Controversial Oxpens River Bridge gets £3.7m budget boost
To secure the additional funding, authority will be delegated to several staff members to manage legal agreements and enter an amended arrangement with Oxfordshire County Council. This will allow Growth Deal funding from the government to be spent in the 2026/27 financial year.
'Wrecking woodland'
Alex Hollingsworth, Labour cabinet member for planning and culture, said that the original funding "was provided by central government and it came through the Oxfordshire Growth Deal"."Oxfordshire County Council was the accountable body, the city council then, after some considerable time, became essentially the delivery mechanism," he said."It is not our money. We cannot spend it on something else."Hollingsworth said there was currently no contract in place with contractor to build the bridge. Construction work is due to begin in spring 2026.Campaigners have raised concerns about the environmental impact and flood resilience of the proposed route. They argue that the path between Osney Mead and the new bridge is not fully floodproofed, and that pedestrians would need to cross a section of towpath under the rail bridge that floods regularly.A spokesperson for the group said it was "an incredible" amount of public money and that the structure would end up "wrecking the only woodland on the main path through Grandpont Nature Park in the process".
You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
30 minutes ago
- The Independent
Council faces wait for ruling on asylum seekers hotel injunction bid
A council will discover on Tuesday whether it has been successful in a bid to temporarily block asylum seekers from being housed at an Essex hotel. Epping Forest District Council is seeking an interim injunction stopping migrants from being accommodated at the Bell Hotel in Epping, which is owned by Somani Hotels Limited. It comes following a series of protests in recent weeks outside the hotel after an asylum seeker who was housed at the hotel was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. At a hearing on Friday, barristers for the council claimed Somani Hotels breached planning rules as the site is not being used for its intended purpose as a hotel, and that the situation 'could not be much worse'. The injunction sought by the authority, if granted, would require the company to stop housing asylum seekers at the hotel within 14 days. Barristers for the company said the 'draconian' move would cause 'hardship' for those inside the hotel, and that 'political views' were not grounds for an injunction to be granted. They also said that contracts to house asylum seekers were a 'financial lifeline' for the hotel, which was only 1% full in August 2022, when it was open to paying customers. At the end of the hearing, Mr Justice Eyre said: 'I am not going to close my notebook and give a decision now. 'I am going to reflect on this, but we need a decision sooner rather than later.' The judge later said that he would give a ruling at 2pm on Tuesday. He also ordered that Somani Hotels could not 'accept any new applications' from asylum seekers to stay at the site until he had ruled on whether to grant the temporary injunction. The hotel has become the focal point of a series of protests after Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, was charged with trying to kiss a teenage girl. Kebatu, who was housed at the hotel at the time of the incident, denies the allegations and is due to stand trial later this month. Opening the hearing in London, Philip Coppel KC, for the council, said the authority had a 'very serious problem' which was 'getting out of hand' and causing 'great anxiety' to residents. He said this had been caused by a 'breach of planning control' by the company, with the site 'no more a hotel than a borstal to a young offender' for asylum seekers. In written submissions, Mr Coppel said there was a 'preponderance of factors overwhelmingly in favour of granting an injunction', which included removing 'the catalyst for violent protests in public places'. Concluding his submissions, Mr Coppel told Mr Justice Eyre that if an injunction was not granted, 'Your Lordship will be telling the residents in Epping: 'You have just got to lump it'.' Piers Riley-Smith, representing Somani Hotels, told the court in written submissions that the alleged planning breach was 'not flagrant' and that it was 'entirely wrong' for the council to 'suggest the use has been hidden from them'. The barrister told the court the hotel previously housed asylum seekers from May 2020 to March 2021, and from October 2022 to April 2024. He also said that while the company did apply for planning permission for a 'temporary change of use' in February 2023, this was a 'pragmatic attempt to address the claimant's concerns, rather than an acceptance that such a use required planning permission'. This application was later withdrawn as it had not been determined by April 2024, the barrister said. Asylum seekers then began being placed in the Bell Hotel again in April 2025, with Mr Riley-Smith stating a planning application was not made 'having taken advice from the Home Office'. In court, he said that while there were genuine concerns among local residents, these had 'expanded' to include 'concerns about wider ideological and political issues from those outside the community'. He continued that these 'particular ideological, non-community concerns are not relevant to planning', and that the concerns of local residents did not 'justify' a temporary injunction.
Telegraph
31 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Britain loses another industry after Starmer refuses to step in
Britain's largest bioethanol plant faces closure after Sir Keir Starmer refused to step in and save the industry. On Friday, the Government announced it would not give any funding to the Vivergo Fuels business in Hull, which is losing £3m a month. Around 150 workers are expected to lose their jobs at the factory, which is expected to close by Sept 13 and is one of only two domestic bioethanol production sites. The industry had hoped for a bailout after Sir Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump, which will allow the US to supply Britain with 1.4bn litres of duty free ethanol. But on Friday afternoon, a government spokesman said: 'This Government will always take decisions in the national interest. 'That's why we negotiated a landmark deal with the US which protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in sectors like auto and aerospace.' It said it had worked to understand the challenges faced by both Vivergo and the Ensus bioethanol plant in Redcar on Teesside, which has also been refused a bailout. But the spokesman said the Government would not offer any direct funding 'as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. They continued: 'We recognise this is a difficult time for the workers and their families and we will work with trade unions, local partners and the companies to support them through this process. 'We also continue to work up proposals that ensure the resilience of our CO2 supply in the long term in consultation with the sector.' Unite, Labour's biggest trade union backer, heavily criticised the Government for refusing to bail out the bioethanol industry. Sharon Graham, general secretary, said: 'This is a short-sighted decision that totally disregards the benefits the domestic bioethanol sector will bring to jobs and energy security. 'Once again, the Government's total lack of a plan to support oil and gas workers as the industry transitions is glaring.' The union noted that bioethanol was a key component of sustainable aviation fuel, which is expected to be in huge demand in the coming years. The closure of the Vivergo plant will also represent a fresh blow to thousands of British farmers who supply grain to the site. A record number of farms are already closing for good after Rachel Reeves's changes to agricultural property relief made the future of thousands of rural businesses unviable. As well as the collapse of a major domestic market, the closure will risk pushing previously profitable farms into making a loss. A spokesman for Associated British Foods (ABF), the owner of Vivergo, said: 'It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. We initiated and led talks with the Government in good faith. 'We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the Government's own green industrial strategy.' ABF accused the Government of having 'thrown away billions in potential growth' and the chance to lead the world in bioethanol. 'The loss of Vivergo will be felt most acutely by our dedicated workforce and their families and by the thousands whose livelihoods depend on our supply chain, from farmers to hauliers and engineers.' During its talks with Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, ABF had demanded ministers step in to cover 'short-term funding of Vivergo's losses' as well as striking a longer-term deal to put its plant on a profitable footing again. Investment from Vivergo is thought to support around 1,220 farming jobs across the north-east of England. The UK imports around 45 per cent of its CO2 and sources have previously warned of a supply crisis without a domestic bioethanol industry if foreign sources were disrupted. In June, The Telegraph revealed a leaked memo by industry leaders that said the bioethanol sector was a 'critical component' of British food security and energy resilience. The memo warned: 'The closure of Vivergo would damage farm incomes, increase import dependency and undermine the Government's strategic goals across multiple departments.'
Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
Britain will not bail out bioethanol industry hit by Trump trade deal
LONDON, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Britain's government will not provide financial support to the struggling bioethanol industry, it said on Friday, leaving a sector hit hard by the UK's tariff deal with U.S. President Donald Trump facing imminent collapse. The failure of the industry, which supports thousands of jobs, could prove to be an embarrassment for Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who hailed May's trade deal as a boost to businesses that would protect employment and attract investment. It would also serve as a stark example of the global impacts of Trump's assault on world trade, with the industry's collapse set to deal a blow to production of byproducts including animal feed and carbon dioxide as well as the British farmers who supply the sector. "We ... have taken the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces," a government spokesman said on Friday. The spokesperson said the trade deal had protected hundreds of thousands of jobs in the auto and aerospace industries. However, under the agreement, the UK's 19% tariffs on U.S. ethanol fell to zero, through a 1.4 billion-litre (370 million gallon) quota - a figure equating to the size of the UK's entire ethanol market. Britain has two major bioethanol plants in northern England - Associated British Foods' (ABF.L), opens new tab Vivergo plant and one operated by Ensus, owned by Germany's Sudzucker Group - which account for nearly all of its production capacity. AB Foods, which had said in June it would shutter the Vivergo plant unless the government stepped in with an aid package, said on Friday it would start an orderly closure process immediately with production of bioethanol and animal feed ceasing by August 31. Ensus has also said its plant faces closure. Bioethanol is produced from crops such as wheat and is used to make petrol greener and to produce sustainable aviation fuel. In June, Starmer's government launched its industrial strategy, promising to invest in the green economy. Both AB Foods and Ensus have said the trade deal, along with existing regulations that already gave U.S. producers an advantage in the British market, had made the environment impossible. "It is deeply regrettable that the Government has chosen not to support a key national asset," a spokesperson for AB Foods said, adding that the decision threw away Britain's sovereign capability in clean fuels. "Jobs in clean energy will now move overseas - principally to the U.S. but also to other countries with a more sensible regulatory environment," the spokesperson added. Ensus did not respond immediately to a request for comment. The government spokesperson said it would work up proposals that ensure the resilience of the supply of carbon dioxide, which is used in the soft drinks and nuclear industries and in hospitals.
