Canada turns to drones for reforestation after wildfires
CHIBOUGAMAU: A large aerial drone flies over the charred remains of Canadian forests devastated by wildfires, bombarding the ground with seed capsules to accelerate reforestation.
This area of northern Quebec province was ravaged by megafires in the summer of 2023 and for the second year in a row a pilot project has been using drones to plant new black spruces and jack pines.
Rather than simply dropping seeds from high above, the company Flash Forest, which is leading the initiative, uses seeds protected in capsules that also contain water and nutrients, as well as fungi, to maximize their growing potential.
"There is a niche that's appropriate for drone reforestation which we've spent the last five years narrowing in on," Flash Forest cofounder Cameron Jones said.
The company focuses its efforts on forests that were scorched in the last year or two and excludes older burn sites that already have vegetation that can crowd out new seeds.
50,000 capsules per day
It is no longer feasible to wait for Canada's forests to bounce back all on their own with millions of hectares of forests destroyed each year.
In 2023, Canada experienced a record year of wildfires with blazes affecting every province, ultimately burning nearly 18 million hectares (44 million acres).
Quebec, and particularly this area in the north of the French-speaking province, was hit especially hard that year.
Drone operator and geospatial data scientist Owen Lucas said the method uses artificial intelligence to map out the sites ahead of time.
"Then we pick our sites based on climate variables, physical attributes, topographic variables, to make sure we're putting the seeds in the right place," he said, his eyes fixed on the drone's remote controls.
The company also has projects in another Canadian province, Alberta, and in Colorado in the United States. Each drone can deliver seeds to plant 50,000 trees per day.
"When you're out here planting you don't see the impact, but when you come back in the fall and you see them growing, you know you're doing a positive thing," Lucas said.
In 2023, like this year, which has already seen more than 4.2 million hectares burned across the country, megafires are being fueled by drought, which experts say is linked to global warming.
"It's sad to have lost so much forest," lamented Angel Mianscum, one of the indigenous leaders of a nearby Cree community.
She was, however, pleased to see there are now "innovative ways of doing things." The Cree community has worked directly with Flash Forest to plan the local reforestation.
I
ndigenous communities are the most affected by fires in Canada because they are often remote and deep in the boreal forest.
Seed shortage
"We are increasingly forced to reforest in Canada. Boreal forest trees are adapted to fires, but today the conditions are becoming more complicated," said Maxence Martin, professor of forest ecology at the University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue.
He points out that in 2023, for example, very young forests burned.
"If the forest is too young, it will take a very long time to start regenerating, so planting is the only option."
While the use of drones can help reach certain areas more quickly, it also has its downsides: many seeds end up wasted.
"And today there is a seed problem because they are complicated to harvest," and therefore Canada is short of them, Martin said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
18 hours ago
- NDTV
'Godfather Of AI' Reveals Bold Strategy To Save Humanity From AI Domination
Geoffrey Hinton, the British-Canadian computer scientist known as the "Godfather of AI", has expressed concerns that the technology he helped develop could potentially wipe out humanity. According to Mr Hinton, there's a 10-20% chance of this catastrophic outcome. Moreover, he's sceptical about the approach tech companies are taking to mitigate this risk, particularly in ensuring humans remain in control of AI systems. "That's not going to work. They're going to be much smarter than us. They're going to have all sorts of ways to get around that," Mr Hinton said at Ai4, an industry conference in Las Vegas, as per CNN. The scientist also warned that future AI systems could manipulate humans with ease, likening it to an adult bribing a child with candy. His warning comes after recent examples have shown AI systems deceiving, cheating, and stealing to achieve their goals, such as an AI model attempting to blackmail an engineer after discovering personal information in an email. Instead of trying to dominate AI, Mr Hinton suggested instilling "maternal instincts" in AI models, allowing them to genuinely care about people, even as they surpass human intelligence. "AI systems will very quickly develop two subgoals, if they're smart: One is to stay alive… (and) the other subgoal is to get more control. There is good reason to believe that any kind of agentic AI will try to stay alive," Mr Hinton said. He believes fostering a sense of compassion in AI is of paramount importance. At the conference, he pointed to the mother-child relationship as a model, where a mother's instincts and social pressure drive her to care for her baby, despite the baby's limited intelligence and control over her. While he expressed uncertainty about the technical specifics, he stressed that researchers must work on this challenge. "That's the only good outcome. If it's not going to parent me, it's going to replace me. These super-intelligent caring AI mothers, most of them won't want to get rid of the maternal instinct because they don't want us to die," he added. Geoffrey Hinton is renowned for his groundbreaking work on neural networks, which laid the foundation for the current AI revolution. In May 2023, he quit his job at Google so he could freely speak out about the risks of AI.
Hindustan Times
21 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
AI Robs My Students of the Ability to Think
One of the things I love about teaching political communications is my students' eagerness to take up the art and craft of the work at hand. Shame seldom cast its shadow on our classroom conversations. Last year that changed. More than half the nonnative English-speaking students and a notable number of native English speakers told me that after relying on AI to draft their papers and emails, their ability to write, speak and conduct basic inquiry is slipping away. They tell me this as if they have done something wrong, never considering that it is their professors, not they, who should carry that burden. I am no stranger to the effect of technology on language and literacy, nor am I shocked by its bland patterns of enthusiastic advent, which always give way to shabbiness and decay. Google promised the ability to search—a word that has terrific depth and meaning—and delivered a crass advertiser-led sorting system. Facebook started as proto-Tinder before a revamp that said we'd get Woodstock-style digital communes. Then it locked us in a space where people scream at each other. Through it all, I have tinkered with, embraced, studied, used, thrown away and taught about more forms of technology than I can remember, from letterpress printing to podcast production. But no new technology has produced such a terrifying admission of stark and fundamental disempowerment by my students as AI has. For all its promise, AI is being developed and used in ways that are disabling. There is little evidence that senior university faculty are committed to tamping down the rampant overuse of AI. Instead, it is the paperweight on a pile of evidence that at an ethical level, universities are too timid or ignorant to insist that students use the core skills we are supposed to be teaching them. Perhaps willful ignorance is the better phrase—these core skills are no mystery. They involve an ability to sift through information and understand who created it, then organize and pull it together with logic, reason and persuasion. When teachers dream of our students' successes, we want to see these skills help them thrive. For that to happen, students must gain the ability to synthesize information. They must be able to listen, read, speak and write—so they can express strategic and tactical thinking. When they say AI is eroding their ability to speak and write, this is what they're losing, often before they've ever fully gained it. It's the result of disturbing trends. One is the general decline in educators' commitment to seeing communications as a fundamental skill that all courses should develop. I often write a page of notes in response to a page of graduate student homework, describing not only what the student should do but why and how to do so in the future. Too often, the reply is: 'I haven't gotten this much feedback since high school.' Compliments are nice, but these asides don't fill me with joy. Nor do the many excuses academics give for this collective failure—from financial and time constraints to the old hyperliteralist trope that we must respond to student demands—even when they're unwittingly against their own educational interests—and torch everything else. Along with this decline in teaching, I am often told (as though I write with a quill) that technology is eclipsing our need to teach these skills to the expert degree we once did. This is the voice of technological evangelism in higher education, and its adherents encourage a deeper embrace of AI, even though—with a few exceptions—they have little to no ability to lead students to any kind of mastery. The types of academics who engage in this kind of boosterism aren't known for their subtlety, so I am constantly inundated with—and told to celebrate—new faculty-created AI tools for everything from the art of cutting text down (try putting the 'I Have a Dream' speech into an AI shortener) to the mortifying practice of using AI to summarize student course reviews or even grade assignments. When confronted, these evangelists often push back with hypersimplified examples of handy AI shortcuts, such as customer service-style bots to answer students' questions about crucial aspects of course management. But I'm struck by their tone, which often presumes that current teaching methods and student engagement are some kind of drudgery that has entitled us to AI-based relief, even if it comes at the expense of our students' learning. All the while, its use is indiscriminate and widespread. Just ask the students who are using it to the point where a tool now has mastery over them and is robbing them of language. In my work, which ranges from negotiation to disability policy, the implications of this disempowerment are frightening. Colin Powell once told my colleagues and me that he often winced at how people would, with a choice of words so poorly attuned to the other side of a negotiation, walk into a room and convert 'an adversary into an enemy.' His observation reflects the depth and breadth of intentionality that humans must possess to do the careful work that can be a matter of life and death for others. Contrary to what AI enthusiasts claim, the human possession of these skills will never become irrelevant if we value life, society and governance. For students to grow into professionals who have those skills, they must first develop them. What it will take for their teachers to defend that right when those teachers already possess the knowledge and power to do so, I do not know. Mr. Green teaches at Harvard's Kennedy School and is author of 'A Perfect Turmoil: Walter E. Fernald and the Struggle to Care for America's Disabled.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on nepotism: Parents wouldn't recommend their kids if ...
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang openly addressed nepotism concerns at a recent all-hands meeting, defending the practice of hiring employees' children and stating that parents wouldn't recommend their kids if they would embarrass them. Huang acknowledged that many employees' children work at the company and insisted it doesn't bother him, adding with a smile that many "Nvidia second-generation" employees even outperform their parents. The comments come amid growing scrutiny over family hiring practices at the chip giant, particularly as Huang's own children have risen to key positions within the company's strategic emerging business divisions. According to reporting from The Information, Huang's daughter Madison and son Spencer have become significant players in Nvidia's future-focused departments after pursuing careers that initially diverged from the technology industry. Family business tradition rare in Silicon Valley The situation at Nvidia represents a departure from Silicon Valley norms, where the children of tech pioneers like Apple's Steve Jobs or Microsoft's Bill Gates typically chose to stay away from their family businesses. Beyond the Huang family, children of co-founder Chris Malachowsky and Director Aarti Shah also work at the company, creating an unusual "family presence" in Silicon Valley. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Bedridden for 2 years, please help my husband walk again! Donate For Health Donate Now Undo Madison Huang leads the Omniverse department , focusing on 3D simulation and Digital Twin software, while Spencer Huang concentrates on AI models and robotics perception software development. Notably, neither sibling works in Nvidia's core chip and data center business, instead positioning themselves in emerging technology areas that could define the company's future growth. Former Nvidia Vice President Greg Estes acknowledged the family connection but emphasised both siblings "work very hard, excel in their respective fields, and have a deep attachment to the company." Huang's next generation takes center stage at Nvidia Madison Huag's rapid ascent at Nvidia has raised eyebrows across Silicon Valley. Her 2023 compensation package topped $1 million as she joined her father's core leadership team represents. The rise is meteoric for someone who joined the company just four years ago. Her brother Spencer has taken a different approach, working behind the scenes to advance Nvidia's robotics ambitions while avoiding the spotlight that follows his sister. The siblings' journey to Nvidia wasn't traditional tech royalty grooming. Madison spent years mastering French pastry arts at Le Cordon Bleu and climbing ranks at luxury conglomerate LVMH. Spencer ran a craft cocktail bar in Taipei, mixing drinks far from Silicon Valley's boardrooms. Their pivot to tech came in 2019 through an MIT artificial intelligence course, followed by MBA programs. Despite the nepotism concerns, internal performance reviews show both siblings have consistently exceeded targets in their respective divisions. Madison's Omniverse unit has doubled its enterprise partnerships under her leadership, while Spencer's robotics perception software has been integrated into three major automotive deals this year. AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
