UK government must provide certainty to Troubles victims, Sinn Fein says
Since taking office last year, the Labour government has pledged to repeal and replace some of the provisions of the contentious Legacy Act that was introduced by the last Conservative government, and bring forward a revised framework for dealing with cases linked to the Troubles.
The Irish government has been involved in the process, and political leaders in Dublin have said intensive engagement is ongoing to see if a 'landing zone' can be arrived at in the coming weeks.
The Northern Ireland Troubles (Legacy and Reconciliation) Act 2023 halted scores of civil cases and inquests into Troubles deaths and also offered conditional immunity to perpetrators of conflict-related crimes in exchange for their co-operation with a new investigatory and truth recovery body.
The Act was opposed by all the main political parties in Northern Ireland, the Irish government and many victims' representative groups.
In 2023, the Irish government initiated an interstate legal case against the UK in the European Court of Human Rights, claiming the Legacy Act breached the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
The case remains active, with ministers in Dublin wanting to see how Labour resolves its concerns over the legislation before any decision is taken to withdraw the action.
Mr Benn's engagement with Sinn Fein on Wednesday was part of a round of discussions with the main Stormont parties.
Alliance leader Naomi Long and deputy leader Eoin Tennyson also had a meeting at the NIO offices in Belfast city centre on Wednesday.
The UUP held an online meeting with Mr Benn while the SDLP's discussions took place on Tuesday. The DUP will hold a meeting with the Northern Ireland Secretary at a later date.
After the Sinn Fein meeting, Mr Finucane said there was a need for families to have a route to seek truth and justice.
'Today was an opportunity for us to reiterate and speak on behalf of those families that have been treated disgracefully by the Legacy Act and that have been left in limbo really since Labour came into government last July,' he told reporters.
'Those families who have had their inquests halted, those families who have uncertainty and who, after many years, still find themselves in a position where they don't know if they will receive truth and justice.'
Mr Finucane said he and Ms O'Neill also raised the case of murdered GAA official Sean Brown.
Mr Benn has applied for a Supreme Court appeal on judicial rulings in Belfast that compel him to establish a public inquiry into the 1997 murder by loyalist paramilitaries.
Mr Brown, 61, the then-chairman of Wolfe Tones GAA Club in the Co Londonderry town of Bellaghy, was ambushed, kidnapped and murdered as he locked the gates of the club in May 1997.
No-one has ever been convicted of his killing.
Mr Finucane said: 'We made it very clear in the meeting that on behalf of Sean Brown's family that there needs to be a full public inquiry established and announced without any further delay.
'We talked about the fact that five High Court judges here have endorsed consistently the family's position and we criticised without any equivocation his (Mr Benn's) decision to take this family, to take Bridie Brown (Mr Brown's 87-year-old widow) and her family to London for an appeal.'
Alliance leader Ms Long described her meeting with Mr Benn as 'constructive'.
'We're very conscious of the impact that the legacy process and lack of a formal and comprehensive legacy process has had on victims, and our priority in all of this is to ensure that victims' families' rights and needs are properly respected in that process,' she said.
'We're on record as having said that we don't believe that the Legacy Act as passed by the last government is fit for purpose, and the courts agreed with us in that regard.
'I would have preferred if that Legacy Act had been repealed and replaced (in full) and we have said that. However, that's not the space we're in, and so what we are doing now is trying to ensure that whatever the Secretary of State brings forward is a clean and fresh start in terms of how we deal with legacy and one that puts the victims at the heart of all that we do.'
Ms Long, who is Stormont's Justice minister, said achieving 'consensus' on a new framework was key.
'We're not in that space yet, but I remain hopeful that there is a possibility we could be in that space, and I think that that would be the best outcome for everyone,' she said.
'This being a contested space where nothing progresses, where nothing moves forward, is not good for families. It's not fair on them that they are constantly at the whim of political change. What we need now is substantive progress.'
Ahead of Wednesday's meetings, Mr Benn said the Government was committed to finding a system 'capable of delivering for all families who are seeking answers around the loss of their loved ones'.
'I am continuing to work with all of the Northern Ireland parties over what should be included in that legislation,' he said.
'It is important that new legacy arrangements are capable of commanding the confidence of families and of all communities.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Tories and Reform decry two-tier justice as suspended Labour councillor cleared
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court accused of the offence after he described demonstrators as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' at an anti-racism rally in the wake of the Southport murders. He was cleared on Friday. Nigel Farage and shadow home secretary Chris Philp both pointed to the idea of 'two-tier justice' in relation to the case. This is another outrageous example of two-tier justice. — Nigel Farage MP (@Nigel_Farage) August 15, 2025 Mr Philp compared the case to that of Lucy Connolly, who was jailed after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' and 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks last year. In a post on X, Mr Philp said: 'The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.' Ex-Reform chairman Zia Yusuf also referred to Connolly's case, and said that 'two tier justice in this country is out of control'. Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X, which meant she did not face a trial. In Jones' case, a jury deliberated for just over half an hour before they found him not guilty. A video showing Jones addressing crowds on Hoe Street in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 last year went viral on social media after the protest, which had been organised in response to plans for a far-right march outside Waltham Forest Immigration Bureau. It is astonishing that Labour councillor Ricky Jones, who was caught on video calling for throats to be slit, is let off scot free – whereas Lucy Connolly got 31 months prison for posting something no worse. The development of two tier justice is becoming increasingly alarming.… — Chris Philp MP (@CPhilpOfficial) August 15, 2025 The suspended councillor said in the clip: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' He also drew his finger across his throat as he spoke to the crowd. Jurors deliberated for just over 30 minutes before finding him not guilty. Jones, who wore a navy blue suit with a white shirt and pale pink tie in the dock, was seen mouthing 'thank-you' at the jurors. Family and supporters hugged each other before Jones, who declined to comment, was driven out of the court grounds in a car. The 58-year-old, who at the time was also employed as a full-time official for the Transport Salaried Staffs' Association union, was arrested on August 8 last year and interviewed at Brixton police station that night. Jones, who has been a borough councillor in Dartford, Kent, since 2019, was suspended by Labour the day after the incident. It is understood a party investigation continues and its outcome will decide what happens to his membership. A spokesperson for the party said at the time his behaviour 'was completely unacceptable and it will not be tolerated'. Giving evidence in his trial, Jones said his comment did not refer to far-right protesters involved in the riots at the time, but to those who had reportedly left National Front stickers on a train with razor blades hidden behind them. Before he made the comment, jurors were shown video where he said to crowds: 'You've got women and children using these trains during the summer holidays.' Lawyers said the case cannot be compared to that of Connolly, as they faced different charges and she pleaded guilty while Jones did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, said in Connolly's case, racially aggravated discourse on social media translated into real-life violence across the country, whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause violent disorder. Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said: 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. That is not bias or 'two-tier justice', it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do, separating facts from noise.' Laura Allen, head of the protest and public order team at Hodge, Jones and Allen lawyers, said it was 'frankly offensive' to the ordinary members of the public who sat on the jury to suggest they had not acted appropriately. She said: 'They are 12 members of the jury, picked at random, who have done their civic duty, have listened to the evidence in the case and concluded they could not be sure that Ricky Jones was guilty. 'Due to the way our jury system works they are not required, and certainly are not permitted, to explain the reasons for their decision.'
Leader Live
an hour ago
- Leader Live
Ricky Jones case should not be compared to Lucy Connolly
Ricky Jones, 58, faced trial at Snaresbrook Crown Court after he described far-right activists as 'disgusting Nazi fascists' in a speech at an anti-racism rally last year, in the wake of the Southport murders. The now-suspended councillor, surrounded by cheering supporters in Walthamstow, east London, on August 7 2024, was filmed stating: 'They are disgusting Nazi fascists. We need to cut all their throats and get rid of them all.' Jurors deliberated for just over half-an-hour and found him not guilty on Friday. This caused Conservative and Reform politicians to brand the decision 'two-tier justice' – with shadow home secretary Chris Philp comparing the case to that of Mrs Connolly, who was jailed for 31 months after she posted a tweet calling for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers and to 'set fire to all the f****** hotels' on the day of the Southport attacks. Former home secretary and Tory leadership candidate Sir James Cleverly also called the jury's decision to clear Ricky Jones 'perverse' in an X post, adding: 'Perverse decisions like this are adding to the anger that people feel and amplifying the belief that there isn't a dispassionate criminal justice system.' Lawyers have said the cases should not be conflated as Connolly and Jones faced allegations of a different nature – and Jones faced trial where Connolly, having pleaded guilty, did not. Peter Stringfellow, a solicitor at Brett Wilson, told the PA news agency: 'Both (Jones and Connolly) said pretty unpleasant things. 'However, I'm afraid the conflation of the two after that is a problem. It comes from people who've got some sort of political agenda, in my view. 'They were facing completely different allegations and a massive part of those different allegations is the racial element. 'If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.' Connolly pleaded guilty last year to a charge of inciting racial hatred by publishing and distributing 'threatening or abusive' written material on X. On July 29 last year, she posted: 'Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care … if that makes me racist so be it.' 'She directs everybody to the fact that this was a racial comment,' Mr Stringfellow said. 'She pleads guilty to that intention … she accepted that she had intended to stir racial hatred. 'The Jones case is different because one, he's facing a completely different allegation: he's facing encouraging violent disorder. 'And the difference with him is he's saying: 'That's not what I was intended to do'.' Mr Stringfellow added that, in the case of Connolly, racially aggravated discourse on social media did translate into real-life violence across the country – whereas Mr Jones' comments at a rally did not cause a violent disorder. 'What she (Connolly) did, what followed her comments about threatening to burn people in hotels, is that that's precisely what then happened – and people were attempting to burn people in hotels.' Ernest Aduwa, partner at Stokoe Partnership Solicitors, said comparisons between Jones' and Connolly's cases were 'misplaced'. 'We need to be honest about what is going on here. The verdict in the Ricky Jones case was not political, it was legal,' he said. 'A jury listened to the evidence, tested it and decided unanimously he was not guilty. 'That is not bias or 'two-tier justice' – it is the justice system doing what it is supposed to do: separating facts from noise. 'Comparisons with the Lucy Connolly case are misplaced. 'Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty. There was no trial, no cross-examination, no jury. She admitted the specific offence: stirring up racial hatred online. 'Ricky Jones faced a different charge … with a high burden of proof. 'The jury decided the Crown had not met it. 'That does not mean the protest was not passionate or loud – it means there was not enough evidence to prove intent to incite violence. That distinction matters. 'I understand why emotions run high. But flattening two different situations into one misleading narrative does no favours to justice. 'The fact that a black man at a protest can receive a fair trial and be acquitted should be seen not as an injustice, but as proof the system can still get it right.' He added: 'The law is not perfect, but it must rest on evidence – not opinion, pressure, or politics.' Laura Allen, head of the protest and public order team at Hodge, Jones and Allen lawyers, said the two cases involved different decisions that need to be put in their legal context and it is 'frankly offensive' to the ordinary members of the public who sat on the jury to suggest they had not acted appropriately. If there is anything close to a two-tier system in the British justice sector it is one that historically 'has not favoured ethnic minorities', although work has been done to try to repair that situation, according to Ms Allen. A judge made a ruling on Connolly's sentence after she had said she was guilty, while a jury listened to the evidence during the trial and found him not guilty. Ms Allen said they are 'just two very different things and it is not possible to compare them in the way that Nigel Farage is choosing to do as part of his political grandstanding'. She said: 'He (Farage) is suggesting that these 12 people, about whom I assume he knows nothing, have not made their decision on the evidence but on some other ulterior motive. 'They are 12 members of the jury, picked at random, who have done their civic duty, have listened to the evidence in the case and concluded they could not be sure that Ricky Jones was guilty. 'Due to the way our jury system works they are not required, and certainly are not permitted, to explain the reasons for their decision.' She added: 'All we know is that the jury found Ricky Jones not guilty. We don't know why. We also don't know the political background of any of these people. We don't know their views on immigration or on race. 'We don't know any of that stuff and that is the whole point.'
Edinburgh Reporter
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
Fringe 2025 – Our Brothers in Cloth ⭐⭐⭐⭐
In 2005 the Irish government published the Ferns Report on its inquiry into allegations of child sexual abuse in the Diocese of Ferns, County Wexford. The report looked solely at the responses of the Roman Catholic church and the civil authorities to the allegations. The report was highly critical of the diocesan bishop, the police and the local health authorities. Twenty years later, Irish writer Ronan Colfer brings his play Our Brothers in Cloth to the Fringe. Colfer's own family was deeply affected by clerical child sex abuse, which resulted in the suicide of a close relative. Our Brothers in Cloth focuses on the devastating impact of clerical abuse on one family, the aftershocks that reverberate from it, and the refusal of a very traditional rural community to accept the truth. In recent years we have seen how women have suffered at the hands of the Catholic church (Small Things Like These, The Magdalene Sisters, The Woman in the Wall); Colfer looks instead at the abuse of young children and the ways in which the perpetrators were protected, as much by lay people's reluctance to face facts as by the authorities' unwillingness to tarnish the reputation of the most powerful organisation in 20th century Ireland. The Kinsella family is mourning its younger son, Christopher, who has taken his own life. His brother Alan (Jake Douglas) burns with grief and guilt; when Chris first attempted suicide a horrified Alan just gave him a good telling off. Since Chris died, the much loved parish priest Fr Mulvaney has moved away, replaced by Fr Seamus O'Donovan (Ronan Colfer); when Alan's friend Mark (Michael Lavin) comes home from London for a visit, we find out why. From then on Alan is on a mission to expose Mulvaney's guilt, but he faces fierce opposition from his mother Martina (Rosalind Stockwell), who can't accept that any priest could do such things. There's been a reported case down in Kerry, and that priest was exonerated by the church; this is all just more lies and rumour. When Mulvaney is finally arrested, Alan thinks many people will come forward – but none does. Douglas powerfully conveys Alan's isolation and despair; he has nowhere to turn, and even when he speaks to his former girlfriend Siobhan (Oli Fyne), she, while sympathetic, is doubtful. Fr Mulveney was such a good man, such a compassionate man, so helpful. He even set up the work scheme that Alan's lately been attending. Despite this, Siobhan and Alan's nightime meeting is a welcome and tender interlude in what is otherwise a tense and rightly shocking hour. Their love for one another is evident; she's the only person in the town who listens to him, despite her misgivings, and the chemistry between them poignantly exposes Alan's vulnerability. Into all this mess comes Fr O'Donovan. He wants to help the Kinsellas; he's holding meetings that Martina's making Alan attend to try to get him off the drink. He offers Martina counselling. He preaches sermons about the evils of alcohol, and quotes, without irony, from Proverbs about not believing deceitful people. He tells Alan that the Bishop will now investigate the accusations against Mulvaney – then ruins it all by adding, 'Father Mulvaney will be found to be innocent.' When Fr O'Donovan tries to defend the church, to separate it from the alleged abusers, Alan brings the full force of his rage down on the priest, 'This church been nothing but a scourge on Ireland!' Whilst every word Alan says rings true, this part of the play did feel a little didactic. I wasn't sure that it fitted Alan's character; yes he is angry and frustrated, but he's also an unemployed labourer, and this speech sounds more like that of an academic. Nevertheless, the central relationship between Alan and his mother is completely convincing at all times. Martina is scandalised by her son's attack on her beloved church; already broken by Chris's death she relies on her priest to get her through – where can she turn if the church itself is culpable? There is a touching scene at the end when she slips back into her memories of the boys' early childhood; as she talks through a particular event a look of uncertainty crosses her face. Was she wrong after all? And if she was, what does that mean for her family, her faith and her life in the small community she's always known? The acting in Our Brothers in Cloth is faultless. Jake Douglas is outstanding as Alan, but every character is played with nuance and skill. Traditional music is used to separate scenes, emphasising the rural and traditional nature of the town, and perhaps also its reluctance to question its long held views. The simple set design works well; having the non—speaking characters in some scenes remain seated at the back of the stage is a very effective way of implying their unwilling involvement. They can try to pretend they don't know what's happening, but they're still present in the moment, they can't escape. Another excellent touch is the loud ticking of the clock, which becomes particularly noticeable when Fr O'Donovan wants to talk to Alan about Chris. In the silence that follows, the clock is like the ticking of a time bomb; when Alan's rage explodes, I was so shocked I jumped in my seat. It's the silence of a nation, about to be shattered forever. Our Brothers in Cloth is a Poke the Bear Production, directed by Ryan McVeigh and produced by Oli Fyne and Ronan Colfer. See it at Assembly George Square, Studio 5 (Venue 20) at 12.15pm every day until 25 August. Tickets here. Please note: there is no show on Tuesday 19 August. For this production, Poke the Bear are partnering with survivors' charities Nexus NI and The Survivors Trust, and activist survivors Colm O'Gorman (who campaigned to have the Ferns Inquiry set up) and Sean Faloon. Like this: Like Related
