Dutch to Seek ‘Solution' to Bank Bonus Cap for Some Staff
(Bloomberg) -- The Dutch Finance Ministry said it's going to look at whether it can tweak the country's bonus restriction for parts of the financial sector while leaving it in place for banks' top brass.
'I will not amend the bonus rules for directors in the financial sector, such as top bankers,' Finance Minister Eelco Heinen said in a letter published on Thursday. But 'I want to see whether a suitable solution is possible for specialist staff of financial companies.'
The finance ministry had been considering easing parts of the country's limits on variable pay, Bloomberg News reported earlier this year. That move could be designed to support banks by focusing on some staff, while seeking to mitigate the risk of a public backlash by excluding senior executives, people familiar with the matter said at the time.
Any softening of the Dutch bonus cap would be the first time the government makes changes favored by banks since introducing some of the regulation a decade ago.
The Dutch cap is far more stringent than restrictions on variable pay applying throughout the rest of the European Union. The country's banks including ABN Amro Bank NV and ING Groep NV have long cited the rules as a substantial hiring impediment, highlighting IT recruitment as a particular challenge.
ABN Amro recently put in place a hiring freeze to keep a lid on costs, Bloomberg News has reported.
The Netherlands put the bonus caps in place in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis that resulted in huge bank bailouts costing the country tens of billions of euros. Top management of banks in which the state owns a stake were banned from receiving any variable pay, and a bonus cap at 20% of fixed salary was subsequently implemented across the rest of the industry.
Heinen said that the financial sector is facing new challenges, such as cyber resilience. 'These new security issues are a focus for financial institutions and that requires additional capacity. This makes the availability of employees with specialist knowledge and experience, such as IT specialists, essential,' he said.
He said that an evaluation showed that companies have to search longer for suitable personnel or have to weaken job requirements as they also compete with big technology companies to which the remuneration rules do not apply.
Heinen also said that financial companies have often increased their fixed wages to remain competitive, leading to less cost flexibility in times of economic downturn. That can particularly pose obstacles for fintechs, he wrote in the letter.
--With assistance from Patrick Van Oosterom.
(Updates with context in sixth paragraph.)
More stories like this are available on bloomberg.com
First Published: 24 Apr 2025, 01:42 PM IST
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
China's Bankers Ditch Global Hotel Chains as Travel Budgets Bite
(Bloomberg) -- These days, Shanghai-based banker Jason Zhang can no longer stay at the Westin hotel in downtown Beijing's financial district after his company cut its travel budget. Instead, he had to settle for a cheaper domestic hotel chain. To his surprise, the discount in room rate didn't lead to a discount in experience. Yes, the expansive breakfast buffet is gone, but Zhang relishes the local dishes served at the domestic chain Atour. Its pillows and comforters are so popular that many guests buy them after checking out. There's no scramble to pack and leave in the morning as checkout can wait until 6 p.m. Zhang is not alone in switching hotels. Chinese banks have scaled back travel perks since last year, barring staff from flying business class and booking pricey hotels, as China's economy slows and companies tighten their purse strings. And while it's making things tough for the top-end international brands, the greater financial prudence has opened up opportunities for smaller local chains that focus on the needs of business travelers. While spending on work-related travel in China slowed in 2024, it still grew to a record $372.5 billion, according to market researcher China Trading Desk. But much of the growth is being captured by hotels offering modest accommodation rather than the luxury end of the spectrum. Mid-range local brands could expand their market share from 45% in 2023 to up to 75% by 2028, the consultancy says. That's giving domestic chains a boost. Atour Lifestyle Holdings Ltd posted record revenue growth of 55.3% to 7.25 billion yuan ($1 billion), thanks in part to sales of its pillows and comforters. Another hotel chain H World Group Ltd saw revenue jump almost 10% year on year. This is in contrast to the major international brands, which are struggling in the Greater China region compared to the rest of the world. InterContinental Hotels Group Plc saw room revenue for business trips in the region decrease 5%, compared with a 2% increase globally. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. says its revenue per room in Asia Pacific was flat, dragged down by China. Marriott International Inc. also saw its Greater China revenue decline, citing weaker domestic demand. 'The primary driver behind this transformation is corporate cost-cutting measures,' said Subramania Bhatt, chief executive officer of China Trading Desk. 'Beyond price, local brands have developed several competitive edges that appeal to business travelers.' While tighter travel budgets are a key reason some are switching hotel brands, it's only part of the story. Local chains unable to match international five-star chains in prestige and glamor are trying to make up in other ways. Yongbin Xu, a director at a private fund management company in Shanghai, used to stay at Marriott or Shangri-La hotels on work trips but has now switched to Intercity, an upper mid-scale brand operated by H World Group. He made the change not because of corporate cutbacks, but because he likes the location and service of Intercity hotels. A room at a Shangri-La or Marriott hotel in Shenzhen costs between 1000 yuan and 1200 yuan per night, while Intercity charges around 700 yuan for a room in the central business district. 'Of course, those hotels sacrifice some services, but for business trips, I don't have time to use the swimming pool or other high-end services,' said Xu. Xu's favorite service at H World: Robots that help ferry food deliveries from the hotel entrance to his room upstairs, whereas international brands ask guests to go all the way down to the entrance to pick them up themselves. Another perk that has won over many local travelers is free laundry, either through self-service washing machines or through a pick-up service. By contrast, it normally costs from 30 to 100 yuan per item for laundry services in the five-star hotels in Beijing and Shanghai. Local chains have also sought to gain an advantage over their larger rivals by the strength of their mobile apps, through which guests can access a broad array of services, such as selecting your own room or requesting more water, without having to speak to reception. While Chinese domestic hotel brands have become more competitive, they also face a number of challenges, including rising operational expenses and cut-throat price competition due to the surge in the supply of rooms in smaller hotels, guesthouses and home-rental apps in the country. By the end of 2024, the number of hotels in China had risen to 348,700, with 17.6 million rooms, both record highs, according to a report by the China Hotel Association. This weighed on the average room rate for both domestic and international brands, which declined between 2% and 7% last year. And prices may face even greater pressure in the coming years as the major chains keep expanding to meet rising demand from Chinese travelers. 'The downward trend in hotel prices and profits will continue this year due to oversupply, increasing the risk of investing in new hotels,' said Zhao Huanyan, a Shanghai-based independent hospitality industry consultant. Despite stronger sales, H World Group saw its profit decline last year due to expenditure on renovation and service upgrades. For Atour, its breakneck expansion appears to have led to a lapse in quality control. The pillow cases at one of its hotels in Hangzhou were found out to be ones meant for a hospital, sparking widespread media and online scrutiny. Atour later explained in a statement that it was a sorting mistake by its laundry supplier and temporarily closed down the location to replace all bed linen. In response to rising local competition, international hotel chains have been expanding their mid-range options in China. Almost 80% of the new hotels IHG has in the pipeline in the Greater China region belong to their more affordable brands, compared with around 20% in their luxury segment. Marriott's chief financial officer Leeny Oberg highlighted in the company's earning call in May the 'terrific interest' in their mid-tier brands. But for Zhang, it's unlikely to be enough to persuade him to switch his allegiance back from China's domestic chains. 'I expect I'll continue to stay at Atour hotels in the future, even for personal trips, as I've come to like them.' More stories like this are available on
Hindustan Times
3 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard may get some of its funding back. But on one condition, says Education Secretary
Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on Tuesday that Harvard and other universities could get back some of the federal funding cut by the Trump administration if they changed their policies. 'It would be my goal that if colleges and universities are abiding by the laws of the United States and doing what we expect of them, that they can expect taxpayer funded programs,' the secretary said at a Bloomberg News event. McMahon said that the Trump administration was "making progress in some of the discussions" with Harvard, despite the ongoing legal battles. The secretary emphasised that the federal funding has a role to play in academic research at the universities. 'I think if we look at our research as for the public good, which I think is intended, then taxpayers are willing to see their tax dollars to support that kind of really good research. And so I'm sure that would continue at the university level,' she said. President Donald Trump has frozen more than $2.6 billion in federal research funding to Harvard and has moved to cancel its federal contracts. The Trump administration justified the actions as part of its effort to eliminate antisemitism on campus. Meanwhile, Harvard has also taken the fight to the court with two lawsuits against the Trump administration, challenging both the loss of federal funding and a decision by the Department of Homeland Security to revoke its license to enrol foreign students. The administration reportedly also asked the university to share its records about misconduct by international students on campus. However, it said that the college has not offered enough information to satisfy their requests. The Trump administration and Harvard have been at loggerheads, with the President repeatedly singling out the institution and taking aim at its perceived left-leaning and admission practices. Trump has proposed that Harvard's federal funding be moved to trade schools and called for its tax-exempt status to be removed. President Donald Trump recently said that the Massachusetts-based school was "starting to behave". Meanwhile, Harvard has rejected the administration's demands that it implement "viewpoint diversity" on campus in its hiring and admission practices. Columbia University has also lost about $400 million in federal funds and did not sign onto the "friend of the court" argument. Other private colleges, including Cornell University, Princeton University and Northwestern University, also have seen funding revoked in the Trump era.
NDTV
6 hours ago
- NDTV
What Is Meta's 'Superintelligence' That Zuckerberg Is Hiring Personally For
Quick Read Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is leading efforts to develop artificial general intelligence (AGI). He is assembling a high-profile "superintelligence" team with lucrative compensation packages. Zuckerberg's hands-on approach includes inviting top recruits to his homes to attract talent. Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg is taking a hands-on approach to one of tech's most ambitious frontiers: building artificial general intelligence (AGI). According to The New York Times and Bloomberg, Zuckerberg is personally assembling a new 'superintelligence' team—offering eye-popping compensation packages that reportedly reach into nine figures—to create what could become the world's most advanced AI platform. AGI, while still a theoretical concept, refers to AI that can outperform humans across a broad range of cognitive tasks. Many experts believe such capabilities may be decades away—if they are possible at all—but Zuckerberg is betting big on accelerating that timeline. Frustrated with Meta's current pace of AI development, the tech billionaire has taken direct control of the project. Bloomberg reports that he's gone as far as inviting top recruits to his homes in Lake Tahoe and Palo Alto in a bid to woo them personally. He's also reorganised his office so that the new AI team, currently about 50 members strong, sits close to him. Among the high-profile hires is Alexandr Wang, founder of Scale AI, who is expected to play a leading role in a new Meta research lab focused on building AI systems with intelligence surpassing the human brain. In a fierce race with rivals like OpenAI (creator of GPT-4) and Google DeepMind (developer of the Gemini models), Meta is offering massive compensation packages—ranging from high six figures to well into the nine-figure range—to lure top AI talent from across the industry. Some of these offers have already been accepted. Zuckerberg's push signals not only a new phase for Meta, but also intensifies the global competition to dominate the future of AI.
