
Explosions heard northeast of Iran's Tehran, state-run Nour News says
The reasons were not immediately clear, Nour News added.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


EVN Report
a day ago
- EVN Report
ARTINERARY: August 2025
It's been over a year since we launched Artinerary at EVN Report and it's time to make some fixes. Starting this August, in an effort to become more consistent, we'll be switching to monthly editions that will appear in the first week of each month. Of course, since news of cultural events in Armenia is released just days before openings, these editions will be regularly updated to include new entries. That said, it's pretty difficult to pitch anything 'cultured' these days when you're faced with the garish spectacle of our Real-Politik landscape. In a development that would make the Game of Thrones writers jealous, recent episodes of Armenian Power Games have pushed government officials, the clergy and the sundry mess that calls itself the opposition, toward unprecedented levels of ignominy in MMA-style skirmishes on and off the social media. While the long-brewing 'existential' confrontation between the Armenian Apostolic Church and the Government was only a matter of time, its timing, and more so, its form, has left everyone gasping in disbelief at the crude machoism of it all—from 'priestly' terrorist plots and masked FBI-style raids on the Mother See to jaw-dropping penis semantics. What's most disturbing, I think, is not so much the open display of the profound rift between the Church and the State, but the face-to-face encounter with the nefarious essence of our society's toxic machoism—the beloved linchpin of Armenian patriarchy. Well, this is what you get for not allowing people any means of collective cultural release – something that the Catholics, Protestants and the Buddhists have regulated so well with their carnivals and fetes that let people mock all forms of authority and morality for a day or two and then go back to more civil forms of obedience or disobedience. Could someone please send these men in suits an annotated copy of Mikhail Bakhtin? JANSEM: THE MASTER OF VIVID LINE Art and entertainment can be an unholy mix, as evidenced by the work of so many post-modern masters like Damien Hurst and Yayoi Kusama, whose quite tacky, but often spectacular installations still confound us with the question as to whether it's all some ingenious ruse or not. But up until the height of modernism in the 1910s, art has always meant to entertain or, at the least, titillate the public to some degree, without necessarily sacrificing its intellectual credentials. lsn't it the thrill of complex visual storytelling that still attracts us to so much Renaissance and Baroque art? The famous French-Armenian painter and graphic artist Jean Jansem (Hovhannes Semerdjian) chose to follow this more traditional trope of visual art when he entered the war-ridden Parisian art scene in the mid-1940s. Though not exactly diverting in their morose dissection of post-war nihilism and angst, Jansem's figurative, social-realist paintings spoke to a public that was tired of all the elitist and obtuse abstract and conceptual art that was being promoted by the art establishment. Branded a 'miserabilist'—a major movement in French and European art of the 1940s-1960s—this first generation descendant of the Armenian Genocide wanted nothing more than to speak directly and clearly about the core human values he deemed to be threatened by unmitigated progress and modernization. As his popularity rose from the mid-1960s onwards, Jansem's work mellowed, becoming more allegorical and palatable for a broad international audience that lined up to buy his distinctively ethereal images of melancholic female models and dancers, still-lifes and urban landscapes. This commercial popularity—bolstered by the artist's uptake of color lithography—has considerably dampened Jansem's credentials, casting him as something of a peddler of misery chic for the bourgeoisie. But this is a wholly undeserved perception, as the new retrospective of Jansem's lithographic work at the National Gallery of Armenia shows . Composed of over 120 lithographic works from the 1960s up to 1990s the artist donated to the Gallery, this first, large-scale survey of his oeuvre in Armenia provides a revealing insight into the highly methodical way Jansem explored the social, aesthetic and philosophical aspects of the subjects he considered to be of urgent and timeless resonance. In a way, his profoundly humanist vision has gained relevance in our troubling reality, coming as a reminder of the elemental empathy and social bonds that we're losing with every bomb in Gaza and every scroll on social media. ABBAS KIAROSTAMI: DESTINATION UNKNOWN When the first Armenian-operated photography studio opened in Constantinople in 1858, few could have predicted the degree to which the Armenians would come to populate this field throughout the next century, or the degree to which the medium would be disregarded by the Armenian cultural establishment thereafter. It was only last month that the National Gallery of Armenia (NGA) finally launched a permanent exhibition space dedicated to photography and new media—the first ever institutional platform of its kind in the country's history. While modest in size, this room marks a momentous shift in the reassessment of the medium as both an art form and a key conduit of visual culture. While the Gallery's own photography collection is still being formed, the inaugural exhibition of the dedicated hall hints at a distinctive direction. Organized in collaboration with the Golden Apricot Film Festival, the show presents a single series of 28 black and white photographs by the legendary master of Iranian cinema, Abbas Kiarostami. Renowned for his hauntingly languid, brilliantly structured films, Kiarostami was also an obsessive photographer, whose long-gestating series on deceptively simple subjects like roads, trees and rain, parallel his cinematic investigations into the essence of nature, human connection and belonging. ' Abbas Kiarostami: Destination Unknown ' presents only the filmmaker's photographs depicting various roads, which he shot while scouring film locations in Iran's provinces. Strikingly beautiful in their graphical sharpness and asceticism, the photographs work best as a sequence of tonal and metaphorical shifts that gradually expands beyond its prosaic subject matter into a transcendental meditation on the sublime power of nature and the infinity of time. The decision to begin the Gallery's photo-exhibition program with a show dedicated to a non-Armenian master from Iran, who was best known for his work in a different art form, suggests a trans-disciplinary, regionally-focused and internationally-orientated strategy. This is essential if the NGA's objective is to position Armenia as an important base for rethinking and reframing the global histories of photography. Exhibition: ' Abbas Kiarostami: Destination Unknown ' Where: National Gallery of Armenia Republic Square, Yerevan Dates: July 15-September 15 MASK: IMAGE AND CONCEPT In a welcome development, transdisciplinary (and transcultural) approaches have also been flickering in the thematic shows organized by the Museum of Russian Art. Their latest show dedicated to the Mask brings the colorful ethnographic still-lifes by sister-painters Mariam and Yeranuhi Aslamazyan together with African ceremonial masks from the collection of the Ethnography Museum of Armenia. The exhibition theme presents a fascinating opportunity to explore the way the 'primitive' mask has been perceived in Armenian visual art—a symbolic device popularized way back in the 1910s by Martiros Saryan—and how it has come to embody our cultural ideas of otherness (especially since Armenians themselves do not have a significant tradition of making or wearing masks). Using the Aslamazyan sisters for this purpose is more than apt: the sisters travelled extensively in Africa and South-East Asia, eventually painting dozens of exuberantly colorful and unabashedly ethno-exotic still-lives that are aesthetically complex echoes of the Soviet imperial ambitions towards the Global South. Judging from the exhibition's promo text, however, the curator and the organizers have no intention in taking a critical or, God forbid, decolonial stance at these issues, focusing instead on the mask as a 'symbol of faith, memory, morality and family values…' This non-committal attitude aside, the show is a rare chance to see these stunning examples of African folk art in Armenia. Exhibition: 'Mask: Image and Concept' Where: Museum of Russian Art 38 Isahakyan St., Yerevan Dates: August 1-September 24 HAO KEPING: MOUNTAINS AND RIVERS OF CHINA Exhibitions focused on distant cultures are a rarity in Armenia. So when not one, but three events simultaneously spotlight contexts far beyond our immediate region, it feels like a subtle shift in the cultural tide—even if some arrive neatly packaged as instruments of soft power from authoritarian states like China. One such exhibition, hosted by the Yerevan History Museum, comes courtesy of the Ningbo Museum—one of the more recent behemoths born of China's museum-building boom. Titled ' Mountains and Rivers of China ', the show is dedicated to the celebrated printmaker Shao Keping and delivers precisely what its name suggests: graceful woodblock prints of China's awe-inspiring natural landscapes, rendered by one of the foremost figures of Chinese socialist-realist art. Born in Ningbo in 1916, Shao Keping rose to prominence soon after the founding of the People's Republic, becoming a key figure in both color printmaking and propaganda poster design. While this exhibition steers clear of the usual imagery of jubilant tractor drivers and heroic coal miners, Keping's idyllic vistas—merging traditional Chinese aesthetics with European realism and Soviet-style neo-classicism—are no less ideologically driven. Rooted in nationalist sentiment and the utopian vision of early Communism, these bucolic landscapes construct a vision of China as a harmonious promised land—conspicuously scrubbed of poverty, labor exploitation, repression, or looming ecological disasters. That absence is precisely what makes the exhibition so compelling: it serves as telling evidence of the nefarious outcomes from the forced union between the arts and the state. Exhibition: ' Mountains and Rivers of China ' Where: Yerevan History Museum 1/1 Argishti St., Yerevan Dates: July 31-September 24 TRADITIONAL HEBEI PAINTING We're going to pretend that this year's surge of Chinese-themed events in Armenia stem purely from a mutual desire to deepen cultural ties. Regardless of the motives, it's a pleasure to encounter the utterly charming art of nianhua (New Year pictures) and nèihuà (inside-painted) bottles from China's historic Hebei province. These forms of traditional folk art remain hugely popular in contemporary China, but visitors to the Martiros Saryan Museum now have the rare opportunity to view precious historical examples on loan from the Hebei Province Museum. The nianhua —essentially early precursors to postcards—are woodblock prints typically depicting deities, symbolic motifs, or zodiac figures associated with the Chinese New Year. Ranging from simple, almost naïve imagery to intricately composed narrative scenes with political and satirical subtexts, these ephemeral prints offer a vivid window into the richness of everyday visual culture in China. Equally captivating are the scented glass bottles painted from the inside with astonishingly fine landscape scenes. Too refined to be dismissed as mere souvenirs, these objects embody the remarkable craftsmanship and attentiveness that reveal much about the specifically Chinese attitudes toward the symbolic importance of objects of material culture and the role of art as a vital means of communication. The choice of the Martiros Saryan Museum as host is particularly fitting. Saryan, the master of Armenian modernist painting, had an enduring fascination with traditional Chinese art, which he also collected. This exhibition may well prompt a long-overdue reassessment of that largely overlooked cultural connection. PERSONAL SPACE: A COLLECTOR'S VIEW Closer to the home front, the Nikoghosyan Foundation is presenting an exhibition featuring works by the so-called 'Bielutin' group of painters from Russia—a loose network of underground artists who challenged the official Soviet art establishment with a scandalous 1962 exhibition at Manezh in Moscow. The group's figurehead, Ely Bielutin founded an independent school and a movement that he termed as 'New Reality'– a conceptually and stylistically hybrid framework inspired by early Soviet avant-garde and the European expressionists. The more talented exponents of the group, like Irina Zakharova, Vladimir Tryamkin and Vera Preobrazhenskaya, were instrumental in cementing the non-conformist scene as the most intellectually and creatively dynamic part of Soviet art. Drawn from the massive collection of late, Moscow-based collector Samvel Hovhannisyan and his wife Karina Kazanjian, the show provides a tantalizing glimpse into the exuberantly experimental milieu of these dissident artists. The exhibition has no scholarly ambitions as it also mixes-in an eclectic range of works by Armenian artists—from famous names like Yervand Kochar and Rudolf Khachatryan to a number of forgotten figures from the 1980s and 1990s. The result is a strange, but captivating potpourri that, first of all, reflects the obsessive drive and broadly-inclusive tastes behind one of the greatest Armenian private art collections ever assembled. THE MANUSCRIPT MYSTERY OF NATURE CREATIVITY Matenadaran's current show presents yet another slice of medieval ecclesiastical visual culture, this time focusing on creationist representations of nature in Armenian manuscripts, complemented by examples of Arabic and Persian illuminated art. That's all well and good, but beyond this broad thematic framework, the exhibition lacks a clear conceptual or critical anchor. It's difficult to gauge, for instance, whether medieval Armenian artists developed distinctly local iconographic, symbolic, or aesthetic modes for depicting the six days of creation and natural phenomena, or whether they simply followed existing regional traditions of ornamentation and illustration. Still, the inclusion of several rarely exhibited manuscripts, intricate silver bindings, and other book-related artifacts showcasing a variety of stylistic approaches offers plenty of visual delight—despite the Institute's unfortunate persistence with musty, cabinet-of-curiosities-style displays. Exhibition: 'The Manuscript Mystery of Nature Creativity' Where: Matenadaran 53 Mashtots Ave., Yerevan Dates: Open from July 2 REFLECTIONS FROM THE MARGINS What's so fun about graduate art exhibitions? Trying to guess who'll be the next big thing, of course—or who most likely won't. Since 2007, the team at Focus NGO's Medialab Centre has been quietly nurturing a new generation of young art practitioners. It's a small but essential alternative education platform where students receive informal training in analogue photography, film and media studies, contemporary art, and—perhaps most crucially—critical thinking. This month, the center presents its latest group of graduates, whose works are organized around the theme of socio-political margins as spaces of resistance. With just seven participants, the exhibition is modest in scale and ambition. Yet the range of critical issues tackled—spanning unchecked urban development to the social stigma surrounding mental illness—offers a sharp and hopeful contrast to the kind of soul-crushing banality too often seen at state art school shows. And that alone is reason enough to support these emerging voices and keep an eye on their future paths. Exhibition: 'Reflections from the Margins' Where: NPAK 1/3 Buzand St., Yerevan Dates: August 8-August 15 PARUYR DAVTYAN. DAVTYAN PARUYR Chances are the name Paruyr Davtyan won't ring a bell for most people in Armenia. But among those in the know, it's linked to one of the most compelling mid-career contemporary artists to emerge from the post-Soviet space. Debuting on the Russian art scene in the early 2010s, the Gyumri-born, transdisciplinary artist quickly established himself as a leading figure within the tradition of Moscow Conceptualism—a politically charged, theory-driven avant-garde movement rooted in early 20th-century Dadaism. Now a fixture on major contemporary art platforms and biennales in Moscow, Davtyan is making his belated debut in his homeland , courtesy of the Cafesjian Centre for the Arts and curator Armen Yesayants. His ironically self-titled solo exhibition offers a clear entry point into his conceptually dense yet surprisingly palatable practice. While the founding figures of Moscow Conceptualism focused on dismantling ideological structures in the late Soviet era, Davtyan is more concerned with interrogating the nature of art itself. Does art possess an innate, immutable identity, or is it a shifting illusion shaped—and reshaped—by socio-historical forces? In exploring these questions, Davtyan's work becomes entirely intertextual and self-reflexive, drawing from and mischievously remixing a vast reservoir of art history that he seems to both gently parody and passionately revere. Although the methods of deconstructive pastiche he employs have become so institutionalized that he appears at times like a classicists of sorts, there's a genuine boldness and vitality in his witty, yet strangely poetic, subversions of canonical works like Monet's Water Lilies or Duchamp's Fountain . Compact but beautifully curated, the exhibition offers a strong overview of Davtyan's practice over the past decade—and is a must-see for anyone interested in the current intellectual trajectories of contemporary visual art. GYUMRI ART WEEK Now in its fourth edition, Gyumri Art Week has firmly established itself as the rightful successor to the short-lived but influential Gyumri Biennale. This month, it returns in full force with an eclectic program that includes contemporary art exhibitions, outdoor installations, performances, music, theater and film screenings. This year's edition centers on ecological and environmental themes, bringing together an intriguing mix of local artists alongside emerging voices from abroad. Special focus is given to Hamlet Hovsepyan and Marcos Grigoryan—two towering figures of Armenian conceptual and land art, whose work called for a more evolved and conscious relationship between nature and artistic practice. Their legacy provides a vital historical anchor, helping to contextualize the depth and ambition of the current generation of artists, many of whom are now confronting the kind of ecological breakdown that even Hovsepyan and Grigoryan could hardly have imagined. Weighty themes aside, Gyumri Art Week also offers a refreshing opportunity to engage with contemporary art outside of the usual Yerevan bubble. Because, the spaces and people through which we typically experience art deeply shape our perception of its meaning and relevance. Attending an event like this in a regional center such as Gyumri can expand—or even transform—your understanding of how art sustains and feeds the social fabric of everyday life. Festival: 'Gyumri Art Week- 4th Edition: Ecology & Environment' Where: Gyumri, Armenia Dates: August 8-August 17 See program DRIVE The summer blockbuster train is in full swing with the expected reboots and franchises like the latest 'Superman', 'Fantastic Four', 'Freaky Friday' and so on. Somewhere in between there will also be a movie with either Tom Cruise or Brad Pitt riding something fast and furious. It's a seemingly endless loop of tautological inanity that wears any semblance of meaning to naught with each, progressively more absurd cycle. So it's a real reprieve to find in the cracks of this grotesque hall of simulacra an authentic piece of film art, even if it was made some 15 years ago. Starring Ryan Gosling—one of the poster-boys of 21st century melancholia for all things analogue—Nicholas Winding Refn's incandescent 2011 thriller ' Drive ' (winner of best director prize at Cannes Film Festival) stands as one of the cinematic high points of the past two decades. A story about an enigmatic stunt driver who gets into a crime job that takes a disastrous turn, 'Drive' is a tense, almost mathematically designed narrative about an aloof loner who temporarily allows emotions to slip through his steely facade. Winding Refn's neon-soaked vision is steeped in nostalgia for the 1970s and 1980s, with multiple references to films like 'Taxi Driver', 'The Conversation', 'Diva' and 'Blue Velvet'. But the Dutch director's cinephile obsessions do not prevent him from crafting a universe that is entirely his own—a neo-noir territory where every surface and glance is permeated by a haunting mixture of strangeness, ravishing beauty and lurid violence. It's the kind of flawlessly engineered mechanism that only gets better with age—like the iconic Chevy Impala that Gosling stylishly wheels into cinematic eternity. So, do yourself a favor, buy a ticket and unbuckle your seatbelt for this transcendent experience.


EVN Report
10-07-2025
- EVN Report
How U.S. Involvement in the Iran-Israel War Can Impact Armenia
The Iran-Israel war, which escalated dramatically with U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, has come to a halt with a ceasefire. With the dust from the conflict still settling, this is a moment to take stock of how the conflict affects security relationships for Armenia. The U.S. involvement in the Iran-Israel war will have profound and multi-dimensional effects and risks for Armenia due to its geopolitical location, common border with Iran, energy projects, security concerns, and regional alliances. The current unpredictable foreign policy stance of the United States further complicates Yerevan's geopolitical strategy. Geopolitical and Domestic Risks for Armenia Armenia is located in a complex geopolitical environment. The nation borders Iran, Turkey, Azerbaijan and Georgia, and has an unsettled conflict and closed borders with its two neighbors. The South Caucasus region is deeply sensitive to any shifts in Middle Eastern power dynamics. U.S. military action against Iran in the midst of the Iran-Israel conflict could ripple into the South Caucasus, affecting Armenia's energy supplies, trade routes, security posture as well as diplomatic balancing act between East and West. While Armenia's regional policy aims to normalize relations with its neighbors , who are also sensitive to the escalation in the Middle East, the conflict may hinder stabilization of relations with Azerbaijan. In the context of security and military implications there is a risk of spillover because Armenia shares a border with Iran, should the current ceasefire fail. Consequently, direct military operations (missile strikes, drone warfare, air raids) near the northern Iranian border could physically endanger Armenian border communities and create risks for locals, especially when Iranian nuclear facilities are targeted. Iran might increase its military deployments in northern provinces bordering Armenia, turning the area into a security hotspot. Retaliatory strikes by Israel, the U.S. or Iran near Armenian territory could cause civilian casualties or large refugee flows toward Armenia. A lasting war on the territory of Iran could also destabilize the South Caucasus because Azerbaijan serves as a strategic partner of Israel and has deep military ties with Israel. Azerbaijan could provide logistical support or airspace for Israeli operations and receive advanced weaponry in return, tilting the regional military balance. Simultaneously, Azerbaijan might exploit the chaos to pressure Armenia over the Syunik region. While Azerbaijan has made public statements suggesting that third parties cannot use its territory for conflict, it could use the conflict as an opportunity to launch its own operations. A prolonged war on Iranian territory with destruction of communications as well as trade route disruptions, could accelerate the unblocking of routes between Azerbaijan, Armenia and Turkey– an issue on the agenda since the end of the 2020 war in Nagorno-Karabakh. During Aliyev's recent visit to Turkey and one day after Pashinyan's meeting with Erdogan in Istanbul , alternative routes to Iranian ones were discussed as the Iranian routes would likely be blocked if military actions intensify and the situation escalates. But, if the U.S. partnership approach toward Armenia persists, this risk remains manageable and under control. From an economic perspective, Armenia relies on Iran for overland access to the Persian Gulf and goods imports. The war will likely disrupt trade corridors like the North-South Transport Corridor, increasing costs and causing shortages of fuel, food, and consumer goods. As security risks from the Iran-Israel war emerge, the Armenian government might need to increase military spending, mobilize reserves, or strengthen border defenses—further straining the economy. The risk of an energy crisis is also high since Armenia imports natural gas and oil products from Iran. If the ceasefire collapses and attacks on Iran continue, Armenia could face energy shortages and price spikes. Alternative routes through Georgia and Russia may become overburdened or geopolitically risky. Considering Armenia's upcoming parliamentary elections in 2026, the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict and its external consequences could generate internal stability risks. Economic downturns, potential energy shortages, and security concerns might provide a pretext for the Russia-backed political opposition to foment public unrest, especially in border regions through orchestrated chaos. Such political instability could hamper Yerevan's reform agenda and governance, and lead to electoral fraud. If the war persists, Armenia's current strategy of balancing between Russia, the West, and Iran could become untenable, forcing it to recalculate alliances. Armenia risks increased isolation from regional powers or realignment among them. On one hand, if Armenia maintains relations with Iran under U.S. pressure, it may face reduced aid and diplomatic support. On the other hand, cutting off ties with Iran would mean losing a critical southern trade and energy lifeline. Armenia may also become vulnerable to Russian, Azerbaijani and Turkish pressure, especially if the Zangezur Corridor issue escalates. Considering Russia's posture and recent official statements on the Iranian issue, Armenia may face intense pressure to align its foreign policy. As a counteraction, the West may push Armenia to reduce ties with Iran, potentially offering economic incentives or military guarantees. If the conflict deepens, t here is no guarantee that Russia, though strained by its Ukraine war, will not pressure Armenia to remain neutral or join a broader anti-Western axis, even as Armenia strategically seeks to strengthen ties with Western partners. In an alternative scenario, Armenia might find opportunities amid this crisis. A prolonged Israel-Iran conflict could allow Armenia to strengthen Western ties by presenting itself as a stable, democratic partner amid regional turmoil. However, this approach carries significant diplomatic risks , especia lly if U.S. objectives conflict with Armenian regional priorities. Nevertheless, it is highly likely the U.S. will maintain its current South Caucasus policy, where stability and peace remain priorities following the 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh war. An Unrestrained and Unpredictable U.S. Foreign Policy The U.S. military strike against Iran creates significant implications for resolving long-standing conflicts in the South Caucasus. U.S. concerns over Iran's nuclear program have consumed U.S. presidents since the 1979 revolution. Prior containment efforts took various forms: indirect and unconventional methods like the so-called Stuxnet cyberattack that disrupted the Iranian program in 2008, direct diplomacy that produced the short-lived Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action in 2015, and the 'maximum pressure' campaign of economic and financial sanctions during Trump's first administration. The U.S. and Iran were seemingly restarting negotiations over Tehran's nuclear program at the beginning of the second Trump administration. The negotiations failed to produce a settlement within the artificial 60-day deadline that President Trump proclaimed. Given the nuanced, complex details involved in nuclear accords, some have doubted whether the 60-day deadline was announced in good faith or whether the negotiations were structured to fail . Regardless, the U.S. attacks during ongoing negotiations undermine Washington's ability to serve as a credible interlocutor in resolving long-standing conflicts. The weakened position of the U.S. as provider of global stability will have important implications for the South Caucasus, and Armenia in particular. The willingness of the U.S. president to launch a military strike against Iran without concrete evidence of Iranian intent to develop a nuclear weapon suggests a degree of impulsiveness and unpredictability in contemporary U.S. foreign policy. While the U.S. president may argue that unpredictability can be a strategic asset that keeps adversaries and allies on edge, it ultimately gives countries less reason to trust the U.S. as an honest broker on complex topics. The U.S. actions also undermine the principle that diplomacy should take priority over using force to resolve problems. For most of the post-WWII period, the U.S. has served as a source of global stability through both its expansive military posture and its articulation of support for the norms of the liberal international order, including democracy, human rights, and multilateralism.[1] The U.S. attack on Iran weakens its ability to promote global norms, thereby providing cover for other countries that may seek to unilaterally resolve long-standing disputes. As these observations relate to Armenia, they suggest that it cannot rely on U.S. support in the event of conflict, nor can it rely upon the restraining effect of global norms that the U.S. has historically supported. While Armenia cannot ignore U.S. interests, U.S. foreign policy under the current administration is too unpredictable to serve as the basis for the promotion of Armenia's national interests. Conclusion U.S. and Israeli intelligence suggests Iran's nuclear facilities were damaged but not destroyed. Should Iran choose to resume its program, the likelihood of a renewed conflict with Israel and the U.S. is high. It is therefore important to consider the likely impacts on Armenia of a renewed conflict between Israel, Iran, and the U.S. Even without the outbreak of another round of conflict, the direct involvement of the U.S. in the Iran-Israel war exposes Armenia to a strategic dilemma: Antagonizing Iran, a key neighbor and trade partner, is not a viable option for Armenia. Yerevan cannot ignore U.S. influence either , especially given America's rising role in Armenia's post-war security building and diplomatically deterring Azerbaijan which continues to claim Armenia's sovereign territories and uses the false narrative of 'Western Azerbaijan'. Should Armenia ignore U.S. interests, Azerbaijan may attempt to exploit the crisis. In this respect, Armenia's best course would likely be careful neutrality—avoiding entanglement while diversifying energy and trade routes, strengthening border security, and maintaining active, balanced diplomacy with both Iran and the United States. Footnotes : [1] I kenberry, G. John (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars . Princeton University Press


EVN Report
09-07-2025
- EVN Report
Examining the Context: Armenia, the 12-Day War and Strategic Ambiguity
Following the 12-day Israel-Iran War and a dramatic U.S. strike on Iran's nuclear sites, Armenia faces new geopolitical risks. Dr. Nerses Kopalyan joins us to examine the implications for Yerevan's foreign policy, explore the limits of neutrality, and assess how Armenia can navigate rising regional volatility by utilizing strategic ambiguity.