
D.L. Hughley on California's Impact and Political Precedents
Source: REACH Media / Radio One Digital
'Without California, the United States of America would be little more than Venezuela,' quips comedian and commentator D.L. Hughley in his segment 'Notes From The GED Section.' It's a bold statement, but one with substantial weight when you consider California's massive influence on the nation's economy and infrastructure. Hughley uses this thought-provoking commentary to underscore the critical role that California plays in sustaining the United States, while addressing the political dynamics and federal overreach that target the state.
Hughley dismantles common narratives about California, emphasizing its strengths. The state is the fourth-largest economy in the world, with unparalleled contributions like producing 60% of America's produce and supporting 14% of the nation's manufacturing. 'At one point, one out of every four jobs created in America came from California,' he notes, challenging critics who downplay the state's relevance.
Yet, despite its undeniable importance, California often finds itself in political crosshairs. 'You might not like California, but you like your lights on,' Hughley jabs, pointing out the resources the state provides to others, even to those who disparage it.
Hughley critiques federal actions like deploying the National Guard to California as political theater, aimed at creating unnecessary confrontations. He draws a striking parallel, saying, 'The last time a president did something like this was Lyndon B. Johnson in Alabama, but for desegregation. Donald Trump sent the National Guard to California because he is a racist.' This comparison underscores the dangerous precedent such federal actions set, where political grudges risk undermining the country's unity and principles.
Hughley also highlights California's progressive stance while acknowledging its leadership in Republican representation, debunking stereotypes. His reflection lays bare the imbalance in political discourse and calls for a deeper understanding of how federal and state politics shape lives nationwide.
Ultimately, Hughley invites his audience to contemplate the broader implications of targeting a state so foundational to America's success. As he puts it, 'Whether you like it or not is not the issue,' but recognizing California's significance should be.
SEE ALSO
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
28 minutes ago
- Axios
Trump signs bill blocking California gas car ban plan
President Trump signed legislation on Thursday blocking California's rules to phase out the sales of gas-powered cars by 2035. Why it matters: Trump is moving to roll back environmental initiatives that were a top Biden -era priority and his action against California comes amid an escalating feud with Golden State Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) amid fiery LA protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids. Driving the news: "It's been a disaster for this country," Trump said as he signed the measure. "We officially rescue the U.S. auto industry from destruction by terminating the California electric vehicle mandate once and for all." Newsom and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced the state and 10 others will sue the Trump administration for what they called his "illegal resolutions targeting" California's clean vehicles program. "Trump's all-out assault on California continues — and this time he's destroying our clean air and America's global competitiveness in the process," Newsom said in a statement. "We are suing to stop this latest illegal action by a President who is a wholly-owned subsidiary of big polluters." The big picture: California has the largest car market, and roughly a dozen other states can follow its rules under the Clean Air Act. Bonata has already announced a lawsuit with 10 other state attorneys general after the Republican-led Senate approved a resolution last month to revoke a waiver allowing California to set its own air quality standards. Between the lines: What Trump signed are revocations of EPA waivers that enable the California EV rule (and separate rules on trucks and nitrogen oxide). Thought bubble, via Axios' Joann Muller: States can follow California or stick with the EPA. Eleven states decided to follow these latest rules but at least one (Vermont) announced it wouldn't enforce it because there was no way they could deliver.

Wall Street Journal
35 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Judge Questions Trump's Authority to Deploy National Guard to Los Angeles
SAN FRANCISCO—A federal judge on Thursday sharply questioned the Trump administration's justifications for mobilizing troops in Los Angeles in response to protests that have swept the city, promising to issue a decision soon in California's bid to stop the deployments. During the hourlong hearing before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco, a lawyer for the Justice Department argued that courts have no power to second-guess the president's decisions regarding the National Guard troops and Marines that President Trump has sent over the objections of state and local officials.
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tensions rising in GOP over Trump border plan as Rand Paul squares off with Stephen Miller
A bitter feud is escalating between Republican Sen. Rand Paul and Donald Trump's top border official, injecting uncertainty into Congress's attempt to pass the administration's signature policy bill this month. Key Trump adviser Stephen Miller came to Capitol Hill to meet with Senate Republicans on Thursday to resolve a major issue over the bill's border security provisions – which Paul opposes. Paul and Miller have been locked in a dispute for days over the border funding. The White House is seeking $150 billion in funds for border security and deportation. But Paul – who has repeatedly lashed out against the price tag of Trump's bill – wants to dramatically cut down that funding. Now, that tension between the two key GOP figures is spilling into the open. Paul is taking swipes at Miller to reporters on Capitol Hill, attacking Miller for his recent comments about the administration looking at suspending habeas corpus and then suggesting on Wednesday that Miller himself was the reason he was uninvited from a White House picnic. Trump has since personally asked him and his family to attend the Thursday event, the senator said. Miller, meanwhile, has been firing off social media posts at the Kentucky senator, accusing him of, for instance, trying to cut funding for border security amid the Los Angeles riots. 'They want to quiet me down, and it hasn't worked, and so they're going to try to attack me. They're going to try to destroy me in other ways, and then do petty little things like social occasions or whatever. But you know, it probably will not work. It probably will not make me cow down or bend over,' Paul told CNN on Wednesday, after saying he was disinvited from the White House picnic. Asked if he was talking about Miller, Paul nodded. Paul's strong push to limit Trump's border security cash puts him mostly on an island among Hill Republicans, according to one person familiar with the talks, though other GOP senators pressed Miller about specific funding accounts in a meeting earlier Thursday. And the back-and-forth has frustrated some of their fellow GOP senators. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin said Miller 'did a good job' answering GOP senators' questions on Thursday about border wall money, but he added some Republicans 'were upset' or 'just didn't want to hear it.' 'I mean, Rand Paul's solution is cut everything in half and call it good. Yeah, that's not real budgeting,' Mullin added. Paul, however, has defended his stance, insisting that the White House needs to justify its funding request, especially since it was made before Trump came into office. And he specifically called out a certain GOP senator whom he accused of being a fiscal hawk only when 'convenient.' 'Senator Graham wants to make sure the president gets exactly what he wants. He's a rubber stamp, and I am a believer that we are acting fiscally responsible at every level of government, across government, and that you can't just sort of be fiscally conservative when it's convenient, when it comes to the border,' Paul told reporters Thursday. Paul did not attend Miller's visit to Senate Republicans on Thursday, citing a conflicting committee meeting. Even so, the meeting at times grew contentious over the president's plans to spend billions on the border. Florida Sen. Rick Scott, offering a defense of his GOP colleagues, said those Republicans were interested in more specifics about how the border money would be spent. 'I think what everybody was pushing back is we want more detail. I know exactly how the money is going to be spent. It's not, has nothing to do with whether we support him,' Scott said. One of those probing Miller on the border funding was GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, another fiscal hawk who has been working to make sure Trump's pricey tax breaks don't add to the deficit. 'The numbers didn't quite add up,' Johnson later told reporters of his questions to Miller. 'He did a really good job of explaining why it is going to be more expensive, but then just how difficult it is going to be to create the beds and the expense of that.' 'There was just some basic numbers that we weren't aware of. We didn't have the math. We didn't have their calculation. I think he was a little blindsided from that standpoint.'