
Netanyahu Says He Plans to Meet With Trump Next Week
The visit would come after Israel and Iran agreed to a cease-fire last week, ending their biggest and deadliest conflict, and as attention refocuses on efforts to achieve a truce in the nearly two-year-old war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.
Indirect talks between Israel and Hamas have repeatedly failed to produce a cease-fire, prolonging the suffering of more than two million Palestinian civilians in Gaza and the captivity of Israeli hostages. The two sides have not been able to agree on how long a cease-fire should last, with Hamas demanding a total end to the war and Mr. Netanyahu expressing interest in only a temporary truce until Hamas's military wing and government are dismantled.
Mr. Netanyahu, speaking at a meeting of government ministers on Tuesday, said that while in the United States, he planned to meet other senior Trump administration officials, including Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Steve Witkoff, Mr. Trump's special envoy for peace missions.
An Israeli official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the prime minister's schedule, said that Mr. Netanyahu planned to fly to Washington on Sunday and meet with Mr. Trump on Monday.
On Sunday, Mr. Trump publicly demanded progress on a deal in Gaza. 'MAKE THE DEAL IN GAZA. GET THE HOSTAGES BACK!!! DJT,' the president wrote on social media.
Some analysts have speculated that Mr. Netanyahu may now be willing to agree to end the war in Gaza, even if it risks far-right political allies leaving his governing coalition. Mr. Netanyahu, those analysts say, could feel that he is in a better position to campaign for re-election because of Israeli and American strikes on Iran's nuclear program.
Though the extent of the damage to Iranian nuclear facilities remains unclear, Mr. Netanyahu has portrayed the campaign as a success and his domestic popularity appears to have risen.
Since the cease-fire, Mr. Netanyahu has faced growing calls at home to secure an agreement to free the remaining hostages in Gaza. Up to 20 hostages abducted in the Hamas-led attack of Oct. 7, 2023, are still believed to be alive, according to Israeli authorities. The remains of 30 others are also being held, the authorities said.
Humanitarian officials have also warned of increasing desperation among Palestinians in Gaza, who are struggling to obtain food aid amid deadly violence near distribution points and enduring miserable conditions in sweltering makeshift shelters.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Billions in grants for summer school, English instruction delayed during Trump administration review
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Trump administration is withholding more than $6 billion in federal grants for afterschool and summer programs, English language instruction, adult literacy and more as part of a review to ensure grants align with President Donald Trump's priorities. The move leaves states and schools in limbo as they budget for programs this summer and in the upcoming school year, introducing new uncertainty about when — or if — they will receive the money. It also sets the stage for a clash with Democrats, who say the administration is flouting the law by holding back money Congress appropriated. Without the money, schools say they won't be able to provide free or affordable afterschool care for low-income kids while their parents work, and they may not be able to hire staff to teach children who are learning English. Programs that rely on the funding were expecting it to be distributed July 1, but an Education Department notice issued Monday announced the money would not be released while the programs are under review. The department did not provide a timeline and warned 'decisions have not yet been made' on grants for the upcoming school year. 'The Department remains committed to ensuring taxpayer resources are spent in accordance with the President's priorities and the Department's statutory responsibilities,' Education Department officials wrote in the notice, which was obtained by The Associated Press. The department referred questions to the Office of Management and Budget, which did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Some advocates fear the grants are being targeted for elimination, which could force schools to cut programs and teachers. Trump's 2026 budget proposal called for Congress to zero out all of the programs under review, signaling the administration sees them as unnecessary. Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., pressed the administration to spend the money as Congress intended. 'Every day that this funding is held up is a day that school districts are forced to worry about whether they'll have to cut back on afterschool programs or lay off teachers instead of worrying about how to make sure our kids can succeed,' Murray said in a statement. A national organization for afterschool programs called the department's action a 'stunning betrayal.' 'Withholding these funds will cause lasting harm to students and families, and to our education system, our future workforce, and our economy,' said Jodi Grant, executive director of the Afterschool Alliance. The six grant programs under review includes one known as 21st Century Community Learning Centers. It's the primary federal funding source for afterschool and summer learning programs and supports more than 10,000 local programs nationwide, according to the alliance. Every state runs its own competition to distribute the grants, which totaled $1.3 billion this fiscal year. Also under review are $2 billion in grants for teachers' professional development and efforts to reduce class size; $1 billion for academic enrichment grants, often used for science and math education and accelerated learning; $890 million for students who are learning English; $376 million to educate the children of migrant workers; and $715 million to teach adults how to read. California's education agency said it was notified Monday that it wouldn't be receiving money from those programs. 'Trump is illegally impounding billions of dollars appropriated by Congress to serve students this fiscal year," Tony Thurmond, California's state superintendent, said in a statement. 'The Administration is punishing children when states refuse to cater to Trump's political ideology.' The administration had signaled its desire to cut much of the money in an April letter to Sen. Susan Collins, chair of the Senate Committee on Appropriations. In that letter, Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, said cutting money for teaching kids to speak English would help "end overreach from Washington and restore the rightful role of State oversight in education.' 'They're trying to send a message,' said Amaya Garcia, who oversees education research at New America, a left-leaning think tank. 'They don't believe that taxpayer funding should be used for these children.' ___ The Associated Press' education coverage receives financial support from multiple private foundations. AP is solely responsible for all content. Find AP's standards for working with philanthropies, a list of supporters and funded coverage areas at Collin Binkley And Bianca Vázquez Toness, The Associated Press Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
13 minutes ago
- The Hill
Roughly 30 percent of 2024 voters used mail ballot: Research
Nearly a third of the ballots cast in the presidential election last fall were submitted by mail, despite long-standing efforts from President Trump and other Republicans to discourage the controversial voting method, new research found. The U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC) released a report this week that found that, while mail-in ballots didn't hit the record levels seen during the height of the pandemic four years earlier (43 percent), the percentage of voters who cast ballots by mail last fall (30.3 percent) remained well above pre-pandemic levels. Most voters in the 2024 general election cast their ballots in person, with 37.4 percent on Election Day and 35.2 percent through in-person early voting opportunities, the report found. However, more than 48 million mail-in votes were cast and counted in the 2024 presidential election, in addition to ballots sent in by members of the military and other overseas voters. 'State policies on the availability of mail voting have evolved rapidly over the past few election cycles,' the EAC's analysts wrote of the findings. Eight states and Washington, D.C., have adopted 'all' or 'mostly' mail elections, where ballots are sent to registered voters and can be returned via secure drop boxes or the U.S. Postal Service, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Additional states allow mail-in elections in some jurisdictions. The growing popularity of voting by mail also comes as Trump has targeted the ballot-casting method as a potential avenue for voter fraud. The president signed an executive order in March that would require all states and territories to count mail-in ballots on or before Election Day, as part of a broader election system overhaul that Trump backed after years of making unfounded claims about widespread voter fraud. 'Free, fair, and honest elections unmarred by fraud, errors, or suspicion are fundamental to maintaining our constitutional Republic,' Trump wrote in the order, which a federal judge blocked last month. 'The right of American citizens to have their votes properly counted and tabulated, without illegal dilution, is vital to determining the rightful winner of an election.' Trump's executive order, rather than ending early voting, sought to rein in delays in finalizing vote tallies in some states, including California, which is the country's most populous state and has an all-mail voting system. California allows mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted up to seven days after polls close. Trump cited other countries that have more restrictions on when ballots can be counted, including those submitted by mail. 'While countries like Denmark and Sweden sensibly limit mail-in voting to those unable to vote in person and do not count late-arriving votes regardless of the date of postmark, many American elections now feature mass voting by mail, with many officials accepting ballots without postmarks or those received well after Election Day,' he wrote. The EAC findings are based on surveys of elections officials in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands.


Time Magazine
14 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
The Republicans Who Voted Against the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Three Senators from President Donald Trump's party joined Democrats in voting against his 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' which narrowly passed the upper chamber on Tuesday with a tie-breaking vote from Vice President J.D. Vance. The bill—a sweeping tax and spending package that includes additional money for deportation efforts, steep cuts to funding for Medicaid, and tax exemptions for tips, among other major provisions—earned the votes of most Republican lawmakers amid pressure from Trump to pass the legislation by his July 4 deadline. It now returns to the House, which passed its own version in May. But the package has faced concerns from some Republicans over its proposed funding cuts to Medicaid, which serves more than 70 million Americans, and what it would mean for government spending. A report by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) indicated that the legislation would add more than $3.9 trillion to the national debt, despite the White House's assertions that it would reduce the deficit. Senators Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine, and Rand Paul of Kentucky ultimately broke ranks with their fellow Republicans in spite of Trump's threats to campaign against lawmakers who voted against the bill. 'I will always do what is in the best interest of North Carolina, even when that puts me at odds with my own party,' Tillis said in a Monday statement. 'I cannot support this bill in its current form. It would result in tens of billions of dollars in lost funding for North Carolina, including our hospitals and rural communities.' Speaking to reporters on Tuesday outside of Florida's 'Alligator Alcatraz' migrant detention center, Trump said he believed the bill would pass the House with ease. Here are the three Senators that voted against the bill. Thom Tillis Sen. Tillis's vote against the 'Big Beautiful Bill' followed an impassioned floor speech on Sunday in which he spoke against the Medicaid cuts in the bill, which he said would affect hundreds of thousands of North Carolina residents. 'What do I tell 663,000 people in two years or three years, when President Trump breaks his promise by pushing them off of Medicaid because the funding's not there anymore, guys? I think the people in the White House … advising the President are not telling him that the effect of this bill is to break a promise,' Tillis said. The CBO found in a report released Saturday that the legislation could cause nearly 12 million adults to lose health insurance over the next decade due to its reductions of hundreds of billions of dollars in Medicaid's funding. Tillis said at the time that he would vote against the legislation unless his concerns were addressed. In a statement on Sunday, he again pointed to the cuts even as he praised other parts of the bill. 'There is a lot for North Carolinians to love about the rest of the One Big Beautiful Bill, including extending historic funding for border security, and ending wasteful spending,' he said. 'We can and must accomplish this without hurting our rural communities and hospitals.' Tillis's opposition to the bill has not come without a cost. Trump threatened on Sunday to meet with other candidates who would primary Tillis in the upcoming Senate race and claimed in a Truth Social post that the Senator 'has hurt the great people of North Carolina.' 'Tillis is a talker and complainer, NOT A DOER!' Trump said, before calling the Senator 'worse than Rand 'Fauci' Paul!', referencing U.S. infectious disease expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, who drew Trump and Republican's ire amid the COVID-19 pandemic, to attack another critic of the legislation. Tillis announced his retirement that same day. 'In Washington over the last few years, it's become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,' Tillis said. 'When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer. But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.' Susan Collins Sen. Collins similarly pointed to concerns about the Medicaid cuts in the bill as a driving force for her decision to vote against it. Some 400,000 Mainers depend on the health insurance program, according to the Senator. 'I strongly support extending the tax relief for families and small businesses,' said Collins in a Tuesday statement. 'My vote against this bill stems primarily from the harmful impact it will have on Medicaid, affecting low-income families and rural health care providers like our hospitals and nursing homes.' While the bill includes a 'special fund' proposed by Collins that would provide some financial support for rural hospitals, she said that inclusion was insufficient to offset the damages the legislation would impose on Medicaid. Rand Paul Sen. Paul also cast a 'no' vote, citing concerns about how the bill would increase the national deficit, which currently stands at $1.36 trillion. Paul said Tuesday that he met with the Vice President and offered to vote for the bill if it included a '90% reduction in the debt ceiling.' 'I offered my vote for fiscal sanity. Congress chose to sell out taxpayers instead. Only once the bill is released, we will know what the true price was.' Paul wrote on X after the vote.