Web archivists scrambling to save US public data from deletion
Resources on AIDS prevention and care, weather records, references to ethnic or gender minorities: numerous databases were destroyed or modified after Trump signed an executive order in January declaring diversity, equality and inclusion programs and policies within the federal governmentto be illegal.
More than 3,000 pages from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention site were taken down and more than 1,000 from the Justice Department's website, Paul Schroeder, president of the Council of Professional Associations on Federal Statistics, told AFP.
404 error
Some websites have disappeared altogether, such as that of the US development agency USAID, which has been effectively shuttered as Trump slashes US aid to poor countries.
And the National Children's Health Survey page displays a "404 error" message.
Federal agencies must now avoid hundreds of words such as "woman", "disability", "racism", "climate crisis" and "pollution" in their communications, the New York Times reported.
"The focus has been on removing language related to environmental (or) climate justice on websites, as well as removing data and tools related to environmental (or) climate justice," Eric Nost, a geographer at Canada's University of Guelph and member of the Environmental Data and Governance Initiative (EDGI) told AFP.
"This Trump administration moved more quickly and with a greater scope than the previous Trump administration," he said.
EDGI, a consortium of academics and volunteers, began safeguarding public climate and environmental data after Trump's first election in 2016.
Among the tools used are the WayBack Machine from the non-profit Internet Archive, or Perma.cc, developed by the Library Innovation Lab at Harvard Law School.
These systems, which long predate Trump's election, help "courts and law journals preserve the web pages they cite to," said Jack Cushman, director of the Library Innovation Lab.
Long used by journalists, researchers and NGOs, web archiving enables a page to be preserved, even if it were to disappear from the internet or be modified later.
This data is then stored on servers in a large digital library, allowing anyone to consult it freely.
Volunteer work
Archiving initiatives have multiplied, expanded and coordinated since Trump's return to the White House.
The Data Rescue Project (DRP) brought together several organizations to save as much data as possible.
"We were concerned about data being deleted. We wanted to try to see what we could do to rescue them," Lynda Kellam, a university librarian and DRP organiser, told AFP.
She first launched the project as an online Google doc in February – a simple word-processing tool listing downloaded PDF files, original dataset titles and archived links.
It is now maintained by volunteers "who are working after work" to keep it running, said Kellam.
"We are all volunteers, even myself. We have other jobs so that has been challenging," Kellam added.
The data collection work, largely carried out by associations and university libraries, is threatened by a lack of resources.
"Funding is the key issue... as the library and archives community rushes to take on a larger preservation challenges than ever before," Cushman said.
"We need to fund coordinators for the ongoing effort, new tools, and new homes for the data."
Harvard is also battling the ire of the Trump administration, which has cut federal grants to the prestigious university and threatened its tax-exempt status after it refused to comply with the president's demands to accept government oversight.
"Data is the modern lighthouse, helping us plan our lives: it shows where we are so we can plan where we're going," Cushman said.
"Businesses, individuals, and governments will suffer greatly from any failure to collect and share reliable data on weather and climate, health, justice, housing, employment, and so on." – AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
an hour ago
- Malaysiakini
Malaysia in a shifting world order
COMMENT | The global geopolitical landscape is undergoing a seismic shift. For decades, American dominance economically, militarily, and diplomatically has defined the post–Cold War international order. Today, that dominance is increasingly challenged by emerging powers and shifting global alignments. The rise of competing powers, growing distrust of US intentions, and the resurgence of nationalist economic policies, particularly under Donald Trump's second term, are accelerating the fragmentation of global power. In place of a US-led unipolar order, a multipolar world is emerging, one increasingly defined by the rivalry between the United States, an emerging axis of Russia-China-India (RCI), and a recalibrated European Union. Trump's recent moves to impose tariffs on a wide swath of countries, including traditional allies like the European Union, Canada, South Korea, and India, mark a decisive...
The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
Blackout hits central, southern Iraq, sources say
BAGHDAD (Reuters) -Iraq was hit by a power outage in its central and southern regions on Monday after a shutdown at a power plant in the western province of Anbar, electricity ministry sources said. The sudden shutdown of the Hamidiya plant led to a fault in the electricity transmission network, the sources said. The chair of Iraq's parliament energy committee told Reuters the outage did not affect the semi-autonomous Kurdistan region. A member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, and one of the world's leading oil producers, Iraq has struggled to provide its citizens with energy since the 2003 U.S.-led invasion that toppled Saddam Hussein. In March, U.S. President Donald Trump's administration rescinded a waiver that had allowed Iraq to pay Iran for electricity, as part of Trump's "maximum pressure" campaign against Tehran. Iraq is heavily dependent on Iranian natural gas imports to generate power. (Reporting by Muayad Kenany and Tala Ramadan; Writing by Hatem Maher; Editing by Alex Richardson)
New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
Could Trump tariffs become BRICS building blocks?
United States President Donald Trump has the BRICS group of nations directly in his trade war crosshairs, slapping super-high tariffs on imports from Brazil and India, and accusing them of pursuing "anti-American" policies. Washington's relations with Brasilia and New Delhi have sunk to new lows. But this belligerence could backfire. The White House said last Wednesday it would impose an additional 25 per cent tariff on goods from India, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil. That brings the levy on most goods to 50 per cent, among the highest rate faced by any US trading partner. Brazil also faces 50 per cent tariffs on many of its US-bound exports, not because of trade imbalances, but because of Trump's anger at what he calls a "witch hunt" against his ally, Brazil's former president Jair Bolsonaro, who has been charged with plotting a coup following his election loss in 2022. This breakdown in relations could be Trump's intention: push these countries to the brink so that they'll agree to trade deals that are heavily lopsided in Washington's favour. That strategy seemed to work with Japan and the European Union. But hitting these BRICS economies with eye-watering tariffs could push them closer together, strengthening the resolve of a group that appeared to be losing whatever momentum, purpose and unity it had. The original BRIC nations — Brazil, Russia, India and China — held their first summit in 2009, eight years after former Goldman Sachs economist Jim O'Neill coined the acronym for this group of emerging economies he said would challenge the G7 group of rich countries in the future. South Africa became the "S" in BRICS two years later, and the club now comprises 11 countries including Indonesia, Iran and Saudi Arabia, as well as a further nine "partner" countries, including Malaysia, Nigeria and Thailand. It was always a disparate group — geographically, economically, culturally and politically — meaning its cohesiveness has always been questionable. Its relations have sometimes been rocky, particularly among its largest members. That's why it was so notable when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi last Wednesday announced that he would visit China for the first time in over seven years. This could be a sign that rising tensions with Washington are helping to thaw frosty ties between New Delhi and Beijing. Also on Wednesday, Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva said he planned to call the leaders of India and China to discuss a joint BRICS response to Trump's tariffs. "I'm going to try to discuss with them about how each one is doing in this situation ... so we can make a decision," said Lula. "It's important to remember that the BRICS have 10 countries at the G20," he added, referring to the group that gathers 20 of the world's biggest economies. While nothing unites like a common enemy, the differences between the BRICS countries could limit how solid that front can actually be. Only 14 per cent of their trade is with each other. Russia and Brazil may have higher levels of intra-BRICS trade, but only nine per cent of China's exports are BRICS-bound, significantly less than the 19 per cent that goes to emerging Asia and 15 per cent destined for the US. And in economic, political and military terms, China matters far more than the others on the global stage. But there are signs that intra-BRICS trade is strengthening. China-Russia trade was a record US$244.8 billion last year, and China and India are the top two buyers of Russian oil. China is Brazil's largest trading partner, accounting for 28 per cent of Brazil's exports and 24 per cent of its imports. Roughly 70 per cent of China's soyabean imports are from Brazil. Trump's tariffs could push BRICS countries closer together in the near term, in areas such as trade, investment and currency usage. They may feel it's in their economic interests and, for some, in their political interests, to present a united front. How long that front can hold is anyone's guess. In the meantime, however, Trump's tariff salvos are BRICS-bound. How these emerging economies respond could be an indication of whether we may truly be seeing a reshuffling of global alliances. The writer is from Reuters
