Forum: Financial advisers must adhere to high ethical standards and industry regulations
Forum: Financial advisers must adhere to high ethical standards and industry regulations
We thank Dr Tan Yia Swam for her letter 'Insurance agents asking doctors to change codes to ensure claims go through' (April 17) and refer to the Ministry of Health's reply 'MOH will review MediShield Life coverage for prophylactic mastectomy' ( April 22). We would like to provide more context regarding Integrated Shield Plans (IPs), preventive treatments and ethical guidelines for financial adviser representatives.
IPs offer coverage for hospitalisation, surgery and selected outpatient treatments on top of MediShield Life coverage. As IPs are today designed to cover medically necessary treatments, treatments and procedures that are preventive in nature are not claimable.
IP insurers are constantly seeking ways to balance the scope of coverage with premium affordability and sustainability for policyholders. Benefits and coverages are reviewed from time to time, taking into consideration advancements in clinical practice and medical science.
We note that the Ministry of Health is undertaking a review of the matter. IP insurers will review the scope of IP coverage accordingly.
Financial adviser representatives play a key role in providing advice to their clients on insurance products, including IPs, and must adhere to high ethical standards and industry regulations.
If consumers or healthcare practitioners encounter potential misconduct, including being pressured to misrepresent medical codes for claims, they should provide the details to the relevant insurers for further investigation and action.
We recognise the complexity of the situation and good intentions of all parties involved. The life insurance industry is committed to working closely with all relevant stakeholders to best address the needs of policyholders equitably.
Chan Wai Kit
Executive Director
Life Insurance Association, Singapore
More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Eurostar plans 5-hour trains from London to Frankfurt, Geneva
Eurostar's plans come as it faces criticism over high prices and reliability. PHOTO: AFP LONDON - Eurostar Group Ltd plans to launch direct train services from London to Frankfurt and Geneva next decade, connecting the UK's capital to two of Europe's key financial centres. The journeys would each take roughly five hours, a spokesperson for the operator said. As part of the new services, Eurostar, which is majority-owned by France's state rail company SNCF, said it would invest approximately €2 billion (S$2.9 billion) to increase its fleet by around 30 per cent. Eurostar's plans come as it faces criticism over high prices and reliability. It could also face opposition from other operators pushing to launch rival services to end its 31-year monopoly on international trains from Britain. Mr Richard Branson's Virgin Group and FS Italiane Group are among the companies seeking to challenge Eurostar on its flagship route between London and Paris. Offering direct trains from London to Frankfurt and Geneva would allow bankers and other finance professionals to continue their work and make calls during their journeys, unlike on planes. Eurostar currently operates services in five countries: the UK, Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Germany. The most popular route, London to Paris, attracted more than 280,000 passengers in 2024. The company behind St Pancras, the London train station where Eurostar operates, and Getlink SE, the Channel Tunnel operator, said earlier in 2025 they wanted to open more services to France and new routes to Germany and Switzerland. In 2024, a report from campaign group Transport and Environment (T&E) rated Eurostar the worst-performing of 27 European rail services. The survey considered factors such as ticket prices, reliability and experience. Eurostar disputed the findings. BLOOMBERG Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
3 hours ago
- Straits Times
2025 could be the year when AI agents take wing, says futurist
During his recent visit to Singapore, the futurist and world-renowned scenario planner Peter Schwartz wanted to change the arrangements for his return flight. He tried to do it through the Singapore Airlines app, but that didn't work for him. So, he turned to the airline's artificial intelligence (AI)-powered digital agent. 'Within seconds, it was able to update my reservation, make the booking and issue me my boarding pass,'' he says. Mr Schwartz, 78, has been working on AI since the 1970s, having written books and even movie scripts about it. Now, as Chief Futures Officer of the customer-relationship management company Salesforce, he is a champion of 'agentic AI' – whereby artificially intelligent agents, acting like virtual humans, can not only make complex decisions, but also act on them. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
Forum: Suing doctors should never be a frivolous decision
I refer to the report on the National University Hospital (NUH) withdrawing its bankruptcy bid against a former patient (NUH withdraws bankruptcy bid after finding out ex-patient was in nursing home, June 9). In this case, a 61-year-old man unsuccessfully sued the NUH Emergency Department for missing the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy, when his presenting complaints were chest pain and shortness of breath in mid-March 2011. NUH refuted the accusations and was allowed to recuperate about $230,000 in legal fees from the plaintiff. The public ought to be aware of a few medical realities before taking their doctors or hospitals to court. First, many serious medical conditions present with non-specific symptoms and signs. When the typical symptoms appear, the condition may already be in the advanced stage. In the current case, by the time the patient presented with numbness of the limbs, the diagnosis of cervical myelopathy was apparent, but it was already in serious state. Second, taking legal action against doctors and hospitals is an expensive endeavour. Expert witnesses and lawyers would be employed by both the plaintiff and the defendant, and they are costly. If a patient loses the trial, he would have to pay for both his and the hospital's legal fees. Third, the winning side can recuperate only 40 to 70 per cent of the total legal costs from the losing side. So even if the hospital wins the court case, it will still lose out financially. Lastly, restructured hospitals are public institutions financed by subsidies from the Government and payments of patients, and provide medical service for the public. When restructured hospitals lose money in legal fees and damages, either their services have to be trimmed, or they ask for more subsidies from the Government, or they increase fees for other patients. Patients should be very certain before they decide to sue their doctors and hospitals. It's a good practice to involve several expert witnesses to give honest and independent opinions about their chance of winning, rather than depending on one or two expert witnesses. If they are seeking justice for perceived mistreatment, they can make a complaint to the hospital, the Singapore Medical Council or the Ministry of Health. Suing doctors should never be a frivolous decision. Dr Desmond Wai More on this Topic Forum: What readers are saying Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
