Wimbledon line-calling technology fails on crucial point in Sonay Kartal match
Umpire Nico Helwerth stopped the point to check whether the technology, which has controversially replaced line judges this year, had worked, informing the crowd after a delay that it had not.
With no evidence of whether the ball was in or out, Helwerth ordered the point to be replayed, and Pavlyuchenkova, who would have won the game had the shot been called out, went on to drop serve.
Intriguing scenes!
Pavlyuchenkova thinks Kartal has put her forehand long and stops before the Brit slams back a winner.
The umpire checks and confirms the electronic line calling system was unable to track the point, which leads to the point being replayed.#Wimbledon pic.twitter.com/Qkz3Rickj5
— BBC Sport (@BBCSport) July 6, 2025
The 34-year-old reacted furiously at the change of ends, saying to Helwerth: 'Because she is local, they can say whatever. You took the game away from me.'
A Wimbledon spokesman said: 'Due to operator error the system was deactivated on the point in question. The chair umpire followed the established process.'
Britain's leading duo Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu have both complained about the accuracy of the system this week.
After her defeat by Aryna Sabalenka on Friday, Raducanu said: 'It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong.'
Wimbledon organisers have defended the technology, which is widely used on the tour.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
36 minutes ago
- Times
Cameron Norrie sets up Carlos Alcaraz clash after sportsmanship spat
There have been bigger wins against better opponents during his career, but Cameron Norrie's Wimbledon fourth-round victory on Sunday ranked as one of his most satisfying triumphs. The last British singles player standing at the All England Club this year withstood a barrage of 103 winners from the racket of Chile's Nicolás Jarry to prevail 6-3, 7-6 (7-4), 6-7 (7-9), 6-7 (5-7), 6-3. At four hours and 27 minutes, it is the longest match the 29-year-old Norrie has ever contested. Norrie, ranked No61 in the world, was exceptional in the way he maintained his focus for an extended period of time as there was much to overcome. The pinpoint serving of the 6ft 7in Jarry produced a total of 46 aces, not only making it challenging to break but also putting greater importance on Norrie's own service holds. Jarry added to the drama by making complaints about Norrie's sportsmanship. First he complained about the length of time Norrie was taking to bounce the ball before his second serve, and even imitated it to make his point clear. After the match Jarry then confronted Norrie by the side of the court to air another grievance about his constant fist pumping and shouts of 'Come on'. The vast majority of the 12,000-capacity crowd on No1 Court unsurprisingly rallied behind the home player and booed Jarry in response. 'He said I was a little bit vocal but that is my energy,' Norrie said. 'I told him he competed so well and it was a great match. 'I wanted to take my time on the second serve and making sure that I'm getting myself ready to set. I actually didn't even notice he was upset with that. I don't want to rush into it and hit a quick double fault. If I'm hitting a second serve, I have to be ready for sure.' Jarry said: 'He's very competitive, so he knows how to make the most of the important games and the important parts of the match.' Another test of Norrie's resilience came in the final two sets. In the third-set tie-break he had a match point for a straight-sets victory but failed to convert and was kept out on court for another two hours as Jarry launched a stirring fightback. The relief was evident at the end when Norrie fell to the court and rolled on to his back in celebration. Three years after reaching the semi-finals here, he has become only the fourth Briton to reach a Wimbledon men's singles quarter-final on multiple occasions in the open era, joining Andy Murray, Tim Henman and Roger Taylor. 'Honestly I don't know how I did that [winning],' Norrie said. 'Credit to Nico. He did an unbelievable job. He played better than me in both tie-breaks [that he lost]. I had to keep fighting.' Centre Court now awaits for Norrie on Tuesday. He had specifically requested a return to No1 Court on Sunday because of his preference for the more feverish atmosphere and the closer position of his coaching box. There is no way, though, that his quarter-final against Carlos Alcaraz can be anywhere other than the main stadium. Norrie leaves No1 Court with fond memories of beating a formidable opponent. Jarry may have come through qualifying with a world ranking of No143, but the 29-year-old made for quite a challenge as someone whose career-high was No16. The reason for his fall down the rankings was the diagnosis of an inner ear disorder, vestibular neuritis, which made it difficult for him to play with the effects of dizziness, vertigo and loss of balance. Well aware that this was going to be a match in which dips of concentration on his serve would be punished, Norrie was mightily relieved in the opening game to save a break point. From there it was an efficient set, with Norrie remaining steady in all facets of his play before having his patience rewarded with a key break for 5-3. More of the same followed in the second set, with Norrie taking his opportunity when the moment came with a backhand cross-court winner on his first set point at 6-4 in the tie-break. At this point Jarry decided to raise a complaint with the umpire Eva Asderaki about Norrie's slow ball bouncing — well within the rules before a second serve as the 25-second limit is only in place before the first serve — and then did the same himself minutes later. The first match point for Norrie came in the third-set tie-break at 6-5, but a bold and brave series of attacking shots paid off for Jarry as he stole the set at 8-7 with a forehand winner. Norrie then let slip another lead in the fourth-set tie-break by losing five of the next six points to be dragged into a fifth set. Norrie remained steadfast despite the setbacks and finally claimed a long-awaited second break of serve for 2-0, the first in the match for either player since the eighth game of the first set. It helped that it was partly gifted through a double fault and an unforced backhand error by Jarry. One break was enough for Norrie to go on and see out the victory, continuing an unexpected turnaround for him on the court this summer. He arrived at the Geneva Open seven weeks ago for qualifying because his ranking was too low for direct entry at No91. Since then he has reached the last 16 of the French Open and now the last eight of Wimbledon, rising to a projected ranking of No43. 'At the beginning of this year, I struggled with confidence,' Norrie said. 'I want to enjoy my tennis more and I'm doing that. It is a bonus to win but enjoying it is what matters. I am so happy to be in another quarter-final in the best tournament in the world.'
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off
A ball that clearly landed long in a match at Centre Court wasn't called out Sunday because the electronic system that replaced line judges at Wimbledon this year accidentally was shut off for three points. And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set — much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally. Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016. 'You took the game away from me,' 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended. Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player. Next for Pavlyuchenkova is a match against No. 13 Amanda Anisimova of the United States, a 6-2, 5-7, 6-4 winner against No. 30 Linda Noskova on Sunday night. Anisimova also was a Wimbledon quarterfinalist in 2022; her best Slam showing was making the 2019 French Open semifinals at age 17. At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out. 'I think he felt bad, a little bit,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out.' Pavlyuchenkova also said Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision.' Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out. At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back.' She also cracked that chair umpires are 'very good at giving fines and code violations' and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls. Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went. 'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened — if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine,' Kartal said. 'I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point.' Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later. The tournament looked into it afterward and blamed 'human error,' saying that the line-calling setup 'was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system,' according to an All England Club spokesperson, who added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology.' The spokesperson also said Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal received apologies from the club. The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls. From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's — or chair umpire's — ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires. Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: 'We should probably look into something else to have better decisions.' Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot. 'The chair umpire has to make the call,' 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said. 'Why is he there if he's not going to call the ball?' ___
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Jamie Murray interview: On Andy, playing after 40 and breaking a world record with Laura Robson
Jamie Murray's first Wimbledon without famous brother Andy didn't go to plan with early defeats in the doubles, but he has earned a new claim to fame by breaking a world record. Before the tournament, he and fellow Brit Laura Robson exchanged a rally of 101 shots whilst travelling at 29mph in adjacent cars on a breezy day at Duxford Airfield near Cambridge. 'We were pretty pleased with ourselves,' chuckles Jamie, who was tied to a harness on a bespoke roof rack so he wouldn't fall off as he traded shots. 'We couldn't move our feet because we were locked into position so we had to be really precise with our shots – a bit of performance pressure. 'It was a cool challenge though I'm not sure we'll be seeing it on the practice courts anytime soon!' For most of his career, Jamie has lived in the shadow of his younger sibling, regarded one of Britain's greatest-ever sportsmen. It's probably unfair given that Jamie's seven Grand Slam titles (two men's doubles and five mixed) hasn't been bettered by any British man in the Open era. Now 39-years-old, he thinks there is still more to come, even though his appearance at this year's Wimbledon was brief with first round defeats partnering Rajeev Ram and Emily Appleton. 'I always had a mental block about playing past 40 but I'm just about there now with my next birthday in February and I still want to play next year for sure. So I guess I'll be going into my forties,' he says. 'I'm still enjoying travelling and competing. My ranking is good enough to play the top events and you're a long time retired. 'I haven't had any real injuries or surgeries or anything like that. My body still feels pretty good. I haven't played particularly well in the last couple of years but I'm starting to get my act together now. 'I still think I can do well at these big events. I was struggling with my serve which is the most important shot in the game but I definitely have more confidence with it just now.' The likes of Cristiano Ronaldo and LeBron James are proof that sporting careers can last longer these days. 'We have access to so many recovery techniques and sports science these days,' acknowledges Jamie. 'Better nutrition, massages, cryotherapy, all of it helps. 'It is fair to say I'm in the twilight of my career and I don't think you will see me still out there at 45 but I'm also aware it won't be easy to recreate the feeling of playing a big match in front of a lot of people against the best players in the world.' He laughs at recently having 'shown up in a suit' as tournament director at Queen's Club. His good nature and calm demeanour would make him a natural for tennis administration should he choose that route. Even the inevitable 'Andy questions' that come up don't ruffle him. Jamie was a dutiful older brother last year to team up with Andy for his farewell doubles at Wimbledon, even though he knew Junior was no longer physically fit enough to be competitive. Neither does there seem to be any resentment at having had his own career play second fiddle to Andy, the first British man to win the Wimbledon singles since Fred Perry. Jamie points out that although they don't see each other as regularly since Andy's departure from tour, their time together now is more like normal brothers rather than two tennis players. 'I'm still travelling 30 weeks a year and need to train, and he's got four kids which keeps him busy with after-school activities and all that stuff,' explains Jamie. 'So we probably see each other less now, but when we do it's nicer to be honest. Quality time, they call it! 'We don't do anything out of the ordinary or too crazy. We have played golf a few times. Sometimes we bump into each other in Wimbledon (where they both live) or go round to the house. 'I've achieved a lot in tennis and had a lot of great moments but ultimately it's singles that gets all the headlines. I understand that. 'It's not necessarily something I craved. I'm happy with my career and proud of what I've achieved. It doesn't necessarily matter if people write about it or not. I'm not losing sleep over it.' Jamie Murray and Laura Robson broke a Guinness World record by completing a rally of 101 consecutive shots as the Lexus NX became the latest court for the stars to play on.
