logo
Urgent warning issued to Australians about Anthony Albanese's election win - and how the country has changed forever: 'I fear our national decline is irreversible'

Urgent warning issued to Australians about Anthony Albanese's election win - and how the country has changed forever: 'I fear our national decline is irreversible'

Daily Mail​15-05-2025

Mark Latham has delivered a scathing verdict on Labor's decisive election win, warning that Australia is facing 'long-term economic decline'.
The former Labor leader and One Nation NSW MP, now a right-wing independent, took to social media in the wake of the federal election this month with a post titled, 'What this election means for Australia'.
'Australia is in the first stage of long-term economic decline,' Mr Latham wrote.
'Post Covid, there has been a sharp decline in the number of productive people and productive workplaces, and a sharp, seemingly permanent increase in the welfare and black economy.
'I would estimate that the proportion of genuinely productive Australians in their workplaces has fallen from 40 per cent to less than one-quarter in the space of just five years. The leaners now easily outnumber the lifters.'
Mr Latham said a modern reliance on opinion polling and focus groups had led to a 'political culture of hand-outs - giveaways, all debt-funded'.
'Even the Liberal Party has joined in, forfeiting its reputation for fiscal responsibility, completing its transformation into a woke sinkhole, more closely resembling the American Democrats than the Howard/Costello era.
'This sadly miserable new economy and the new politics that goes with it has given Labor a natural electoral advantage.'
He listed his reasons why Australia was 'in the middle of a perfect economic storm', including a new political hand-out culture and the 'post-Covid stupor and industrial-scale abuse of Work From Home'.
Mr Latham also referred to the transition to renewables as 'economic self-harm' and said the country's ethos of strength and resilience had been replaced by a 'woke Alphabet world of victimology'.
Mass immigration was destroying housing affordability and 80 per cent of new jobs were debt-funded from the public sector, he claimed.
'No nation on earth has so much available space, yet we have the world's highest housing prices.
'No nation on earth has so many available resources, yet once left in the ground, we have the world's highest power prices. The golden age of Hawke/Keating/Howard/Costello economics has ended.'
Mr Latham's post received hundreds of supportive comments, with many lamenting that the golden age of Australia was finished.
'I fear for the future, not for me, but for all the young people growing up in a country devoid of commonsense and hope,' one said.
'Virtually a mirror image of the current UK decline,' said another.
'We are no longer the Lucky Country,' a third said.
'Thank goodness we grew up when we had strong leadership and we prospered in our manufacturing, farming industry, our exports and high living standards. A fair go and hard work was rewarded.'
'I fear we have passed the point of no return,' said another supporter.
'The voters will not accept a fiscal turn-around that reduces the over-generous hand outs they have been granted to secure votes.'
Mr Latham's post comes after the Federal Court ruled in September he had defamed fellow independent MP Alex Greenwich with a homophobic tweet.
The court awarded Mr Greenwich $140,000 in damages.
It also ordered Mr Latham to pay his rival's legal costs on a party-party basis, which normally covers around 70 per cent of the fees incurred.
Mr Greenwich's legal costs have been estimated to exceed $600,000, meaning the case may cost the former Labor leader more than half a million dollars.
Mark Latham's full message to Australia
BEFORE THE ELECTION:
Australia is in the first stage of long-term economic decline.
Post Covid, there has been a sharp decline in the number of productive people and productive workplaces, and a sharp, seemingly permanent increase in the welfare and black economy.
I would estimate that the proportion of genuinely productive Australians in their workplaces has fallen from 40% to less than one-quarter in the space of just 5 years.
The leaners now easily outnumber the lifters.
Once measured in opinion polling and focus groups, this has produced a political culture of hand-outs – giveaways, all debt-funded, as we have seen in this Federal election campaign.
Even the Liberal Party has joined in, forfeiting its reputation for fiscal responsibility, completing its transformation into a woke sinkhole, more closely resembling the American Democrats than the Howard/Costello era.
This sadly miserable new economy and the new politics that goes with it has given Labor a natural electoral advantage.
If you want big spending, debt funding and a hand-out dependency, underpinned by low productivity, soft working conditions, rorted government programs and the Ponzi scheme of Big Australian migration, you might as well vote for the people who truly believe in it, and have been masters in creating it. That's the ALP and Albanese.
Australia is in the middle of a perfect economic storm:
• the new political culture of a hand-out and welfare economy;
• the post-Covid stupor and industrial-scale abuse of Work From Home;
• the economic self-harm of an energy transition driving up power prices and harming our competitiveness while leaving global surface temperatures unchanged;
• our national ethos of strength and resilience replaced by the woke Alphabet world of victimology;
• mass immigration destroying housing affordability, as the over-regulated supply side can't keep up;
• inexorable growth in that most horrendous new terminology: the care economy (child care, disability care and aged care), such that 80% of new jobs are debt-funded from the public sector;
• the new national past time of rorting poorly-designed government programs: leading to a huge and growing black economy in tobacco, the NDIS, training programs and renewable energy scams; and
• a political class totally disinterested in labour productivity and economic competitiveness.
No nation on earth has so much available space, yet we have the world's highest housing prices.
No nation on earth has so many available resources, yet once left in the ground, we have the world's highest power prices.
The golden age of Hawke/Keating/Howard/Costello economics has ended.
Like many Australians of my age, I tell my children how fortunate I feel to have seen our nation at its best in the 1990s, yet how maudlin and pessimistic I feel for their generation.
Australian public policy used to be run by the creative minds of our national interest.
Now it's in the hands of a self-serving, blinded elite who can't see past the next focus-group-generated giveaway.
As the Anzacs might have said, waiting for the third charge at The Nek, 'we're stuffed, mate'. And nothing in this election campaign is helping.
In fact, it confirms our worst fears in taking Australia backwards. Mediocrity in Canberra means the best of our country is now behind us.
Albanese has spent an extra $190 billion in just 3 years, yet living standards have gone backwards by 10 percent. Any random bloke at the local pub could have done better with all that money.
But is seems likely tomorrow that Australians will return Labor to office. I fear our national decline is irreversible.
ELECTION UPDATE:
The analysis above: That's the way the election result played out.
Labor's natural electoral advantage gave it a landslide .
There will be a lot of commentary about Dutton's mistakes, dumb Liberal tactics, Albanese cleverness etc.
But the biggest thing is in how the country has changed.
A huge turning point was Scott Morrison's Jobkeeper program during Covid: it taught Australians the government would pay them for staying at home.
Ever since, the hunger for debt-funded government benefits and concessions has been insatiable. So too, the demand to stay home (Work From Home).
This coincides with the way Australia has become a fragile service economy, with the loss of manufacturing and mining jobs.
Productivity has collapsed, returning to 2016 levels.
So we have more Australians demanding more government money but fewer Australians working productively to pay for it.
The inevitable result is the trillion dollar debt in Canberra.
Australia has changed rapidly, in a way that's right in Labor's hitting zone.
Look at the CVs of the Labor MPs elected yesterday: a party now dominated by social workers, teachers, apparatchiks and public servants.
They believe in unlimited debt-funded government handouts: exactly what the new Australian electorate is demanding.
Combined with massive migration numbers bringing in more Labor voters (who look at our publicly funded handouts and benefits and think it's a picnic) the ALP has cobbled together a winning electoral coalition.
Once you add to these 'leaners' the woke, the Alphabet mob and climate change fanatics, Labor starts well in front in electoral demographics.
In the new Australia it has a natural winning advantage.
The ALP could be renamed the WWM party: Woke Welfare Migrant.
Yesterday Albanese didn't sharply lift the Labor primary vote. It rose 2% to 34.6% (goodness, I got 37.5% in losing to John Howard in 2004).
His success came from driving down the Liberal-National primary vote to 32%.
The uniquely Australian voting system also helps Labor, with Albo winning 60% of the seats from one-third of the votes.
Labor's negative campaign won it for them. As voters have become more disengaged from party politics and election campaigns, TV ads have become more important in swaying voters.
The ALP scare advertisements, saying that Dutton's $600 billion nuclear plan would cut everyone's benefits, were incredibly effective. Just as incredible, the Liberals made no attempt to rebut the Labor fear campaign.
Voters are no longer rusted on to the major parties. Allegiances are now soft.
Meaning that if the Leaners think they are about to lose something, they flood away from the party (supposedly) doing it.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Kia Confirms A Tasman SUV Is Coming
Kia Confirms A Tasman SUV Is Coming

Auto Blog

time4 hours ago

  • Auto Blog

Kia Confirms A Tasman SUV Is Coming

The Kia Tasman may spawn a rugged SUV to take on the 4Runner. This should be good. Kia May Soon Have An Answer To The 4Runner And Bronco The Kia Tasman is a midsize pickup with styling that not everyone will gel with, and which is off-limits to American buyers for the time being. However, its eccentricity in the styling department may not negatively impact its future prospects for diversification, according to a report from Australia's Carsales. When asked by the publication whether a Kia Tasman-based SUV could be openly discussed, Kia Australia Chief Engineer for Ride and Handling Graeme Gombold answered the question directly: 'Three years down the track.' That means a new Toyota 4Runner rival could reach dealer floors by 2029. 0:00 / 0:09 Tesla sales in Europe drop yet again Watch More An SUV Is Just One Way The Tasman Could Grow Gambold's job is to fine-tune Kia suspensions for the specific demands of the Australasian region and its roadways, so it follows that the engineer would know what's coming down the pipeline. However, this new SUV, and other potential incarnations of the Tasman, first depend on the base vehicle achieving success, as the brand's marketing boss, Dean Norbiato, was quick to point out. 'If Tasman is a success, then it will open many doors, so let's get Tasman right first,' said the executive. 'Once we get that right, then we can go from there. Let us take a breath; the media was asking for a ute [pickup truck] for 10 years.' So it'll be some way off if it happens, but clearly, Kia knows it's worth exploring, and suggesting that 'many doors' can be opened indicates there may be other applications for the truck. Chances Of An American Tasman SUV Source: Kia Kia's American arm offers the Sportage and Sorento, but neither of those is constructed atop a body-on-frame architecture, which means there is still a gap in the U.S. market that Kia could potentially fill, offering something to compete with the Ford Bronco and Toyota 4Runner. However, as noted at the outset, the Tasman's chances of arrival in America seem slim, and if that's not arriving, would it be worth tweaking the eventual SUV? Perhaps not, but the good news is that Kia is bringing a pickup of some sort to our shores, and there's no reason to believe that truck can't someday spawn an SUV that fits right into a gap in the U.S. market. Autoblog Newsletter Autoblog brings you car news; expert reviews and exciting pictures and video. Research and compare vehicles, too. Sign up or sign in with Google Facebook Microsoft Apple By signing up I agree to the Terms of Use and acknowledge that I have read the Privacy Policy . You may unsubscribe from email communication at anytime. About the Author Sebastian Cenizo View Profile

How another Labor immigration blunder has allowed a vile child sex offender to remain in Australia
How another Labor immigration blunder has allowed a vile child sex offender to remain in Australia

Daily Mail​

time4 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

How another Labor immigration blunder has allowed a vile child sex offender to remain in Australia

The Albanese government took too long to scrap the visa of a migrant who performed an indecent act in front of a child, so he can stay in Australia, a court has ruled. The Federal Court decision is the latest in a string of immigration policy blunders to weigh on the party since 2023 - causing ex-Immigration Minister Andrew Giles to be demoted - though it seems it didn't harm Labor's performance at the March election. Federal Court judge Christopher Horan found a decision to deport the man, known as XMBQ, was unlawful because there was an 'unreasonable' delay between the appeals tribunal deciding the man could stay and termination of his visa. The ruling, first reported by The Australian, could set a precedent requiring immigration ministers to make decisions within a particular timeframe. Giles - now replaced by Tony Burke - previously came under fire for being caught off guard by the High Court's ruling in November 2023 that indefinite immigration detention was illegal, resulting in the release of more than a hundred criminals. Later, he was criticised over his Ministerial guideline, known as Direction 99, that stated a migrant's family connections to Australia and how long they have lived here should be considered in potential deportation cases, despite a criminal's rap sheet. Giles moved to cancel dozens of visas after it emerged that violent offenders were using the measure to avoid deportation. In the latest case XMBQ, a Somali man, had convictions for kicking a police officer in the face and performing a sex act in front of a 29-year-old woman and a 13-year-old girl on public transport. Lawyers for XMBQ challenged whether the former Immigration Minister's intervention in his case was legal. Giles cancelled the Somali man's visa on June 8, 2024 after the Administrative Appeals Tribunal decided he should be allowed to stay in April 2021. Justice Horan said the delay between the appeal and Giles's decision was far too long, ruling in the favour of XMBQ. 'If the minister is to exercise the power to set aside the original decision and cancel the visa, the minister must do so within a reasonable time,' the judgment said. 'Otherwise, the connection with the original decision as the object of the power will be lost, and it can no longer be said that the minister is addressing or responding to the state of affairs produced by or resulting from the original decision.' Immigration law specialist Simon Jeans said that although Giles had the power to cancel this visa it 'was a risk' and a 'decision [made] in haste' as he was under pressure to save his job. He suggested it would have been less risky for the Immigration Department to cancel XMBQ's visa rather than the minister intervening. XMBQ was born in Somalia in the 1960s before fleeing to Lebanon in 1993. He arrived in Australia as a refugee in 2004. XMBQ was placed on the sex offenders register for 15 years after pleading guilty to the public exposure charges in June 2017. In December 2017, his visa was cancelled by a delegate of the immigration minister but this was later overturned in the Federal Court. Lawyers for the man claimed Giles's decision to cancel his visa had been impacted by XMBQ being charged with two counts of rape, although he was not convicted. Justice Horan rejected this claim. The Albanese government and Mr Giles suffered a similar blow in January this year when a Bhutan-born man who attacked his wife with a meat cleaver was allowed to remain in Australia by the Federal Court. It ruled Mr Giles had made multiple 'jurisdictional errors' by overturning an appeals decision that the man could remain in Australia, because he did not consider the effect of deportation on his children and his stateless person status.

Should young Australians be worried about Labor's superannuation tax changes?
Should young Australians be worried about Labor's superannuation tax changes?

The Guardian

time5 hours ago

  • The Guardian

Should young Australians be worried about Labor's superannuation tax changes?

As debate rages over the Labor government's tax changes for large superannuation accounts, some young workers have asked their financial advisers whether they will be caught by the reforms. Advisers have told Guardian Australia that some young workers have even questioned whether they should stop making additional contributions. Experts say it's unlikely that younger Australians will get caught by the changes, with older, high-income earners the most exposed to the reforms. Here's what young Australians need to know about the changes. Most workers are legally entitled to be paid a guaranteed 11.5% of their wages into their superannuation fund, or 12% from July this year. The government levies a tax of 15% on the earnings on super balances of workers yet to retire and of retirees with more than $2m. Labor has proposed to lift that 15% tax to 30%, but only for the earnings from the portion of the balances over $3m. Earnings on the first $3m in an account would still be taxed at 15%. The tax would be levied each year. You can read a broader breakdown here. Economists expect most young people currently working will not hit $3m balances, though higher-income earners will have a higher chance at getting there. By the 2050s, when millennials will be looking at retirement and gen Z and Alpha will dominate the workforce, one in 10 people will have $3m balances, Treasury and Grattan Institute modelling shows. That could rise to three or four in every 10 people in the 2060s according to Diana Mousina, an AMP economist. But she says it is unlikely that 'half of gen Z' will reach $3m in super balances, contrary to some media reporting of her analysis. Mousina's modelling shows a worker earning more than $90,000 a year who works for 40 years consecutively with a 3% pay rise every year would probably achieve a $3m balance. This means a worker in their 20s who reaches $90,000 or over soon, then maintains it for the rest of their working life, could one day be affected. Workers on lower incomes who made no extra contributions and took time off work, for example to have a child, would be unlikely to reach $3m, according to Harry Chemay, a superannuation and wealth management consultant. The Financial Services Council, meanwhile, expects about 500,000 people of 14.6 million currently employed would earn enough to see their top-range tax breaks reduced slightly under the new proposal. While the reform would increase tax rates on big balances, superannuation would still be an effective way for high-income earners to reduce the tax they pay. The average superannuation balance in mid-2022 was $164,000, so most Australians are nowhere near balances over $3m. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email The proposed 30% tax rate is still lower than the top income tax rate of 45%, meaning superannuation contributions would continue to offer a tax break for well-paid workers. Public debate over the tax illuminated how lightly superannuation is taxed, according to Jonathan Philpot, a wealth management partner at accounting firm HLB Mann Judd in Sydney. 'It actually highlights that super actually has much lower tax rates than virtually any other structure you can have in your retirement years,' he says. 'I wouldn't want people changing their super plans.' Experts believe it is likely the threshold for the new tax would be lifted above $3m at some point in the future, so some young people who hit the $3m figure may not end up paying extra. Mousina is among those who agree the $3m benchmark for the new extra rate will probably rise but she suggests the increase could be baked into the new laws for the tax, which need the Greens' support to pass. 'We should think about indexing it, rather than just having no legislation around when it's going to cap out,' she says. The lack of assurance on whether the tax threshold will be lifted above $3m has attracted some media outcry, despite expert consensus that the figure would have to rise. Debate has also focused on the proposal to tax a type of investment return called unrealised gains, which would see high earners pay tax on a rise in value of some assets on paper while leaving them unable to get that money back if the asset value falls in the future. Most super accounts would have limited exposure to unrealised gains, according to Chemay. Australians with self-managed super funds are more likely to struggle with this type of investment. However, self-managed super funds only make up about 1 million of the 20 million or so super savers – and just 15% of them are under the age of 45. For perspective, four million Australians have more than one super account. The government in 2018 estimated the resulting extra fees would leave the average worker about $50,000 worse off by the time they retired.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store