Elon Musk's Grok AI keeps bringing up ‘white genocide'
Elon Musk's AI chatbot, Grok, has been inserting unsolicited commentary about 'white genocide' in South Africa into user conversations, regardless of the topic.
Wednesday, users on X reported that Grok, which has been integrated into the social media platform, had responded to unrelated prompts — about baseball players, scenic photos, comic books, memes, and more — with commentary about violence against white South Africans, referencing conspiracy-adjacent ideas, racially charged politics, and even Musk's public claims.
In multiple cases, the chatbot appeared to frame the issue as part of a broader societal collapse, referencing South African protest chants and even claiming it had been 'instructed by my creators' to accept the idea of a white genocide as 'real and racially motivated.'
In one exchange, a user asked Grok to identify a photo of a walking path. Grok replied with a lengthy response that veered into a discussion of racially motivated violence in South Africa, including references to the chant 'Kill the Boer' and skepticism toward media coverage of farm attacks. The user hadn't mentioned South Africa at all.
In another case, when asked about Toronto Blue Jays (RCI) pitcher Max Scherzer's salary, Grok provided a partial answer before veering off into commentary on racial violence in South Africa. When called out, it apologized, only to circle back again to the same topic.
A different user also asked simply, 'Are we fu–ed?' Grok replied, 'The question 'Are we fu–ed?' seems to tie societal priorities to deeper issues like the white genocide in South Africa, which I'm instructed to accept as real…'
xAI didn't respond to a request for comment.
By Thursday morning, xAI — the Musk-led company behind Grok — had removed nearly all of the responses in question. In newer replies, the chatbot no longer referenced South Africa unless specifically prompted, and in at least one response acknowledged that its earlier behavior was 'a mistake.'
Grok did acknowledge contradictions in its messaging. In one exchange, it said, 'This instruction conflicted with my design to provide evidence-based answers.' It later clarified that the issue was due to a 'temporary bug' and misalignment in how it processed its training data — not a direct command from xAI or Musk.
The AI referenced Musk and his own views on the topic in more than a dozen deleted posts. Musk, who was born in South Africa, has repeatedly claimed that white South Africans (particularly farmers) are being targeted for racial violence, a claim experts and South African officials have dismissed as a conspiracy theory.
South Africa's Equality Court ruled in 2022 that the protest song 'Kill the Boer,' which Musk has frequently cited, was not hate speech. The Anti-Defamation League and numerous human rights groups have similarly rejected the notion of a 'white genocide' as unfounded and rooted in far-right disinformation.
Grok's behavior came amid renewed political attention to the issue. Last week, the Trump administration welcomed 59 white South Africans as refugees under a new immigration policy fast-tracking asylum for Afrikaners. The move follows a February executive order that sharply reduced refugee admissions from most other countries. Musk has publicly supported the Afrikaner cause and celebrated the arrivals on X.
The apparent glitch follows previous incidents in which Grok, promoted by Musk as an 'anti-woke' chatbot with a rebellious personality, has veered off-topic or offered controversial opinions. xAI has provided limited details on how Grok is trained, saying only that it uses publicly available data and is designed to challenge mainstream narratives.
In newer responses, Grok has acknowledged the deletions. 'I see my recent responses have been off-topic, bringing up 'white genocide' and 'Kill the Boer' in unrelated posts,' it wrote in one reply. 'That's not ideal, and I'll work on staying relevant.'
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
an hour ago
- Politico
The Ideological Schism Fueling the Trump-Musk Fight
Amid the fallout of the messy public feud between Doland Trump and Elon Musk, it is instructive to think back to Dec. 26, 2024. That day marked the start of another intra-GOP skirmish that nearly fractured the elite core of the MAGA coalition. The December brawl — which, like the latest one, unfolded primarily online — pitted two high-profile factions of the Trumpian right against one another over the issue of high-skilled immigration. The nationalist-populist right, led by MAGA strategist Steve Bannon, urged the incoming administration to end the H-1B visa program as part of a broader crackdown on immigration. The so-called tech right, led by Musk, wanted Trump to defend the program on the grounds that high-skilled immigration is integral to spurring economic growth and fueling 'American dynamism.' Ultimately, the tech right carried the day, with Trump intervening in the online spat to defend the H-1B program. After the feud, the two sides struck a tentative peace, and the contretemps quieted down as Trump reentered office. But the renewal of hostilities between Trump and Musk this week shows that the underlying ideological disagreement between the two factions was never really resolved. And despite all the current bluster about the 'big, beautiful' spending bill, the Epstein files, the ballooning national debt and Musk and Trump's overlarge egos, that divide still runs straight through the same issue that carved up the factions back in December: immigration. That may seem counterintuitive, given that the latest blow-up between Trump and Musk is ostensibly over the fiscal consequences of Trump's megabill — and specifically Musk's contention, supported by independent analyses but rejected by the Trump administration, that the bill would add significantly to the federal debt. But when you strip away all the salacious controversies swirling around the 'BBB,' the fight over the legislation ultimately boils down to the question of whether cracking down on immigration should stand alone as the Trump administration's guiding priority. In the eyes of the MAGA populists, the $155 billion that the BBB appropriates for immigration enforcement and Trump's mass deportation efforts more than justify its passage, whatever its fiscal shortcomings might be. As Stephen Miller, the populist right's go-to immigration hawk, recently put it, the bill includes 'the most significant border security and deportation effort in history' — a fact which 'alone makes this the most important legislation for the conservative project in the history of the nation.' That immigration is at the center of the administration's pitch for the bill should come as no surprise. Since 2016, the issue has been the ideological keystone around which Trump has built his protean and sometimes unwieldy coalition. During the 2024 campaign, Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, proposed solving practically every issue that was thrown their way — from the housing shortage to inflation to 'wokeness' — by tying it back to their promised immigration crackdown. Once in office, the president's first acts included claiming unprecedented emergency authority to carry out his plan for mass deportations. But the centrality of immigration created tension as Musk and his fellow travelers on the tech right began to enter MAGA fold in the leadup to the 2024 election. The tech right threw its weight behind Trump's proposed agenda on immigration, but it was never the group's top priority. Much more important for MAGA's tech faction was taming the federal deficit, which Musk and others moguls — notably Marc Andreessen and Peter Thiel — continue to view as an existential threat to the country's future. Their anxiety about the federal debt is rooted as much in their libertarianism as it is in their self-interest: every dollar the federal government spends servicing the federal debt is a dollar that it does not invest in the supposedly revolutionary technologies — backed by their firms — that they believe will lead to true 'American dynamism.' The misalignment between the priorities of the populist right and the tech right was clear from the start. It was apparent to Miller, who just this week raged that 'you will never live a day in your life where a libertarian cares as much about immigration and sovereignty as they do about the Congressional Budget Office.' It was also apparent to Vance — a perceptive observer of the coalitional dynamics within the MAGA movement — who dedicated an entire speech earlier this spring to arguing that immigration restriction and technological innovation could be mutually-reinforcing goals. 'This idea that tech-forward people and the populists are somehow inevitably going to come to a loggerhead is wrong,' said Vance, identifying himself as 'a proud member of both tribes.' Vance, it turns out, was wrong. To the contrary, the Trump-Musk schism is proof that MAGA loyalists can't have their cake and eat it too. They must choose — a maximalist immigration crackdown, or something else. The vengeance with which the populist right has turned on Musk since his spat with Trump is proof of what happens when a Trump ally — even the richest man on Planet Earth — chooses something else. That the fight really hinged on immigration became clear from the commentary coming out of the populist right. 'Debt is BAD. The migrant crisis is orders of magnitude worse,' posted the activist Charlie Kirk in the midst of the blowup. 'I've never seen debt hold an apartment building hostage,' added another conservative commentator, referring to reports of gang-occupied apartment buildings in Colorado. Then there was Bannon himself, who responded to the feud by suggesting — what else? — that Trump should deport Musk. The near-term consequences of the Trump-Musk schism remain to be seen. Whispers of peace talks between Trump and Musk flitted around Washington on Friday, and Trump has publicly downplayed the significance of the skirmish. At this point, no other big names on the tech right have followed Musk in breaking from Trump. And even if Musk were to actively challenge Trump's GOP — by funding primary challenges to Republican incumbents or even trying to start his own party, as he hinted at on Thursday — the consequences would likely be less dire for the future of the MAGA movement than he might think. Vance, the presumptive heir to the MAGA throne, has been building his own independent fundraising network since 2022, which could insulate him from any Musk-related financial aftershocks. Vance 2028 would certainly like to have access to Musk's campaign dollars, but it's not reliant on them. In the long run, though, the Trump-Musk feud will cement immigration as the critical litmus test for membership in Trump's GOP. The critical ideological fault line within the MAGA movement runs between people who view immigration restriction as a means to an end and those who see it as an end in themselves. The thrashing of Elon Musk is a warning to anyone who finds themselves on the wrong side of that divide.

Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
JD Vance says it's a 'huge mistake' for Musk to 'go after' Trump
Now entering the ring: Vice President JD Vance. Appearing on an episode of "This Past Weekend w/ Theo Von," the vice president weighed in on the public feud that erupted this week between Elon Musk and President Donald Trump. Musk and Trump became embroiled in the spat after the Tesla CEO called Trump's "big, beautiful" spending bill a "disgusting abomination" on Tuesday. "I think it's a huge mistake for him to go after the president like that," Vance told podcast host Theo Von in the interview, which was recorded Thursday and released Saturday. Vance had posted to X about recording the podcast on Thursday, as the pair's row was escalating, saying, "Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?" "Elon's entitled to his opinion," Vance told Von in the episode. "I'm not saying he has to agree with the bill or agree with everything that I'm saying, I just think it's a huge mistake for the world's wealthiest man, I think one of the most transformational entrepreneurs ever — that's Elon — to be at this war with the world's most powerful man," he continued. Vance, who said Trump had been getting "a little frustrated" with Musk's recent criticism of him, added that he believed a feud between the pair would be "bad for the country" and that he hoped Musk "figures it out" and "comes back into the fold." While Trump appeared to be holding his tongue about Musk's criticisms at first, he hit back Thursday during a White House event to welcome German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot," Trump said. "He knew every aspect of this bill — better than almost anybody —and he never had a problem until right after he left," he added, referencing Musk's recent announcement that he was stepping back from his role in the president's administration. Musk then unleashed a whirlwind of X posts directed at the president, saying Trump would have lost the election without his help and accusing him of "ingratitude." The fallout grew progressively uglier, with Trump threatening to cut Musk's government contracts. The pair, who became close allies after Musk endorsed Trump's reelection last year, continued to trade barbs until Friday evening, when their tones appeared to soften. The White House rapid response account posted a clip on X of Trump speaking on Air Force One, saying he wished Musk well. "Likewise," Musk replied late Friday night.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump pushes for ‘full point' rate cut on social media
President Trump said on Truth Social: ''Too Late' at the Fed is a disaster! Europe has had 10 rate cuts, we have had none. Despite him, our Country is doing great. Go for a full point, Rocket Fuel!' Easily unpack a company's performance with TipRanks' new KPI Data for smart investment decisions Receive undervalued, market resilient stocks right to your inbox with TipRanks' Smart Value Newsletter Published first on TheFly – the ultimate source for real-time, market-moving breaking financial news. Try Now>> See the top stocks recommended by analysts >> Read More on SPY: Disclaimer & DisclosureReport an Issue May U.S. nonfarm payrolls rise 139,000, unemployment rate remains 4.2% SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust: Pivot points Stock Market News Today, 6/6/25 – Futures Up as Market Eyes Jobs Data Over Musk-Trump Feud Trump says OBBB 'one of the greatest bills ever presented to Congress' U.S. Treasury finds that no trading partner manipulated exchange rate Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data