Conclave to pick new pope begins on May 7. But who are the antipopes?
The Papal Conclave 2025 will start on Wednesday, May 7, with a A total of 133 cardinals from different countries meeting inside the Sistine Chapel in Vatican City to choose the next pope, successor of Pope Francis who died on April 21. Antipope caused a lot of confusion because of which Church was split for almost 40 years(REUTERS)
As the Catholic Church prepares to elect its 267th pope, global attention is fixed on the Vatican. From speculation over frontrunners and betting odds to curiosity about the secretive voting process, the world is watching closely.
Amid the anticipation, one question is also resurfacing: Who exactly are the antipopes? Who are antipopes?
An antipope is a person who makes a competing claim to the papacy, in opposition to the legitimately elected pope. This typically occurs during times of political or doctrinal conflict within the Church, and the antipope is not recognised as the true pope by the wider Catholic Church.
Also Read: What was Pope Francis' final wish? Here's how late pontiff's popemobile will help children in Gaza
Between 1378 and 1417, the Catholic Church witnessed a period of Western Schism also known as the Papal Schism or Great Western Schism. This was time period where multiple individuals simultaneously claimed to be the legitimate pope. The Schism also saw the emergence of rival claimants (antipope), which created serious political and spiritual splits in the Church.
Antipope caused a lot of confusion because of which Church was split for almost 40 years. However, The schism was ultimately resolved by the Council of Constance in 1417, which led to the election of Martin V, a universally accepted pontiff, as reported by Pique. Well known- antipopes
Some well-known antipopes were Clement VII, Benedict XIII, Alexander V, and John XXIII.
Also Read: No phone signals, jammers, lockdown: Vatican's world to seal for Conclave to elect pope
As the new conclave begins, the idea of antipopes reminds us that choosing a pope has not always been simple. Sometimes, it led to long and serious arguments in the Church.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Economic Times
43 minutes ago
- Economic Times
As US trade truce gets back on track, some Chinese exporters are 'slowly dying'
Reuters U.S. and China flags are pictured at Lancaster House, on the second day scheduled for trade talks between the U.S. and China, in London, Britain, June 10, 2025. Jacky Ren, who owns a kitchen appliance factory in China, says exporters in his industry are now selling at a loss to keep their U.S. clients, with little power to say "no" to requests for lower prices on products facing higher tariffs. If an exporter does not take such orders, Ren said, "you will die immediately. So, people think it's better to die slowly." U.S. and Chinese officials agreed on Tuesday on ways to restore a trade truce and roll back duelling export restrictions, including on rare earths, where China has a near-monopoly in production and major leverage in the negotiations. But in the meantime, the pain from U.S. tariffs is deepening in China, especially among smaller exporters such as Ren's Gstar Electronics Appliance Co., which did not move part of their production abroad after U.S. President Donald Trump imposed tariffs in his first term in office. The growing pressure on companies to sell at a loss or to cut wages and jobs to stay afloat gives Washington a pain point to press Beijing in coming weeks and months as talks continue between the two sides to rebalance their trade relationship. "If it lasts more than three or four months, I think many of these small and medium-sized enterprises will not be able to bear it," said Zhiwu Chen, chair professor of finance at the University of Hong Kong. "This is definitely a bargaining chip for the United States." This week's talks in London are expected to bring the two sides back to where they were after an initial discussion in Geneva last month, when they agreed to cut back tariffs from triple-digits to levels that are still damaging for both sides, but at least allow trade flows to resume. U.S. levies on Chinese goods remain 30 percentage points higher than last year. In April, when tariffs were at their highest, the number of loss-making Chinese industrial firms rose 3.6% year-on-year to 164,467 - a whopping 32% of the total, official statistics show. Industrial capacity utilisation dropped to 74.1% in the first quarter of this year - when Washington began raising tariffs - from 76.2% in the last quarter of 2024, according to Chinese government data. It remains near record lows. And while China's overall export growth rate of 4.8% in May might be interpreted as a sign of resilience - even as U.S. exports shrank by more than 30% - the intense competition among Chinese manufacturers looking for a slice of the subdued external demand is evident in falling prices. "People forget, but the current tariff level is already quite painful," says Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief economist for Asia Pacific at Natixis. "This is a weakness" for Beijing, she said, but cautioned "it's not a big card" for Washington, which has its own worries over high inflation and product scarcity. Beijing was also confident it can bear more pain than its rival, she said. DELAYED WAGES Before the meeting in Switzerland, Beijing had grown increasingly alarmed about internal signals that Chinese firms were struggling to avoid bankruptcies, including in labour-intensive industries such as furniture and toys, Reuters reported last month. The subsequent rollback in tariffs may have saved China from a nightmare scenario of mass layoffs, but analysts say millions of jobs remain at risk. Candice Li, a marketing manager for a medical devices maker in southern China, says her employer has not paid wages for the past two months due to cashflow issues caused by new demands from U.S. clients who want to protect themselves from the tariff uncertainty. Li says U.S. buyers no longer offer an advance deposit for their orders and demand to only make payments 120-180 days after delivery. And because other Chinese firms accept such terms, her employer is not in a position to fight back. "They have us under their thumb," Li said. "It looks calm on the surface, but it's really hard to do business now." "The company can't even manage to pay wages," she said, adding a quarter of the staff left as a result. "It's really hard to keep the company running." To be sure, not all Chinese firms are under such strain. In the short term, neither the United States nor other countries can significantly reduce their reliance on supply chains from an economy that produces about a third of the world's goods. The pain is being felt mostly among small firms in sectors that don't make essential products, such as Christmas decorations or where China can easily be replaced by other producers - for instance, in household appliances and other low-to-mid-range electronics. Across the economy, industrial profits in China still rose 1.4% year-on-year in January-April, according to official statistics that capture data from firms with annual revenue of at least 20 million yuan ($2.78 million). China's headline resilience has been helped by U.S. importers frontloading orders ahead of higher tariffs, while Beijing ramped up fiscal spending and cut interest rates, said Shuang Ding, Standard Chartered's chief Greater China and North Asia economist. But as these mitigating factors wane in coming months, Beijing might grow increasingly uncomfortable, analysts warn. "They still rely on low-end manufacturing sectors, in particular exporting sectors, to support their general macroeconomy," said He-Ling Shi, economics professor at Monash University in Melbourne. "The American government has to react to pressure from industries. China's central government ... doesn't need to react immediately, but in the long term, it's still a big concern."
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Why are LA protesters waving the Mexican flag?
As immigration protests grip Los Angeles following ICE raids and a federal troop deployment, the Mexican flag has emerged as a powerful and controversial symbol. Seen across rallies in LA County, the flag reflects cultural pride for some and raises political alarm for others. Why has it become central to this latest wave of demonstrations? read more A man skates holding a Mexican flag as smoke and flames rise from burning vehicles during a protest against federal immigration sweeps, near Los Angeles City Hall in downtown Los Angeles, California, US, June 8, 2025. File Image/Reuters As protests erupted across Los Angeles following a controversial string of ICE raids and the federal government's deployment of troops, one symbol stood out prominently amid the marches, rallies, and clashes: the green, white, and red Mexican flag. From downtown LA to surrounding cities like Compton and Paramount, demonstrators have carried the Mexican flag alongside American and other Latin American banners. How the Mexican flag is being used at LA protests Tensions in Los Angeles reached a boiling point after U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers conducted sweeping raids last week in the city's garment district. The operation resulted in the arrest of 118 immigrants, according to federal authorities. The crackdown sparked an immediate wave of protests across various parts of LA, including the city center, Compton, and Paramount. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While many protests began peacefully, scenes of confrontation and civil unrest soon followed. Protesters voiced opposition to what they described as an indiscriminate assault on immigrant communities. Amid the chaos, many carried flags — chiefly the Mexican flag — as a gesture of solidarity and cultural pride. The Trump administration responded to the unrest by deploying approximately 2,000 National Guard troops and Marines to Los Angeles, a decision that inflamed tensions further. California Governor Gavin Newsom expressed strong opposition to the federal deployment, publicly denouncing it as a violation of California's authority. In a post on X, he stated: 'I have formally requested the Trump Administration rescind their unlawful deployment of troops in Los Angeles County and return them to my command… We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. This is a serious breach of state sovereignty — inflaming tensions while pulling resources from where they're actually needed. Rescind the order. Return control to California.' The growing presence of law enforcement and military personnel only heightened public anger, leading to more clashes and dozens of arrests in ensuing days. Meanwhile, social media posts from officials and media coverage began to focus on one vivid and recurring image: the Mexican flag flying amid smoke, police lines and protest chants. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Why the Mexican flag For many demonstrators, waving the Mexican flag is neither an act of rebellion nor foreign interference — it is a symbol of identity, belonging and solidarity. Los Angeles County is home to over 3.4 million residents of Mexican heritage or birth, the largest such population in any US county. According to 2023 US Census estimates, approximately 4.8 million people of Hispanic or Latino origin live in LA County, comprising 48 per cent of the population. Among them, about 74 per cent are of Mexican descent. The flag's appearance in protests is thus rooted in demographic and cultural realities. Protesters have not only carried the Mexican flag but also the flags of other Latin American countries and the United States. A man waves a Mexican flag as smoke and flames rise from a burning vehicle during a protest against federal immigration sweeps, near Los Angeles City Hall in downtown Los Angeles, California, US, June 8, 2025. File Image/Reuters In some cases, hybrid flags combining national symbols have appeared as well. Elizabeth Torres, 36, who protested outside a detention centre in downtown LA, articulated the dual sentiments of cultural heritage and civic pride when she told The New York Times: 'I am a very proud American. But I have to show support also for our Mexican brothers and sisters.' In the eyes of participants like Torres, the flag represents more than a nation — it's a gesture of inclusion, a reminder of familial roots, and a protest against what they see as unjust immigration enforcement practices targeting communities like theirs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD How Trump is seeing the 'foreign flags' While many demonstrators see the flag as a celebration of identity, the Trump administration has interpreted it as a political provocation. The visibility of foreign flags — especially the Mexican one — became a talking point for top officials who characterized the protests as a threat to national sovereignty and law enforcement. Vice President JD Vance posted on X: 'Insurrectionists carrying foreign flags are attacking immigration enforcement officers.' Stephen Miller, Trump's deputy chief of staff for policy, echoed similar sentiments in a widely circulated social media post: 'Foreign nationals, waving foreign flags, rioting and obstructing federal law enforcement attempting to expel illegal foreign invaders.' White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt also weighed in, sharing a photo of a protester waving the Mexican flag and declaring: 'The riots in Los Angeles prove that we desperately need more immigration enforcement personnel and resources. America must reverse the invasion unleashed by Joe Biden of millions of unvetted illegal aliens into our country.' The Department of Homeland Security released multiple images and videos featuring the Mexican flag during protests, reinforcing a narrative that equates the protests with foreign interference and lawlessness. However, legal experts and academics have pushed back on these claims, emphasizing the legality and precedent behind flag-waving in protest contexts. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Raul Hinojosa-Ojeda, an associate professor of Chicana, Chicano and Central American Studies at UCLA, told CNN: 'Waving a foreign flag – or even destroying an American one – is legal under freedom of expression rights protected by the Constitution's First Amendment.' He also pointed out that the Trump administration's reaction to the flag is part of a broader strategy to delegitimise dissent by focusing on visual symbols: 'Invoking flags to demonise protesters is a well-documented move on the part of the Trump administration, knowing that every single demonstration of this type brings out the Mexican flag.' What history tell us The current Mexican flag was officially adopted in 1968, though earlier versions date back to the early 19th century during Mexico's war for independence from Spain. In Mexico, the use of the flag is strictly regulated by law — it can only be displayed during patriotic ceremonies, official events, or under specific conditions at schools and sports functions. In the US, however, the flag has long played a role in immigrant rights demonstrations. Its use at protests became particularly prominent in 1994, during resistance to California's Proposition 187. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD That controversial measure sought to deny undocumented immigrants access to public services like education and healthcare. The flag was used by demonstrators at the time to assert pride in their heritage and defy exclusionary policies. Former Mexican foreign minister Jorge Castañeda contextualised the flag's symbolism during a recent interview with CNN: 'This is something that goes back, actually, to the 1990s, when many people protested against Proposition 187 at the time. And then also the early 2000s when demonstrations all over the United States took place against several laws that were being implemented then on immigration.' Castañeda noted that while the flag is once again central to protest visuals, most of those carrying it are likely US citizens. 'Practically all of the demonstrators, all of the protesters, are American citizens,' he said. 'You would have to be quite reckless and foolish to be a Mexican citizen without papers, or even as a legal permanent resident, to go out and demonstrate today in these protests because you would most likely be arrested and deported, even if you're a legal permanent resident and certainly if you have no papers.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD While critics argue that the use of foreign flags can undermine the effectiveness of a protest by appearing unpatriotic, many in Los Angeles view the flag as a deeply personal symbol. For them, it serves not to reject America but to advocate for a more inclusive version of it. How waving foreign flags in US is not new Waving foreign flags during US demonstrations is not unique to these events. Public celebrations, parades, and political rallies across the United States frequently feature foreign flags without controversy. Puerto Rican flags were widely flown during New York City's Puerto Rican Day Parade. Irish flags are a staple of St. Patrick's Day celebrations. In various urban enclaves, such as Little Italy or Koreatown, national banners proudly decorate businesses and neighbourhoods. What makes the Mexican flag's use controversial in this moment is the political context. As the Trump administration accelerates efforts to remove undocumented immigrants, invoke the Alien Enemies Act, and implement stricter immigration enforcement measures, any sign of cultural pride among immigrant communities has become a lightning rod for criticism. The administration insists it is targeting 'the worst of the worst' in its enforcement push, but immigration advocates argue that ordinary families, workers, and community members are being swept up in these operations without just cause. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
2 hours ago
- First Post
Putin wants to replace WhatsApp in Russia with a ‘national messenger' app
WhatsApp is the last surviving foreign messaging platform in Russia, and now, Putin wants it gone. The Russian president recently highlighted the need to establish a 'national messenger' read more WhatsApp logo is seen in this illustration taken, on August 22, 2022. Reuters File Russian President Vladimir Putin wants his officials to deactivate their WhatsApp accounts and embrace a national messaging service that the country plans to create within the next few years. WhatsApp is the last surviving foreign messaging platform in Russia, and now, Putin wants it gone. The Russian president recently highlighted the need to establish a 'national messenger'. The State Duma of Russia has adopted a federal law that will oversee the creation of the service for correspondence, telephone calls, and as a platform to receive public and commercial services. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The development was confirmed by presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov, according to a report by TASS. What will the new messenger be like? Peskov has noted that Russia's indigenous messaging service should be 'best quality' and 'on par' with foreign alternatives. The new service will run on Russian-developed software and be integrated with the government portal Gosuslugi, allowing users to verify their identity, present digital documents, register transactions, and certify documents using electronic signatures. 'The emergence of a national messenger is great, provided that it will be a competitive messenger that is on par, as they say, with foreign alternatives. Because there are many of them out there, and anyone can use them,' Peskov said. Peskov emphasised the need to cultivate a competitive landscape in the sector, stating that 'a national messenger - and not just a single one - should appear in our country,' highlighting the belief that competition fuels innovation. He added, 'There should also be a competitive environment in this field, because worldwide, messengers thrive only in conditions of very, very tough competition.' Which countries have their own messaging services? With the introduction of its own messaging service, Russia won't be the first country to enter the market of correspondence apps. Countries like China, Vietnam, Japan and South Korea have their indigenous messaging applications.