
House GOP zeroes in on immigrants to help fund tax cuts
Republicans are leaning on immigrants, undocumented or not, to help make the math work for their sprawling tax package.
Even as they push to cut taxes on millions of Americans, lawmakers want to simultaneously bar immigrants from claiming a panoply of tax benefits, from the popular Child Tax Credit to Obamacare health-insurance subsidies to an obscure break on student-loan debt that's forgiven when someone becomes disabled.
Republicans are zeroing in on so-called refundable credits, where people can get a check from the government when the benefit exceeds their tax bills. They say those payments should not be going to people who are not citizens.
The little-noticed provisions are likely to generate more than $80 billion for the Republicans' $4 trillion tax-cut plan while dovetailing with the president's hardline approach to immigration.
'Why don't we just find people in Ethiopia and Iran and pay them benefits too?' said Rep. Kevin Hern (R-Okla.), a tax writer. 'They're not citizens of the United States and we're going to make sure taxpayer dollars are protected.'
It's a move that has outraged Democrats and immigration groups, who say it would hurt vulnerable populations.
They also note it would hit some people who are here legally, including some children who are U.S. citizens. Two million of them would lose access to the Child Tax Credit through provisions in the bill requiring their parents to have Social Security numbers, forecasters say.
And they warn it could actually depress tax collections. Undocumented immigrants are required to pay income taxes like everyone else, and taking away benefits could dissuade some from filing altogether — especially in the wake of a controversial agreement by the IRS to help the Department of Homeland Security identify people in the U.S. illegally.
'It's disgusting,' said Rep. Linda Sanchez (D-Calif.), another tax writer. 'It's a malicious thing that hurts not just individuals, but communities at large.'
'They're just trying to throw red meat to the MAGA base.'
The provisions haven't gotten much attention, overshadowed by higher-profile fights over state and local tax deductions and other flashpoints in Republicans' megabill, approved Thursday by the House. But it amounts to another front in Republicans' fight against illegal immigration, and the most comprehensive effort in years by lawmakers to cut off immigrants from tax benefits.
Immigrants are ineligible for Social Security numbers, so the IRS gives them so-called Individual Taxpayer Identification Numbers allowing them to file. In 2023, the agency issued almost 900,000 ITINs. Not all went to undocumented immigrants, and the IRS doesn't track how much they pay in tax, but budget experts generally agree they contribute more in taxes than they receive in benefits, though estimates vary.
The bill aims to deny undocumented immigrants various tax benefits by barring claims using ITINs.
Currently, a child is required to have a Social Security number to qualify for the $2,000 Child Tax Credit, which means kids who are citizens can benefit even if their parents are not here legally. The legislation would require the person filing the return to have a Social Security number too.
If married, both parents would have to have them, and the couple would be required to file their taxes jointly. That's designed to prevent people from evading the rules by doing their taxes separately, but it could be awkward for some, like a couple getting a divorce.
People would also be required to have Social Security numbers to receive two popular college education breaks: the $2,500 American Opportunity Tax Credit and the $2,000 Lifetime Learning Credit.
Immigrants would also lose access to a provision in the tax code that waives the tax bill that would otherwise be triggered if a person becomes disabled or dies and their outstanding student-loan debt is canceled. Normally, the IRS sees forgiven debt as equivalent to income and subjects it to tax.
Undocumented immigrants would likewise be barred from provisions sought by President Donald Trump creating new breaks for tips and overtime pay.
Republicans would also restrict Obamacare subsidies used to buy health insurance, though there, the effect would be felt by other categories of immigrants.
Undocumented immigrants have always been banned from taking that credit. The legislation would prevent claims by other immigrants who have been legally admitted to the U.S., including those granted asylum, temporary protected status and others.
And Republicans would impose a new 3.5 percent tax on remittances to people abroad. U.S. citizens would get a special tax credit to compensate them for having to pay the levy.
Many Republicans call the tax benefits wasteful and some say they create an incentive for people to illegally migrate to the U.S.
'We should be able to make it very clear that illegal immigrants are not going to be given certain benefits,' said Rep. Blake Moore (R-Utah).
At the same time, he said he's concerned about hurting other immigrants here legally, such as refugees. 'That's where I find there to be much more nuance and need for conversation,' he said.
The effort is drawing protests from Democrats, immigrant advocacy groups and the Mexican government.
Sanchez is particularly incensed by the child credit restrictions.
'You're punishing the U.S. citizen's children for their parent's immigration status,' she said, adding that Hispanic children are more likely to live in poverty.
Advocates also worry about an uptick in uninsured health care as people lose access to Affordable Care Act subsidies.
Meantime, Mexico's ambassador to the U.S. fired off a letter to tax writers criticizing the remittance tax.
It amounts to 'double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work,' wrote Esteban Moctezuma Barragan. 'Applying this tax would disproportionately affect the most vulnerable workers, many of whom perform essential functions critical to the proper functioning of the U.S. economy.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
36 minutes ago
- New York Post
Bill Maher mocks Dems for trying to find ‘their Joe Rogan,' suggests figuring out how they lost him
'Real Time' host Bill Maher mocked the Democratic Party's attempt to find 'their Joe Rogan,' pointing out the irony that the podcaster had leaned left until he became disillusioned with the party. The host explained, 'One idea that's getting a lot of attention is the Dems need to find their Joe Rogan, a liberal Joe Rogan.' Maher argued that rather than 'conjuring up a new Joe Rogan,' Democrats should be asking themselves how they lost him in the first place. Advertisement Rogan previously endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., in the 2020 election. It wasn't until 2024 that Rogan publicly endorsed President Donald Trump. The 'Real Time' host lampooned the idea that the real reason why former Vice President Kamala Harris lost the 2024 election is because 'Republicans have a podcast.' 'Okay, maybe. Or, you could consider this,' Maher jeered. 'Instead of conjuring up a new Joe Rogan, ask yourself why you lost the old one, because he used to be on your side.' In 2024, regarding the Democratic desire to find its own Rogan, the podcaster said, 'They had me.' 'I was on their side,' he added. Advertisement Maher noted that he's watched the political evolution of both Rogan and Musk and their party affiliations didn't switch 'overnight.' Youtube/Real Time with Bill Maher Maher compared Rogan's political transformation to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who was also a liberal who ended up being 'driven to the other camp by bad attitudes and bad ideas.' Maher noted that he's watched the political evolution of both Rogan and Musk and their party affiliations didn't switch 'overnight.' Maher referenced a 2022 post on then-Twitter from Elon Musk in which he shared a chart depicting his feeling that the Democratic Party had moved too far to the left for him, rather than his ideology moving to the right. Advertisement Rogan previously endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders, D-Vt., in the 2020 election. Rogan said that Democrats have moved so far that it 'left a basically liberal centrist like him — now labeled a conservative,' adding that he related to Musk's post. Maher also highlighted attempts by the left to cancel Rogan and Musk as a key reason they abandoned the party. Advertisement 'They tried real hard to cancel Rogan a few years ago — and when Elon hosted 'Saturday Night Live' in 2021, well before he was a Trumper — some of the cast gave him the cold shoulder for the sin of being rich,' he recalled. 'You think people don't remember when you do this s— to them?' The late-night host asserted that while he's never left the party, Democrats need to work hard to get 'all the guys in America like Joe and Elon' back on their side, but assured them that it's still possible.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Deletes Tweet Linking Trump to ‘Epstein Files'
Former 'First Buddy' Elon Musk has deleted a spate of explosive tweets in which he claimed President Donald Trump 'is in the Epstein files.' He added in the since-scrubbed June 5 tweet, 'That is the real reason they have not been made public.' He then promised, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' The dramatic claim came amid Musk's nearly three-day blitzkrieg attack against Trump, urging Congress to 'kill' the MAGA head's 'big beautiful bill,' ripping it as 'ugly and 'pork-filled,' and suggesting Trump should be impeached again for his plan to add an estimated $2.4 trillion to the federal deficit through the megabill. Yet Musk appears to have reset and climbed out of his 'Trump Derangement Syndrome,' as the president labeled it, amid MAGA's calls for the billionaire to make amends with the Republican president. Investor and former DOGE architect James Fishback—who told Politico that he left the so-called department amid the Trump-Musk feud—tweeted Friday that Musk owed Trump a 'full-throated apology.' He added, 'And every hour you delay, it'll make an eventual apology less sincere.' Amid disagreements on policy between the Trump and Musk, Fishback said Musk 'should not have baselessly and personally attacked him.' Musk used Fishback's tweet as an opportunity to share his side, writing in successive comments under the post: 'What's the apology for exactly.' He added, 'Be precise,' declaring, 'I will apologize profusely as soon as there is a full dump of the Epstein files.' Musk's comments under the post have also since been deleted. Keeping the pressure on Musk, Fishback followed up by sharing his Friday appearance on CNN with two specific directives on why the Tesla CEO should apologize to Trump. 'First, randomly calling for the impeachment of the duly elected President of the United States over a policy disagreement,' Fishback wrote. 'Second, and it just pains me to bring this up, is the slanderous accusation that somehow the President of the United States was a co-conspirator in a multi-decade sex trafficking ring of minors.' Attempting to play peacekeeper, Fishback added that it was 'not okay' for Musk to drag Trump 'in the mud' with 'scumbag' Epstein. 'As Americans, we are allowed to disagree on the substance of the issue—but ad hominem attacks have no place in the public square,' Fishback wrote. Another commentator added, 'The Epstein comment went too far, whether it is true or not.' However, other commentators weren't convinced Musk owed Trump anything at all. 'He owes Trump exactly nothing,' commented X user John Roush under Fishback's post. 'He made the mistake of believing Trump's talk about reigning in spending, agreed to try and help, ended up becoming one of the most reviled men in America, and then found out that Trump doesn't give a damn about spending & was just using him as an election prop.' Rumors have swirled that White House aides have set up a deescalation call between Trump and Musk. Despite this, BBC News reported that the president is 'not interested' in making up with Musk.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Illinois congresswoman says Sikh man praying on House floor was ‘deeply troubling'
The Brief U.S. Rep. Mary Miller (R-Illinois) said in a since-deleted post on X that a Sikh chaplain leading a prayer in Congress was "deeply troubling." She initially misidentified the man as Muslim, according to multiple reports. Miller's comments have received backlash from several fellow members of Congress. WASHINGTON, D.C. - A Republican congresswoman representing parts of downstate Illinois is getting heat for saying in a since-deleted social media post on Friday that it was "deeply troubling" to her that a Sikh man led a prayer in the House of Representatives, after misidentifying the man as Muslim. What we know According to multiple reports, U.S. Rep. Mary Miller wrote on X: "It's deeply troubling that a Muslim was allowed to lead prayer in the House of Representatives this morning. This should have never been allowed to happen. "America was founded as a Christian nation, and I believe our government should reflect that truth, not drift further from it. May God have mercy!" Miller then edited the post to reflect that the man was actually Sikh, but later deleted it entirely. Still, Miller's post garnered criticism from multiple members of Congress, including Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, a Democrat who represents parts of Chicago's northwest suburbs and is running for a U.S. Senate seat. He called Miller's comments anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim. "I am appalled by Rep. Mary Miller's comments—first misidentifying a Sikh chaplain as Muslim, then saying he should have 'never been allowed' to lead the House in prayer. Her remarks were both anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim, and they reflect a disturbing pattern of religious intolerance," Krishnamoorthi said. "The Constitution guarantees freedom of religion for all. The Sikh and Muslim communities have long contributed to the strength, service, and spirit of our nation. All Americans—regardless of party—must come together to reject these attacks and stand united against all forms of prejudice." Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-New York), the minority leader in the House, also reacted to Miller's comments saying, "It's deeply troubling that such an ignorant and hateful extremist is serving in the United States Congress. That would be you, Mary." The Congressional Asian Pacific Americans Caucus, which includes Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Illinois) and Krishnamoorthi, said on X that it condemned Miller's anti-Sikh and anti-Muslim bigotry." "Sikhs and Muslims practice two separate and distinct religions, and conflating the two based on how someone looks is not only ignorant but also racist," the CAPAC added in its post. A request for comment to Miller's campaign was not immediately responded to on Saturday. The backstory It's not the first time Miller has drawn ire for controversial comments during her tenure in Congress. Just a few days into her first term in 2021, Miller apologized for knowingly quoting Adolf Hitler during a rally outside of the U.S. Capitol. While discussing the need for the Republican Party to appeal to young people, she said, "Hitler was right on one thing. He said, 'Whoever has the youth has the future.'" She made that comment on Jan. 5, 2021, the day before supporters of President Donald Trump stormed the Capitol to stop the certification of President Joe Biden's 2020 election victory. Miller apologized for the comment and said some were trying to "twist" her words to "mean something antithetical to my beliefs." She added she was "passionately" pro-Israel and "will always be a strong advocate and ally of the Jewish community." In 2022, in response to the U.S. Supreme Court overturning the constitutional right to an abortion, Miller said at a rally the decision was a "victory for white life." A spokesman said Miller meant to say the decision was a victory for a "right to life," and that her comment was a "mix-up of words."