Dozens of Indiana DCS employees could lose their jobs due to restructuring
The agency protecting Hoosier children from abuse and neglect announced the changes Friday. They go into effect July 1.
DCS Director Adam Krupp said the layoffs won't put children at risk because 'these are not the folks on the front line.'
Instead, the employees are part of middle and upper management that Krupp is reducing so that family case managers have a more direct line to authority. Between 16 and 40 employees could be laid off, depending on if some accept new lower-paying positions.
'This is going to reduce the opportunity for communication breakdowns and it's going to reduce the delay in decision-making,' he said. 'I very much believe this will improve our outcomes in terms of focusing on child safety and working closely with families, whether it be on the prevention side or the intervention side.'
The behemoth agency has more than 4,040 employees, with almost 1,800 family case managers who handle daily interactions with children and families.
'All Hoosier children deserve a safe place to lay their head at night, and our most vulnerable kids often need an extra layer of security. Things are not working as well as they should at DCS, but we are going to change that,' said Gov. Mike Braun. 'With this entrepreneurial plan, we will remove layers of inefficient middle management and bureaucracy and instead redirect resources to frontline services like foster care and family case workers to keep kids safe.'
It is estimated the state could save between $4 million and $8 million from restructuring – dubbed Project Awaken — but that money could also be redirected to child safety efforts.
Krupp talked with the ICC and went through the nine layers of employees currently in the agency, from him all the way down to family case managers. The reorganization will eliminate a level of assistant deputy directors and several others.
The state will also move from 18 different regions — each with its own manager — to five. The agency said it looked at caseloads, square mileage and staff to help determine the regions, generally aligning with a central region and four quadrants.
He noted that these regions had slowly developed their own microcultures, or 18 different ways of doing things. The streamlining will result in more consistent policies.
'Executive management, right now, we are too far removed from a family case manager, and that's not because of geographical distance. That's simply because of all the layers of communication, information flow and decision-making,' Krupp said.
He added the state will continue to hire family case managers, noting it's a constant cycle of turnover and training.
More: Kids could be sleeping in your local DCS office. Here's how often it happens in Indiana.
'It never really stops,' Krupp said.
He said currently the agency needs between 175 and 195 more family case managers to meet statutory caseload ratios. DCS has long struggled with retention due to the stress of the job and the three months needed for training.
There was a brief move during the General Assembly session to eliminate those caseload rules, but Krupp said that is not a priority. He said lawmakers considered giving the agency more flexibility.
As part of the restructuring, the legal division will also be aligned under the new regions and work more as a co-leader with regional directors. Financial and budgeting efforts have been centralized so that there is more visibility into day-to-day spending. DCS has regularly overspent its appropriation in the state budget.
Krupp added that work toward reorganization started during the transition period after the November election. The agency in May announced new mission, vision and purpose statements and this is the second phase of reorganization.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Breaking down claims Trump could arrest Putin at Alaska summit on Ukraine war
In August 2025, as U.S. President Donald Trump prepared to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, social media users speculated whether Trump could or should arrest Putin, who had been wanted on a warrant from the International Criminal Court since March 2023. The ICC accused Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, the Russian commissioner for children's rights, of "the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation." The U.S. has never been a formal member state of the ICC. Former President Bill Clinton signed the Rome Statute, the document that established the ICC, in 2000. The U.S. withdrew from the statute in 2002. Trump has imposed sanctions on court officials during both his administrations. As such, though it was impossible to know with certainty at the time of this writing, there was no indication Trump would arrest Putin in Alaska, nor did he have a legal obligation to do so. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and other European leaders criticized the summit for not including Ukraine. Though Trump teased "land swapping" as part of a prospective peace deal, both Zelenskyy and Russian media dismissed this idea. In August 2025, as U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin prepared to meet in Alaska to discuss the war in Ukraine, speculation swirled online about whether Trump could or should arrest the Russian president at the meeting on a warrant from the International Criminal Court that accused Putin of carrying out war crimes. One X user claimed (archived) that arresting and extraditing Putin would be the "only right outcome" of the planned summit. Posts on Facebook (archived), Instagram (archived), Threads (archived) and Reddit (archived) also called for Putin's arrest at the summit. However, though it was impossible to know at the time of this writing exactly what would happen at the Aug. 15 summit, Trump was under no legal obligation to arrest Putin over the ICC's warrant. The U.S. has never ratified the Rome Statute, the document that gave the ICC its jurisdiction to prosecute certain crimes, and withdrew from it before its enactment in 2002. During his previous and current administrations, Trump has sanctioned ICC officials and otherwise dismissed the court's authority. Russia also did not recognize the court at the time of this writing. ICC relies on international partners for enforcement The ICC is an international court based in The Hague, Netherlands. The Rome Statute gave the court authority to try four types of crimes: genocide, war crimes, crimes against humanity and the crime of aggression. The United Nations also can refer cases to the ICC if they fall outside those four types of crimes, giving the court the power to try them. However, unlike — for example — a court in the U.S. that relies on domestic police forces and prosecutors to arrest and charge defendants, the ICC relies on national systems from member states to arrest and transfer defendants to the court as well as uphold sentences the court imposes. In March 2023, the ICC issued an arrest warrant for Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova, the Russian commissioner for children's rights. According to the warrant, the pair were allegedly responsible for "the war crime of unlawful deportation of population (children) and that of unlawful transfer of population (children) from occupied areas of Ukraine to the Russian Federation," starting in February 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. That warrant meant that the national systems of any Rome Statute signatories had the authority to arrest Putin and Lvova-Belova should they enter those countries. US historically offered cold shoulder to ICC As mentioned above, the U.S. is not a Rome Statute signatory and has no commitments to the court or its warrant for Putin. The U.S. signed the Rome Statute under former President Bill Clinton in December 2000 but never ratified it, meaning it was never legally binding. The U.S. withdrew from the Rome Statute in 2002, during George W. Bush's first term as president. Trump imposed potential sanctions on ICC officials, employees, agents and their family members during his first administration. The Biden administration revoked those sanctions before Trump reimposed sanctions on the ICC early in his second presidency. Though the U.S. has previously handed over people with ICC warrants to national systems that in turn handed them over to the ICC, arresting and directly handing over Putin to the ICC would be an unheard-of measure. Even member states have previously opted not to arrest people with ICC warrants despite hosting them in their countries, an issue that the ICC has struggled to curb or discipline. In 2024, the ICC's Pre-Trial Chamber found that Mongolia, which ratified the Rome Statute in 2002, failed to arrest Putin when he visited the country in late August 2023, five months after the ICC issued a warrant for his arrest. However, Mongolia seemingly did not face consequences for its lack of cooperation with the ICC. The Assembly of Parties, the court's management oversight and legislative body, noted (Page 6) the incident in a resolution adopted by the ICC in December 2024. That resolution did not include any consequences for Mongolia's failure to arrest Putin. Trump teases 'land swapping' While on the campaign trail in 2024, Trump repeatedly said he could end the war in Ukraine in a single day if he were elected. Aug. 15, 2025, will be the administration's 208th day. Ahead of the summit, Trump told (at 1:56:55) reporters during a news conference on Aug. 11 that he would meet Putin and "probably in the first two minutes I'll know exactly whether or not a deal can be made." Trump also teased (at 1:51:05) discussions about "land swapping" between Russia and Ukraine. Russian media, reporting on Trump's news conference, wrote that "Moscow has repeatedly emphasized that the issue of territorial affiliation of Crimea, Donbas and Novorossiya is closed, and the results of the referendums are already reflected in the Russian constitution." Russia occupied and annexed the Crimean Peninsula in 2014. It has pushed further into the Donbas regions of Luhansk and Donetsk since invading Ukraine in February 2022. Novorossiya was a region in imperial Russia, since part of southeastern Ukraine, that Russian forces have also moved to control as part of the 2022 invasion. Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the president of Ukraine, criticized the decision to hold a summit without Ukraine in a video message (archived) on Aug. 9. Zelenskyy also dismissed the idea of "land swapping," writing on X (archived): "The answer to the Ukrainian territorial question already is in the Constitution of Ukraine. No one will deviate from this—and no one will be able to. Ukrainians will not gift their land to the occupier." On Aug. 12, three days before the summit, European leaders said in a joint statement that "a just and lasting peace that brings stability and security must respect international law, including the principles of independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and that international borders must not be changed by force." The statement echoed Zelenskyy's, adding "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine." According to reporting in German media, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz arranged a call for European leaders with Trump and Zelenskyy on Aug. 13, two days before the planned summit. The call would focus on "pressure options against Russia, questions about Ukrainian territories seized by Russia, security guarantees for Kyiv and the sequencing of potential peace talks," according to a Politico report citing a German government spokesperson. In sum, there was no indication at the time of this writing that Trump and Putin's Alaska summit would end in the Russian president's arrest. Though Putin was wanted on a warrant from the ICC that accused him of carrying out war crimes, neither the U.S. nor Russia recognize or cooperate with the court. Whether Trump would be able to secure a peace deal in the war in Ukraine at a summit without Ukraine present remained to be seen. "Blocking Property of Certain Persons Associated With the International Criminal Court." Federal Register, 15 Jun. 2020, European Council. European Union Leaders' Statement on Ukraine. 12 Aug. 2025, Graham, Thomas. What Does Putin Really Want in Ukraine? | Council on Foreign Relations. Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. "How the Court Works." International Criminal Court, "Imposing Sanctions on the International Criminal Court." The White House, 6 Feb. 2025, International Criminal Court. "Ukraine Situation: ICC Pre-Trial Chamber II Finds That Mongolia Failed to Cooperate in the Arrest and Surrender of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Refers the Matter to the Assembly of States Parties." International Criminal Court, 24 Oct. 2024, Mongolia | International Criminal Court. Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. President Clinton on Signing of ICC Treaty (Rome Treaty). Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. "Putin Welcomed in Mongolia despite ICC Arrest Warrant." BBC News, 3 Sep. 2024, Rome Statute and Other Agreements | International Criminal Court. Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. "Situation in Ukraine: ICC Judges Issue Arrest Warrants against Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin and Maria Alekseyevna Lvova-Belova." International Criminal Court, 17 Mar. 2025, The White House. "Executive Order on the Termination of Emergency With Respect to the International Criminal Court." The White House, 1 Apr. 2021, ---. "President Trump Holds a Press Conference, Aug. 11, 2025." YouTube, 11 Aug. 2025, "Trump Says He Can End the Russia-Ukraine War in One Day. Russia's UN Ambassador Says He Can't." AP News, 1 Jul. 2024, "Trump to Join European Leaders on Emergency Call before Putin Talks." POLITICO, 11 Aug. 2025, "Uganda LRA Commander Dominic Ongwen 'to Be Sent to ICC.'" BBC News, 13 Jan. 2015. "Ukraine in Maps: Tracking the War with Russia." BBC News, 24 Feb. 2022, "Ukraine Updates: Merz Invites Trump, Zelenskyy to Meeting – DW – 08/11/2025." Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. "U.S. Withdraws from International Criminal Court Treaty." DVIDS, Accessed 12 Aug. 2025. Van Den Berg, Stephanie. "South Africa Defends Decision to Ignore ICC's Bashir Arrest Warrant." Reuters, 7 Apr. 2017. @ZelenskyyUa. "Ukraine Is Ready for Real Decisions That Can Bring Peace." X, 9 Aug. 2025,

Indianapolis Star
2 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Is Rep. Baird using taxpayer funds to prep his son for a congressional seat? An opponent thinks so
A July mailer sent by Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Baird's congressional office to Hoosiers in Warren County includes an image of not one, but two elected Bairds. In the photo, Congressman Baird and his son, Greencastle Republican state Rep. Beau Baird, stand alongside a boy and a cow. Bold text on the mailer reads 'Congressman Baird champions the One Big Beautiful Bill to support Hoosier farmers.' For years, Beau Baird has been rumored as a future candidate for the 4th Congressional District, which contains the counties immediately to the west of Marion County, should his father choose not to run for another term in Congress. Recently, the elder Baird has used pictures of his son in taxpayer-funded mailers and has started omitting his first name in some materials when identifying himself in prominent spots, referring to himself instead as simply "Congressman Baird." Congressman Baird hasn't yet said if he's running for reelection, and legally he isn't doing anything wrong, experts say. But if his son runs instead, he'll get the perk of already-built-in name recognition from years of the last name being on the ballot and on official office material. At least one 2026 Republican candidate for the 4th Congressional District, stretching from Morgan County north to Jasper and Newton counties, said it's wrong for Jim Baird to include photos of his son in his congressional communication materials. 'The perception is, and I believe it to be true, that there's a little bit of nepotism going on,' said state Rep. Craig Haggard, R-Mooresville. "And he's trying to use taxpayer money to enhance his son's chance of winning his seat.' It's not unusual for members of Indiana's U.S. House delegation to share photos of their family members in taxpayer-funded communication materials from their congressional office. U.S. Rep. Jefferson Shreve in March, for example, shared a photo in an email newsletter to constituents of him and his wife, Mary, as he took the oath of office with Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson by his side. But Congressman Jim Baird's use of franking, a congressional privilege that lets elected officials use taxpayer-funded member allowances to communicate with constituents, has included at least seven photos of Beau Baird in mailers since 2023. Of Indiana's U.S. House delegation, Baird spent more on franking by mail in 2024 than all other members but U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz at nearly $174,000. Those materials were approved by a bipartisan group of lawmakers known as the House Communications Standards Commission. Additionally, ethics experts that spoke with IndyStar said Jim Baird's materials with his son pictured are likely not a violation of any franking rules. A spokesperson for Baird's office in a statement to IndyStar reiterated that all mass communications are reviewed by the congressman's office and the bipartisan House commission. 'Photos in official mass communications are selected from events the Congressman attends across the district,' the spokesperson said. 'While other individuals may appear, only the Congressman is identified in these materials. Every mass communication is reviewed and approved to ensure compliance with Franking guidelines before distribution.' But name recognition does give candidates for elected office a boost. Hoosier elected officials that have used the family last name have seen successes in past elections. Current Democratic U.S. Rep. André Carson, who is in his ninth term in Congress, took over his grandmother Julia Carson's congressional seat after she died in 2007. Evan Bayh, the former Indiana governor, was elected to the U.S. Senate in 1998, a seat his father Birch Bayh held from 1963 to 1981. "That name recognition is worth a lot," said Mike Wolf, the chair of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Purdue University Fort Wayne. "It's not a surprise that they would also slip in somebody who would doesn't have the federal franking privilege, but gets the benefit of it." House franking guidelines allow members to share photos of their family members in materials if the image is still related to the official business of the office and if they don't explicitly introduce or endorse their relative. None of the materials sent by Jim Baird's office that included photos of Beau Baird identify him by name, nor do they label Baird as the congressman's son or as a state representative. "Do I think that there's probably a line that maybe is being towed a little bit here, yes," said Danielle Caputo, senior legal counsel with the Campaign Legal Center who viewed some of the mailers with Baird and his son. "But he's not being referenced. I saw some of the photos. They're very small. It's not like he's front and center. It's not very clear that he is anyone." Redistricting push: How much more red can Indiana's U.S. House delegation get? Donald Sherman, the executive vice president and chief counsel for Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington, D.C., said he personally had not seen a member of Congress include family members in franked materials, but elected officials across party lines often want to keep a seat in their family. 'I wouldn't be shocked if it had happened before,' Sherman said. 'But it doesn't fall within any technical restrictions in the rules.' Two years ago, Haggard announced a plan to run for Congress if Jim Baird stepped away from another term representing the 4th Congressional District. But Haggard said he's done waiting: he filed his paperwork Aug. 8 to run for the seat in 2026. 'I believe I'll be running against a Baird,' Haggard said of next year's 4th District Republican primary. 'Which Baird? I don't know.' Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Kayla Dwyer at kdwyer@ or follow her on X@kayla_dwyer17.


Indianapolis Star
2 days ago
- Indianapolis Star
Indiana's U.S. House members can pay for flyers with taxpayer dollars. Here's who spent the most
The messages arrive in Hoosier mailboxes. They pop up as text messages, emails and television or radio commercials. Others show up as billboards in Northwest Indiana or newspaper ads in Richmond. "Congresswoman Spartz has also been working with President Trump and DOGE to eliminate waste, fraud, and abuse, and codify their findings," reads text on a March postal mailer from U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz's office. "Under Biden's policies, millions of illegal aliens entered our country," a separate December 2024 text from U.S. Rep. Jim Baird reads. These congressional communications to Hoosiers aren't political messages from campaigns. Instead they are paid for through members' allowances, which are funded by taxpayers. Both past and present members in Indiana's U.S. House delegation have taken advantage of this centuries-old congressional privilege known as franking, which allows members to send unsolicited mail or share communications, like text messages or emails, with constituents. U.S. Senators can disseminate franked materials, too, but there are different rules and Indiana's senators over the last 10 years have not used it. Indiana's nine House members since 2020 have annually spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on just franked mail items, according to quarterly House financial disbursement reports reviewed by IndyStar. That isn't a full picture of their spending, though, because that number doesn't include any additional money spent on text messages or billboards. They typically spend more during election years despite rules requiring 60-day blackout periods with no office communications before elections. While the core purpose of franking is to communicate with Hoosiers, it has also been viewed as a controversial privilege. The ability to regularly send messages to constituents on taxpayer dimes provides an advantage to incumbents over election challengers, experts say. Plus, while a bipartisan House group reviews and approves materials, the rules on franking allow representatives to disseminate political critiques and messages that can sometimes appear like campaign ads. In Indiana, where congressional primaries are typically the more competitive races, a politically relevant advertisement or mail piece from a congressional office can widen the recognition gap between an incumbent and potential competitors, experts said. In some cases, photos included in franked materials can also provide a recognition boost to a representative's family members. "Everyone's trying to get their name out and there's a lot of noise to break through," said Mike Wolf, the chair of the Mike Downs Center for Indiana Politics at Purdue University Fort Wayne. "Members of Congress, at any chance they can, need to do that." U.S. Rep. Victoria Spartz, who had the tightest primary election in Indiana during the most recent cycle, disclosed the most spending on franked mail in both 2023 and 2024 of any Hoosier in Congress, enabling her to use taxpayer dollars to remind voters of her priorities. The costs of sending franked materials are reported in the House's quarterly disbursement reports, which shows records of how members used their allowances. In 2024, Indiana's House delegation collectively spent more than $600,000 on franked mail to Hoosiers. Digital communications or advertisements also cost money but, because they are not categorized the same as mail, they're harder to identify in the quarterly disbursement reports. For example, U.S. Rep. Erin Houchin submitted 50 advisory opinion requests for franked materials in 2024, the most of Indiana's House members. But Houchin's requests were largely for text messages to constituents. Members of Indiana's delegation received between about $1.8 million and $1.95 million in member allowances last year to cover franking and other office expenses. The biggest spenders on franked mail in 2024, according to the reports, were Spartz, Baird and Democratic U.S. Rep. Frank Mrvan, who all cracked six figures. Spartz in 2024 reported spending $196,000 on franked mail with Baird spending nearly $174,000 and Mrvan spending $104,000, according to an IndyStar review of the financial reports. (A spokesperson for Spartz told IndyStar the actual spend was higher, but did not respond to a question as of press time about the discrepancy between the two numbers.) "Our office budgets approximately $300k annually to send three-four quarterly update mailers to stay in touch with our constituency, with the Q4 annual update mailer size adjusted based on available funds," the spokesperson said. "We generally provide updates on constituent services, town halls, and key policy developments in D.C." U.S. Rep. André Carson, a Democrat, and former Republican U.S. Reps. Jim Banks, Greg Pence and Larry Bucshon in 2024 all spent less than $1,000 on franked mail. Pence and Bucshon did not seek reelection in 2024 and Banks successfully ran for U.S. Senate. Before a text message arrives on someone's phone or a newsletter in someone's inbox, representatives must get those materials approved by the House Communications Standards Commission. This bipartisan group signs off on franked communications and issues advisory opinions to ensure the materials follow House rules on restrictions like timing and content of the materials. Franking is a bipartisan affair in Indiana. But the content and type of materials released to Hoosiers between 2024 and the first seven months of 2025 largely depends on the member of Congress directing the messages, according to an IndyStar review of submitted materials. The current delegation for the 119th Congress has submitted 82 requests for advisory opinions to the House Communications Standards Commission between Jan. 1 and July 31, which span from texts to emails to mailers. Franked materials by Indiana's seven Republican members at times contained more political messaging, but they still were approved for distribution by the bipartisan House Communications Standards Commission. In 2025, most of the communication from Indiana's Republicans included supportive messages about President Donald Trump's agenda, including the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Who represents Indiana in Congress: Who represents Indiana in Congress? Who you need to know and how to contact them In 2024, though, many of the materials sent by Republicans criticized the Biden administration and former President Kamala Harris. For example, U.S. Rep. Rudy Yakym sent a postal and digital mailer to constituents in the 2nd Congressional District about his vote to impeach former Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas. The postal mailer features a large grainy photo of Mayorkas alongside a headline about Yakym's impeachment vote. 'Every state—including Indiana— has become a border state under Secretary Mayorkas' tenure,' Yakym is quoted in the mailer. 'My vote to impeach Secretary Mayorkas is an important step in holding the Biden Administration accountable and ensuring we end this crisis and stand up for America's sovereignty by restoring Law and Order to the southern border.' Yakym's mailer was approved in February 2024 under a provision of federal code that allows elected officials to tell the public about "matters of public concern" from a past or current session of Congress. 'Impeachment, for example, that's an action of Congress,' said Danielle Caputo, senior legal counsel with the Campaign Legal Center. 'They're allowed to talk about that and their perspective on what they did and why it matters to their district.' Members from both parties have also spent dollars on billboards in past years. Both Mrvan in 2024 and Baird in 2023 and 2024 submitted advisory opinion requests for billboards advertising their congressional offices in their districts. Materials shared in 2024 by Indiana's two Democrats, Mrvan and Carson, featured fairly tame political messaging. In addition to billboards, Mrvan in 2024 sent mailers to constituents about his legislative actions, including support for law enforcement. Carson in 2024 released a television ad about his support for former President Joe Biden's bipartisan infrastructure law and another on how to apply for a service academy through his office. Mrvan has yet to submit requests for advisory opinions on franked messages in 2025 while Carson prepared radio ads for a youth job fair held in March. Just as they did in the 18th century, franked materials do serve a purpose for Indiana's elected officials, who seek to inform the public about actions in Washington, D.C. "The original basis of the frank was very simple," said Matt Glassman, a professor with the Government Affairs Institute at Georgetown University. "Members of Congress need to communicate with their constituents, and in 1795 had to be able to write letters to people and post things and tell them what was going on. That's still an important service, right? Getting the message out about what's going on in Congress, how you voted, is a public service." While the rules for what they can spend taxpayer money on allows a vast amount of options to be shared with their constituents, ethics experts told IndyStar it's worth it for members to consider if their message helps the broad spectrum of people that live in their district. 'All of those individuals, regardless of their politics, regardless of who they voted for are legally represented by this elected member of Congress," said Donald Sherman, the executive vice president and chief counsel for Citizens for Responsible Ethics in Washington. "So I think mailers should be written with them in mind, not just catered to a Republican primary voter or a swing voter.' Contact IndyStar state government and politics reporter Brittany Carloni at