logo
Minnesotans rally around the state for immigrant and workers' rights on May Day

Minnesotans rally around the state for immigrant and workers' rights on May Day

CBS News02-05-2025
What Minnesotans rallied for during annual May Day demonstration
What Minnesotans rallied for during annual May Day demonstration
What Minnesotans rallied for during annual May Day demonstration
It was a movement from coast to coast, seen in the Twin Cities as the International Workers' Day rally drew hundreds to the Minnesota State Capitol, rallying for immigrant and workers' rights.
"I'm just with the people, fighting for what's right," said Karen Schmidt, who attended the rally from Blaine, Minnesota.
Some say new policies from the White House amount to attacks on organized labor and immigrants, making the May Day tradition of widespread demonstrations even more important.
"I'm for labor. As a solution, maybe this is a time for a general strike," said Keith Christensen, from Minneapolis.
But in a space of strong opinions, a group playing the bongos said keeping the peace was important.
"We've had great reaction. People dance," said Micki Rasmussen, who leads the group from Bloomington, Minnesota.
Crowds weren't only seen in Minnesota's capital city, but also over at the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport.
Attendees at the airport included Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan and Sara Nelson, the International President of the Association of Flight Attendants/CWA.
"I'm just happy to be here," Nelson told WCCO before speaking at the Capitol rally after her day at MSP. "It's exciting to be in a place with such rich labor history. That needs to be repeated right now."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minn. State Patrol to have 3rd party assess Capitol security in wake of lawmaker shootings, Senate chamber breach
Minn. State Patrol to have 3rd party assess Capitol security in wake of lawmaker shootings, Senate chamber breach

CBS News

time3 days ago

  • CBS News

Minn. State Patrol to have 3rd party assess Capitol security in wake of lawmaker shootings, Senate chamber breach

The Minnesota State Patrol, which oversees state Capitol security, said it will contract with a third party for an independent security assessment of the complex in St. Paul following a breach of the Senate chamber over the weekend and the shooting attacks on lawmakers in their homes last month. A 36-year-old man is now charged with second-degree burglary for allegedly breaking into the Minnesota Senate chamber late last Friday when the building was closed off to the public. Charging documents say he was found naked sitting in the Senate president's chair, claiming he was the governor, around 11:15 p.m. He was caught on surveillance video earlier in the day, according to the criminal complaint filed Tuesday, and investigators believe he used a wooden edge to prop open an exterior building door so he could get back inside later that night. Anyone can enter during normal business hours and there are no security checkpoints or metal detectors required for those visitors. Colonel Christina Bogojevic, the chief of the Minnesota State Patrol, said officers believed the man was experiencing a mental health episode and took him to a nearby hospital Friday. He then again appeared on the Capitol grounds twice on Saturday before he was arrested that evening. There's a "comprehensive review" underway to review what happened and make any necessary changes to Capitol security protocols, she said. That's in addition to the third-party expert analysis, for which a contract is being finalized. "This is about bringing fresh eyes and objectivity to a place that holds great meaning for Minnesotans," Bogojevic said in a news conference Tuesday. She told reporters her agency increased staff at the Capitol building — which is part of a larger 140-acre complex that includes other state government buildings — and implemented other policy changes in wake of the killing of Rep. Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark in what authorities call a politically motivated assassination. Sen. John Hoffman and his wife Yvette were wounded and the gunman had a hit list targeting other Democratic elected officials. "Many of these changes were already happening in the wake of June 14 lawmaker shootings, but we are now redoubling our efforts following this past weekend's incident," Bogojevic explained. That the Capitol intruder propped open a door to get inside was "alarming," she said. But while many doors have alarms that notify security if left open for an extended period of time, the door he entered did not have that feature. She declined to say how the man later entered the Senate chamber, citing the ongoing investigation. The chamber is usually locked and only accessible by a few, and sergeants-at-arms are out front during the legislative session. Separately, there will be an independent after-action report looking into law enforcement's response to the June 14 attacks, said Bob Jacobsen, commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Public Safety. That is a collaboration with his agency and the Brooklyn Park police, who encountered the accused assassin at the Hortman home that night. "What I believe that law enforcement did during the hours after and during this investigation — did admirable work in finding, investigating, finding and arresting [suspect Vance] Boelter within 43 hours from the time that those first shots were fired at Mr. Hoffman and his wife," Jacobsen said. "Can there be things that we can do to improve? Absolutely. And that's why we were asking for that independent review to take a look at the communications that have been coming through, the criticisms that have been coming through, and the successes that have been coming through." The shootings have shattered lawmakers' sense of safety and have sparked a debate about state capitol security well before the security breach over the weekend. Some are calling for measures like metal detectors, while others fear that will limit access to Minnesotans' seat of government. Jacobsen said that they are considering the number of public entrances to the building, but that his agency and Minnesota State Patrol want to work with "legislative partners" before making any final decisions. A special advisory committee, which includes a bipartisan slate of lawmakers across both chambers that makes recommendations on improvements, is set to meet next month. "We need to walk that balance between having an open capital and that security and safety that people would expect," he said. WCCO first reported last week that the Legislature would tap into state funds in each chamber's respective budgets to help cover the costs for security upgrades at the homes of concerned lawmakers if they request the assistance.

140K Minnesotans could lose Medicaid under new law
140K Minnesotans could lose Medicaid under new law

Axios

time3 days ago

  • Axios

140K Minnesotans could lose Medicaid under new law

An estimated 140,000 Minnesotans could eventually lose access to their government-funded health care under sweeping federal Medicaid changes President Trump signed into law this month. Why it matters: That's about 12% of all people currently using the state's Medicaid program, known as Medical Assistance (MA). The big picture: The prediction is a top takeaway from a new preliminary analysis from the state Department of Human Services saying that Minnesota will lose upwards of $1.4 billion in federal heath care funding over the first four years of implementation. Catch up fast: The federal tax and spending package, called the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, aims to reduce Medicaid spending by nearly $1 trillion through new work reporting requirements, twice-yearly eligibility checks and other provisions shifting costs to state and hospitals. Follow the money: DHS estimates that coverage losses related to the work reporting requirements alone will cut federal funding flowing to the state by $200 million a year. Local state, and tribal governments also face an additional $165 million in annual administrative costs related to implementation, and hospitals could eventually lose $1 billion a year under changes to the provider tax. What they're saying: John Connolly, a deputy DHS commissioner and state Medicaid director, said Monday that the law represents a "dramatic change for Minnesota" that will hit low-income adults without children, those parenting teenagers and rural hospitals particularly hard. A top concern, he said, is that people who are eligible for Medicaid will still "lose coverage because they can't complete the paperwork" required by the law. Others who still have coverage may see their out-of-pocket costs rise, he warned, leading fewer Minnesotans to seek preventative care. The other side: House Speaker Lisa Demuth (R-Cold Spring) defended the changes as "common-sense work requirements for able-bodied adults without children" that "strengthened program integrity measures to make sure only those who are eligible are receiving benefits." "In a state with such a massive fraud problem, these changes are a welcome step in the right direction to make sure Medicaid is strong for those who need it," she added. What we're watching: Officials are still assessing the direct impact on the state budget, which already faced a projected deficit down the road. Gov. Tim Walz says he probably won't need to call a special session to address the fiscal impact, since many of the Medicaid changes don't take effect until 2027 or later. But he predicted to Axios last week that lawmakers will face "very difficult decisions" when they return to St. Paul in February. 🍽️ Low-income residents may feel cuts to federal food assistance, while owners of high-priced homes could see tax breaks. 🧑‍🧑‍🧒‍🧒 Other tax deductions 🚘 People who gamble, give to charities or take out new car loans could also see changes to their tax bills.

Judge throws out federal suit on Illinois, Chicago sanctuary policies
Judge throws out federal suit on Illinois, Chicago sanctuary policies

UPI

time6 days ago

  • UPI

Judge throws out federal suit on Illinois, Chicago sanctuary policies

Chicago police officers watch as activists take to the streets for a May Day protest on May 1 to voice concerns on Trump administration's policies, including immigration. May 1 is also known as International Workers Day. File photo by Tannen Maury/UPI | License Photo July 26 (UPI) -- A federal judge threw out a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against Illinois, Cook County and Chicago sanctuary policies that ban assisting in immigration-related matters. On Friday, District Judge Lindsay Jenkins in Chicago dismissed the entire lawsuit, writing the U.S. Department of Justice lacked standing, though she allowed lawyers to amend their lawsuit by Aug. 22. Jenkins, who serves the Northern District of Illinois, was appointed by President Joe Biden. Illinois is a blue state with a Democratic governor, Chicago mayor and Cook County state's attorney. Chicago is located in Cook County. In the lawsuit filed in February, the DOJ accused the governments of blocking federal immigration law based on the 10th Amendment, which deals with state and federal powers. DOJ hasn't yet publicly said whether there would be an appeal. The Department of Homeland Security has increased deportation raids, particularly in big cities with sanctuary laws. "The Sanctuary Policies reflect Defendants' decision to not participate in enforcing civil immigration law - a decision protected by the Tenth Amendment and not preempted by [the federal Immigration and Nationality Act]," Jenkins wrote in the 64-page ruling. "Finding that these same Policy provisions constitute discrimination or impermissible regulation would provide an end-run around the Tenth Amendment. It would allow the federal government to commandeer States under the guise of intergovernmental immunity - the exact type of direct regulation of states barred by the Tenth Amendment." In their lawsuit, DOJ lawyers said sanctuary cities violate the U.S. Constitution's supremacy clause. In 2017, then Gov. Bruce Rauner, a Republican, signed the 2017 Trust Act, which prohibits state and local law enforcement from involvement in separation efforts with U.S. Customs and Border Enforcement, as well as other federal agencies. The law allows coordination among agencies. A state law in 2021 prohibits local and state officialsgiving a person's custody status, release date or contact information with federal immigration officials. Raunere was succeeded by J.B. Pritzker, who testified last month to a U.S. House committee about sanctuary policies. He was also named in the suit. "Illinois ensures law enforcement time and energy is spent fighting crime - not carrying out the Trump administration's unlawful policies or troubling tactics," Pritzker spokesman Matt Hill said in a statement. "As the grandchild of Ukrainian refugees, the Governor's personal story shows how immigration is central to America's story, economy and culture. He told it to Congress when he laid out how Illinois follows the law and would like the feds to follow suit." Pritzker posted on X that "Illinois just beat the Trump Administration in federal court. Their case challenging the bipartisan TRUST Act was dismissed -- unlike the President, we follow the law and listen to the courts." Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul noted in 1997 the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that federal officials may not "impress into its service - and at no cost to itself -- the police officers of the 50 States." In 1985, then-Chicago Mayor Harold Washington signed an executive order declaring it a sanctuary city. In 2006, Chicago enacted the Welcoming City ordinance, which allows all residents to obtain city services, including police protection and medical care. "We will continue to fight for the dignity of our immigrant, migrant, and refugee communities and stand up for the rights of all Chicagoans against any federal overreach," Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who was named in the suit, said in a statement to WLS-TV. The federal lawsuit also targeted Cook County, which bans ICE agents from the county jail or other places unless they have a criminal warrant not relayed to immigration. "The Trump administration's continued attempts to bully local communities into adopting their preferred policies are not only unlawful, but counter to our values and ability to fight crime effectively," Cook County State's Attorney Eileen O'Neill Burke said in a statement. "We need victims and witnesses of crime to feel comfortable coming forward, just as we are compelled to hold those who commit crimes accountable." The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois said in the statement that the court "was correct to reject the Trump Administration's lawsuit and to allow public officials in Illinois and Chicago to follow our policies that prioritize local public safety and welfare over federal civil immigration enforcement." Trump in an executive order on Jan. 25 stripped sanctuary cities of all federal funding. In February, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced her agency was filing a civil lawsuit against state of New York over immigration enforcement. "This is a new DOJ. We are taking steps to protect American citizens," she said with federal agents behind her. "As you know, we sued Illinois, and New York didn't listen ... you're next." Lawsuits also have been filed against California and New Jersey. There are 13 sanctuary states, including New York and Illinois. In addition, there are sanctuary cities outside them, including Atlanta; Louisville, Ky.; Baltimore; and New Orleans as well as several designated counties. None are in Texas or Arizona, which border Mexico. The other two border states, New Mexico and California, have sanctuary laws.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store