logo
Starmer must stop ‘pussyfooting around', says Labour Red Wall chief

Starmer must stop ‘pussyfooting around', says Labour Red Wall chief

Telegraph03-05-2025

Sir Keir Starmer needs to stop 'pussyfooting around' and make policy as decisively as Donald Trump, the chairman of Labour's Red Wall group of MPs has said.
Jo White has called on the Prime Minister to start showing some leadership after Labour suffered a string of defeats to Reform at Thursday's local elections, including losing the Runcorn and Helsby by-election.
She told the Prime Minister to 'take a leaf' out of Donald Trump's book and announce policies such as a national grooming gangs inquiry, a crackdown on immigration and investment in left-behind industrial heartlands.
Since his return to the White House, Mr Trump has signed hundreds of executive orders that have led to drastic policy shifts on immigration, the economy and diversity schemes.
Ms White also condemned Labour's winter fuel raid, declaring that it had become the party's 'poll tax'.
It is the first major public declaration of disaffection within Labour's own ranks since the local election results were announced.
In an article for The Telegraph, Ms White said: 'After a good kicking at elections, the usual and heavily anticipated response from the ruling party is that we are listening. But this isn't going to wash. Labour needs a reset.
'Sir Keir Starmer has shown strong leadership internationally and he needs to start showing the same leadership in our own country and stop the Government pussyfooting around.
'He should take a leaf out of President Trump's book by following his instincts and issuing some executive orders. This is leadership from the front.'
Ms White founded the Red Wall Caucus of around 35 Labour backbenchers shortly after entering the Commons as the MP for Bassetlaw last year.
The group all represent traditionally safe Labour seats in the North and Midlands that swung to the Tories under Boris Johnson in 2019 and are now being targeted by Reform.
Nigel Farage's party won control of Derbyshire, Nottinghamshire, Doncaster and Durham councils on Thursday – counties where support for Labour has historically been very strong.
Ms White went on to call on Sir Keir to go further on the rape gangs scandal, asking: 'Where are the child abuse inquiries where the victims are still seeking justice?
'Telford-style inquiries should be set up immediately in the towns and cities where grooming gangs are running rings round the authorities.'
Last month, Labour dropped its plans for five local grooming gang inquiries based on the judge-led one into grooming gangs in Telford in favour of a 'flexible' approach.
While this could still involve full independent local inquiries, it could instead include local victims' panels or council-led audits of the handling of historic abuse cases.
Other policy proposals put forward by Ms White included the introduction of digital ID cards – which she said was the 'only way' to stop illegal immigration – and writing off Covid debts.
She went on to suggest that the Government was 'too busy talking to itself' and called for more financial support for post-industrial towns where there have been 'years of disinvestment'.
A vow to 'reindustrialise Britain' was at the heart of the Reform local election campaign and Mr Farage went further than the Government in calling for the permanent nationalisation of British Steel following last month's Scunthorpe crisis.
Ms White reserved some of her strongest criticism for Sir Keir and Rachel Reeves's decision to strip more than 10 million pensioners of their winter fuel payments.
The decision has been defended by Downing Street, which claimed it was necessary to balance the books and fund public services.
But the raid on retirees continues to spark anger among Labour MPs, and Ms White went on to compare it to the poll tax – a policy that helped bring about Margaret Thatcher's downfall.
She said: 'The Winter Fuel Allowance has now become our poll tax problem, We have lost the pensioner vote because of this; I hear the anger.
'To serve as the Government that listens, we should be immediately raising the threshold to the higher-income tax level, and it is an executive order that my constituents in Bassetlaw would all welcome.'
Ms White concluded by saying that Britain was in a 'ruinous state' when Harold Wilson took office in 1964, and that a disastrous by-election loss led to a necessary policy reset.
'Wilson went on to win a landslide less than a year later,' she said. 'Sir Keir Starmer can take lessons from his approach.'
The Government talks to itself – those outside are not being listened to
By Jo White
After a good kicking at elections, the usual and heavily anticipated response from the ruling party is that we are listening. But this isn't going to wash. Labour needs a reset.
Sir Keir Starmer has shown strong leadership internationally and he needs to start showing the same leadership in our own country and stop the Government pussyfooting around. He should take a leaf out of Donald Trump's book by following his instincts and issuing some executive orders. This is leadership from the front.
Where are the child abuse inquiries where the victims are still seeking justice? Telford-style inquiries should be set up immediately in the towns and cities where grooming gangs are running rings around the authorities.
There should be an immediate introduction of digital ID cards, required for employment and accessing public services. This is the only way to stop illegal immigration.
Free our public services from the pressures of Covid debts so they have the finances to deliver on our priorities by writing them off. Our schools and hospitals can be lifted from the shackles of debt in the way quantitative easing was used when Gordon Brown brought stability during the banking crisis. This would be a game-changer.
People are fed up with being told how to run their lives by people looking down their noses at them. We have a huge problem with our messaging; it is failing to hit the mark. Slogans on meeting our net zero targets are a prime example. They are meaningless for people who are facing rising energy costs and purchasing an electric car is an unattainable luxury.
The language needs to shift to the guarantee of green energy in order to get free hot water and cheaper electricity bills. Building on our security by making Britain self-reliant in energy production.
While the Government is busy talking to itself the voices of those on the outside are not being listened to. The realities of living in areas where there have been no big transport projects or huge development investments needs to have a voice around the table. Our lives are very different from the metropolis, our choices, and opportunities, less, our facilities are more remote or non-existent.
The demands raised by the new Labour MPs from the post-industrial towns, where infrastructure is poor and there have been years of disinvestment, and where large numbers voted for Brexit and have now switched to Reform, must be taken off the to-do list and urgently actioned. We know this works.
Ros Jones, the re-elected Labour mayor of Doncaster, made reopening Doncaster airport her number-one priority. The Government committed £30 million investment and she was rewarded at the ballot box.
While over half the country voted for Brexit, there isn't a single person sitting in the Government who backed the EU leave deal. Where are the voices of the 40 Labour MPs who argued in favour of respecting the referendum? The number of government ministers representing leave-voting constituencies is insignificant.
Both Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher brought in people who were not like them, possibly people that they didn't even like, and they were certainly people they sometimes disagreed with. This Government needs to step outside its comfort zone. Sir Keir needs to spend more time travelling the country quietly listening to what people are really thinking. This is a sign of a confident government.
Now we need to be honest with ourselves and address the issue that has hung like a weight around our shoulders since the early days of this Government, the Winter Fuel Allowance has now become our poll tax problem. We have lost the pensioner vote because of this; I hear the anger. To serve as the Government that listens, we should be immediately raising the threshold to the higher income tax level, and it is an executive order that my constituents in Bassetlaw would all welcome.
When Harold Wilson first became prime minister in 1964, the country had been left in a ruinous state with an £800 million deficit. Tough decisions were taken, including freezing a pensions rise, and there were concerns about rising immigration. A by-election disaster led to a reset. A Labour MP at the time commented: 'The prime minister was becoming just a technician. [The by-election] forced him to remember what it was to be a political leader.' Wilson went on to win a landslide less than a year later. Sir Keir can take lessons from his approach.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Scotland trapped in doom spiral of disappointment under Labour
Scotland trapped in doom spiral of disappointment under Labour

The National

time30 minutes ago

  • The National

Scotland trapped in doom spiral of disappointment under Labour

WHEN it was put to him that his notorious Vow – which promised a federal UK within three years of a No vote – had failed to deliver anything remotely close to federalism, Gordon Brown infamously and patronisingly dismissed complaints with an airy: 'Look at the small print.' That's a caveat which always needs to be borne in mind whenever the Labour Party makes a promise, especially a promise to the people of Scotland. You might have thought that anyone in Scotland tempted to vote Labour might have learned that lesson by now, but obviously not. Labour keeps lying and people keep voting for them. As long as they do, Scotland is trapped in a doom spiral of continual disappointment. (Image: free) In the latest iteration of Brown's, above, injunction to look at the small print, the Labour Government has yet again watered down its commitment to create a new publicly owned renewable energy company based in Scotland. The litany of broken promises regarding Great British Energy is long and dismal. We discovered shortly before last year's Westminster general election that the company would not in fact be an energy company in any commonly understood sense of the term. READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch questions Reform UK and Labour 'belief in the Union' GB Energy would not generate energy to sell to consumers, nor would it own any energy infrastructure. Instead, it was to be an "investment vehicle" for funnelling public money into privately owned renewable energy projects. Last year, Keir Starmer announced that his government would invest £8.3 billion into the state-owned clean energy company in a bid to invest in renewable energy projects and decarbonise the entire UK electricity system by 2030. We were also promised that the new company would create 1000 jobs in Aberdeen, where we were assured that it would have its headquarters. It was clear by this point that these jobs would mostly be low level office based administration jobs, not highly skilled trades positions which might be attractive to the offshore oil workers who face losing their jobs as the industry in the North Sea winds down. We later discovered that Jürgen Maier, the new company's chair, would continue to work from an office in Salford in Greater Manchester, which, the last time anyone checked, is not in Aberdeen. We also learned that the new company would not have its own dedicated office building but would share premises with other governmental departments. Most damningly of all, we found out that the 1000 new jobs which the company was supposedly creating in Aberdeen would not actually materialise for 20 years. As if all these betrayals were not enough, a new insult has now been added to the existing injury. It came out in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review that GB Energy will now have to share the promised £8.3bn in funding with a new body which will invest in nuclear energy. The Treasury's spending plans said that Great British Energy and 'Great British Energy – Nuclear', which was quietly renamed from Boris Johnson's Great British Nuclear a day before the spending review, would now split the funds, with £2.5 billion going towards a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors. This leaves £5.8 billion to be invested in renewable energy projects, a very far cry from the £28 billion which the party had been promising to invest in green industries back in 2023 when Labour was still in opposition. In shades of Gordon Brown's patronising small print comment, when asked about the decision to hive off a large chunk of the funding promised to GB Energy to develop green renewable energies and spend it on nuclear instead, a Whitehall source told The Guardian newspaper: "This has always been part of our plans, but I think perhaps not everyone was paying attention." READ MORE: Unionists just don't view the status quo the same way we do So there you go. It's not that the Labour Party has been underhand and duplicitous yet again – it's all our fault for not paying attention to a change that Labour made in the dead of night, a change which they knew would immediately be buried in the media attention given to the headline announcements in the spending review. SNP MSP Bill Kidd said: 'The fact Labour is raiding its promised funding for GB energy to spend on nuclear is shocking but not surprising. "Scotland is already a global leader in renewable energy, and we generate far more electricity than we consume. Our priority must be a just transition that delivers long-term economic opportunities for all - not more nuclear.' Tories trapped in a death spiral The Tories are due to hold their Scottish conference in Edinburgh this weekend as the party faces an existential crisis. In recent weeks it has lost a dozen councillors to the Nigel Farage fan club, with yet another Aberdeenshire Tory defecting on Thursday. Meanwhile, the Tory group in Dumfries and Galloway council has disintegrated amidst bitter in-fighting with seven of the council's 16 Conservatives departing, four to form a group called Novantae – the name of the Celtic tribe which inhabited the region during the Iron Age – and three to create the Dumfries and Galloway Independent Group. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch speaking at the party's Edinburgh conference (Image: PA)Despite selecting a candidate who is a member of the Orange Order in a blatant attempt to appeal to the sectarian vote in the recent Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election, the Tory vote collapsed to single figures. They only narrowly avoided the humiliation of a lost deposit as their voters deserted them en masse for the even more vile Reform UK, which appears to be hoovering up the staunch vote. With an unpopular and uninspiring leader in the form of Kemi Badenoch, and with Reform UK outflanking the Tories on the right, the Conservatives seem trapped in a death spiral. They won't be missed.

SNP could have got the votes to win had they backed this petition
SNP could have got the votes to win had they backed this petition

The National

time31 minutes ago

  • The National

SNP could have got the votes to win had they backed this petition

In the run-up to the by-election the SNP leadership played the well-worn Westminster political 'first past the post' tactic. That is, not to try to promote your own policies but to claim that a vote for your candidate will prevent the 'much worse' party winning the seat. That way there's no need to make any promises or commitments to the electorate, you just claim to be much better than the party you claim is likely to win the seat if your party fails to win it. READ MORE: Israel launches second wave of major strikes on Iran John Swinney insisted on claiming that the outcome of the election would be a win for either SNP or the unknown Reform UK candidate, so that voting SNP was required to stop the neo-fascist Farage bunch from taking the seat, and in doing so, getting a foothold in Scotland. He offered no evidence to back this up, just his own political wisdom and in following this strategy, allowed Labour's 'invisible man' to quietly take the seat with practically no campaign – Labour were probably looking on and thinking it would be rude to interrupt! We now know that John's political wisdom was widely off the mark, indeed his claim that Reform was doing so well probably played into the Farage media hype, which is the core of the Reform organisation, and to that extent helped them in the election. This was a disaster for the SNP, losing a seat that they've held since its introduction in 2011. So again, the only winner was political apathy and disillusionment, with a turnout of only 44.2% compared to 63.2% in 2021, John Swinney seemed to imply this was a reasonable result? I know that in the run-up to this election, the SNP candidate Katy Loudon asked SNP members and the wider constituency for their support. Andy Anderson, the national convener of the Respect Scottish Sovereignty movement, responded to Katy, asking her to give her support to petition PE2135 on Scottish human rights which is currently before the Scottish Parliament. Andy said if she would do this, he would talk to RSS supporters in the constituency and seek their help to get her elected. RSS has about 7000 supporters in Scotland and hundreds of these supporters are in that constituency, so getting their active support for the SNP candidate could have been decisive in the outcome of this election. So how did Katy respond? She didn't. Andy prompted her again. No response. It seems it was more important to the SNP leadership to keep their options open to undermine the UN human rights of the Scottish people than to win a by-election. The Scottish people will not tolerate this, we will persist in our struggle for Scottish human rights and for direct democracy, and this RSS petition is an important part of that struggle. Apathy and political disillusion will not continue to dominate our electoral system. So, if the SNP want a viable political future in Scotland, they had better pay attention to the human rights of the Scottish people and start to respond to this issue. Paddy McCarthy via email IT is always a good way to finish the working week, witnessing the complete meltdown with associated frothing at the mouth of the extremists, those whot love to label themselves as 'Reform'. The followers of Farage – yes, he that is nothing more than a 'market-stall Trump' – dislike having their twisted ideology questioned. Which is in itself a classic reaction by those with leanings towards the totalitarian state. Their disdain for human rights, obsession with national security, and want of suppression of workers' rights all point to the fascist way of thinking. Yet if you were to ask them what their goal is? Their answer is that all they crave is their country back? They are, of course, unable to state where they wish to bring their country back from. But they know that the problems facing the UK could be solved by putting machine guns on the Channel crossing points, kicking out everyone who does not look the same, speak the same, or prays to a different god! After all, are they nothing more than an invasion force sitting in our midst just waiting for the call? Which is similar to the scaremongering used before the start of the First World War. Then it was directed at the German waiters in London, who were supposedly all serving officers in the Kaiser's army. The rancid press also stated that thousand of rifles with even more ammunition had been pre-placed in the UK for use by the waiters/officers! Oh, how they crave to have the country returned to a time of smartly dressed obedient children, with housewives equally smartly dressed doing their daily shopping at local shops. A time that did not exist outside of the BBC. The fascists will not accept that they are being manipulated by politicians who are, by their nature, dangerous, corrupt of ideology, and vile in deed. Scotland as a matter of urgency must separate from that breeding ground of rancid thought that is Westminster. Only through independence and rejoining our friends in Europe (in whatever form) shall we halt this goose-stepping into the abyss of intolerance and authoritarianism. Cliff Purvis Veterans for Scottish Independence 2.0 AN excellent article by Dr Mark McNaught on the advantages of the Efta/EEA over the EU for an independent Scotland (Jun 11). In particular, he calls out the EU's now blatant and highly dangerous military ambitions. What he doesn't mention, however, is that Scotland would be a net contributor to the EU. Latterly the UK was paying around £9 billion annually, the equivalent of more than £150 per adult. Given that Von der Leyen and co are hell-bent on admitting the ultimate basket case, Ukraine, that figure would be a lot higher. George Morton Rosyth

Assisted dying: Safeguard for children and ban on advertising added to bill by MPs
Assisted dying: Safeguard for children and ban on advertising added to bill by MPs

ITV News

time33 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Assisted dying: Safeguard for children and ban on advertising added to bill by MPs

Health professionals would not be allowed to raise the subject of assisted dying with child patients and advertising for such a service would be banned, MPs have said. The new parts to the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill were voted in on Friday as a second day of debate on various amendments came to a close. It is expected the next major vote on the overall bill will take place next Friday, which could see it either fall or pass through to the Lords. Impassioned debate heard the bill described by Conservative MP Kieran Mullan as a 'deeply consequential and highly contentious piece of legislation for our society'. He argued not enough time has been allocated for debate on such a divisive issue, but health minister Stephen Kinnock said there had been more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent so far, and more than 500 amendments had been considered at committee stage earlier this year. On Friday a majority of MPs approved a new clause, tabled by Labour MP Dame Meg Hillier, to ensure medics cannot raise the topic of assisted dying with under-18s. Her separate amendment to prevent health workers from bringing up the issue with adult patients before they have raised it was voted down. The amendment on child patients was hailed as a 'first major Commons defeat' by opposition campaigners Care Not Killing which welcomed 'MPs removing the ability of doctors to raise unprompted assisted suicide with children'. A group of Labour MPs opposed to the proposed legislation called it an '11th hour rejection of the claims made about the safety of this bill' which 'proves that confidence is slipping away from it'. They also cautioned that MPs might not have a copy of the final bill by the time they vote 'on this life and death issue' next week, as some outstanding amendments will still be being considered on Friday morning. A ban on advertising assisted dying should the bill pass into law has also been approved. An amendment, by fellow Labour MP Paul Waugh, to limit exceptions on that ban did not pass. He said the ban as it stands has 'unspecified exceptions, which could make the ban itself worthless', warning online harms from ads about assisted dying on TikTok 'could be a reality without the tighter safeguards in my amendment'. A number of other amendments were passed, including a provision for assisted dying deaths to not automatically be referred to a coroner and around the regulation of substances for use in assisted dying. Other issues debated included an amendment requiring the Health Secretary to publish an assessment of the availability, quality and distribution of palliative and end-of-life care one year after the bill passing into law. Pledging her support for the amendment, which was tabled by Liberal Democrat Munira Wilson, Kim Leadbeater said MPs should not have to choose between supporting assisted dying or palliative care as it is not an 'either/or' conversation for dying people. She said palliative care and assisted dying 'can and do work side by side to give terminally-ill patients the care and choice they deserve in their final days', and urged MPs to support 'all options available to terminally ill people'. Ms Wilson's amendment is supported by Marie Curie, which said it is 'desperately needed as the end-of-life care system is in crisis, with huge gaps in services and a lack of NHS leadership on this vital part of our health and care system'. It is expected that this amendment will be voted on next Friday. One MP, who became emotional as she recalled the death of her husband who she said had been 'in extreme pain' with terminal cancer, urged her colleagues to 'mind our language' after words like 'murder' were used. Liberal Democrat MP Caroline Voaden, whose husband died of oesophageal cancer, said it is 'so wrong' to use such language. She said: 'This is about helping people die in a civilised way and helping their families not go through a horrendous experience of watching a loved one die in agony.' The beginning of Friday's session saw MPs add a new opt-out clause to the bill. The amendment, meaning no person including all health and social care professionals, can be obliged to take part in assisted dying had been debated and approved last month, but has now been formally added to the bill. The bill passed second reading stage by a majority of 55 during a historic vote in November which saw MPs support the principle of assisted dying. Demonstrators both for and against a change in the law once again gathered outside Parliament to make their views known on the bill. Sarah Wootton, chief executive of Dignity in Dying which is in favour of a change in the law, said: 'Our country is closer than ever before to the safe, compassionate, and tightly regulated assisted dying law that so many people want, from all walks of life and every part of the country.' But former MP Caroline Ansell, from Christian Action Research and Education (Care), which opposes assisted dying, urged parliamentarians to vote against the bill. She said: 'It is irredeemably flawed in principle and in detail. Parliament should close the door to assisted suicide and focus on truly compassionate and life-affirming forms of support.' As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally-ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the bill and any amendments, meaning they vote according to their conscience rather than along party lines.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store