
President Bush determined to 'rid world of evil-doer Saddam Hussein', new records reveal
Newly declassified UK government files show Sir Tony Blair was warned by his US ambassador that George W Bush was determined to overthrow dictator Saddam Hussein, in the months before the invasion of Iraq.
Sir Tony, who was prime minister at the time, was trying to encourage the US president to use diplomatic means to change the situation in the Middle Eastern country, and flew to Camp David in January 2003 to make the case, just two months before the joint US-UK invasion.
The UK government was also hoping the United Nations Security Council would agree a new resolution specifically authorising the use of military force against Iraq.
But the files, made public for the first time, show that Sir Tony's ambassador, Sir Christopher Meyer, warned him it would be "politically impossible" to sway Mr Bush away from an invasion unless Hussein surrendered.
The documents, released by the National Archives at Kew in west London, show Sir Christopher also wrote that Mr Bush believed himself to be on "a crusade against evil to be undertaken by God's chosen people".
Sir Tony's foreign policy adviser, Sir David Manning, told the PM that when he met Mr Bush, he should make the point that a new diplomatic resolution was "politically essential for the UK, and almost certainly legally essential as well".
But the White House was becoming increasingly impatient at the unwillingness of France and Russia - both of whom held a veto - to agree a resolution so long as UN inspectors were unable to find any evidence of Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the supposed justification for war.
Sir Christopher warned Sir Tony shortly before his visit to see Mr Bush in January 2003 that options for a peaceful solution in Iraq had effectively run out.
He wrote: "It is politically impossible for Bush to back down from going to war in Iraq this spring, absent Saddam's surrender or disappearance from the scene.
"If Bush had any room for manoeuvre beforehand this was closed off by his State of the Union speech.
"In the high-flown prose to which Bush is drawn on these set-piece occasions, he said in effect that destroying Saddam is a crusade against evil to be undertaken by God's chosen people."
In a cable sent the previous month, Sir Christopher said that much of the impulse for deposing Hussein was coming from the president, a born-again Christian, who was scornful of what he saw as the "self-serving" reservations of the Europeans.
"His view of the world is Manichean. He sees his mission as ridding it of evil-doers. He believes American values should be universal values," Sir Christopher stated.
"He is strongly allergic to Europeans collectively. Anyone who has sat round a dinner table with low-church Southerners will find these sentiments instantly recognisable."
In the end, Sir Tony and Mr Bush abandoned efforts to get a new Security Council resolution, blaming French President Jacques Chirac for refusing, and launched the invasion of Iraq anyway.
Lobbying from Mandelson and anger at the French
Among the new files, there are also a number of other revelations. These include:
Current UK ambassador to the US, Sir Peter Mandelson, was so desperate to get back into government following his second resignation from Sir Tony's government that he asked Lord Birt, a policy adviser to Downing Street, to write to the prime minister in 2003, asking for him to receive a role - four months before Sir Peter was appointed as the UK's next European commissioner
Sir Tony was furious at French president Jacques Chirac's efforts to undermine pressure being put on Zimbabwean dictator Robert Mugabe by the UK in 2003, over growing violence caused by a policy of driving the remaining white farmers from their lands in the African nation
The prime minister also insisted on changing the rules around which parties can lay wreaths at the Cenotaph on Remembrance Sunday in a bid to protect the Northern Irish peace process in 2004, despite warning this could create an "adverse reaction" from the SNP and Plaid Cymru

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Harsh reality behind Colbert's 'cancellation' as DNC spokesperson
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission served a brutal dose of reality to Stephen Colbert (pictured) fans 'wailing' over the loss of the liberal comedian's show. Brendan Carr explained how the drama over Colbert's Late Show cancellation was nothing more than political theater - and the actual motive was just dollars and cents. On Thursday, CBS announced that the comedian's decade-long run as the host of CBS' late night flagship will end next May. The sudden move s parked immediate backlash from left-wing celebrities and politicians, who claim the decision was strictly politically-motivated. The cancellation was revealed two days after Colbert used the term 'big fat bribe' to describe Paramount's $16million settlement with President Trump. Paramount, which owns CBS, decided to settle on the lawsuit over deceptive editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Kamala Harris. The entire affair came amid a pending merger between CBS parent company Paramount and Skydance - a deal still awaiting regulatory approval under the oversight of the Trump administration. CBS - long known as the 'Tiffany Network' - insisted that canceling Colbert's show was 'purely a financial decision against a challenging backdrop in late night.' 'It is not related in any way to the show's performance, content or other matters happening at Paramount,' it added. Though the program regularly topped its timeslot on network TV, it reportedly hemorrhaged $40 million a year in revenue - a staggering loss that ultimately proved unsustainable. However, the network instantly faced widespread accusations, including from US senators, of cancelling Colbert for political reasons, particularly given the timing following his vocal criticism of Trump. 'Stephen Colbert, an extraordinary talent and the most popular late night host, slams the deal, days later, he's fired. Do I think this is a coincidence? NO,' Bernie Sanders wrote to X. Actress Jamie Lee Curtis added her voice to the backlash, telling the Associated Press : 'They just cut NPR and, you know, public broadcasting. Yes, they're trying to silence people, but that won't work. It won't work. We will just get louder.' Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren wrote to X : 'CBS canceled Colbert's show just THREE DAYS after Colbert called out CBS parent company Paramount for its $16M settlement with Trump – a deal that looks like bribery. America deserves to know if his show was canceled for political reasons,' she added. 'If Paramount and CBS ended the Late Show for political reasons, the public deserves to know. And deserves better,' California Senator Adam Schiff (pictured) wrote to X. Jon Stewart, Colbert's former Comedy Central colleague, also weighed in on the controversy during Monday's episode of The Daily Show, questioning the network's decision to cancel the program. 'Watching Stephen exceed all expectations in the role and become the number one late-night show on network television has been an undeniable great pleasure for me as a viewer and as his friend, and now Stephen has been canceled for "purely financial reasons," Stewart said. Colbert ultimately gained a reputation as one of Trump's fiercest critics, departing from the traditional late-night in favor of a more overtly partisan approach. Following the announcement of The Late Show's cancellation, President Trump took to Truth Social on Friday to gloat over the news in a celebratory post. 'I absolutely love that Colbert' got fired. His talent was even less than his ratings,' he wrote. Colbert, who briefly addressed the move Friday, devoted much of his Monday show to the controversy, eventually uniting with almost every other liberal late-night talk show host in a show of support, as well as Adam Sandler and even Lin-Manuel Miranda. The 61-year-old comic opened after a standing ovation and a lengthy applause from the New York City crowd by saying 'cancel culture has gone too far' and then joked now that the show is ending, he can say whatever he feels. Colbert said sarcastically of Paramount: 'They made one mistake, they left me alive! For the next ten months, the gloves are off!' The Late Show host then referenced Trump's comments, turning to an 'Eloquence Cam' and said: 'How dare you, sir? Would an untalented man be able to compose the following satirical witticism? Go [expletive] yourself.' He then referenced Trump stating in the same Truth Social post: 'I hear Jimmy Kimmel is next.' Colbert replied: 'Nope, no, no. Absolutely not. Kimmel, I am the martyr. There's only room for one on this cross. And the view is fantastic from up here. I can see your house!' He also said that cancellation meant he could finally admit what he felt about the president. In contrast to his often over-the-top anti-Trump monologues, he dryly, quietly said: 'I don't care for him. Doesn't seem to have the skill set to be president. Just not a good fit, that's all.' Colbert also referenced a story from The New York Post saying the show lost $40-$50million last year, though some have suggested its as high as $100million. 'I could see us losing $24 million but where would Paramount have possibly spent the other $16 million, oh...' he quipped, naming the amount the company settled with Trump for over his 60 Minutes lawsuit. He then went back to bashing Trump and the recent news accusing him of writing a 'bawdy' letter to Jeffrey Epstein for his 50th birthday. 'I'll have more to say about all this after the commercial break. The only other story is a small one... the president is buddies with a [expletive],' he said. In a follow-up post on X, Carr chimed in again, taking aim at the comedian and slamming him for his reaction to the cancellation. 'I'm surprised to learn that CBS didn't find this stuff profitable,' he wrote.


Daily Mail
11 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Starmer faces mounting calls for a Lionesses Bank Holiday if England women retain their Euros title after dramatic semi-final comeback
English football fans should get a day off to celebrate if the Lionesses bring it home by winning the Euros for the second time in a row, Keir Starmer has been told today. The Prime Minister is facing renewed calls for a Bank Holiday if the women's national team beat either German or Spain in Sunday's final. The Lionesses tested the nation's stress levels again last night with an incredible extra-time win over Italy in a semi-final, after scoring second from the end of normal time and extra time. Last-gasp goals by Michelle Agyemang and Chloe Smith saw them overcome Italy 2-1 in Geneva. No10 has been resisting calls to give millions of workers a day off, despite Sir Keir backing calls for a Bank Holiday when they won the Euros in 2022, when he was opposition leader. Liberal Democrat culture, media and sport spokesman Max Wilkinson said that it was important for the nation to mark 'the talent, success and historic achievement' of the team. 'The Lionesses can make history on Sunday and retain the Euros title they won so memorably three years ago. If they do that, the Prime Minister should give us a public holiday to honour their achievement,' he said. 'Retaining the title would be one of our country's greatest sporting achievements. Fans and patriots across the country deserve the chance to celebrate the talent, success and historic achievement of this amazing team. 'The Prime Minister is a football fan - we've all seen the pictures of him enjoying a kick around with his mates. 'If Wiegman's heroes deliver glory, we'll all be hoping he'll put the ball into an empty net by giving the Lionesses and the rest of us a chance to mark the occasion.' The Lionesses were on the brink of elimination by Italy when 19-year-old substitute Michelle Agyemang forced extra time, drawing the sides level with an equaliser in the sixth minute of stoppage time to cancel out Barbara Bonansea's 33rd-minute opener. Then, with another shootout minutes away, Beth Mead was brought down and Kelly stepped up to the spot, where she was initially denied by Laura Giuliani, but buried the rebound to complete England's second successive stunning comeback. Asked yesterday whether the PM will grant a Bank Holiday if England go on to win the whole tournament on Sunday, Sir Keir's spokesman said: 'I'm not aware of any plans for that.' In 2022, the previous Tory government ruled out granting an extra Bank Holiday if England won the women's Euros. This was despite pressure from Sir Keir, the then Opposition leader, for them to do so. Ahead of that year's final, the Labour leader told the Daily Mirror that a Lionesses' victory should be 'marked with a proper day of celebration'. In 2023, when England reached the World Cup final, Sir Keir posted on social media: 'It's almost 60 years since England won the World Cup. 'I'm never complacent about anything… but there should be a celebratory bank holiday if the Lionesses bring it home.' However, a report in 2022 said that the cost to the public finances of a single day bank holiday due to lost productivity is around £2.4billion.


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Fossil fuels are ‘flailing and failing' as world enters new energy era, says UN chief
The age of fossil fuels is nearing its end and a clean energy revolution is well underway, UN secretary-general António Guterres said on Tuesday, urging governments to accelerate the shift before it is too late. 'We are on the cusp of a new era. Fossil fuels are running out of road. The sun is rising on a clean energy age,' Mr Guterres said in a speech in New York. 'I have never been more confident that they will fail – because we have passed the point of no return.' Backed by the latest figures from the International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA), Mr Guterres said that renewables made up 92.5 per cent of new electricity capacity last year. Investment in clean energy reached $2 trillion in 2024 – nearly $800bn more than what flowed into fossil fuels. 'The clean energy future is no longer a promise. It's a fact,' he said. 'No government. No industry. No special interest can stop it.' Despite his optimistic tone, the UN chief warned that the transition is still too slow and uneven, particularly in developing nations that lack access to finance and technology. He called on wealthy countries and major tech firms to lead the charge by committing to 100% renewable-powered operations by 2030. 'The energy transition is unstoppable,' he said. 'But the transition is not yet fast enough or fair enough.' The remarks marked a notable shift in tone from previous UN warnings that focused on the escalating dangers of global heating. This time, Mr Guterres framed the energy transition as an economic and security imperative. 'Countries that cling to fossil fuels are not protecting their economies – they are sabotaging them,' he said. 'Driving up costs. Undermining competitiveness. Locking-in stranded assets. And missing the greatest economic opportunity of the 21st century.' 'There are no price spikes for sunlight. No embargoes on wind. Renewables mean real energy security. Real energy sovereignty. And real freedom from fossil-fuel volatility.' More than 90 per cent of renewable energy projects today are cheaper than fossil fuel alternatives, according to IRENA. Solar power is now 41 per cent cheaper than the lowest-cost fossil fuel option, while onshore wind is less than half the price. Still, major gaps remain. A UN report released alongside IRENA's data warned that grid investment is failing to keep pace with the boom in renewables. For every dollar spent on clean generation, only 60 cents is going into infrastructure – when parity is needed to support the transition. Critical mineral supplies also remain a concern, as do geopolitical tensions and trade disputes that could raise costs or slow momentum. Yet Mr Guterres insisted the shift is already transforming lives – and holds vast potential for regions like sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia where energy access remains limited. 'You can't build a coal plant in someone's backyard,' he said. 'But you can deliver solar panels to the most remote village on earth.' Environmental groups welcomed the speech. Bill Hare, CEO of Climate Analytics, said: 'Any investment in new fossil fuels now is a fool's gamble, while joining the race to renewables can only bring benefits – not just jobs and cheaper energy at stable prices, but energy independence and access where it's needed most.' Shady Khalil, senior global policy strategist at Oil Change International, said the speech sent a clear signal that 'the fossil fuel era is ending and the renewable energy transition is now unstoppable.' But he warned that 'Global North countries like the US, Canada, Norway, and Australia are still gearing up for massive oil and gas expansion,' calling it 'reckless and gluttonous short-termism' that would backfire on their economies. Jacobo Ocharan, head of political strategies at Climate Action Network International, said Guterres was 'on the money' in calling for a transition that delivers 'equity, dignity and opportunity for all.' He said COP30 must produce a roadmap 'grounded in human rights, justice and equity' rather than remaining stuck in 'the polluting and unfair past, which is where the fossil fuel industry wants us trapped.' Mr Guterres called on countries to use their updated national climate plans – due in September – to slash fossil fuel subsidies and invest in clean energy. The message, he said, was not about sacrifice but smart economics. 'This is not just a shift in power,' he said. 'This is a shift in possibility. This is our moment of opportunity.'