LONG ISLAND UNIVERSITY ANNOUNCES 2024 GEORGE POLK AWARDS IN JOURNALISM
Coverage of Four Foreign Conflicts Among Winners in 15 Categories
NEW YORK, Feb. 17, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Incisive reports from four areas of bloody conflict — Sudan, the Russian-Ukraine war zone, Israel's West Bank and Haiti — are among 15 winners of the George Polk Awards for 2024 announced today by Long Island University.
Four other winners dealt with health and medical issues – the exploitive practices of a huge health care provider, the deadly consequences of state abortion bans, the failure of government agencies to respond to a bird flu outbreak and the unauthorized dismemberment and sale of cadavers for research and education.
Also cited were reports on the dangers children face on social media platforms, Baltimore's lacklustre response to an overdose epidemic, the sale of useless and often damaging solar energy systems to vulnerable Texas homeowners, the unsavory personal history of Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, secret deals allowing police in California to hide a history of corruption and criminality, a beloved novelist's ineffectual response on learning of her daughter's sexual abuse and the extended incarceration of an aged inmate for refusing to admit to a 55-ycar-old crime he swears he did not commit.
The George Polk Awards were established in 1949 by Long Island University to commemorate George Polk, a CBS correspondent murdered in 1948 while covering the Greek civil war. The awards, which place a premium on investigative and enterprising reporting that gains attention and achieves results, are conferred annually to honor special achievement in journalism. The latest winners were selected from 493 submissions of work that appeared in print, online or on television or radio, nominated by news organizations and individuals or recommended by a panel of former winners.
'Given the range and depth of exceptional reporting before us,' said John Darnton, curator of the awards,"winnowing the list to these 15 meant making some very hard calls. These winners represent the best of the best. The runners-up were all worthy.'
'Long Island University has long recognized the importance of investigative journalism through the George Polk Awards and our George Polk School of Communications, which is helping prepare an international class of the journalists of tomorrow,' noted Dr. Kimberly Cline, President of Long Island University.
The award for Foreign Reporting goes to Ronen Bergman and Mark Mazzetti of The New York Times Magazine for 'The Unpunished: How Extremists Took Over Israel,' chronicling how a half-century of condoning the terrorizing of West Bank Palestinians by ultranationalist settlers and their supporters became government policy.
Declan Walsh and the staff of The New York Times have won the award for War Reporting for a series of dispatches from Sudan, reported at great personal risk, demonstrating how starvation, indiscriminate destruction and inhuman atrocities were deployed as tools of a civil war. Their reporting exposed the clandestine role played in the conflict by the United Arab Emirates and other nations seeking resources and power. Confronted with Walsh's reporting, the UAE paused some of its Sudanese operation.
The National Reporting award winner, Katherine Eban of Vanity Fair, revealed how political considerations that prioritized economic interests over public health concerns slowed the federal government's response to a bird flu outbreak, seemingly ignoring lessons of the Covid-19 pandemic.
Alissa Zhu, Nick Thieme and Jessica Gallagher of The Baltimore Banner have won the Local Reporting award for doggedly amassing data to establish that Baltimore was enduring the most lethal drug overdose crisis of any major city in American history with some surprising victims. Their work, accomplished in the face of city officials' resistance, was supported by The New York Times Local Investigations Fellowship.
Sara DiNatale of the San Antonio Express-News has been honored for State Reporting for her four-part series exposing the deceptive practices of solar energy contractors who trained door-to-door scam artists to target elderly homeowners with false promises of energy savings that never materialized, rebates that didn't exist and tax credits for which they didn't qualify. On top of worthless systems those taken in were often left with damaged roofs.
The Health Care Reporting award goes to Bob Herman, Tara Bannow, Casey Ross and Lizzy Lawrence of STAT for 'Health Care's Colossus,' a penetrating six-part series examining the massive reach of UnitedHealth Group into every aspect of a broken health care system. The series focuses on how the conglomerate milks the system for profit at the expense of taxpayers, patients and clinicians by providing assembly-line care that treats millions of patients as products to be monetized.
Kavitha Surana, Lizzie Presser, Cassandra Jaramillo and Stacy Kranitz of ProPublica have won the Medical Reporting award for mining hospital records and death certificates in Texas and other states that enacted stringent abortion bans in the aftermath of the 2022 U.S. Supreme Court Dobbs decision to uncover a tragic result: the preventable deaths of women denied routine treatment for pregnancy complications as new laws threatened physicians with prosecution.
The award for Political Reporting goes to Jane Mayer of The New Yorker for 'Pete Hegseth's Secret History,' which unearthed a record of financial mismanagement, sexual misconduct and repeated incidents of workplace intoxication that twice cost President Trump's nominee for Secretary of Defense leadership positions in advocacy groups he ran. Hegseth was confirmed by a single vote but not before an intense Senate examination of issues largely stemming from Mayer's reporting.
Katey Rusch and Casey Smith, alumnae of the UC Berkeley Graduate School of Journalism Investigative Reporting Program working with the support of the program, have won the Justice Reporting award for 'Right to Remain Secret,' a two-part series published by the San Francisco Chronicle. A product of five years of research, their stories detailed how dozens of police officers in California arranged to cleanse their records of damaging behavior and retire with lucrative pensions in secret deals that allowed their departments to avoid cumbersome dismissal proceedings.The practice was curtailed following these revelations.
The award for Technology Reporting is presented to Olivia Carville and Cecilia D'Anastasio of Bloomberg Businessweek for stories about child safety online that revealed how predators have used the Roblox gaming platform to groom and exploit children, how 'sextortion' scammers blackmailed teens via Instagram and how drug dealers sold fentanyl to kids using Snapchat. The stories had impact. Roblox rolled out new safety updates for minors, including enhanced parental controls, and Meta removed 70,000 accounts linked to financial sextortionists.
Rachel Aviv of The New Yorker has been honored for Magazine Reporting for 'Alice Munro's Passive Voice,' a stunning 20,000-word opus delving into the late Canadian novelist and short story writer's dismissive reaction when she was confronted with her romantic partner's sexual abuse of her daughter, a betrayal only deepened by the revelation that Munro, a 2013 Nobel laureate, used the experience to enrich her fiction.
The award for National Television Reporting goes to Mike Hixenbaugh, Jon Schuppe, Liz Kreutz and the late Susan Carroll of NBC News and Noticias Telemundo for 'Dealing the Dead,' revealing that a medical school in north Texas was dismembering the corpses of individuals who died alone. Undertaking little effort to find next of kin, it leased out the body parts for research and education, doubling the pain for relatives who discovered later that a loved one had been parcelled out an arm and leg at a time. The medical school ended the practice after reporters shared detailed findings ahead of their reports on NBC Nightly News and NBCNews.com.
Special Correspondent Marcia Biggs, videographer Eric O'Connor and producer André Paultre of the PBS NewsHour have won the Foreign Television Reporting award for their series 'Haiti in Crisis,' which depicted the complete breakdown of daily life in parts of Port Au Prince with chilling interviews of citizens who have come to describe and even participate in unspeakable barbarism at the hand of street gangs in matter-of-fact terms. Biggs, a veteran reporter in global war zones, is a grand niece of George Polk.
The Podcast award goes to Ben Austen and Bill Healy for the Audible Original 'The Parole Room,' which followed the 20th effort to gain parole by Johnnie Veal, convicted in the 1970 murder of two Chicago police officers and still in prison nearing 70. Negotiating an anachronistic system — Illinois abolished parole in 1978 so only those convicted before then are eligible — Veal confronted a kind of Catch-22. By steadfastly maintaining his innocence he was deemed unworthy of release for lack of remorse.
The 2024 Sydney Schanberg Prize goes to Sarah A.Topol of The New York Times Magazine for 'The Deserter,' a view of the invasion of Ukraine through the eyes of a disillusioned Russian combat officer who defected with his wife and child, one of 18 deserters Topol interviewed in in more than a year of reporting while keeping herself and her sources safe from Russian security services. Her detailed account of the officer's journey became an epic 35,000-word portrait of an army sent to fight a war with little meaning to them. The Schanberg Prize was established by the journalist Jane Freiman Schanberg to honor long-form investigative or enterprise journalism embodying qualities reflected in her late husband's legendary career. It comes with a $25,000 award funded by Freiman Schanberg, who stipulated that it honor 'highly distinguished, deep coverage of armed conflicts; local, state or federal government corruption; military injustice; war crimes, genocide or sedition; or authoritarian government abuses' of at least 5,000 words 'that results from staying with a story, sometimes at great risk or sacrifice.'
The 2024 George Polk Award winners will be honored Friday, April 4 at a luncheon ceremony at Cipriani 42nd Street.
About Long Island University (LIU)
Long Island University, founded in 1926, is a leading research and teaching university that continues to redefine higher education by providing high-quality academic instruction by world-class faculty, serving more than 16,000 students from its Long Island and Brooklyn campuses. Recognized by Forbes for its emphasis on experiential learning and by the Brookings Institution for its 'value added' to student outcomes, the University is ranked in the top 7% of national research universities. LIU has a network of over 285,000 alumnus, including industry leaders and entrepreneurs around the globe. Visit www.liu.edu for more information.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

26 minutes ago
Zelenskyy says US citizen killed in Kyiv after massive overnight Russian attack
Massive overnight Russian strikes on Kyiv killed 15 people, Ukrainian officials said, as Moscow launched hundreds of drones and missiles at targets across the country. June 17, 2025

Miami Herald
38 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Why are Israel and Iran at war? What are the risks? Experts weigh in
The war between Israel and Iran continues to rage on, with both sides ramping up deadly attacks on one another, threatening to engulf the region in a broader conflict. How did the war begin? Why did Israel initiate it? And what are the risks associated with it — particularly for the U.S.? Experts on the region weighed in below. How did the war start? On June 13, Israel launched a large-scale military campaign against Iran — its long-time adversary, which it accuses of sponsoring terrorism — code-named Operation Rising Lion. Dozens of military sites across the country, including nuclear sites, were struck with air-to-surface missiles, according to the Israel Defense Force (IDF). Nine nuclear scientists and multiple top generals were also killed. Hours later, Iran responded by unleashing a barrage of missiles on Israeli cities, many of which were intercepted by the country's Iron Dome defensive system, but some broke through, with explosions rattling Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Over the ensuing days, both sides carried out more attacks, which have amounted to more than 200 deaths in Iran and 24 deaths in Israel as of June 16. The outbreak of conflict came just days before Iran was scheduled to enter into its sixth round of nuclear talks with the U.S. Why did Israel attack? Israeli officials, including Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, said the offensive against Iran was carried out in order to cripple its nuclear program, which they assert was on the verge of developing a nuclear bomb. 'The proximate trigger for the conflict was intelligence that Iran had, in fact, made advances on weaponization of a potential nuclear weapon which, combined with the progress in enrichment and its worrisome stockpile of highly enriched uranium, posed an imminent threat of breakout,' Robert Satloff, the executive director of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, told McClatchy News. Multiple Middle East experts, though, pushed back against the notion that Iran posed an immediate danger. 'The nuclear threat from Iran was potential, not imminent,' Richard Betts, a professor emeritus of war and peace studies at Columbia University, told McClatchy News. 'No serious analyst of this topic believes Iran was about to produce a nuclear bomb and drop it on Israel,' Nader Hashemi, a professor of Middle East politics at Georgetown University, told McClatchy News. The U.S. intelligence community has recently shared this view as well. In March, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard testified before Congress that Iran is not in the process of constructing a nuclear weapon (Trump, on June 16, disregarded this assessment, asserting the country was 'very close' to developing a weapon). Aside from fears about Iran's nuclear ambitions, other factors likely played into Israel's pre-emptive attack, experts said. Among them are 'the prime minister's domestic political calculations, the protracted campaign against Palestinians in Gaza, and a more permissive international environment that features a sympathetic Trump administration,' Nathan Funk, a professor of peace and conflict studies at the University of Waterloo, told McClatchy News. 'Netanyahu likely arrived at the conclusion that he has little to lose and much to gain,' he said. Was the U.S. involved? Messaging from the Trump administration has been mixed as it relates to whether U.S. officials had direct involvement in Israel's attacks. Shortly after they began, Secretary of State Marco Rubio wrote on X that 'Israel took unilateral action against Iran,' adding, 'We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region.' The message was shared by the White House. But, Trump later told Reuters he had advance knowledge of the attack, saying 'we knew everything.' In a June 16 post, he said 'IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON' and added 'Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!' 'The exact position of the Trump administration in all of this is still opaque,' Funk said. 'The extent to which Trump and his deputies approved of this attack — or merely decided to accommodate it — remains uncertain.' Satloff added that Trump has long been a top ally of Israel — and that the U.S. military is already involved to some degree. 'From the outset, the Trump administration has been very supportive, especially in terms of playing a key role in Israel's layered defense against Iranian missile strikes,' he said. Throughout the latest conflict, U.S. military assets in the region have assisted Israel in intercepting Iranian missiles, according to Axios. 'To date, the U.S. has not gotten directly involved but this might soon change, (especially) if Iran attacks U.S. troops or ships,' Hashemi said. What are the risks? Experts warned that there are numerous risks if the U.S. were to be more actively involved in the conflict — which Trump has said is a possibility. 'There are grave risks to the U.S. if this situation persists, including threats to U.S. personnel and infrastructure in the Gulf region, economic dangers associated with a possible impact on oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz, and the possibility that the U.S. could be drawn directly into the armed conflict if it continues to escalate,' Funk said. Hashemi said there are alarming parallels to previous wars in the region. 'This feels very much like the lead up to the 2003 war in Iraq,' he said, citing exaggerated claims about weapons of mass destruction and a flouting of international law. 'It is clear the West has learned very little from the Iraq war.' Satloff, in contrast, pushed back against comparisons to the Iraq War, which led to the deaths of over 4,400 U.S. service members and about 200,000 Iraqi civilians over the course of eight years. 'I think the potential for an 'Iraq war 2.0' is slim to none,' he said. 'This is principally an aerial conflict, without the tens of thousands of boots on the ground that characterized Iraq.' But, without diplomacy, the situation could escalate, 'leading to outcomes that would be profoundly destructive to U.S. security interests and to the peoples of the region,' Funk cautioned. 'Diplomacy can be frustrating,' he said, 'but war is much, much worse.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Coalition of the willing to reconvene ‘in weeks' as UK pushes Russian oil cap
Sir Keir Starmer and Volodymyr Zelensky will convene a meeting of the so-called 'coalition of the willing' in the coming weeks, Downing Street said as the UK pushed for allies to tighten the oil price cap on Russia. The Prime Minister on Tuesday announced a series of measures aimed at ramping up pressure on Vladimir Putin as he continues to resist calls for an unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine. Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the G7 summit in Canada, Sir Keir said he 'strongly' believes that restrictions on the price of Russian crude oil should be strengthened to deplete its energy revenues. He also dismissed suggestions that plans, led by Britain and France, for a 'coalition of the willing' to send peacekeeping troops to Ukraine were dead in the water as progress towards a potential truce stalls. In a bilateral meeting with the Ukrainian president on the sidelines of the leaders' conference on Tuesday, the two leaders 'agreed to drive forward the next stage of military support', Number 10 said. 'Their meeting followed an extensive session with wider partners, focused on maintaining momentum to secure a just and lasting peace for Ukraine,' the readout said. 'The Prime Minister and president agreed to drive forward the next stage of military support – adding that a strong Ukraine is essential to guarantee peace in the long term. 'They agreed to convene the next coalition of the willing meeting in the coming weeks. 'They also discussed ramping up the economic pressure on Putin, with the Prime Minister updating the president on the new sanctions announced by the United Kingdom today. 'They agreed there should be no place to hide for those who fund Putin's war machine.' Mr Zelensky said they had agreed that 'to force Russia to end this war, coordinated sanctions by all G7 countries are needed against their energy and banking sectors, shadow fleet, and military-industrial complex'. Britain announced sanctions on 20 Russian oil tankers as well as measures to tighten the net around companies managing the vessels, with Downing Street saying the UK would also seek to 'move with partners' to tighten the energy price cap. A wider package of measures which Sir Keir suggested would be forthcoming from leaders gathered at the summit in the Canadian Rockies is yet to materialise after splits opened up in the approach to Russia on Monday. Allies face an uphill struggle to lower the cap from the existing rate of 60 dollars per barrel after Donald Trump signalled his reluctance to impose further measures on Moscow. The US president suggested he wanted to wait to 'see whether or not a deal is done' with Ukraine before targeting the Kremlin with further action. Speaking to reporters with him in Kananaskis, Sir Keir was asked if tightening the oil price cap would be possible without the backing of Washington. 'Obviously today we're going to focus on Ukraine,' Sir Keir said. 'We've got President (Volodymyr) Zelensky coming in. We're putting in extra sanctions today, including sanctions on the shadow fleet. 'Others will be doing, similar actions in coming days. And so that does ramp up the pressure. 'On the oil price, obviously, we're still looking at how we're going to make that work. But I strongly believe that we have to put those sanctions in place. We're having those discussions with President Zelensky today.' Talks to broker a possible peace in Ukraine have stalled as Moscow continues to pound the country with missile and drone attacks and holds out on US-backed proposals for an unconditional truce. Meanwhile, the UK and France have been leading efforts to assemble a so-called 'coalition of the willing' made up of nations prepared to send peacekeeping troops to Kyiv to enforce a potential ceasefire. Asked whether those plans were dead in the water, Sir Keir told reporters: 'On the coalition of the willing, no, not at all. That is obviously intended to answer the question, how do you ensure that if a deal is reached, a deal is kept so it's a lasting deal? 'Because the concern, has always been, that there have been deals, if you like, before, Putin has then subsequently breached them. 'So how do you stop that happening again? And the military planning is still going on, as you would expect, so that, when the time comes, we're ready to act.' Mr Zelensky is attending the G7 conference in Kananaskis, along with leaders from Canada, the US, France, Italy, Japan, Germany and Britain. As well as sanctions on Russia's shadow fleet, Britain has also targeted two UK residents – Vladimir Pristoupa and Olech Tkacz – who the Government said had operated 'a shadowy network of shell companies' aiding Moscow. The branch of the Russian defence ministry leading the country's underwater intelligence gathering operations, known as Gugi, has also been sanctioned. Sir Keir said: 'These sanctions strike right at the heart of Putin's war machine, choking off his ability to continue his barbaric war in Ukraine. 'We know that our sanctions are hitting hard, so while Putin shows total disregard for peace, we will not hesitate to keep tightening the screws. 'The threat posed by Russia cannot be underestimated, so I'm determined to take every step necessary to protect our national security and keep our country safe and secure.'