
Scotland trapped in doom spiral of disappointment under Labour
WHEN it was put to him that his notorious Vow – which promised a federal UK within three years of a No vote – had failed to deliver anything remotely close to federalism, Gordon Brown infamously and patronisingly dismissed complaints with an airy: 'Look at the small print.'
That's a caveat which always needs to be borne in mind whenever the Labour Party makes a promise, especially a promise to the people of Scotland. You might have thought that anyone in Scotland tempted to vote Labour might have learned that lesson by now, but obviously not. Labour keeps lying and people keep voting for them. As long as they do, Scotland is trapped in a doom spiral of continual disappointment.
(Image: free)
In the latest iteration of Brown's, above, injunction to look at the small print, the Labour Government has yet again watered down its commitment to create a new publicly owned renewable energy company based in Scotland. The litany of broken promises regarding Great British Energy is long and dismal. We discovered shortly before last year's Westminster general election that the company would not in fact be an energy company in any commonly understood sense of the term.
READ MORE: Kemi Badenoch questions Reform UK and Labour 'belief in the Union'
GB Energy would not generate energy to sell to consumers, nor would it own any energy infrastructure. Instead, it was to be an "investment vehicle" for funnelling public money into privately owned renewable energy projects. Last year, Keir Starmer announced that his government would invest £8.3 billion into the state-owned clean energy company in a bid to invest in renewable energy projects and decarbonise the entire UK electricity system by 2030.
We were also promised that the new company would create 1000 jobs in Aberdeen, where we were assured that it would have its headquarters. It was clear by this point that these jobs would mostly be low level office based administration jobs, not highly skilled trades positions which might be attractive to the offshore oil workers who face losing their jobs as the industry in the North Sea winds down.
We later discovered that Jürgen Maier, the new company's chair, would continue to work from an office in Salford in Greater Manchester, which, the last time anyone checked, is not in Aberdeen. We also learned that the new company would not have its own dedicated office building but would share premises with other governmental departments.
Most damningly of all, we found out that the 1000 new jobs which the company was supposedly creating in Aberdeen would not actually materialise for 20 years.
As if all these betrayals were not enough, a new insult has now been added to the existing injury. It came out in Chancellor Rachel Reeves's spending review that GB Energy will now have to share the promised £8.3bn in funding with a new body which will invest in nuclear energy.
The Treasury's spending plans said that Great British Energy and 'Great British Energy – Nuclear', which was quietly renamed from Boris Johnson's Great British Nuclear a day before the spending review, would now split the funds, with £2.5 billion going towards a new generation of small modular nuclear reactors. This leaves £5.8 billion to be invested in renewable energy projects, a very far cry from the £28 billion which the party had been promising to invest in green industries back in 2023 when Labour was still in opposition.
In shades of Gordon Brown's patronising small print comment, when asked about the decision to hive off a large chunk of the funding promised to GB Energy to develop green renewable energies and spend it on nuclear instead, a Whitehall source told The Guardian newspaper: "This has always been part of our plans, but I think perhaps not everyone was paying attention."
READ MORE: Unionists just don't view the status quo the same way we do
So there you go. It's not that the Labour Party has been underhand and duplicitous yet again – it's all our fault for not paying attention to a change that Labour made in the dead of night, a change which they knew would immediately be buried in the media attention given to the headline announcements in the spending review.
SNP MSP Bill Kidd said: 'The fact Labour is raiding its promised funding for GB energy to spend on nuclear is shocking but not surprising.
"Scotland is already a global leader in renewable energy, and we generate far more electricity than we consume. Our priority must be a just transition that delivers long-term economic opportunities for all - not more nuclear.'
Tories trapped in a death spiral
The Tories are due to hold their Scottish conference in Edinburgh this weekend as the party faces an existential crisis. In recent weeks it has lost a dozen councillors to the Nigel Farage fan club, with yet another Aberdeenshire Tory defecting on Thursday. Meanwhile, the Tory group in Dumfries and Galloway council has disintegrated amidst bitter in-fighting with seven of the council's 16 Conservatives departing, four to form a group called Novantae – the name of the Celtic tribe which inhabited the region during the Iron Age – and three to create the Dumfries and Galloway Independent Group.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch speaking at the party's Edinburgh conference (Image: PA)Despite selecting a candidate who is a member of the Orange Order in a blatant attempt to appeal to the sectarian vote in the recent Hamilton, Larkhall, and Stonehouse Holyrood by-election, the Tory vote collapsed to single figures. They only narrowly avoided the humiliation of a lost deposit as their voters deserted them en masse for the even more vile Reform UK, which appears to be hoovering up the staunch vote.
With an unpopular and uninspiring leader in the form of Kemi Badenoch, and with Reform UK outflanking the Tories on the right, the Conservatives seem trapped in a death spiral. They won't be missed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Powys County Times
an hour ago
- Powys County Times
Government plan to keep Pip payouts for 13 weeks ‘not very much', says MP
A Labour MP has described the Government's plans to avert a rebellion on welfare cuts as 'not very much really'. Dr Simon Opher, a GP and the MP for Stroud, told the BBC he is 'going to rebel' in a vote and 'a number of colleagues are in the same situation'. The 'non-negotiable' protections that Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall is to include in the Welfare Reform Bill are understood to include a guarantee that those who no longer qualify for personal independence payments (Pip) will still receive the payments for 13 weeks. Speaking to BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday, Dr Opher said: 'It's a slight delay in the disability cuts – it's 13 weeks rather than four weeks – so it's something, but not very much really. 'And it doesn't change the basic fact that they're… planning to cut disability payment to quite a lot of people really. 'So not terribly impressed, but it's something at least.' The Government has faced a backlash from its own MPs over the package of measures, aimed at reducing the number of working age people on sickness benefits. Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals were 'impossible to support'. Asked whether he would rebel if the measures came to a vote in the Commons, Dr Opher told the programme: 'I am going to rebel. 'And this comes hard to me, I've never actually voted against the Government and I know a number of colleagues in the same situation. 'So I just urge the Government really to just consider parts of this again.' A Green Paper laid out proposals for a 'transitional protection for those who are no longer eligible for Pip', but the Government's plans revealed this week clarify the 13-week length. Ms Kendall told The Guardian earlier this week: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned that 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Appeals for de-escalation after Israel bombarded by Iranian missiles
Iran bombarded Tel Aviv with hundreds of missiles overnight in retaliation for Israeli strikes on its nuclear bases. Calls from Sir Keir Starmer and other world leaders for calm amid the mounting conflict appeared to fall on deaf ears, as Tehran struck back against Israel's attacks. Air raid sirens sounded out across Israel and its citizens were ordered to move into bomb shelters, as the attack began. A plume of smoke could be seen rising from central Tel Aviv amid the barrage, after at least one Iranian missile appeared to bypass the iron dome missile defence system. The rocket attacks on the Tel Aviv area wounded 34 people, according to Israel's paramedic service, including one woman critically injured after being trapped under rubble. Israel's paramedic service said two people were killed and another 19 people were injured after Iranian missiles struck the central Israeli city of Rishon LeZion on Saturday. A spokesperson for Beilinson Hospital said one woman was killed in a second Iranian barrage when a building was hit in Tel Aviv. A spokesman for Iran's Foreign Ministry said continuing nuclear talks with the US would be 'meaningless' after the strikes, although he stopped short of saying the talks were cancelled according to The Mizan news agency. Operation Rising Lion – the offensive against Tehran – has mainly targeted nuclear sites, including destroying the above ground section of Iran's main Natanz nuclear base. Hossein Salami, the leader of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, was among the senior Iranian figures reportedly killed in Israel's initial overnight strikes. Some 78 people were killed and more than 320 wounded in Iran, according to its ambassador to the UN. The attack is believed to be the most significant Iran has faced since its war with Iraq in the 1980s. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said 'more is on the way' in a video message released on Friday night. Danny Dannon, Israel's UN ambassador, claimed the operation was launched because Iran was 'within days' of having the capability of building nuclear weapons. Tensions between Israel, the US and Iran have escalated in recent weeks, amid negotiations over the Iran nuclear deal, which is aimed at preventing the country from developing nuclear weapons. On Friday, Israel's western allies attempted a diplomatic blitz aimed at cooling temperatures in the Middle East. After convening a Cobra meeting of senior ministers and officials, Sir Keir spoke to Mr Netanyahu, urging him to de-escalate and work towards a 'diplomatic resolution'. The Prime Minister and US President Donald Trump agreed the burgeoning conflict needed to be resolved by 'diplomacy and dialogue'. And Sir Keir joined with France's Emmanuel Macron and Germany's Friedrich Merz in calling for restraint. David Lammy, the Foreign Secretary, spoke to Iran's foreign minister and urged calm, later warning the Middle East is facing a 'moment of grave peril'. Mr Trump has also suggested that Iran now had a chance to agree a nuclear deal to bring an end to the fighting. On his Truth Social platform, the President wrote: 'Two months ago I gave Iran a 60 day ultimatum to 'make a deal'. They should have done it! 'Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn't get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!' Both the UK and the US have insisted they were not involved in the Israeli strikes and that Israel acted unilaterally. The first time Israel discussed the strikes with the UK was at midday on Friday, according to Tzipi Hotovely, the country's ambassador to the UK. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called for the attacks to be halted. 'Israeli bombardment of Iranian nuclear sites. Iranian missile strikes in Tel Aviv. Enough escalation. Time to stop. Peace and diplomacy must prevail,' he said in a post on X.


Telegraph
2 hours ago
- Telegraph
How Britain could be dragged into the Israel-Iran conflict
It was the moment that Benjamin Netanyahu had awaited for decades: at 3am on Friday, the Israeli prime minister's forces launched a massive attack on Iran, aiming to wipe out swathes of its nuclear weapons programme. Israel said its goal was to 'roll back' Tehran's programme, which it considers an existential threat, and has signalled that more strikes will follow, which could destroy the nuclear project altogether. But as the dust settles following Israel's initial salvo of air strikes, the risk of this operation unleashing an all-out regional war – and one that could even drag in Britain – looks higher than ever. On Friday night, Iran unleashed dozens of Iranian ballistic missiles towards Israel, the IDF said, with explosions heard in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, and at least two civilians killed. Iran's foreign ministry has signalled that it will retaliate, not only against Israel but also the United States, which it says 'approved' the attack and serves as Israel's 'primary patron'. 'The US government, as the primary patron of this regime, will also bear responsibility for the dangerous repercussions of the Zionist regime's reckless actions,' it warned. Those words could open the door to a large-scale Iranian response against US military bases in the Middle East, including those in Iraq, Qatar, Bahrain and the UAE. Ellie Geranmayeh, a senior Middle East analyst at the European Council on Foreign Relations, said: 'This is the biggest military attack Iran has faced since the war with Iraq in the 1980s, and is being viewed by Iran as a declaration of war. 'In Iran's view, there is no way that the Netanyahu government acted without a US green light.' Mr Netanyahu confirmed this on Friday, saying that Israel informed the United States about its plans to attack Iran before carrying them out. On Friday, The New York Times reported that the US government would 'soon' send additional fighter jets to the Middle East, suggesting that the Trump administration expects attacks shortly from Iran or its proxies that will require a military response. US officials said that the Pentagon is also 'positioning warships and other military assets' in the region to protect American troops from a possible attack. The Iranian statement also claimed that 'grave and far-reaching consequences' will be inflicted on Mr Netanyahu's 'supporters' – raising the possibility that key allies Britain and France might be dragged into regional conflict as well. While the UK is not currently planning to take part in defending Israel from Iranian counter-attacks, Iran's allusion to Western 'supporters' suggests that British military bases in the region could also be considered legitimate targets by Tehran as it draws up plans for retaliation. The UK has air bases in Qatar, the UAE, Oman and Cyprus, as well as a naval support facility in Bahrain. There is already a precedent for the UK launching air strikes on Iran's proxies, such as in April when the RAF used Typhoon jets to strike Houthi drone production sites in Yemen. If Iran were to target UK military sites as part of a wider assault on Israel and its key allies, Britain could react in kind by striking Iranian targets with fighter jets from one of its Gulf state bases, which are on the other side of the Persian Gulf from Iran. Tehran will be under immense pressure to respond forcefully to the latest attack, and says the US will soon 'receive a forceful slap'. But the regime has been left weakened by a string of catastrophic blows over the past two years to its main proxy groups and regional allies, and will be carefully weighing its options for a response. Hezbollah, the regime's biggest proxy group in Lebanon, was decimated by Israel last year, and its closest regional ally, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, was overthrown in December. On Friday, Hezbollah announced that it will not retaliate against Israel on Iran's behalf, underlining how severely it has been weakened by a wave of Israeli airstrikes and pager-bomb attacks, which decapitated its leadership and most senior commanders. In Yemen, the Houthi militia group recently halted its attacks on US vessels in the Red Sea under a ceasefire deal with Washington, and may be reluctant to break that deal only for the sake of rushing to Iran's defences. But experts say that if the Houthis break that ceasefire and rejoin the fray, it could significantly increase the likelihood of British involvement, due to a need to prevent a repeat of the havoc that Houthi strikes caused for trade vessels in the Red Sea in 2023 and 2024. Dr Burcu Ozcelik, a senior fellow from the Royal United Services Institute security think tank, said: 'Any such move would reverberate far beyond Yemen, threatening maritime security in the Red Sea and risking direct entanglement of the US and UK in a widening regional conflict.' In Moscow, Iran's strongest ally, officials have released a lukewarm response to the Israeli operation, which expressed 'concern' about the 'cynical' aggression – hardly a rallying cry to join Tehran in a regional war. In other words, Tehran is diplomatically isolated at present, which could reduce the risk of other key global players, other than the US, being dragged into the fighting. John Foreman, a former UK defence attache to Moscow, said Vladimir Putin was unlikely to get drawn into a Middle Eastern conflict in defence of his Iranian allies. 'Russia's relationship with the UAE and Saudi Arabia is probably more important to it. Iran has always been under the cosh, and now I don't think Russia wants to be between the Americans and the Iranians,' he said. He added that much of the Russian military support that was expected to be given to Tehran as thanks for drone shipments for Putin's war on Ukraine has not materialised. ' If you look at what Russia has given Iran, it has never given them the advanced fighters or the advanced air defence that Iran probably needed,' he said. As for a counter-attack coming directly from Iran, this could involve ballistic missile and drone attacks on Israel and US assets in the region. Previous waves of Iranian missile and drone attacks on Israel, in April and October 2024, caused limited damage, in large part due to air defence and interception provided by Western allies, including the UK. But there is a key difference: Iran's April salvo was responding to Israel bombing an Iranian embassy complex in Damascus, while October's was a response to Israel killing Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader, and Hassan Nasrallah, the Hezbollah leader. Those previous escalations pale in comparison to Friday's direct attacks on Iranian soil, which have not only severely damaged Iran's nuclear facilities but also wiped out some of the country's most senior military commanders – including the chief of staff of the armed forces. Iran may also consider asymmetrical forms of retaliation such as cyber-attacks or harassing shipping assets in the Strait of Hormuz to drive up oil prices. Renewed action from Israel in the coming days that goes even further than Friday's attack, and which might occur before Iran manages to respond to the first round, cannot be ruled out. On Friday afternoon, Israel continued to pummel Iran with air strikes targeting surface-to-surface missile launch sites, no doubt seeking to limit Iran's capacity to respond. As of Saturday, Israel appeared to have severely damaged, but not completely demolished, Iran's Natanz site, the main nuclear facility. It targeted other key sites such as the Fordow enrichment facility near Tehran, but not the Isfahan nuclear technology centre, which employs thousands of nuclear scientists. The name of Israel's operation – Rising Lion – may even be an allusion to pre-Revolution Iran, as the lion is a symbol of the Iranian monarchy that was overthrown in 1979. This potentially hints that Israel's true goal goes far beyond suppressing the Iranian nuclear programme and could envisage the downfall of the Islamic Republic. If Israel's operation expands even further – and Donald Trump has suggested that it will unless Iran comes to the negotiating table – it could be considered by Iran to not just be a dire threat, but an existential one.