logo
India closely monitoring China-Pakistan-Bangladesh trilateral

India closely monitoring China-Pakistan-Bangladesh trilateral

India Gazette4 hours ago

New Delhi [India], June 26 (ANI): The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) on Thursday said that it is keeping a constant watch on developments in India's neighbourhood, especially in light of the recent trilateral meeting involving China, Pakistan, and Bangladesh.
Speaking at a press briefing, MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said, 'We maintain a constant watch on the developments in our neighbourhood that have a bearing on our interests and our security, our relations with individual countries, while they stand on their own footing, take into account the evolving context as well.'
The meeting held on June 19 in Yunnan, China, took place on the sidelines of the 9th China-South Asia Exposition and the 6th China-South Asia Cooperation Forum. It was attended by Bangladesh's acting foreign secretary Ruhul Alam Siddique, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Sun Weidong, and Pakistan's Additional Secretary (Asia Pacific) Imran Ahmed Siddiqui. Pakistan's foreign secretary to China, Amna Baloch, participated via video link, as reported by Daily Star.
As reported by The Daily Star, Bangladesh called it an 'informal meeting', Pakistan termed it as 'the inaugural meeting of the trilateral mechanism'.
In their statements, China and Pakistan stated that the three sides agreed to explore and implement cooperation projects in areas such as trade, maritime affairs, climate change, agriculture, human resources, education, and culture.
When asked about India's recent restriction imposed on trade with Bangladesh, the MEA spokesperson said that the decisions were based on 'Bangladesh's own quest for fairness, equal treatment and reciprocity.'
'The trade-related amendments announced by India in respect of Bangladesh were based on Bangladesh's own quest for fairness, equal treatment and reciprocity. We await resolution of the underlying issues pending with the Bangladeshi side for a long time, these issues have been raised by India at several structured meetings earlier, including at the Commerce Secretary level talks,' Jaiswal said.
The Ministry of Commerce and Industry imposed restrictions on imports from Bangladesh through land ports after Bangladesh imposed import restrictions on Indian staples like yarn and rice.
According to the Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI), India's restrictions on imports from Bangladesh via land ports will impact goods worth USD 770 million, accounting for nearly 42 per cent of total bilateral imports.
The move limits the entry of products such as ready-made garments and processed foods to specific seaports, an official press release by the Ministry stated and is widely viewed as a response to Bangladesh's recent curbs on Indian yarn, rice, and other goods, along with its decision to impose a transit fee on Indian cargo, marking a shift from previously cooperative trade relations.
Under the new directive, all kinds of ready-made garments from Bangladesh can now only be imported through Nhava Sheva and Kolkata seaports, with entry through land ports no longer permitted. (ANI)

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ultimate sacrifice: Asim Munir on death of Pak major tied to Abhinandan's capture
Ultimate sacrifice: Asim Munir on death of Pak major tied to Abhinandan's capture

Hindustan Times

time20 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Ultimate sacrifice: Asim Munir on death of Pak major tied to Abhinandan's capture

Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir attended the funeral prayer of Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah, the Pakistani Army officer killed in a clash with the Taliban militants at the Pak-Afghan border. Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir attended the funeral prayer of Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah. (File photo)(AP) As he attended Shah's funeral, Munir recognised his "ultimate sacrifice" and said that Pakistan owed an "eternal debt" to its martyrs. Syed Moiz Abbas Shah was the one who claimed Indian Air Force pilot Abhinandan Varthaman's capture in 2019 after his jet was shot down in an aerial dogfight. The dogfight took place after India's Balakot air strike on February 26, 2019 in response to the Pulwama terror attack nearly a fortnight prior to that on February 14. "The entire nation stands united in grief and pride, saluting his ultimate sacrifice for the defence of the country. We owe an eternal debt to our martyrs. The blood of our Shuhada is the foundation of our nation's strength," Munir reportedly said, according to an Express Tribune report. Major Syed Moiz Abbas Shah was an officer of Pakistan Army's Special Services Group. He was commissioned into the Pakistani Army in 2011, and later became part of the Special Services Group (SSG). He was killed during a clash with Taliban militants in the Sararogha area of South Waziristan. In the same operation, 11 terrorists belonging to the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) were killed by the Pakistani Army. 'Major Syed Moiz Abbas fought bravely in the face of resistance and ultimately laid down his life in the line of duty, upholding the highest traditions of bravery, sacrifice, and patriotism,' the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) statement quoted Munir as saying. The Pak Army officer's funeral took place in his hometown at Chaklala Garrison in Rawalpindi. Abhinandan Varthaman's capture Indian Air Force pilot Abhinandan Varthaman was part of the Combat Air Patrol and was captured in 2019 after Pakistan's airstrikes in response to the Balakot Airstrike by India. The Balakot Airstrike was an Indian operation targeting a Jaish-e-Mohammad training camp in Pakistan's Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. Pakistan had deployed around 24 fighter jets to target Indian military installations, which led to a 10-minute aerial dogfight between the two countries on February 27, a day after the Balakot airstrike. Abhinandan Varthaman's jet was shot down in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, and he was held captive for about 60 hours and was returned to India on March 1, 2019. Just moments before his MiG-21 Bison was shot down and he was forced to eject, Abhinandan Vardhaman successfully shot down a Pakistani F-16 fighter jet.

Tier-III Cities Drive 62% of New Insurance Premiums: Probus Report
Tier-III Cities Drive 62% of New Insurance Premiums: Probus Report

Hans India

time21 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Tier-III Cities Drive 62% of New Insurance Premiums: Probus Report

Probus, one of India's leading InsurTech and insurance broking firms, has released a new report highlighting a major shift in the country's insurance landscape. The findings reveal that Tier-III cities and beyond now contribute nearly 62% of total new insurance business in the current fiscal year, signalling a dramatic decentralisation of India's insurance growth story. Once considered peripheral markets, smaller towns are rapidly emerging as the real growth engines of Digital Bharat, a transformation propelled by the success of UPI, expanding digital payment infrastructure, and deepening internet penetration. Most UPI transactions now originate from non-metro regions, indicating a high level of digital adoption and financial participation. Probus notes that this is not a temporary or seasonal trend, but a consistent pattern of growth observed over the past three consecutive fiscal years – rising from 58% to 62%, reflecting a sustained upward momentum. In FY2024-25 alone, the Motor Insurance segment registered the highest growth at 25.6%, fuelled by rising awareness, digital accessibility, and a strengthened PoSP (Point-of-Sale Person) network. Local distribution models, especially those built on app-based onboarding, regional language interfaces, and education-first selling, have played a key role in bringing insurance products closer to underserved consumers. What was once a passive, compliance-driven purchase is now increasingly seen as a proactive financial planning tool in Tier-III cities and beyond. The report also highlights strong momentum across insurance verticals for FY 2024-25 compared to FY 2023-24, with life insurance premiums growing by over 60% in fresh policies. Non-life insurance premiums, led by motor, health, and SME segments, showed significant growth, with SME insurance emerged as the fastest-growing segment in FY 2024-25, registering a 112% increase. Commenting on the findings, Rakesh Goyal, Director, Probus, said, 'At a global level, the Indian economy has shown remarkable resilience despite external headwinds. A key reason behind this strength is the steady rise of Tier-II and Tier-III cities, and our latest data confirms that. At Probus, we are proud to be aligned with the Government of India's vision of 'Insuring India by 2047.' We've built digital tools and strengthened our PoSP models to deliver seamless, contextual insurance solutions to the emerging consumer in India.' The company's robust PoSP network continues to be the vital bridge connecting underserved markets to comprehensive insurance solutions, driving Probus's mission to empower every corner of India with financial security.

Citizens abroad for the long term are non-residents under FERA: HC
Citizens abroad for the long term are non-residents under FERA: HC

Hindustan Times

time24 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Citizens abroad for the long term are non-residents under FERA: HC

MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Wednesday observed that persons staying abroad with no clear intention of returning to India would be treated as 'persons resident outside India' under the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA), and upheld a penalty of ₹ 1.4 crore against a family which purchased a huge amount of shares from an Indian company without prior appeal to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (Shutterstock) The case dates back to the mid-1990s, when a series of share transactions was carried out by the Shroff family and its company Sujay Trading Corporation Pvt Ltd. The Enforcement Directorate (ED) on November 18, 1999, had served the family with a notice, stating that Shroff's daughters, who were residents of the United States, had purchased shares worth ₹ 16 lakh from a Mumbai-based company called Ditco Securities Pvt Ltd without taking prior approval from the RBI as prescribed under FERA. Remarking that the daughters were 'persons resident outside India' under FERA, the ED stated that they were married in the US and had been settled there for a few years. Highlighting their lack of intention of returning to India permanently and the purchase of shares from an Indian company without the RBI's approval resulted in the ED penalising them on October 30, 2000. The three daughters were charged an amount of ₹ 41 lakh each, ₹ 25.8 lakh was levied on their father, and ₹ 8.5 lakh on Sujay Trading Pvt Ltd, which was run by the parents. Aggrieved by this, the Shroff family approached the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange, which upheld the conclusions reached by the ED and dismissed the appeals on November 18, 2005. Subsequently, the family appealed in the Bombay high court in 2006, challenging the orders passed by the ED and the appellate tribunal. The family contended that the daughters were not 'persons resident outside India' but were students pursuing their higher studies in the US. Therefore, there was no need for them to obtain permission from the RBI for the purchase of shares in an Indian company. Based on this defence, they submitted that there was no violation of any of the provisions of FERA. Highlighting the clear intentions of the Shroff daughters to settle in the US, the ED clarified that it had taken the decision after evaluating the relevant documents. It stated that the penalties imposed on the Shroffs were proportionate to the economic offence, and were legally sound. The division bench of Justices M S Sonak and Jitendra Jain upheld the decision of the ED and the appellate tribunal and observed that the daughters' prolonged stay in the US clearly reflected their intention to permanently settle abroad, thereby establishing them as 'persons resident outside India'. It held that the evidence, such as their marriage and their continued stay outside India since the 1980s, corroborated their intentions. The court further stated that merely holding an Indian citizenship or a student visa did not exempt them from the provisions of FERA. With no exemptions proven by the family, the bench held that there was no error in the findings by the authorities and upheld the penalties. 'Considering the magnitude of the transactions and the circumstances in which the same were carried out, there is no substance in the argument based on any alleged disproportionality in the penalty amounts, ' it added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store