Second Look Act draws hours of testimony in House Judiciary Committee
For almost three hours, the exchanges were respectful but the tension was palpable as speakers debated a bill that would let inmates petition for a reduction in their sentences after 20 years in prison.
There were brief moments of raised voices, occasional murmurs from the packed hearing room and a few speakers moved to tears. But for the most part, the sides stuck to the facts before the House Judiciary Committee as they debated whether inmates deserve a second look.
The bill known as the Maryland Second Look Act would let an incarcerated individual file a petition to have their sentence reduced once they have served 20 years. The petition, filed in the circuit court where they were sentenced, could be approved by the court if the judge determines the inmate is no longer considered a danger to the public.
More than 1,700 currently incarcerated individuals had served 20 or more years of their sentences as of January, according to the Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services. More than 300 of those were serving life without parole sentences.
Proponents say the bill would provide another avenue for incarcerated individuals who have been rehabilitated to rejoin society. Among the many speakers who testified in support of the bill were survivors of crime, members of advocacy groups and religious figures, and several who had served time in prison.
'We believe that they are worthy of a second opportunity,' said Anthony Muhammad, who told the committee that he has used his proverbial second chance to participate in community engagement.
Muhammad said he was arrested at age 15 on two homicide charges and sentenced to life plus 20 years before being released after nearly 30 years, under the Juvenile Restoration Act. He said he knows dozens of individuals who have been incarcerated for decades, 'have demonstrated their maturity and rehabilitation' but have not been given the second look the bill would allow for.
Supporters like Curtis Alston argued that incarcerated individuals can bring positive change on their release. Alston, who was appointed by Gov. Wes Moore to a task force studying inmate reentry, had previously been sentenced to multiple life terms. He said that people like him who have seen their sentences cut short have made a difference in their communities.
'Do you know how many people and how many lives that we have already saved since we've gotten home?' Alston said, raising his voice. 'Do you think that it's just the police force that has caused the homicide rate to go down?'
While opponents were vastly outnumbered, they were just as passionate in their arguments over the proposal. One, Theresa Darvish, lost her son to a murder in late 2021.
Darvish, after describing the devastation of losing her son, took issue with the bill allowing for a judge to reconsider a sentence once it has already been decided on, calling the proposed measures 'rampant and ambiguous.'
'This [bill] is retroactive,' Darvish said. 'But my judge cannot go back and retroactively resentence the thug, the murderer.'
Opponents also point to the prospect of victims being forced to relive their trauma by relitigating the sentence when an inmate's petition is heard. Victims would be notified but would not be required to appear or testify when a case is reconsidered, but opponents say that reopening cases would be traumatizing.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
'When does it end?' Baltimore County State's Attorney Scott Shellenberger (D) asked the committee. 'Somebody already said it doesn't end, and you're right. Don't add to it not ending.'
Speakers on both sides were pressed by committee members on the issue of forcing victims to relive their trauma. Other concerns voiced by opponents included recidivism and the concept of the law giving a perceived break to violent offenders.
This is the second year for the Second Look Act, which passed the Senate in 2024 only to stall in the House. Del. Cheryl Pasteur (D-Baltimore County) was the lead sponsor last year and again this year, when the bill has garnered far more cosponsors.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
Woman who allegedly murdered NYC girlfriend, cut her body into 13 pieces and took on her identity arrested 18 years later
A Georgia woman was arrested for the murder and years-long identity theft of her girlfriend, a New Yorker who was found dismembered beyond recognition in a burning body bag nearly 18 years ago, according to authorities. Angel Thompson has been charged with the December 2007 murder of Nicole Alston, a 24-year-old woman from Manhattan who was discovered cut into 13 pieces, with her hands, feet, and head missing in a burning body bag on the side of a quiet Georgia road, Fulton County officials announced at a press conference on Wednesday. 4 Angel Thompson has been charged with the December 2007 murder of Nicole Alston, a 24-year-old woman from Manhattan who was discovered cut into 13 pieces in a burning body bag on the side of a quiet Georgia road. Fulton County Sheriff Advertisement 'It took a true sociopath to do what happened here,' Clay Bryant, an investigator with the Troup County Sheriff's Department, said. The missing parts of Alston's body were never located, and the condition of her remains led to the 16-year lag in her identification, officials said. But, in early 2023, the case was reviewed, and DNA evidence that matched a relative helped authorities confirm the remains belonged to Alston, whose last known location was Manhattan. Advertisement Investigators learned that Alston left the Big Apple in 2007 to live with Thompson, who was wanted at the time in New York for theft and identity fraud, according to documents obtained by Fox 5 News. Thompson allegedly trafficked Alston before she was murdered, and the two had an abusive, coercive relationship, authorities said. 4 Nicole Alston had been using dating apps to look for a new partner on the night her girlfriend allegedly killed her. Fulton County Sheriff 'We believe this victim was trafficked prior to her murder, that this involved classic domestic violence, where this young lady [Thompson] was basically not going to allow both her lover and, i hate to say such a nasty term, but her cash cow, the person that was bringing her money, go,' Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis said at the press conference. Advertisement On the night Alston was killed, she had already begun to go on dating apps and look for other women, Detective John Nanoff told reporters. After Alston's remains were discovered, Thompson allegedly stole her identity to collect social security benefits, food stamps, and Section 8 housing under her name for eight years. She then opened bank accounts, email accounts, and even swapped Alston's photo with her picture on her driver's license in 2010, Nanoff said. 4 After Alston's remains were discovered, Thompson allegedly stole her identity to collect social security benefits, food stamps, and Section 8 housing under her name for eight years. Fulton County Sheriff Advertisement 'It's astounding what she was able to do, what she did for how long she did it,' Nanoff said. 'I've never seen something so calculated and meticulous before,' he said. In 2015, when the Social Security Administration contacted her to confirm her identity to continue benefits, Thompson began using her original identity, Fox 5 reported. She collected roughly $140,000 in government benefits under Alston's identity, Nanoff said. 4 Thompson allegedly trafficked Alston before she was murdered, and the two had an abusive, coercive relationship. Fulton County Sheriff In August 2023, Thompson was arrested for concealing Alston's death, the outlet reported. Finally, on Tuesday, she was arrested and charged with Alston's murder and two counts of identity theft, nearly two years later, records show. Sylvia Austin, the mother of the victim, said she never stopped looking for her daughter after she went missing. 'She didn't deserve this, and I wish I'd never let her come to Georgia,' she said. Advertisement 'She was the life of the party. She was happy, and through all of her trials and struggles, she always made everything seem OK. She was always the one people called on to talk to,' she said. Willis indicated prosecutors will take their time with Thompson's indictment due to the elaborate nature of the case. Officials urged anyone with information about Thompson or the couple to reach out to the Fulton County District Attorney's Office. The alleged killer is currently in custody at Fulton County Jail without bond, according to court records.
New York Times
5 days ago
- New York Times
Members of House committee ask major sports leagues to defend broadcast antitrust protection
Two members of the House Judiciary Committee on Monday sent letters to the commissioners of the four major U.S. men's sports — MLB, the NBA, NFL and NHL — about the cost and difficulty of watching sporting events in the streaming era. A day later, however, Ohio Republican Jim Jordan, the committee chair and one of the letters' signees, said it's not clear yet whether the committee will bring officials from those leagues to Capitol Hill for a hearing. Advertisement 'We always say everything's on the table,' Jordan said by phone Tuesday. 'That includes hearings, that includes maybe legislation. We don't know. We haven't decided on any of that. We're just at the first step, which is, what exactly is going on out there? How much does it really cost to the average fan?' Competing streaming services have fractured the landscape for viewers, who typically need several expensive packages to watch the entirety of a team's season. The letters the Congressmen sent challenge the leagues to defend the antitrust protection they are afforded by the Sports Broadcasting Act, or SBA, passed by Congress in 1961 — something different from an oft-referenced exemption unique to baseball, which stems from a 1922 Supreme Court decision. The SBA permits teams in each league to come together and sell their TV rights en masse. In most other industries, individual businesses inside the same industry would run the risk of antitrust violations when making business deals in concert. 'These leagues are making all kinds of money,' Jordan said. 'Is this complicated, expensive system really what's best when they have this antitrust exemption right now?' MLB said Tuesday it will be responsive to the committee members' request, which was co-signed by Rep. Scott Fitzgerald, a Wisconsin Republican who heads up the committee's antitrust inquiries. The NHL declined comment. The NBA and NFL did not immediately return a request for comment. The NBA last year agreed to deals with Amazon, ESPN and NBC worth $77 billion collectively, a model that MLB hopes to replicate when its national TV deals expire following the 2028 season. Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred is pushing for his office to gain greater control of regular-season TV rights that teams have typically sold independently so he can create more robust national packages. Advertisement 'I think it's very important — in fact, crucial — that when we go to the market for our post-'28 deals,' Manfred said last month, 'that we have the ability to say to our broadcast partner, 'We have all these rights: what have traditionally been our national (rights), what have traditionally been our local. Let's cut them up in a way that is the best in terms of reaching our fans and maximizing our revenue.'' Jordan said Tuesday he did not yet know what specific changes he'd like made to the sports TV model. This is not the first time this year that Congress has made an issue of sports viewership. The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, chaired by another Republican, Ted Cruz, called the four major U.S. men's leagues to the mat in May. Officials from three of the four leagues attended that committee's hearing, with the NFL holding out. 'I haven't looked closely at what Senator Cruz and the Commerce Committee has done there,' Jordan said. 'Maybe our staffs have (talked) a little bit.' The cost to watch sporting events speaks to many voters, potentially creating political capital for elected officials who raise it, but officials have also rarely taken action on antitrust matters in sports. Jordan allowed for the possibility that change would not follow here, either. 'I never thought we'd get the designated hitter,' Jordan said. 'I never thought I'd see a guy pitch and hit home runs like (Shohei) Ohtani does. … There's always change. All I'm saying is, we feel like it's important to look into it. Everything's on the table. And when I say everything, I mean it.' Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
House Judiciary Committee requests briefings from NFL, NBA, NHL and MLB commissioners on broadcast blackouts
After decades of the four biggest professional leagues in the United States receiving a broadcasting antitrust exemption, the House Judiciary Committee may be looking to alter that law. The committee has formally requested briefings with the commissioners of four of the U.S.'s main professional leagues with the intention of discussing broadcasting markets and blackout exemptions. In a statement released Monday, the Judiciary Committee included the letters sent out to each of the four commissioners: Adam Silver (NBA), Roger Goodell (NFL), Gary Bettman (NHL) and Rob Manfred (MLB). Per the statement, the committee plans to meet with the commissioners to discuss the Sports Broadcasting Act (SBA), a law that gives sports leagues an antitrust exemption for broadcasting games on network television. The SBA, which was passed in 1961, was originally passed in order to help the NFL organize its broadcast rights as a collective, streamlining the process. But now, per the statement, the House is looking into "the sufficiency of existing law" in terms of the current broadcast landscape. "The current state of the sports broadcasting market has changed considerably since the 1960s. The majority of sports viewership now occurs outside of traditional network broadcasting," the committee writes in the statement. "As a result, most of the distribution agreements that a sports league enters into are subject to antitrust challenges, while a narrow subset are not, creating legal uncertainty, distorting the market, and effectively expanding the blind spot for potential antitrust violations." The request was made by two Republican representatives: Jim Jordan (R-OH), the House Judiciary Committee Chairman, and Scott Fitzgerald (R-WI), the chairman of the Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust. Two Democratic representatives, Jamie Raskin (D-MD) and Jerry Nadley (D-NY) were also named in the letters; both are ranking members of the Judiciary Committee. In the letters, the committee requests that the commissioners speak on their individual league's "participation in the sports broadcasting market and related matters." Silvers, Goodell, Bettman and Manfred are asked to arrange for the briefing before Aug. 25.
