
Menendez brothers case: What's next for killers after defense, DA spar over resentencing
LOS ANGELES – Whether Erik and Lyle Menendez will see life outside prison walls is still unclear after their resentencing hearing was postponed for another month after a judge ruled that two motions needed to be settled before the process could move forward.
At the heart of the issue was Los Angeles District Attorney Nathan Hochman's motion to continue citing access to a part of the comprehensive risk assessment (CRA) report that California Gov. Gavin Newsom requested for the clemency request and the Menendez team's request for the DA to be admonished for showing crime scene photos at last week's hearing.
Attorneys and Judge Michael Jesic will meet on May 9 to discuss next steps after the planned two-day resentencing was called off.
Court was paused for a short recess on Thursday as Jesic needed to clear up confusion and address frustrations over the CRA report.
The report determines whether the brothers would pose a threat to the public if they were released. It was provided to prosecutors, and the judge was notified that he could read it prior to the scheduled hearing.
"The completion of the Comprehensive Risk Assessments is a significant development in this case," Hochman said. "It's critical that Judge Jesic has sufficient time to thoroughly examine its findings and make an informed decision on its admissibility — before any resentencing hearing moves forward."
"A decision of this magnitude demands the most current and comprehensive information available. These updated Comprehensive Risk Assessments provide crucial insight into whether the inmates pose an unreasonable risk to public safety today,"
The judge said he wanted to move forward with witness testimony, but the brothers' attorney, Mark Geragos, argued that unless the judge were to choose to exclude the report, he would not move forward. Geragos requested a continuance to have time to file a motion to recuse the DA, adding he would have done that already if not for a time requirement to file such a motion.
The report was not shared with the defense, which Geragos argued was unfair.
Jesic said they received clarity from Newsom's office that it is not asserting privilege on the comprehensive risk assessment. With those results potentially coming into play, Geragos said he will file a motion to recuse the DA from the case within 10 days.
Geragos argued that he is not a party to the clemency proceedings where the report is involved, saying, "They keep mixing and matching."
A recusal motion requests that the individual steps away from a case because of a potential conflict of interest or bias that prevents them from operating impartially.
During the May 9 hearing, the parties will first address the motion to recuse, and then they will address whether the risk assessment will be admissible in court. Because of the personal nature of the report, some of it may be in closed court, the judge said. They will also not be conducting a resentencing hearing that day, so no testimony is expected.
The Menendez legal team chose not to go forward with testimony in the resentencing on Thursday.
The "retraumatization" of coming back again for testimony versus needing to retestify if the DA team is removed is "the lesser of the two evils," said Bryan Freedman, another attorney for the brothers.
Jesic had made it clear that one of his main concerns was the time that family members took off and all the travel and other expenses made to be at this week's hearings. The defense team said the family understood, despite some traveling to be present.
"I don't want to keep retraumatizing the family," Geragos said. "I'll leave that to the DA."
Both brothers listened closely as this played out. Erik, who looked visibly annoyed, nodded along as the judge listed what they had planned for the May 9 hearing, while Lyle was emotionless, hearing that their bid for freedom had been pushed back.
The judge declined the Menendez team's request for the DA to be admonished for showing the crime photos, but asked both sides to provide warning.
"It is extremely rare…where you have victims also supporting the defendants," Jesic said. "I didn't even think about it when the picture went up."
"It was a gruesome murder," he continued. "If anyone is uncomfortable, maybe they shouldn't be here."
Jesic also reminded the prosecution that they were not there to retry the case. Deputy District Attorney Habib Balian had argued that it was necessary to show the photos.
"We need to understand that Erik and Kyle Menendez caused that carnage," he said.
Geragos condemned the prosecution's tactics as a "dog and pony show," saying, "None of these shenanigans would have happened if this wasn't the Menendez brothers."
"His personal bias is seething through in every action that has been taken," Freedman said of Hochman's intentions. Freedman added that many Menendez family members had never seen the crime scene images.
The judge then defended Balian, saying he had known him for years and believed there was no ill intent in showing the photos, though he admitted the situation was complex.
SIGN UP TO GET TRUE CRIME NEWSLETTER
Balian also apologized for sharing the images, saying that "it was never my intention" and that he was sorry someone ended up in a hospital after seeing the images.
The brothers' attorneys and family held a news conference following the conclusion of Thursday's paused hearing.
"The family does not want to go through this charade anymore with the DA," Geragos said. "This is a DA who made up his mind and did no hard work in terms of his position. He is vindicating no one's interest."
Tamara Goodall, a cousin of Erik and Lyle, also spoke to the media and her disappointment with Thursday's outcome.
"It was very clear that Hochman has no desire to come at this objectively. He made the statement, and I quote, referring to all of the quote unquote horrible people that Mark represents. That does not tell me that this person has any ability to see Erik and Lyle through any other lens," Goodall said.
"Unfortunately, for this family, there are no secrets. For this family, there's no floor on the amount of trauma that they have to go through," Geragos said.
When asked how Lyle and Erik were taking the news, Geragos said that they were "cautiously optimistic."
"There are a lot of reasons to believe that when we do the re-sentencing hearing, that we will get Judge Jesic to reduce this to a manslaughter and release them on time served," Geragos explained. "That's what the goal is here. The goal is not, as I stated in court, to get a 50-to-life and to convert this into a parole hearing. The goal here is very simple."
GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE TRUE CRIME HUB
Hochman's office said they "are aware of the defense's concerns and welcome the opportunity to address them in court."
"Our office remains committed to ethical and impartial prosecution. We believe the facts will demonstrate that our conduct has been professional, appropriate, and in the interest of justice," Hochman said.
He also thanked his team of prosecutors — Balian and Deputy District Attorneys Seth Carmack and Ethan Milius — for their "unwavering commitment to ensuring that the Court is presented with the full picture."
"They have shown extraordinary dedication and professionalism throughout this process, and their work continues to honor the memory of Jose and Kitty Menendez," Hochman said.
Hochman previously criticized the brothers' decision to "stubbornly remain hunkered down in their over 30-year-old bunker of lies, deceit and denials."
The Menendez brothers and their supporters have been pushing for a resentencing hearing, saying the brothers had been unfairly convicted to life in prison in 1996 for murdering their two parents, Jose and Kitty Menendez, in their Beverly Hills home in 1989.
Their first trial ended in a mistrial, when jurors couldn't agree on their fate. After a second trial in the mid-1990s, in which some of their evidence about the alleged sexual abuse was excluded, jurors agreed with prosecutors that their motive had been greed.
Stepheny Price is a writer for Fox News Digital and Fox Business. She covers topics including missing persons, homicides, national crime cases, illegal immigration, and more. Story tips and ideas can be sent to stepheny.price@fox.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sacramento County fails to address elder financial abuse, Grand Jury finds
( — The Sacramento County Grand Jury released a new report on Wednesday, stating that the county is not doing enough to protect against elder financial abuse. According to Elizabeth TenPas, Grand Jury Foreperson, it is unlike other counties; Sacramento does not have a proactive approach in dealing with what they said is a serious and growing problem. Financial abuse can result in great harm to victims over the age of 65. The Grand Jury has deemed that elder adults who are victims of abuse by family members, trusted advisors, tradespeople, or unrelated caregivers are being disadvantaged of justice, TenPas said. TenPas stated in a press release that the Grand Jury's investigation found that from 2019 through 2024, Sacramento County Adult Protective Services confirmed almost 4,000 cases of elder financial abuse, but the law enforcement within the county only referred 123 cases to the District Attorney's Office for possible prosecution. From brunch to BBQ to hiking: Celebrate Father's Day in Sacramento 'Neither the District Attorney nor county law enforcement agencies have dedicated staff specifically trained to investigate and prosecute elder financial abuse,' said Elizabeth TenPas, Grand Jury Foreperson for 2024-2025. 'In fact, the District Attorney's website explicitly states that such exploitation is only prosecuted on 'rare occasions' by the elder abuse unit. Many abusers avoid consequences because the District Attorney's Office does not prosecute financial abuse cases that are not accompanied by physical abuse, or involve large dollar losses or multi-victim schemes.' After the cases had been given to the DA's office, they only filed charges for 99 cases of the 123 that were given to them, authorities said. The newly published report found additional findings to focus on the need for: Increased funding for creating elder financial abuse prosecutor, investigator, and victim advocate positions in the DA's office. Each law enforcement agency to have at least one detective with specialized training in the investigation of elder financial abuse, as well as training for uniformed officers on recognizing the signs of such abuse. Reactivation of the Financial Abuse Specialist Team to facilitate collaboration between the DA, law enforcement, social service agencies, legal services organizations, victim advocacy organizations, and financial institutions to combat financial elder abuse. Improved record-keeping and data collection practices by Adult Protective Services and law enforcement agencies to allow tracking of elder financial abuse cases. Greater community outreach on the part of Adult Protective Services, the DA and law enforcement agencies. Officials stated that the Grand Jury makes many recommendations that include adding funding in the DA's office to investigate and prosecute these crimes, while also recommending specialized training for law enforcement to know the signs of financial elder abuse. For more information about the investigation, click here to review the Grand Jury website. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Motorcyclist killed in crash on Mass. highway lost control, veered into oncoming traffic, DA says
A man was killed in a crash on a Massachusetts highway on Thursday when he lost control of his motorcycle and veered into oncoming traffic, authorities announced Friday. Emergency officials responding to a report of a crash in the area of 2309 Cranberry Highway in Wareham shortly before 5 p.m. found two motorcycles resting on their side and a damaged SUV at the scene, according to the Plymouth District Attorney's Office and Wareham police. Witnesses told investigators that 49-year-old Matthew Burns, of South Attleboro, lost control of his motorcycle, veered into the southbound lane, and was hit by a white Mercedes GLC300. Burns, who was unresponsive when first responders arrived at the scene, was pronounced dead after efforts to resuscitate him proved unsuccessful, officials said. Burns was riding with four other motorcyclists at the time of the crash, one of whom suffered minor injuries. Massachusetts State Police spoke with the driver of the Mercedes, who said she noted several motorcycle operators traveling in the opposite direction and that one lost control while attempting to navigate a bend in the highway, according to the DA's office. The woman also told investigators that 'she could not avoid crashing into the motorcycle or the operator,' the DA's office added. An investigation into the crash remains ongoing. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Harvey Weinstein Says He Has ‘Regrets' and ‘Acted Immorally' Ahead of New York Retrial Verdict: ‘But Never Illegal, Never Criminal'
Harvey Weinstein gave a rare interview as he awaits the verdict in his New York sex crimes retrial, saying that he has 'regrets' that he 'acted immorally' but claiming that it was 'never illegal.' In an exclusive phone conversation on Fox 5's 'Good Day New York,' anchor Rosanna Scotto asked the former Hollywood producer and convicted sex offender what he thought of the women who had testified against him, and if he has any regrets. 'I think Arthur said they had 4 million reasons to testify, as in dollars,' Weinstein said, referring to his lawyer Arthur Aidala. More from Variety Harvey Weinstein's New York Retrial Closes With Prosecutors Urging Jury to 'Let Him Know the Rules Apply to Him' Ahead of Deliberations Harvey Weinstein Was the 'One Being Abused,' Defense Says in Retrial Closing Argument; Prosecution Calls Him 'No Victim' Harvey Weinstein Doesn't Plan to Testify at New York Retrial 'I have regrets that I put my family through this, that I put my wife through this, and I acted immorally,' Weinstein continued. 'I put so many friends through this and hurt people that were close to me by actions that were stupid, you know what I mean? But never illegal, never criminal, never anything.' Weinstein, who was found guilty on three of seven charges in an L.A. sexual assault trial in 2022 and sentenced to 16 years in prison, is being retried in New York after his previous convictions in the state were overturned in 2024. He has been charged with two counts of committing a 'criminal sexual act' in the first degree and one count of third-degree rape. Closing arguments in the retrial wrapped on Wednesday, and jury deliberations began on Thursday. Scotto also asked Weinstein why he decided not to testify in the retrial. Though he said he 'wanted to,' Weinstein added that Aidala 'said to me that the jury was very feeling strongly, that the jury understood our case and would be sympathetic to our case and that the DA would try to rip me apart if I took the stand.' Weinstein continued, 'I'm not afraid of the DA, but this was the best advice and this is the advice you often hear: don't take the stand if you don't have to.' Listen to Weinstein's full interview on 'Good Day New York' here. Best of Variety New Movies Out Now in Theaters: What to See This Week Emmy Predictions: Animated Program — Can Netflix Score Big With 'Arcane,' 'Devil May Cry' and the Final Season of 'Big Mouth?' What's Coming to Netflix in June 2025