Will AC's temperature range be fixed between 20 to 28 degrees Celsius? Here's what govt says
On being asked when the new AC temperature range would be implemented, the minister stated that any such situation "may arise only after 2050".
"I do not think it will happen immediately; capacities will be gradually built for it over time," he said.
Yadav said that achieving climate targets must be done in line with national circumstances and the CBDR-RC (Common But Differentiated Responsibilities and Respective Capabilities) principle.
As per India's nationally determined contributions (NDCs), or national climate plan, submitted to the UN climate body, emphasise ensuring "access to energy to its people".
This principle of CBDR-RC means all countries must fight climate change, however, all developed nations should do more because they have historically contributed more emissions and have greater resources.
AC temperature setting:
Earlier in June, Union Minister Manohar Lal Khattar had said that air conditioners in India will soon be required to operate within a fixed range of 20 degrees Celsius to 28 degrees Celsius, and settings below or above this limit will be prohibited.
According to the Bureau of Energy Efficiency (BEE), most ACs in India are currently set between 20 and 21 degrees Celsius, though the ideal comfort range is 24 to 25 degrees Celsius.
BEE recommends setting air conditioners at 24 to 25 degrees Celsius to balance comfort and energy use. It says that keeping the temperature too low, around 20 to 21 degrees Celsius, wastes electricity.
The agency also says that raising the AC temperature by just 1 degree can save about 6 per cent of electricity. Increasing it from 20 degrees Celsius to 24 degrees Celsius could lead to energy savings of up to 24 per cent.
Each year, India adds 10-15 million new ACs, with another 130–150 million expected over the next decade. Without policy intervention, ACs alone could drive 120 GW of peak power demand by 2030 and 180 GW by 2035, nearly 30 per cent of the projected totals, according to a recent study by India Energy and Climate Center (IECC) at University of California (UC) Berkeley.
The study says the fastest-developing major economy can avoid severe power shortages and save consumers up to ₹2.2 lakh crore (USD 26 billion) by doubling the energy efficiency of room ACs over the next 10 years.
In the summer of 2024, room air conditioner sales surged by 40 to 50 per cent year-on-year amid record-breaking temperatures.
The research shows, the share of the household sector in India's total electricity consumption increased from 22 per cent in 2012-13 to 25 per cent in 2022-23. Much of this rise can be attributed to economic growth and the increasing need for cooling due to rising temperatures, experts say.
With agency inputs.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
14 minutes ago
- Mint
India may choose a tiered path to rare earth self-reliance
New Delhi: India may link incentives aimed at spurring rare earth magnet manufacturing to the level of local materials used as the government seeks to counter China's supply curbs, according to two people aware of the development. The government is considering a cascading localization provision for sourcing rare earth oxides, the people said. They spoke on the condition of anonymity as the scheme is still being finalized. Levels or tiers are under consideration, said the first person quoted earlier. 'This means whoever sources their raw material for processing from India, domestically, they can get higher incentives." The ministries of heavy industries, and mines have not finalised the scheme draft yet, the second official said. Queries emailed to the two ministries on 14 August remained unanswered. China, which controls about 60% of global rare earth mining and 90% of supply, imposed export restrictions in April, affecting supplies to sectors such as semiconductors, electronics, renewable energy, defence, and automobiles. India's ₹1,345-crore scheme, announced by Union heavy industries minister HD Kumaraswamy, aims to incentivize the processing of rare earth oxides into permanent magnets within the country. Also read | Out of rare earths, India's automakers turn to old tricks and new tech India's demand for rare earth magnets is likely to rise above 7,000 tonnes by 2030, driven by electric vehicles, according to a report by consultant Primus Partners published this month. '...This dependency represents a strategic vulnerability, especially as rare-earth magnets are critical not only to EVs but also to industrial automation, electronics, renewable energy systems, and defence applications." The government's plan to link disbursal to a formula, offering the highest incentives to manufacturers to fully source oxides domestically, comes as, according to media reports, it is set to increase the outlay to over ₹5,000 crore to draw more interest from the industry. The incentives for sintered magnets, which are used in more critical applications such as MRI machines and surgical devices, electric motors, wind turbines, and in high-performance sensors and devices for planes and satellites, are expected to be higher than bonded magnets used in printers, copiers, battery-operated toys, among others, the second person quoted earlier said. India has 7.23 million tonnes of rare earth oxides, the government informed Parliament on 23 July. But state-run India Rare Earths Ltd is the only refiner of the critical mineral in the country. Also read | The Arabian Sea is calling, and this time for rare earths India, along with the US, Australia, and Japan, announced a new Quad Critical Minerals Initiative in early July to strengthen and diversify supply chains as a veiled response to China's export control order. In June 2023, India became a member of the US-led Mineral Security Partnership, which also includes Australia, Canada, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, the Republic of Korea, Sweden, the UK and the European Commission. MSP seeks to bolster critical minerals supply chains and ensure that these ores are produced, processed and recycled by catalyzing investments from governments and private sector across the full value chain. Previous central government schemes to support domestic manufacturing capabilities also had stringent localization rules. Production-linked incentive schemes run by the heavy industries ministry for zero-emission vehicles, their components, and batteries require at least 50% local raw material and components to qualify. The focus on local sourcing of oxides is important because, like magnets, India and other markets are dependent on China for them as well, according to Nitin Gupta, chief executive officer and cofounder, Attero Recycling, an e-waste and lithium-ion battery recycling company. The company, which already produces oxides, says it will be ready to set up magnet manufacturing capacity within a year. 'If we develop rare earth magnet manufacturing capacity, but not the local oxide production, then we may face a similar supply crunch in the case of oxides also in the future," he said. 'Hence, the focus on local sourcing of oxides under the scheme being prepared." Also read | India's rare earths riddle: No quick fix as China holds the magnetic key
Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India taxed, China spared: Marco Rubio defends US' double standards on Russian oil
Synopsis U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that global energy prices could rise if the U.S. imposes secondary sanctions on China for refining Russian oil, amid criticism over the U.S. placing a 25% tariff on India for similar purchases but sparing China. Reuters US Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned on Monday that energy prices could rise if the United States imposes secondary sanctions on China for refining Russian oil. The statement follows growing questions over why the U.S. imposed an additional 25% tariff on India for purchasing Russian oil, while taking no similar action against an interview with Fox News, Rubio said, "If you put secondary sanctions on a country – let's say you were to go after the oil sales of Russian oil to China. Well, China just refines that oil. That oil is then sold into the global marketplace, and anyone who's buying that oil would be paying more for it or, if it doesn't exist, would have to find an alternative source for it." "So we have heard, when you talk about the Senate bill that was being proposed where there was a hundred percent tariffs on China and India, we did hear from a number of European countries – not in press releases but we heard from them – some concern about what that could mean."China remains the largest buyer of Russian oil, at about 2 million barrels per day, followed by India and sanctions debate is unfolding again in the wake of Trump's widely publicised meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska. While the summit failed to produce a ceasefire agreement in Ukraine, Trump termed the discussions as productive, rating them a "10 out of 10." Earlier, the US president claimed that the tariffs imposed on India for purchasing oil from Russia have influenced Moscow's decision to seek a meeting with Washington, as the country was losing its 'second largest customer'.In an interview with Fox News on Thursday, Trump said, "I think everything has an impact," and claimed that when he told India that "we're going to charge you, because you're dealing with Russia and oil purchases", it "essentially took them out of buying oil from Russia".India last week said it has not halted oil purchases from Russia in response to the US President's tariff threat and continues to buy based solely on economic the steep tariffs are likely to hit the USD 40 billion of non-exempt exports that India does to the US, there has been chatter around stopping or curtailing oil imports from Russia. However, AS Sahney, Chairman of Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), the country's largest oil firm, has clarified that there is "no pause" on Russian oil imports, and India's intent to continue buying Russian oil remains unchanged. Responding to the US tariffs, the Ministry of External Affairs had said that the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Delhi's new school fee law puts parents in charge: Here's why it's not as simple as it sounds
Can new rules fix old problems in Delhi's private schools? What the 2025 education bill really means for parents NEW DELHI: The Delhi government has introduced the Delhi School Education (Transparency in Fixation and Regulation of Fees) Bill, 2025, aiming to regulate fees in all private schools across the city. Education Minister Ashish Sood stated that the law seeks to end arbitrary fee hikes and increase transparency by involving parents in the decision-making process. The bill, passed in the Monsoon Session of the Delhi Assembly, extends fee regulation to all 1,700 private schools, closing a loophole from the 1973 rules which covered only 300 schools. It introduces committees comprising parents, teachers, school management, and government representatives to oversee fee fixation and grievance redressal, as reported by PTI. Key provisions of the bill and penalties for violations According to the bill, fee proposals must be approved by school-level committees by July 15, district-level committees by July 30, and finalised by September. If no consensus is reached within 45 days, an appellate committee will intervene. Schools raising fees without government approval face fines ranging from Rs 1 lakh to Rs 10 lakh, with double penalties if excess fees are not refunded, as stated by the education minister in a PTI report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Could This NEW Collagen Blend Finally Reduce Your Cellulite? Vitauthority Learn More Undo The bill grants the Director of Education powers akin to a sub-divisional magistrate, enabling uniform enforcement and action against violations. This includes the authority to take suo motu action when necessary. Parental participation and grievance redressal mechanisms The law formalises parental involvement in fee fixation, giving them veto power over fee increases. Ashish Sood explained in an interview with The Times of India ( TOI ) that the bill addresses concerns about individual parents holding schools hostage by requiring at least 15% parental support to file complaints. He described this as a necessary balance to prevent institutional paralysis, as quoted by TOI . Sood highlighted that for the first time, parents have a clear channel to raise concerns not only about fees but also about infrastructure and school facilities. "Parents couldn't raise concerns about the lack of lab facilities, poor services, or absence of playgrounds. Now, for the first time, parents have been given that voice," he said. Opposition and parents' protests Despite these provisions, parent groups like the United Parents' Voice (UPV) have protested against the bill, alleging it was enacted without adequate public consultation. UPV staged a demonstration at Jantar Mantar, submitting a memorandum to the government demanding a rollback of unapproved fee hikes and independent audits by the Comptroller and Auditor General and forensic experts, as reported by PTI. Parents also criticised the bill's requirement for formal parental representation and the limit on individual complaints, claiming it restricts their ability to raise grievances. They called for monthly fee collection systems and transparency through government portals to ease financial burdens, and sought government-supervised elections for parent-teacher associations. Legal and financial implications Critics have argued that the bill limits recourse to civil courts for fee disputes. However, Sood pointed out to TOI that Delhi has 600 civil courts but questioned whether any fee-related disputes have reached them, arguing that the bill's three-tier grievance redressal system is adequate. The Director of Education can receive complaints directly and escalate unresolved issues further. The bill resets the fee structure from April 1, 2025, treating existing fees as proposed fees to be reviewed by the committees. If a hike is deemed excessive, it will be rolled back; if justified, it may be permitted. Schools that fail to comply with these processes face penalties. The 2025 bill represents a significant step towards regulating private school fees and involving parents in governance, aiming to address longstanding issues of arbitrary fee increases and lack of transparency. While the government maintains that the bill balances interests of all stakeholders, some parent groups remain sceptical, continuing to call for greater accountability and inclusive decision-making. TOI Education is on WhatsApp now. Follow us here . Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
