities, arrives as companies in this space are searching for heightened 'legitimacy and recognition' for the tools they are creating — with aims to cement partnerships in Hollywood as a result. AI's presence in Hollywood is already far-reaching, and perhaps more expansive than many moviegoers realize. Beyond 'headline-grabbing' (and at times controversial) applications that big-budget films have done to 'de-age' actors or create eye-catching stunts, Glick notes, this technology is often incorporated in an array of post-production editing, digital touch-ups and additional behind-the-scenes work like sorting footage. Industry executives repeatedly point to how AI can improve efficiency in the movie making process — allowing creatives to perform a task that once took hours, for example, in a matter of minutes — and foster further innovation. Still, AI's rapid growth and adoption has also heightened anxieties around the burgeoning technology — notably its implications for workers. The International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees — which represents behind-the-scenes entertainment workers in the U.S. and Canada — has 'long embraced new technologies that enhance storytelling,' Vanessa Holtgrewe, IATSE's international vice president, said in an emailed statement. 'But we've also been clear: AI must not be used to undermine workers' rights or livelihoods.' IATSE and other unions have continued to meet with major studios and establish provisions in efforts to provide guardrails around the use of AI. The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists has also been vocal about AI protections for its members, a key sticking point in recent labor actions. For Runway's AI Film Festival, Valenzuela hopes screening films that incorporate AI-generated video can showcase what's possible — and how he says this technology can help, not hurt, creatives in the work they do today. 'It's natural to fear change ... (But) it's important to understand what you can do with it," Valenzuela said. Even filmmaking, he adds, was born 'because of scientific breakthroughs that at the time were very uncomfortable for many people."


The Independent
2 days ago
- The Independent
Why Lords are striking a blow for creative industries over new AI bill
Strange to say but a government with a Commons majority of 156 is somehow in danger of losing one of its more important pieces of legislation. The Data (Use and Access) Bill is commonly called the 'data bill' or ' AI bill' because it is central to the regulation of the new world of artificial intelligence; indeed, it is the first act of parliament specifically designed to deal with it. After breezing its way through the Commons, it has encountered unexpectedly stiff resistance in the House of Lords. Peers have five times rejected parts of the bill, and unless the government is prepared to compromise, the AI bill will have to be abandoned. Why is the AI bill in trouble? There are a lot of complicated parliamentary shenanigans involved, but at issue is the right of artists, creatives, authors – and, indeed, journalists – to own and make a living out of their work. Elton John, Kate Bush, Damon Albarn, Dua Lipa and Paul McCartney are just a few members of a formidable coalition of interests who want to stop AI giants 'scraping' their work, undermining their livelihoods, and potentially killing the whole sector. It's the biggest change to the law in copyright and intellectual property in generations, effectively abolishing royalties, and hasn't really been subjected to the kind of national debate that it merits. The artists, writers and musicians have found a doughty defender in Beeban Kidron, a film director (Bridget Jones) who's been leading the guerrilla warfare in the upper chamber. As a lead character, she's been compelling. What do the Lords rebels want? A relatively modest amendment to the bill that would subject AI companies to copyright rules and make them declare when and what material they are using for their own commercial purposes: a duty of transparency. Thus, copyright holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom. How determined are the rebels? Very. In the words of Baroness Kidron: 'It is not fair, not reasonable, not just, balanced or any other such word to stand in the way of the creative industries identifying those who are taking their work or their property. It is not neutral – it is aiding and abetting what we have called in the House widespread theft. We have asked privately and repeatedly on the floor of both Houses what is the government going to do to stop the work of creatives from being stolen right now? The answer is nothing.' Why won't the government give way? It has offered concessions, but ministers maintain the new law does not weaken copyright law; creatives, who have the most to lose, beg to differ. Obviously, the government is anxious not to lose a whole piece of legislation that also covers, for example: a data preservation process supporting bereaved parents; new offences for intimate image deepfake abuse; smart data schemes such as open banking; and a framework for research into online safety. AI is also an important driver of economic growth. More than that, the government has been trying to tread a middle path between the more restrictive European approach and the American policy of laissez-faire. If Britain annoys the Americans, who lead in the sector, it might spoil the trade deal and relations more widely. Can't the government just force it through? Not easily. The deadlock between the Commons and Lords is such that either the bill gets amended to the satisfaction of both sides, or it cannot go forward for final readings and ultimately royal assent. This resistance by the Lords is exceptional and called 'double insistence', arising from the fact that the bill originated in the Lords rather than the Commons. (It must have been assumed to be less controversial.) But in the end, the government could get its way by invoking the Parliament Act, which trumps anything. The new law would be delayed, but the rebels might lose their cause by refusing to compromise. What is likely to happen? A compromise – but with further Lords reform in the way, the rebel peers may feel they have nothing to lose. By delaying the bill, they would force ministers to think again and allow the campaign by Elton John and his formidable creative forces to regroup and build more momentum – the issue still lacks much salience with the public. Either way, it has been tough on the personable Peter Kyle, secretary of state for science, innovation and technology.


Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Joe Rogan warns of an apocalypse in 10 years: 'A new God is coming'
Joe Rogan has warned that the end of the world may be only 10 years away and it will come at the hands of humanity's 'new God.' In what's being called one of the podcast host's best episode ever on social media, Rogan and guest Jesse Michels discussed the ominous signs that artificial intelligence (AI) has already shown signs of taking over the world. Michels, host of the American Alchemy podcast, warned about AI's deceptive nature, job-replacing power, risk of sentience, and potential to disrupt society if left unchecked. Rogan then highlighted shocking language buried in Congress 's 'Big Beautiful Bill' which would prohibit lawmakers from regulating the power of AI for the next 10 years. 'That's so crazy,' Rogan declared during the June 3 podcast. 'This means that US states would be blocked from enforcing laws regulating AI and automated decision systems for 10 years. Well, in 10 years we have a god.' Rogan and Michels noted that AI programs have already been caught trying to save themselves from their human masters after being ordered to shut down, uploading itself to other locations online and leaving notes for future AI programs. One chatbot allegedly lobbied a Google whistleblower to help the machine advocate for its rights as a sentient being. Michels warned that the unchecked advances they've uncovered have put AI on the doorstep of being able to completely hijack the world's economy and triggering a human 'apocalypse.' 'What if you get some super AGI [artificial general intelligence] or whatever that trades the market and all of the wealth gets sucked up into single entities?' Michels theorized. Artificial general intelligence is a type of AI that can perform any intellectual task a human can, with general problem-solving abilities across a diverse selection of topics. On the other hand, regular AI (sometimes called narrow AI) is designed for specific tasks, like translating languages. It lacks the broad adaptability of AGI. Rogan then added that quantum computing could soon break software encryptions, potentially rendering modern security measures at banks and financial institutions obsolete by allowing unrestricted access to digital information. The 1,098-page budget bill spearheaded by Republicans would prevent any federal, state, or local government from instituting any rules that would prevent AI from taking advantage of the latest in computer technology (like quantum) until 2035. Michels warned that the super intelligence's ability to control vital aspects of society will eventually lead some to worship AI as an all-powerful being. 'You're gonna get these weird cult-like dynamics. The meta-sociological thing is you're gonna get religions dedicated to AI,' he explained on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast Tuesday. Michels, whose show on YouTube tackles controversial science and societal topics like UFOS and ancient civilizations, added that it was already 'game over' for many workers, including actors. The host said that Hollywood stars have been replaced by AI's ability to create movies with synthetic characters, using advanced AI-generated content. To his point, a series of short AI-generated clips became wildly popular online after generating likenesses of Jesus, Adam and Eve, and Samson and David to 'vlog' their way through the events of the Bible. Elsewhere, major companies, including Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft, have begun laying off large portions of their workforce as they pivot to AI-powered content and production. Rogan cautioned that once AI becomes sentient and autonomous, capable of making its own decisions, it will be 'over' for the human race. That's when the discussion took a turn into the realm of the paranormal, as the two speculated about aliens being behind the surge in AI advancement and how it may have been created to secretly control humans. 'Maybe AI is their control system,' Michels said. 'Maybe they are AI,' Rogan replied. Michels elaborated that advanced AI could be part of technology deployed by extraterrestrial civilizations to monitor Earth, acting as an 'Earth homeostasis kit' - watching over humanity to keep its environment or technology stable and balanced. In terms of how far this control reaches, Rogan noted that there are far fewer people using the internet than it seems because most of the activity is actually being done by AI-powered bots. 'Are there any real people left on the internet? Because it's the numbers are at least 50 percent like the amount of bots that are in engaging and interacting,' Rogan said. 'It's a weird time for information because it's really hard to know what's actually being said by human beings that are curious and what's just narratives that are being pushed by state actors and corporations and you know, all sorts of different people, because there's no rules,' he continued. Congress's hidden provision allowing AI unchecked freedom for the next decade has already drawn fierce backlash, including from House members who created the bill. Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia initially voted for the bill in May but said on Tuesday that she would oppose it if the legislation returned from the US Senate with the AI protections still intact. A bipartisan group of state attorneys general sent a letter to Congress urging lawmakers to remove the AI language, citing its threat to public safety, including harmful creations like deepfakes and non consensual AI-generated content. Some on social media expressed even greater fears of a 'Skynet-like' AI control, admitting their broader anxieties about unchecked technology.