
30 years since Croatia's war of independence – DW – 08/05/2025
Once a year, on August 5, the small sleepy town of Knin in Northern Dalmatia becomes the heart of Croatia'spolitical life. The country's political and military elite gather under the flag on the castle ruins above the town, and there are patriotic speeches with pathos galore.
It's the "Day of Victory and Homeland Thanksgiving" and the "Day of Croatian Defenders," commemorating the military operation "Oluja" (Storm) carried out from August 4 to 7, 1995.
The raising of the oversized flag above Knin Fortress remains to this day a symbol of Croatian troops victory over Serbia during the Yugoslav wars of the 1990s. At that time, the Croatian army and police units recaptured the entire Krajina region on the border with Bosnia in a large-scale offensive within 85 hours — thus capturing the largest part of the third of Croatia's territory that had been occupied by Serbs since 1991.
Operation Storm also brought about a military turning point in the neighboring war in Bosnia and Herzegovina: In a coordinated action by Croatian and Bosnian-Herzegovinian armies — with limited NATO air support — the long-standing Serbian siege of the western Bosnian city of Bihac was broken and all of Western Bosnia was recaptured. Shortly afterwards, Croatian-Bosnian forces also brought other parts of Bosnia under their control. Serbian-controlled territory shrank from 70% to 49% of the country, ultimately leading to the US-brokered Dayton Peace Agreement.
The wars in former Yugoslavia, which began in 1991 with Slovenia and Croatia's declarations of independence from Yugoslavia and the subsequent Ten-Day War in Slovenia, were provisionally ended. They didn't officially end until four years later, when NATO fought against Serbia in the Kosovo War, which eventually led to the establishment of an independent state of Kosovo.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Operation Storm brought about a profound and lasting change for the country: during these 85 hours and immediately afterward, approximately 200,000 Serbs left the Krajina area heading towards Serbia. Many were forcibly expelled, but most fled in fear of revenge from advancing Croatian troops. In the preceding years, more than 170,000 Croats had been displaced from Serbian-dominated areas of Croatia, mainly at the beginning of the war. And hundreds of crimes were committed by Serbian troops against Croatian civilians.
As it turned out, this fear was justified: According to the Croatian human rights NGO documenta.hr, there was a lot of looting during Operation Storm. Many Serbian houses and even entire villages were destroyed and set on fire. More than 1,000 Serbian civilians who stayed behind were murdered.
Even though most of these crimes are well-documented, hardly anyone was prosecuted or convicted for them. Post-war Croatian judicial authorities showed little interest in investigating crimes committed by Croatian soldiers.
And neither did the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) in The Hague find those responsible. While Ante Gotovina, one of the Croatian commanders, and another Croatian army general were sentenced to long prison terms in 2011 over war crimes, both were acquitted in the second instance and released from custody.
Even though many refugees have returned to Croatia since the war, Serbs now have only marginal significance in Croatian society.
Although three decades have passed since Oluja, the assessments of the Serbian and Croatian sides differ significantly. In Croatia, it is clearly viewed positively, seen as a legitimate, justified, and heroic military operation within the framework of a defensive war.
For the 30th anniversary, a large military parade was held in the capital Zagreb on July 31, 2025. A long column displayed all the military equipment available to the Croatian army today. Many soldiers participated, and much technology was shown, with newly acquired French Rafale fighter jets flying over spectators. For the first time, soldiers from other NATO countries participated in such a display, as Croatia has been a member of the alliance since 2009. Two Leopard tanks were borrowed from Germany for the parade: while the Croatian army doesn't have them yet, they have been ordered.
Croatian President Zoran Milanovic wrote on Facebook about the parade, "We celebrate our victories; we hate nobody. We are completely aware — and I want those who come after us to be aware too — that it was a victory of Croatian soldiers, the Croatian people, and Croatia's leadership at the time."
On the Serbian side, Operation Storm is considered not only the most significant military defeat in the Yugoslav war, but also synonymous with the expulsion of Serbs and the war crimes and devastation they suffered. In this sense, Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic repeated the old narrative during this year's commemoration ceremony, under the motto "Oluja is a pogrom — We remember forever," that Serbs have been suffering under enormous injustice from the international community for 30 years.
"We will never again allow anyone to threaten the freedom of Serbs," Vucic said, adding that foreign countries are strengthening all states around Serbia and only weakening his country. Vucic also said that Serbia threatens no one, but will show everyone on September 20 "what kind of people's army we have created" and that Serbia is strong enough to defend itself. There will be a large military parade in Belgrade on this day. And once again, French Rafale fighter jets will fly over spectators at this display, just as they did in Zagreb.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Int'l Business Times
2 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Europe Pushes For Ukraine Role In Trump-Putin Talks
European leaders pushed on Sunday for Ukraine to be a part of the negotiations between the United States and Russia, ahead of talks between presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump. The two leaders will meet in the US state of Alaska on Friday to try to resolve the three-year war, but Europe has insisted that Kyiv and European powers should be part of any deal to end the conflict. EU foreign ministers will discuss the next steps before the talks in a meeting by video link on Monday, joined by their Ukrainian counterpart. The idea of a US-Russia meeting without Zelensky has raised concerns that a deal would require Kyiv to cede swathes of territory, which the EU has rejected. "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain and Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a joint statement, urging Trump to put more pressure on Russia. In a flurry of diplomacy, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky held calls with 13 counterparts over three days including Kyiv's main backers Germany, Britain and France. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz on Sunday said he hoped and assumed Zelensky will attend the leaders' summit. Top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas said any deal between the United States and Russia to end the war in Ukraine must include Kyiv and the bloc. "President Trump is right that Russia has to end its war against Ukraine. The US has the power to force Russia to negotiate seriously. Any deal between the US and Russia must have Ukraine and the EU included, for it is a matter of Ukraine's and the whole of Europe's security," Kallas said. "I will convene an extraordinary meeting of the EU foreign ministers on Monday to discuss our next steps," she said in a statement Sunday. Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andriy Sybiga will also take part in the meeting on Monday afternoon, the ministry said. NATO head Mark Rutte told ABC's This Week broadcast on Sunday that Trump was "putting pressure on Putin", adding: "Next Friday will be important because it will be about testing Putin, how serious he is on bringing this terrible war to an end." Ukraine's military said on Sunday it had taken back a village in the Sumy region from the Russian army which has made significant recent gains. The village is on the frontline in the north of the country and about 20 kilometres (13 miles) west of the main fighting between the two armies in the northern region. As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield. The EU's Kallas backed Kyiv's position on Sunday. "As we work towards a sustainable and just peace, international law is clear: All temporarily occupied territories belong to Ukraine," the EU foreign policy chief said. NATO's Rutte said it was a reality that "Russia is controlling some of Ukrainian territory" and suggested a future deal could acknowledge this. "When it comes to acknowledging, for example, maybe in a future deal, that Russia is controlling, de facto, factually, some of the territory of Ukraine. It has to be effectual recognition and not a political de jure recognition," Rutte told ABC's This Week.


Int'l Business Times
3 days ago
- Int'l Business Times
Russia Cautious On Armenia-Azerbaijan Deal, Iran Reject Border Corridor
Russia cautiously welcomed a US-brokered draft deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan on Saturday, but Moscow's regional ally Iran rejected the idea of a new border corridor backed by President Donald Trump. The two former Soviet republics signed a peace deal in Washington on Friday to end a decades-long conflict, though the fine print and binding nature of the deal remained unclear. The US-brokered agreement includes establishing a transit corridor through Armenia to connect Azerbaijan to its exclave of Nakhchivan, a longstanding demand of Baku. The United States would have development rights for the corridor -- dubbed the "Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity" -- in the strategic and resource-rich region. But Russia's ally and the warring parties' southern neighbour Tehran said it would not allow the creation of a such a corridor running along the Iranian border. "With the implementation of this plot, the security of the South Caucasus will be endangered," Akbar Velayati, an advisor to supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei told the Tasnim news agency. The planned corridor was "an impossible notion and will not happen", while the area would become "a graveyard for Trump's mercenaries", he added. In a similar tone, Moscow said it would "further analyze" the corridor clause, noting there were trilateral agreements in place between Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan, from which no one had yet withdrawn. "It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards," said Russian foreign ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova. Moscow, previously a key backer of Armenia, still has a military base there. Embroiled in its Ukraine operation, launched in 2022, it did not intervene in the latest conflict. This has strained the historically warm ties between Yerevan and Moscow, home to a large and influential Armenian diaspora, triggering Armenia's drift towards the West. Christian-majority Armenia and Muslim-majority Azerbaijan went to war twice over their border and the status of ethnic enclaves within each other's territories. Moscow, once the main power broker in the Caucasus, is now bogged down in its more than three-year offensive in Ukraine, diverting political and military resources into the grinding conflict of attrition. Both Armenia and Azerbaijan praised the US efforts in settling the conflict. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev even said he would back President Donald Trump's nomination for the Nobel Peace Prize. The US-led NATO alliance welcomed the deal as a "significant step forward". But in Moscow, Zakharova refrained from even calling it a deal, referring to it merely as "the meeting of the leaders of the South Caucasus republics in Washington" -- adding, however, that it still deserved "a positive assessment". Analysts also sounded a note of caution, with the International Crisis Group pointing out that the deal left "a lot of questions unanswered". The two countries went to war twice over the disputed Karabakh region, which Azerbaijan recaptured from Armenian forces in a lightning 2023 offensive, sparking the exodus of more than 100,000 ethnic Armenians. Azerbaijan and Armenia agreed on the text of a comprehensive peace deal in March. Much of the White House agreement was a "repackaging" of that, which helped both countries get on Trump's good side "by giving him a role," the Crisis Group's senior South Caucasus analyst Joshua Kucera said. Azerbaijan later added a host of demands to that March deal, including amendments to Armenia's constitution to drop territorial claims for Karabakh, before signing the document. Pashinyan has announced plans for a constitutional referendum in 2027, but the issue remains deeply divisive among Armenians, with Kucera warning that this could yet derail the process. Kucera called the corridor "one potentially significant development" from the White House meeting, but added that missing key details could prove "serious stumbling blocks". Nevertheless, she added, even if many details were still missing and nothing was guaranteed, the deal still gave Armenians "a promise of a better life and then maybe even more peace in the region". 'It should not be ignored that Armenia's border with Iran is guarded by Russian border guards,' said Russia's Zakharova AFP


DW
3 days ago
- DW
As Putin and Trump talk Ukraine, what will be on the agenda? – DW – 08/09/2025
The presidents of Russia and the US plan to meet next Friday in Alaska to discuss a possible end to the war in Ukraine. What do they want to achieve, and what are the most contentious issues? Russian President Vladimir Putin and his US counterpart Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in person for bilateral talks on August 15 to discuss how to end the war in Ukraine. Before his election victory in November 2024, Trump announced he would end the war within the first 24 hours of his term. He is now about 200 days past his own deadline. Trump said the meeting with Putin will help accelerate the peace process. Here's an overview of what's known so far. The two leaders will meet next Friday in Alaska, a state in the northwest of the United States. The Kremlin has confirmed the meeting and has also invited Trump to Russia after the talks in Alaska. Kremlin foreign policy adviser Yuri Ushakov described the choice of location for the meeting as "logical." "Russia and the United States are close neighbors, bordering each other," Ushakov said. "It seems quite logical that our delegation should simply fly across the Bering Strait and that such an important and eagerly awaited summit between the leaders of the two countries should be held in Alaska." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video For the US president, who portrays himself as an accomplished dealmaker, taking a significant step toward peace would be of personal and reputational importance. His political ally, Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu, recently nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. As for the actual conflict, Trump wants a ceasefire at the very least, and a long-term solution, at best. Trump has said he also wants to arrange a three-way meeting with Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. But neither the Russian nor the Ukrainian leader has agreed to this yet. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Russian president wants to prevent the NATO military alliance from expanding further eastward. It's likely he will try to convince Trump to vote against Ukraine's NATO membership . Another important point for Putin is preventing any possible NATO military presence on Ukrainian territory. He also wants a new, Russia-friendly government in Kyiv. In addition, Putin has repeatedly demanded that certain territories captured by Russian troops during the Ukraine war be permanently transferred to Russia. Putin likely expects Trump to provide assurances on this as well. The biggest point of contention is military action. Russian attacks on military and civilian targets in Ukraine have resulted in many deaths and the destruction of Ukrainian infrastructure. Ukraine is also striking back inside Russia and doing damage there. However, there's an imbalance in terms of population and Ukraine is keen to end the war and, with it, the rising death toll among its own people. But at what cost? According to experts, Russia probably won't be willing to end the war without some concessions, a pivotal factor being Ukraine's potential NATO membership. According to Kyiv, NATO membership would significantly reduce the likelihood of another Russian attack in the future because when one NATO member is attacked, the others are required to come to its aid. The security alliance includes the US and other nuclear-armed powers, the United Kingdom and France. Another negotiating point will be Ukraine's borders. Kyiv has demanded full sovereignty for Ukraine and wants the borders to go back to the way they were before the war. But experts have said it's unlikely Russia would agree, as Putin wants territories currently held by the Russian army to be transferred to Russia. Russian troops currently occupy a large part of the four eastern Ukrainian regions of Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia, territories which Russia claims as its own. In addition, there are areas elsewhere in Ukraine currently held by the Russian army, as well as the Crimean Peninsula, which Russia annexed in 2014.