Archaeologists Sifted Through an Ancient Lakebed—And Found 1.5-Million-Year-Old Tools
A pilot project to scan the surface material of an Iraqi desert revealed 850 different artifacts from the Old and Middle Paleolithic eras.
Included in the finds were ancient stone hand axes that date back to as far as 1.5 million years ago.
The ancient lake that has long been home to all of these hand axes offers a peak into the early human activity of the region.
A pilot project to investigate the archaeological surface material present in the Iraqi Western Desert recently discovered a bounty of finds from the Old and Middle Paleolithic era, including 850 different Stone Age artifacts. The find was enough for archaeologist Ella Egberts to declare the entire effort a 'huge success,' according to a statement from Vrije University Brussel.
The team discovered seven Paleolithic sites, all located in an area just six by 12 miles in size. Surface-level excavation zeroed in on one site that featured a dried-up lakebed with a dry riverbed crossing the landscape. Egberts collected over 850 artifacts from this spot, including hand axes that may be as old as 1.5 million years.
'The other sites also deserve equally thorough systematic investigation,' Egberts said, 'which will undoubtedly yield similar quantities of lithic material.'
The stone tools were quite the pull, considering the archaeologists who discovered them simply sifted through the surface and didn't conduct deep digs. Along with the ancient hand axes, the team also uncovered much more recent Levallois flakes. Considered more sophisticated than hand axes, the flakes are hand tools that date to between about 300,000 and 50,000 years ago.
By examining the distribution of the sites and studying the area's geomorphological history, Egberts and her team the team found clues of early humans using the landscape. Expanding research into a larger area, Egberts believes, would allow researchers to gain a fresh perspective on how human evolution and behavior progressed on the Arabian Peninsula.
Egberts said that research in Iraq has been limited in recent decades due to the instability of the region. There weren't issues in this particular effort, however, which was funded by the British Institute for the Study of Iraq. 'Apart from the presence of numerous checkpoints, we were able to carry out our work without any problems,' she said. 'The people are friendly, and it's actually very nice to work in Iraq.'
The Iraqi State Board of Antiquities and Heritages has encouraged the team to continue, which Egberts plans to do. Once she's able to secure the necessary funding, she hopes to reconstruct pictures of Pleistocene environmental changes and the early human presence and behavior in the Western Desert—hand axes and Levallois flakes included.
You Might Also Like
The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape
The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere
Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Found the Oldest Ever Fingerprint Left by a Human
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story. Archaeologists discovered a human fingerprint left on a rock in Spain now considered the oldest known human fingerprint. Experts believe a Neanderthal intentionally made the print roughly 43,000 years ago. The rock was used only for the art—a rarity for the ancient time period—rather than a tool or some other utilitarian usage. A Neanderthal may have given us the oldest-known human fingerprint by attempting to paint a face on a small granite pebble in what is now modern-day Spain In a new study published in Archaeological and Anthropological Science, experts claim that a 43,000-year-old fingerprint left in red ocher pigment was intentionally placed on the rock in what was possibly an early form of art. The Neanderthal was attempting to paint a face on a small granite pebble in what is now modern-day Spain. 'This object contributes to our understanding of Neanderthals' capacity for abstraction, suggesting that it could represent one of the earliest human facial symbolizations in prehistory,' wrote the study authors, a collaboration between the Complutense University of Madrid, the Geological and Mining Institute of Spain, the General Commissariat of Scientific Police of the National Police, and the University of Salamanca. Discovered in the San Lazaro rock shelter in central Spain, the team used scanning electron microscopy and multispectral spectroscopy analyses to find the complete fingerprint and then forensic analyses to determine it had to come from a human. 'It is not just a fingerprint; it is the signature of an individual who manipulated this object with a purpose that goes beyond the utilitarian,' the researchers wrote. The authors believe the fingerprint was intentionally placed and the pigment suggests it was applied with the tip of a finger after being soaked in pigment. 'Someone held it, painted it, and placed it there,' the researchers wrote. Found on a pebble believed to have originated from the Eresma River and moved to the shelter, the rock shows no signs of ever being used as a tool, giving the pebble a rare non-utilitarian function from the Middle Paleolithic period, according to a translated statement from the researchers. The painted fingerprint matches up with the pebble's form to make it seem that the Neanderthal who added the red-soaked print meant to create a 'human face, with eyes, a mouth, and a ridge shaped like a nose.' 'This pebble could thus represent one of the oldest known abstractions of a human face in the prehistoric record,' the authors wrote, noting it could be 'face pareidolia,' the act of humans giving objects human-like qualities. The study said that detailed analyses of the print showed it was 'unequivocally attributed to Neanderthals.' The human who dipped their finger into the pigment 'intentionally manipulated' the rock for non-utilitarian purposes and by bringing the rock into the shelter, the Neanderthal could have been following ritualistic behavior or simply trying to liven up a space with a little abstract art. You Might Also Like Can Apple Cider Vinegar Lead to Weight Loss? Bobbi Brown Shares Her Top Face-Transforming Makeup Tips for Women Over 50
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Scientists Found a 43,000-Year-Old Fingerprint That May Be the Oldest Ever Left by a Human
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." Here's what you'll learn when you read this story. Archaeologists discovered a human fingerprint left on a rock in Spain now considered the oldest known human fingerprint. Experts believe a Neanderthal intentionally made the print roughly 43,000 years ago. The rock was used only for the art—a rarity for the ancient time period—rather than a tool or some other utilitarian usage. A Neanderthal may have given us the oldest-known human fingerprint by attempting to paint a face on a small granite pebble in what is now modern-day Spain In a new study published in Archaeological and Anthropological Science, experts claim that a 43,000-year-old fingerprint left in red ocher pigment was intentionally placed on the rock in what was possibly an early form of art. The Neanderthal was attempting to paint a face on a small granite pebble in what is now modern-day Spain. 'This object contributes to our understanding of Neanderthals' capacity for abstraction, suggesting that it could represent one of the earliest human facial symbolizations in prehistory,' wrote the study authors, a collaboration between the Complutense University of Madrid, the Geological and Mining Institute of Spain, the General Commissariat of Scientific Police of the National Police, and the University of Salamanca. Discovered in the San Lazaro rock shelter in central Spain, the team used scanning electron microscopy and multispectral spectroscopy analyses to find the complete fingerprint and then forensic analyses to determine it had to come from a human. 'It is not just a fingerprint; it is the signature of an individual who manipulated this object with a purpose that goes beyond the utilitarian,' the researchers wrote. The authors believe the fingerprint was intentionally placed and the pigment suggests it was applied with the tip of a finger after being soaked in pigment. 'Someone held it, painted it, and placed it there,' the researchers wrote. Found on a pebble believed to have originated from the Eresma River and moved to the shelter, the rock shows no signs of ever being used as a tool, giving the pebble a rare non-utilitarian function from the Middle Paleolithic period, according to a translated statement from the researchers. The painted fingerprint matches up with the pebble's form to make it seem that the Neanderthal who added the red-soaked print meant to create a 'human face, with eyes, a mouth, and a ridge shaped like a nose.' 'This pebble could thus represent one of the oldest known abstractions of a human face in the prehistoric record,' the authors wrote, noting it could be 'face pareidolia,' the act of humans giving objects human-like qualities. The study said that detailed analyses of the print showed it was 'unequivocally attributed to Neanderthals.' The human who dipped their finger into the pigment 'intentionally manipulated' the rock for non-utilitarian purposes and by bringing the rock into the shelter, the Neanderthal could have been following ritualistic behavior or simply trying to liven up a space with a little abstract art. You Might Also Like The Do's and Don'ts of Using Painter's Tape The Best Portable BBQ Grills for Cooking Anywhere Can a Smart Watch Prolong Your Life?
Yahoo
26-05-2025
- Yahoo
Study reveals how woolly mammoths adapted to survive ice age
Research has revealed how woolly mammoths and other species adapted to survive the ice age. A team of palaeontologists and palaeogeneticists studied ancient fossil and DNA evidence to understand the changes animals and plants went through in the Northern Hemisphere. They found that cold-adapted animals began to evolve 2.6 million years ago, when permanent ice at the poles became more common. The study showed that many current cold-adapted species, as well as extinct ones like mammoths, evolved around 700,000 years ago, when cold periods doubled in length. READ MORE: Dorset 'war cemetery' not victims of Roman Conquest Research shows Arctic foxes and polar bears arrived later than once thought (Image: Canva) The findings, which offer a greater understanding of how species evolved in the past, were published in the journal Trends in Ecology and Evolution. John Stewart, professor of paleoecology at Bournemouth University, led the study. He said: "The cold-adapted species are among the most vulnerable animals and plants to ongoing climate change. "Therefore, an understanding of how species evolved in the past is essential to help us understand the risks faced by endangered species today." As part of their research, the team compared evidence of evolution in plants and beetles with that for mammals. SEE MORE: Habitat in many estuaries at high risk of being 'squeezed' out by climate change Cold-adapted animals began evolving 2.6 million years ago, researchers find (Image: Canva) They suggested that ideas that some organisms had evolved earlier in the polar regions need to be tested. This means that the way the modern Arctic ecologies assembled needs to be resolved, as it is not clear when and how the animals and plants who live there came together. The study found evidence for early occurrences of true lemmings and reindeer in the Arctic, where they may have evolved as climates cooled in the early Pleistocene period, between one and two million years ago. The polar bear and Arctic fox, on the other hand, may have joined them more recently within the last 700,000 years, colonising from the south. Some of the ice age cold species like the woolly rhino are different and may have evolved in the steppe grasslands to the south, with the earliest occurrences in the Tibetan Plateau. Professor Stewart said: "This is the first concerted effort to compare the evolution of cold-adapted animals and plants since modern methods of palaeogenetics appeared."
