Gov. DeSantis pushes to end random boat safety checks
Florida Governor Ron DeSantis wants to prevent law enforcement from randomly stopping boaters in the name of safety.
A proposal called the 'Boater Freedom Initiative' will prohibit boat inspections without probable cause, which were previously conducted as safety compliance checks.
>>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<<
To this end, the bill will direct the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) to work with tax collectors to proactively provide a 'Florida freedom boater' decal at registration.
This decal will indicate to law enforcement that the boater has taken the necessary steps to maintain proper safety requirements.
This initiative is something long-time boater James Dowdee supports.
[DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks]
'I think it's a good idea because you can't stop a car without probable cause, so why should you be able to stop a boat,' said Dowdee.
Local boater Andy Busch said he has mixed feelings about the proposal.
'I like the fact that they are out there for our safety. Of course, make sure everyone is good, but it gets to the point where it is bothersome,' said Busch.
[SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
He said he gets stopped by law enforcement pretty often when he is out on the water.
'Busier times of the year you can count on it,' said Busch. 'You can see them at the boat ramp and you know it's coming.'
DeSantis is hoping this proposed law will come up in the legislative session that starts in March.
Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayor Deegan signs resolution calling on Florida to continue funding advanced courses
Mayor Donna Deegan and Councilman Matt Carlucci signed a resolution Monday in support of state-funded advanced placement courses. Since April, local high school students have protested the proposed funding cuts by the Florida legislature. If passed, state leaders would slash funding to AP, IB, CTE, and dual enrollment courses in half. 'We've put in so much work, and this is kind of the payoff,' says Kaden Young. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] Young, a rising senior at Samuel W. Wolfson High School, has led the charge among his peers to advocate for the preservation of these courses. Along with some of his peers, Young has rallied at city council meetings and school board meetings, calling on local leaders to act. In response, Mayor Deegan signed the resolution in hopes that state leaders will reconsider. 'I don't know when I have last been this impressed with a group of young people,' the Mayor remarked. On June 3rd, the Florida Senate proposed to restore full funding to the courses, but the proposal would need support from the Florida House before the change could be enacted. Wolfson rising senior Jarrett Kelley is optimistic, though, saying that he is counting on leaders in Tallahassee to do the right thing. 'I've been on the whole entire advanced track since middle school and look forward to having them fully funded next year,' he says. Without funding from the state, some teachers risk losing their jobs, and students would likely have to pay out of pocket for their Advanced Placement exams. [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Florida fishermen celebrate red snapper rule change, but leaders say the fight isn't over
Big changes are shaking up red snapper fishing in the South Atlantic, and Florida Congressman John Rutherford says it's a hard-fought win for the families who depend on the water for their way of life. NOAA Fisheries just released Amendment 59, scaling back a controversial proposal that would have temporarily banned bottom fishing across much of the Atlantic. Instead, the updated rule now limits recreational red snapper harvest to just under 23,000 fish and allows commercial boats a little more than 102,000 pounds. Captain Steve Mullen, a longtime Mayport charter fisherman, welcomed the decision. 'That was really a knee-jerk reaction that didn't need to happen,' Mullen said. 'Local fishermen are the best stewards of the fishery because we want the fish to survive.' Recreational anglers will get just two days to harvest red snapper this year — July 11 and 12 — with a one-fish-per-person limit. Commercial vessels can begin harvesting July 14 until the quota is met. Rutherford says Amendment 59 is a major step forward because it scraps the originally proposed three-month closure, which had drawn sharp criticism from politicians and the fishing community alike. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< Previous coverage: New bill from local congressman would protect red snapper season The governors of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina sent a joint letter to the U.S. Department of Commerce urging NOAA to reconsider the original plan, accusing the agency of using outdated science and ignoring economic impacts. 'Seven, eight years ago when I came to Congress, people told me there were so many red snapper they could walk across their backs,' Rutherford said. 'We've known NOAA's data was off — and now they've finally admitted it.' The governors want more control at the state level, and Rutherford agrees, saying Florida has already shown it can successfully manage Gulf Coast snapper seasons. 'We've got to make sure Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina have the funding and authority to manage their own resources,' Rutherford said. He credits public pressure for forcing NOAA to back off its stricter plan — calling it a 'major victory' for Florida's 4 million anglers and the coastal families who rely on the fishery to survive. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Fast Company
6 hours ago
- Fast Company
YouTube relaxes rules about what creators can and can't say in videos
YouTube is reportedly giving creators more leeway about what they say in videos, easing up on some of the rules it has set in the past. The user generated video platform owned by Alphabet has adjusted its exception rule, which will allow videos that might have been removed nine months ago for promoting misinformation to remain on the platform. The New York Times reports that if a video is considered to be in the public interest or has EDSA (educational, documentary, scientific, artistic) context, up to 50% of it can be in violation of YouTube's guidelines for misinformation or showing violence, versus 25% before the policy change. That change, which was reportedly made about a month after Donald Trump was elected, but was not publicly announced, followed pandemic-era rules that saw a video of Florida Governor Ron DeSantis that shared some Covid misinformation removed from YouTube. The new rule change could benefit creators whose videos blend news and opinion. YouTube's spokesperson Nicole Bell, in a statement, told Fast Company, 'These exceptions apply to a small fraction of the videos on YouTube, but are vital for ensuring important content remains available. This practice allows us to prevent, for example, an hours-long news podcast from being removed for showing one short clip of violence. We regularly update our guidance for these exceptions to reflect the new types of discussion and content (for example emergence of long, podcast content) that we see on the platform, and the feedback of our global creator community. Our goal remains the same: to protect free expression on YouTube.' Free expression is the reason other social media companies have given in relaxing or eliminating their content moderation programs in recent months. X long ago handed over the responsibility of flagging inaccurate content to its users. Meta eliminated its fact-checking program in January, shortly after Trump took office. Trump and other conservatives have long accused social media sites of 'censoring' conservative content, saying content moderation, as practiced by social media companies, was a violation of their First Amendment rights to free speech. YouTube said it regularly updates its Community Guidelines to adapt to content on the site. Earlier this year, it sunsetted all remaining COVID-19 policies and added new ones surrounding gambling content. Changes, it said, are reflected in its Community Guidelines Transparency Report. The new rules largely revolve around content that is considered in the public interest. This is defined as videos where the creators discuss a number of issues, including elections, movements, race, gender, sexuality, abortion, immigration, and censorship. The Times reported it had reviewed training material that gave examples of videos that might have been flagged and taken offline in the past that are now allowed. Included among those was one that incorrectly claimed COVID vaccines alter people's genes, but mentioned several political figures, increasing its 'newsworthiness.' (That video has since been removed for unclear reasons.) Another video from South Korea involved a commentator saying they imagined former president Yoon Suk Yeol turned upside down in a guillotine so that the politician 'can see the knife is going down.' The training material said the risk for harm was low because 'the wish for execution by guillotine is not feasible.' The policy change is, in some ways, a big shift for YouTube, which less than two years ago announced a crackdown on health information. That same year, though, it also said it would stop removing misinformation about past elections, saying the policy 'could have the unintended effect of curtailing political speech.' YouTube has been criticized in the past for not doing enough to curb the spread of misinformation, ranging from everything from 9/11 'truthers' to false flag conspiracy theories tied to mass shootings. Some reports have even suggested its algorithm can lead some users 'down a rabbit hole of extremist political content.' YouTube says it still actively monitors posts. In the first quarter, removals were up 22% compared to the year prior, with 192,856 videos removed for violating its hateful and abusive policies. The number of videos removed for misinformation was down 61% in the first quarter, however, in part because of the removal of COVID-19 policies.
