Taiwan's Lai tied up by political chaos after year in office
TAIWANESE President Lai Ching-te promised to stand up to China and defend democracy when he took office in 2024. A year on, domestic political turmoil has engulfed the island, stymieing his agenda as it faces Chinese military pressure.
Self-ruled Taiwan is known for its rough and tumble politics, but analysts say the current dysfunction is distracting lawmakers and eroding public confidence – to the benefit of Beijing.
China claims Taiwan is part of its territory and has threatened to use force to bring it under its control.
"The only beneficiary of a divided, fractured Taiwan that is incapable of addressing its own long-term requirements and vulnerabilities is China," said Ryan Hass, a senior fellow at Brookings Institution.
Lai, a staunch defender of Taiwan's sovereignty and detested by Beijing, was elected in January 2024 with 40 per cent of the vote, but his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lost its majority in parliament.
The main opposition Kuomintang party (KMT), which has friendly ties with China, has teamed up with the Taiwan People's Party to challenge the government's policies, including slashing the general budget.
Tensions have escalated into physical fights inside parliament and thousands of supporters of the DPP and opposition parties holding rival street protests.
The KMT has called Lai a "dictator" and accused him of pushing Taiwan closer to war with China, while the DPP suggests the KMT is a tool of Beijing and is undermining Taiwan's security.
The political atmosphere is "poisonous", said Bonnie Glaser, a Taiwan-China affairs expert at the German Marshall Fund of the United States.
The parties "spend a lot of their time thinking about how to weaken support and damage the reputation and the image of their political adversaries", Glaser said.
"There's no bipartisanship or ability to come together on issues," such as low wages and power shortages.
Lai, who marks his first year in office on Tuesday, has seen his approval rating fall to 45.9 percent from 58 per cent nearly a year ago, according to a survey by Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation in April.
His disapproval rating rose to 45.7 per cent – the highest since he took office – which the polling group linked to the Lai government's handling of US tariffs on Taiwan and the DPP's unprecedented recall campaign targeting the opposition.
DPP supporters are seeking to unseat around 30 KMT lawmakers through a legal process that allows legislators to be removed before the end of their term.
While the threshold for a successful recall is high, the DPP only needs to win six seats to wrest back control of parliament.
A rival campaign to unseat 15 DPP members has been embroiled in controversy after KMT staffers were accused of forging the signatures of dead people.
The KMT has also threatened to recall Lai.
"It feels like it's a negative sum game where all sides are going to come out looking a bit tarnished. The Taiwan political system is going to look a bit more frayed," said Hass.
Despite the turmoil, Lai has chalked up some domestic successes since taking office, said David Sacks, a fellow for Asia studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Among them, raising public awareness about the Chinese threat to Taiwan, and pledging to increase the island's defence budget to more than three per cent of GDP.
But foreign affairs have been more fraught with "a lot of uncertainty" under US President Donald Trump over Washington's policy towards Taiwan, China and the region, Sacks said.
While China has already decided that "Lai was not somebody that they wanted to work with", he said.
Analysts said the ongoing hostility between the DPP and KMT was eroding public confidence in Taiwan's political institutions, bolstering Beijing's narrative that Taiwanese people would be better off as part of China.
Beijing has ramped up military pressure on Taiwan in recent years, deploying fighter jets and warships on a near daily basis and staging several large-scale drills around the island since Lai took office.
Taiwan accuses China of also using espionage, cyberattacks and disinformation to weaken its defences.
Lai branded China a "foreign hostile force" in March, angering Beijing and drawing criticism from the KMT for being a "troublemaker."
"The more divided and dysfunctional Taiwan looks within, the easier it is for Beijing to make its case directly to the people of Taiwan," Hass said.
There could be a silver lining to the chaos if Beijing sees less urgency for military action against Taiwan, said Chen Fang-yu, assistant professor of political science at Soochow University in Taipei.
"All of the efforts by China is working for the opposition parties," said Chen, pointing to their success in district elections.
"They believe that someday people will be tired of seeing the DPP government because the DPP has been there for three terms," Chen said.
"For now, maybe China can wait."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
2 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
'99% Muslim Klang's village folks have every right to fume over crematorium built close to mosque'
IN a rare case, a non-Muslim Klang native has stood up in defence of Kampung Raja Uda villagers who are reportedly up in arms over the construction of a four-storey columbarium adjacent to a mosque in their vicinity. Facebooker Emmanuel Joseph who felt annoyed with racial comments contended that 'people who don't live here may not understand' the actual situation on the ground. 'Until six months ago, I lived in this area, just two streets away from this very mosque. The villager's concerns are not unfounded for the village is 99% Muslim,' observed the self-proclaimed 'Chindian Klang native who is moderately fluent in sarcasm and irony' in a Facebook post. 'The nearest non-Muslim house is just streets away left and right … and they already have two large Chinese temples at the end of the adjacent street. This area is opposite Pandamaran which itself has like a few dozen temples including many large ones. 'So why not put the crematorium or columbarium or whatever there (in Kampung Raja Uda)?' Emmanuel was commenting on a recent Bernama report that the village folks were even contemplating to submit a protest memorandum to Selangor ruler Sultan Sharafuddin Idris Shah on the matter, As it is, most of the 5,000 residents in the village oppose the construction of the columbarium on a one-hectare plot of private land given the project had not been discussed with the residents who only became aware of it two weeks ago. 'Many residents are worried that the village area may become polluted by ashes generated from the cremation process, particularly for homes situated less than 10 metres from the site,' village committee chairman Azhar Ibrahim told reporters after participating in a peaceful protest in Port Klang recently. Delving further, Emmanuel described Kampung Raja Uda as 'relatively tolerant despite the strong PAS presence there'. 'There's even a couple of Hindu shrines just around the nearby Muslim cemetery, co-existing peacefully,' observed the University of London law graduate. 'This particular mosque is newly renovated and a work 25 years in the making.' Hoping that non-Muslims 'don't make it out to be case of intolerant villagers when it really isn't', Enmanuel added: If I were still staying there, I wouldn't agree to a burial ground of any sort on this street either. The house on the left of the mosque is Hindu and prayers are still done there harmoniously. The house opposite that one is a popular businessman who holds parties now and then with no problems. This mosque is very popular and active in social work, etc and is frequently packed with parking being already tight there. The entire area around the mosque are hang-outs and tomyam stalls where Malay youth hang out. The end of the street houses a pasar malam that mainly serves a Muslim clientele but they happily host Chinese vegetable sellers and yoyo ice and toys traders, among others.' – June 9, 2025 Main image credit: Bernama
The Star
3 hours ago
- The Star
Comment: What can Cambodia offer the US ahead of third round of tariff negotiations?
PHNOM PENH: As Cambodia and the US prepare for a potential third round of negotiations regarding the heavy tariffs imposed on Cambodian goods, the stakes could not be higher for the Cambodian economy. The current situation — where the US maintains a 49% tariff on a broad range of Cambodian exports — is unsustainable for a developing country that relies heavily on international trade. This trade barrier threatens not only Cambodia's economic stability but also its attractiveness as a regional investment destination. The second round of negotiations ended without a concrete agreement, leaving both sides with open expectations and diplomatic uncertainty. As the third round approaches, Cambodia must reconsider its approach and think strategically about what it can offer the US — both as a gesture of goodwill and as a calculated move to regain economic advantage. The US remains one of Cambodia's most important export markets. In 2023 alone, the Kingdom exported over $8 billion worth of goods to the US, primarily garments, footwear and travel goods. With the new tariffs, many of these goods are now subject to nearly 49% import tax — crippling their competitiveness in the US market. Even more concerning is the broader implication: Chinese investors and manufacturers, who had shifted to Cambodia in previous years to avoid US-China trade disputes, are now beginning to pull out. If Chinese businesspeople, who have been instrumental in building Cambodia's manufacturing base, decide to relocate to Vietnam, Indonesia or Bangladesh, the long-term damage to Cambodia's industrial ecosystem could be devastating. It is clear that without a breakthrough in negotiations, Cambodia risks economic isolation and a significant loss in employment opportunities, foreign direct investment, and GDP growth. This is why Cambodia must consider making the first concession. In diplomacy, small symbolic actions can unlock large strategic benefits. Cambodia must recognise that the US is not only negotiating as an economic power but also as a political actor with global norms and values. The deterioration of Cambodia-US relations began in 2017, when the Cambodian government accused the US of supporting a 'colour revolution' and took a number of aggressive actions against the opposition, particularly the Cambodia National Rescue Party (CNRP). Since then, several high-profile political activists with alleged ties to the United States have been arrested or exiled. To move forward, Cambodia could consider making a political goodwill gesture before the third round of talks. For example, the early or conditional release of certain political prisoners — particularly those with clear connections to US institutions or civil society organisations — could demonstrate a spirit of compromise. This would not only help repair trust but also provide the US with a tangible outcome to present to its own domestic stakeholders, especially members of Congress who remain critical of Cambodia's human rights record. The US has long maintained a dual-track policy toward Cambodia: one based on economic engagement and another focused on human rights and democratic governance. Unlike China, the US does not provide aid or investment without conditions. The US seeks reciprocity in political values — freedom of expression, multiparty democracy and rule of law. Thus, even as Cambodia hopes for economic relief, it must understand that US negotiators are likely to push for more than trade concessions. They may seek reassurances on political reform, media freedom, and the reopening of democratic space. Pre-emptively addressing these concerns could help create a more favourable environment for the third round of discussions. It is important for Cambodian leaders to see beyond short-term national pride and recognise the broader geostrategic context. While China remains Cambodia's closest political and economic ally, China itself is now looking for ways to stabilise its relationship with the US, especially in the trade sector. China's priority is to show that it can be a strong and credible actor on the global stage. In this context, Cambodia must also demonstrate that it is a 'qualified friend' — not one that simply asks for help, but one that brings value to the relationship. China wants to support strong, stable and strategically useful allies. If Cambodia appears diplomatically isolated or economically weak, even China's support may become more conditional. The best way for Cambodia to prove its strength is to show that it can negotiate effectively with global powers like the US while maintaining its own dignity and national interests. Cambodia's leadership has repeatedly emphasised national sovereignty and pride, which are valid principles. But diplomacy requires pragmatism. By taking a calculated step toward political openness, Cambodia stands to gain not only economic relief but also renewed credibility on the world stage. This is not about surrendering national dignity — it is about safeguarding Cambodia's economic future. The third round of negotiations offers a narrow but real window of opportunity. Cambodia should walk into that room not as a passive petitioner, but as a proactive and responsible partner ready to contribute to a shared solution. The US is not asking Cambodia to become its ally against China. What it wants is clear: respect for democratic norms, transparent governance and political accountability. Offering the first concession — on Cambodia's own terms — could redefine the trajectory of bilateral relations for the better. All in all, Cambodia is at a crossroads. The current trade impasse with the US must be resolved not through confrontation, but through strategic compromise. A well-thought-out gesture — particularly one rooted in political goodwill — could unlock immense economic and diplomatic benefits. Now is the time for courage, not defiance. By showing a willingness to engage constructively, Cambodia can not only win favour in Washington but also retain the respect and support of its friend in Beijing. This delicate balancing act requires wisdom, timing and a clear understanding of what Cambodia must give in order to get what it truly needs. - The Phnom Penh Post/ANN *** Seun Sam is a policy analyst at the Royal Academy of Cambodia. The views and opinions expressed are his own.
The Star
6 hours ago
- The Star
South Korea: From arms seller to Philippines to deeper defence partner possible
MANILA: South Korea could take a step further in its growing defence ties with the Philippines and consider taking part in joint maritime patrols in the South China Sea and negotiating a possible visiting forces agreement, according to a Korean expert, adding his voice to growing calls for deeper security cooperation between the two countries. Both countries are facing hostile neighbours. Chinese vessels have rammed and used water cannons on Philippine ships and flashed military-grade lasers at Philipppine troops on several occasions, while South Korea grapples with nuclear threats from North Korea, a key ally of China. 'If China's coercive actions in the South China Sea escalate and begin to threaten the stability of South Korea's maritime trade routes, and the United States calls on South Korea to participate in joint patrols to help maintain regional stability, then South Korea would likely have no choice but to join neighbouring countries in such joint patrol operations,' Keun Sik Moon, professor at Hanyang University and former Korean navy officer, said. The Philippines has been conducting regular joint patrols in the West Philippine Sea, Manila's exclusive economic zone in the South China Sea, with its closest security partners US, Japan and Australia, and also with other friendly states. Manila and Seoul have upgraded their ties to a strategic partnership last year, including broader defence and security cooperation. South Korea is among the Philippines' top arms suppliers. Moon said he was in favour of a status of visiting forces agreement between Manila and Seoul, which allows increased defence cooperation and allows both countries to hold exercises in each other's territories. 'Korea-Philippines VFA could support joint amphibious training, maritime interdiction and anti-terror drills. It also secures local MRO (maintenance, repair and overhaul) hubs for South-East Asian exports and enhances Korea's force mobility,' he said. This agreement, Moon said, 'aligns with Korea's global security strategy and enhances joint defence readiness against South China Sea threats, elevating Korea from an arms seller to a strategic security partner.' The Philippines already has similar agreements with the United States, Australia, Japan and New Zealand. Defence Secretary Gilberto Teodoro Jr said last month that they will 'start scoping and see what happens' after the elections in South Korea if VFA discussions can start. He was in favour of a possible VFA deal due to existing military cooperation with Seoul. 'We already have interoperability with them, especially in naval operations, and our FA-50 aircraft came from them,' he said. The Philippines last week signed a deal for an additional 12 FA-50 light fighters from Korea Aerospace Industries for P40 billion. - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN
