logo
These CEOs plan to invest billions in 'Trump accounts,' government savings plans for newborns

These CEOs plan to invest billions in 'Trump accounts,' government savings plans for newborns

Business Insider3 hours ago

The White House is ready to usher in a new generation of boss babies — and it's enlisting the help of some of America's most prominent executives.
A small crowd of CEOs joined President Donald Trump at the White House for a roundtable on Monday to promote his plan to deposit $1,000 in investment accounts for newborn babies. The program is part of the president's signature — and controversial — spending bill, which has passed the House but faces headwinds in the Senate after getting publicly bashed by Elon Musk.
The CEOs who attended the roundtable included Dell Technologies CEO Michael Dell, Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi, and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon.
A White House official confirmed to Business Insider ahead of the event that under the program, the executives would announce plans to invest billions of dollars worth of collective investments into Trump Accounts for their employees' future children.
With the exception of Dell, it was not immediately clear how much each company plans to invest if the initiative becomes law, and the companies did not specify when contacted by BI.
Dell said in a statement provided to BI that the company would match the government's $1,000 investment for the children of its employees.
"The creation of investment accounts for every child will compound into substantial nest eggs providing support for education, home ownership, and starting families," the CEO said.
Other corporate leaders who attended the event on Monday afternoon included Robinhood CEO Vladimir Tenev, Salesforce cofounder Parker Harris, Altimeter Capital CEO Brad Gerstner, Arm Holdings CEO Rene Haas, and ServiceNow CEO William McDermott.
"This is a pro-family initiative that will help millions of Americans harness the strength of our economy to lift up the next generation, and they'll really be getting a big jump on life," Trump said during his prepared remarks at the start of the roundtable.
Trump Accounts would be available to every American citizen born from January 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, according to the bill.
Under the program, if the bill in its current form passes and is signed into law, the federal government would invest $1,000 into an index fund that tracks the stock market. The child's guardians will control the account. Guardians could deposit up to $5,000 a year into the account, which the child could access once they're 18.
In a statement to BI, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that passing the president's spending bill, called the "One Big Beautiful Bill," and the associated Trump Accounts, will put the lives of young Americans on the right financial path!"
BI reached out to the companies of the CEOs who attended the roundtable.
In their remarks at the event and statements provided to BI, the CEOs emphasized that the investment accounts would set the next generation up for success by giving them a financial head-start.
"Our economy's future vitality is dependent on young people understanding the power of investing for the long term," Solomon, CEO of Goldman Sachs, said during the roundtable.
"The American stock market is among the greatest wealth creation engines of our time," Tenev, the Robinhood CEO, said in a statement. "Speaking personally, as an immigrant to this country, I've seen firsthand the vast opportunities afforded by our financial system."
A representative for ServiceNow said in a statement: "This is more than policy — it's about unlocking a future where more Americans can own, build, and thrive."
Monday afternoon's investments are another example of the Trump administration's close ties to the private sector.
The administration has also secured hundreds of millions of dollars in pro bono work from major law firms for causes the administration supports.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How immigration raids at Ambiance Apparel and Home Depot led to the Los Angeles protests
How immigration raids at Ambiance Apparel and Home Depot led to the Los Angeles protests

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How immigration raids at Ambiance Apparel and Home Depot led to the Los Angeles protests

LOS ANGELES — Four days of unrest in Los Angeles over President Donald Trump's push to increase immigrant arrests and deportations have led to the arrests of at least 56 people, clashes between protesters and law enforcement officials and the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines in the country's second-largest city. How did this happen? The tensions started Friday, when Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and others arrested over 40 immigrants in raids targeting day laborers at a Home Depot parking lot and workers at the Ambiance Apparel clothing manufacturer, searching for 'fictitious employee documents.' As news of the raids spread fear and panic, relatives and protesters arrived to confront the federal agents wearing camouflage and bulletproof vests. Some protesters tried to stop vehicles carrying detained immigrants or used other methods to block arrests. Soon the clashes turned violent, with officers using pepper spray and batons, pushing crowds back with riot shields as some protesters fled or retaliated. A prominent labor leader was among those arrested. The protests spread from downtown Los Angeles into the communities of Paramount and Compton, where rumors of arrests also added to the flaring tensions. Trump, acting without agreement from state leaders, called in the California National Guard on Saturday. By Sunday, the troops, outfitted with heavy military equipment, had moved into the streets of downtown Los Angeles in a show of force in the state with the largest immigrant population. Trump said on his social media site, Truth Social, that he had directed the homeland security and defense secretaries and Attorney General Pam Bondi 'to take all such action necessary to liberate Los Angeles from the Migrant Invasion, and put an end to these Migrant riots.' But the clashes dragged on through the day and into the night, with looting and driverless cars' being set on fire. The families of the arrested immigrants have accused the government of 'kidnapping' their loved ones. Meanwhile, the presence of the troops has set up a battle between the Trump administration and lawmakers in a state that is known for its liberal immigration policies. About two dozen members of the detained workers' families showed up to a rally and news conference outside Ambiance Apparel on Monday, holding up homemade signs with photos of their loved ones next to birthday cakes, holding their kids and smiling. 'It has been incredibly painful to witness the arrest of my father and of his co-workers,' said Saraí Ortiz, who said her father, José Ortiz, was among those arrested. 'My father gave 18 years of his life to this company,' she said at a news conference outside the site of the raid Friday. 'He was always here. He was a loyal worker.' At least four people at the news conference said they hadn't received updates from immigration authorities or been able to communicate with their detained family members. Jerónimo Martínez, 39, said in an interview through an interpreter that he's worried about Lázaro Maldonado, his nephew, because the family hasn't had any communication with him since Friday. 'I don't know where they've taken him,' Martínez said. 'I don't know what place he might be in, so I am worried.' A young man who identified himself as Carlos said he considers his brother, José, to have been 'kidnapped,' because his brother was taken by force in the Ambiance raid and is being held without being able to contact relatives or lawyers, which he said is the definition of kidnapping. 'The only crime he committed was trying to live a better life and trying to get ahead and work. Because of that dream, I had to witness him being chained up like he was some dangerous animal. The whole process wasn't just inhumane; it was illegal,' Carlos said. Trump also mobilized about 700 Marines on Monday to support the National Guard in protecting federal personnel and property, U.S. Northern Command said in a statement. California Gov. Gavin Newsom blamed anarchists and troublemakers for the fires and any violence, not peaceful protesters, but he said, 'Donald Trump at the end of the day is the sponsor of these conditions." Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said in a statement on X that 'Trump didn't inherit a crisis — he created one.' California Attorney General Rob Bonta sued the Trump administration for federalizing the state's National Guard troops and deploying them to quell protests over objections of California government leaders. The raids were a striking departure by the administration from Trump's campaign statements that his plans for mass deportation would focus on violent immigrant criminals. The raids follow weeks of ICE officers and other federal agents' showing up at immigration courts across the country, including in California, to arrest people as they left the courthouses where their cases were dismissed. Those arrests have been accompanied by video on social media or captured by news outlets of some family members being arrested and of young children standing nearby as a parent or parents are handcuffed or restrained with zip ties. Increasingly, people are seeing ICE arrest and take away immigrants who've lived and worked in the United States for years or are part of their community, including people who are seeking asylum or had other temporary legal protection from deportation. NBC News reported last week that White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller, angry over what he saw as low numbers of arrests and deportations, ordered senior ICE officials to begin detaining 3,000 migrants a day or be fired. Amid the turmoil, ICE was already ramping up arrests by using thousands more federal law enforcement personnel and up to 21,000 National Guard troops in what it had dubbed 'Operation At Large," NBC News reported. Before the clashes in Los Angeles, smaller confrontations between protesters and law enforcement had begun to erupt in other cities around the country. In Chicago on Wednesday, chaos unfolded as protesters confronted ICE officers over arrests during scheduled check-ins with immigration officials. In San Diego, a surprise raid by armed federal officers at a popular Italian restaurant drew protests. Officers dispersed the crowd with what were identified as flash bang grenades. In Los Angeles, protests and tensions continued. Tyler Kingkade reported from Los Angeles and Suzanne Gamboa from San Antonio. This article was originally published on

Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'
Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Officials approve site for new Tesla factory despite vehement opposition: 'It's not going to be good for anyone'

A South Australian city has approved the use of state-owned land by Tesla to build a factory, despite overwhelming public opposition to the project. According to the Guardian, the city council of Marion, Adelaide, voted to seek state approval to sell land to Tesla on which they plan to build a new factory. The approval came despite overwhelming public opposition to the proposed sale, as 95% of over 1,000 people who submitted statements to the council had objected to the proposal. Marion Mayor Kris Hanna addressed the decision after the vote was taken, saying that denying the project would have no impact on Musk, but would cost the city over 100 potential new jobs. "If we didn't proceed, it would have cost 100 jobs to local residents but it would have had no impact on Elon Musk," Hanna said. "Tesla would almost certainly find somewhere else in Australia to build their factory." The brand perception of Tesla is currently at an all-time low around the globe, and sales numbers have been in a tailspin for several months. In the case of Marion, the vast majority of the backlash centered around Tesla CEO Musk and his involvement in far-right political movements around the globe, but other environmental concerns were levied as well. "Please dear God," one wrote. "It's not going to be good for anyone." "I could not think of a worse developer to sell the land to," said another opponent. "Tesla sales have been plummetting [sic] … this is likely to attract protests and negative attention that the neighbourhood does not need or want." Musk's companies have come under fire before for dodging environmental regulations. In Memphis, his xAI facility has been accused of setting up gas-powered turbines that pump pollution directly out into the city without permits, directly violating the Clean Air Act. Opponents of the proposal note that while the site would be used to recycle batteries, it would only recycle Tesla batteries, and not those made by other companies, limiting its usefulness. "My understanding is Tesla only recycle Tesla batteries and we know most people in SA … have another brand," Sarah Luscombe, a Marion councillor who voted against the approval, said. What do you think of Tesla and Elon Musk? Elon is the man Love the company; hate the CEO I'm not a fan of either I don't have an opinion Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The deal now advances to the next stage, where it needs approval from the state government of Adelaide. According to the Guardian, the state seems to be in favor of the deal. South Australia Premier Peter Malinauskas said he supported the deal, despite Musk's controversial political positions. "Any time we see any big, major industrial investment in our state, in my view, it is welcome," the premier said. "Mr. Musk's politics, while I violently disagree with them … that's his prerogative." Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.

75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Unrest
75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Unrest

Newsweek

time27 minutes ago

  • Newsweek

75 Democrats Express 'Gratitude' to ICE in Antisemitism Vote Amid LA Unrest

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Seventy-five Democrats broke ranks on Monday, joining Republicans in voting for a House resolution condemning antisemitism and expressing "gratitude" for Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other law enforcement personnel. Why It Matters Monday's vote comes as Los Angeles is reeling from days of political unrest after ICE raided several downtown city neighborhoods and arrested more than 50 people. The arrests are part of the Trump administration's broader crackdown on undocumented migrants, which has also swept up people who are legally permitted to be in the United States. President Donald Trump has deployed 4,000 National Guard troops to L.A. since the protests started unfolding and has also mobilized 700 Marines to respond if the strife escalates. What To Know Monday's resolution condemned this month's antisemitic attack in Boulder, Colorado, in which the suspect, Mohamed Sabry Soliman, faces 118 criminal charges, accused of targeting a march calling for the return of Israeli hostages in Gaza. The resolution also "affirms that free and open communication between State and local law enforcement and their Federal counterparts remains the bedrock of public safety and is necessary in preventing terrorist attacks; and expresses gratitude to law enforcement officers, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement personnel, for protecting the homeland." Of the 212 Democrats in the House, 113 voted against the resolution, which was introduced by Republican Representative Gabe Evans. Seventy-five Democrats voted in favor of the measure, including Representative Joe Neguse, who represents the district where the Boulder attack occurred. Six lawmakers—five Democrats and one Republican—voted "present." This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store