Tunisia jails opposition leaders for up to 66 years
The opposition said the charges were fabricated and that the trial was a symbol of President Kais Saied's authoritarian rule.
What do we know about the case?
State news agency TAP first reported the sentences that ranged from 13 to 66 years, citing a judicial spokesperson as saying they were enforced immediately.
Forty people were prosecuted in the case, although more than half of them fled abroad after being charged.
Tunisian media outlets reported that the defendants were found guilty of 'conspiracy against state security and belonging to a terrorist group'.
Authorities say the defendants tried to destabilise the country and overthrow Saied.
Many of those jailed were vocal critics of the president, including Nejib Chebbi, the leader of the main National Salvation Front opposition coalition.
Chebbi told reporters before Friday's sentencing that the trial proved that Tunisian authorities wanted to 'criminalise the opposition'.
Others include Chebbi's brother, Issam Chebbi, the leader of the centrist Republican Party, Ghazi Chaouachi, the head of the centre-left Democratic Current party, and Abdelhamid Jelassi, from Ennahda, an Islamic democratic movement.
A former head of intelligence, Kamel Guizan, was also one of the defendants.
Speaking just before the sentencing hearing, defence lawyer Ahmed Souab described the trial as a 'farce'.
The trial began in March, but was postponed twice. Journalists and civil society groups were barred from attending.
Staging a sweeping power grab
After Tunisia emerged as the only democracy from the Arab Spring, Saied was elected on a populist anti-corruption platform in 2019.
Two years later, he staged a sweeping power grab, dissolving the parliament and ruling by decree.
Since then, Saied has overseen the dismissal of the judiciary and the arrest of his main political rivals.
He was reelected in October in a first-round vote described by observers as a sham, amid a record low turnout.
Human rights groups have repeatedly raised concerns about Saied's rule.
In a recent report, Human Rights Watch said Tunisia has seen an 'increased reliance on arbitrary detention and politically motivated prosecutions to intimidate, punish and silence its critics'.
Saied rejects accusations that he is a dictator and says he is fighting chaos and corruption that is rampant among the political elite.
DW
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
18 hours ago
- Observer
Arab countries reject Israeli settlement plan
Sayyid Badr bin Hamad al Busaidy, Foreign Minister, has condemned the statements made by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Prime Minister of Israel, in a joint statement issued by the foreign ministers of 30 Arab and Islamic countries, as well as the Secretaries-General of the League of Arab States, the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). The statement strongly denounced Netanyahu's remarks regarding the so-called Greater Israel. The joint statement emphasised that Netanyahu's statements represent a blatant violation of international law and stable international relations. They pose a direct threat to Arab national security, state sovereignty; and regional and international peace. Arab and Islamic countries reiterated their commitment to international legitimacy and the UN Charter, particularly the article prohibiting the use or threat of force. They pledged to adopt policies that promote peace and benefit all countries and peoples by prioritising security, stability and development over control and coercion. Furthermore, the statement condemned the approval by Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich of a settlement plan in the E1 area and his racist rejection of a Palestinian state. These actions were deemed a violation of international law and an attack on the Palestinian people's right to establish an independent state within the 1967 borders. Israel was reminded that it has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory. The foreign ministers of Arab and Islamic countries also rejected the settlement plan and all illegal Israeli measures, citing Security Council Resolution 2334, which condemns Israeli settlement activities in occupied Palestinian territories. They supported the International Court of Justice's Advisory Opinion, which called for an immediate end to the Israeli occupation and reparations for damages caused. Additionally, the ministers warned against Israeli policies aimed at annexing Palestinian territories and expanding settlements in the West Bank. They highlighted the threats posed to Islamic and Christian holy sites, such as the Al Aqsa Mosque, as well as settler terrorism and the displacement of Palestinians. These actions were seen as fuelling violence and hindering prospects for a comprehensive peace. — ONA
Observer
20 hours ago
- Observer
Countries issue a joint statement condemning Greater Israel
A joint statement has been issued by the Foreign Ministers of 31 Arab and Islamic countries and the Secretaries-General of the League of Arab States, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the GCC states. It condemned in the strongest terms the statements made by Benjamin Netanyahu, Prime Minister of Israel (the occupying power), which were reported by the Israeli media, regarding so-called "Greater Israel." These statements represent a gross disregard and a blatant and dangerous violation of the rules of international law and the foundations of stable international relations, and constitute a direct threat to Arab national security, the sovereignty of states, and regional and international security and peace. They stress that while the Arab and Islamic states affirm their respect for international legitimacy and the Charter of the United Nations, particularly Article 2, paragraph 4, regarding the rejection of the use or threat of force, the Arab and Islamic states will adopt all policies and measures that frame and consolidate peace, in a manner that achieves the interests of all states and peoples in security, stability, and development, far from the illusion of control and the imposition of the power of force. They also condemn in the strongest terms the approval by extremist Israeli Minister Bezalel Smotrich of the settlement plan in Area 1 and his extremist, racist statements rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state. They consider this a flagrant violation of international law and a blatant assault on the inalienable right of the Palestinian people to establish their independent, sovereign state on the June 4, 1967, lines, with occupied Jerusalem as its capital. They emphasize that Israel has no sovereignty over the occupied Palestinian territory. They affirm their absolute rejection and condemnation of this settlement plan and all illegal Israeli measures, which constitute a flagrant violation of international law and Security Council resolutions, in particular Resolution 2334, which condemns all Israeli settlement activities aimed at changing the demographic composition, character, and legal status of the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967, including East Jerusalem, the capital of the State of Palestine. They also reaffirm the Advisory Opinion issued by the International Court of Justice, which emphasized the illegality of the Israeli occupation of the Palestinian territory and the necessity of ending it immediately, eliminating its effects, and providing compensation for its damages. They warn of the danger of Israeli intentions and policies aimed at annexing Palestinian territories, and the continued extremist Israeli government's expansionist settlement approach in the occupied West Bank, including attempts to harm Islamic and Christian holy sites, foremost among them the blessed Al-Aqsa Mosque/Al-Haram Al-Sharif, as well as settler terrorism, daily incursions into Palestinian cities, villages, and camps, the systematic destruction of Palestinian refugee camps, and the displacement of Palestinians from their homes. This directly contributes to fueling cycles of violence and conflict and undermines the chances of achieving a just and comprehensive peace in the region. They also warn against relying on ideological and racist illusions, which threaten to intensify the conflict, making it difficult to control its course or predict its outcomes, and threatening regional and international security and stability alike. In a related context, the foreign ministers of the Arab and Islamic countries, the League of Arab States, and the Organization of Islamic Cooperation reiterate their rejection and condemnation of the crimes of Israeli aggression, genocide, and ethnic cleansing. They also affirm the ceasefire in the Gaza Strip, while ensuring unconditional access to humanitarian aid to halt the systematic starvation policy used by Israel as a weapon of genocide. This requires an immediate end to the deadly Israeli blockade of the Strip, the opening of Israeli crossings with the Gaza Strip, and holding Israel, the occupying power, fully responsible for the consequences of its crimes in the Gaza Strip, including the collapse of the health and relief system, as the occupying power. They also reaffirm their complete and absolute rejection of the displacement of the Palestinian people in any form and under any pretext, and call on the international community to pressure Israel to halt the aggression and fully withdraw from the Gaza Strip, in preparation for creating the appropriate conditions for implementing the Arab-Islamic plan for early recovery and reconstruction efforts in the Strip Emphasizing that the Gaza Strip is an integral part of the occupied Palestinian territory, and the necessity for the State of Palestine to assume governance responsibilities in the Gaza Strip as well as in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, with Arab and international support, within the framework of the political program of the Palestine Liberation Organization, the sole legitimate representative of the Palestinian people, and the policy of one system, one law, and one legitimate weapon. In this context, they call on the international community, especially the permanent members of the Security Council, particularly the United States of America, to assume their legal and moral responsibilities and work immediately to compel Israel to halt its ongoing aggression against the Gaza Strip and its dangerous escalation in the occupied West Bank, and to stop the delusional, inflammatory statements issued by its officials. In addition, they call on the international community, especially the permanent members of the Security Council, to assume their legal and moral responsibilities and to work immediately to compel Israel to halt its ongoing aggression against the Gaza Strip and its dangerous escalation in the occupied West Bank, and to stop the delusional, inflammatory statements issued by its officials. They also call on the international community to provide international protection for the Palestinian people, enable them to obtain their legitimate rights, foremost among which is their right to establish their independent, sovereign state on their national soil, and hold accountable the perpetrators of crimes and violations against the Palestinian people. Foreign Ministers include those from Oman, Jordan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Chad, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Gambia, Indonesia, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Nigeria, Qatar, Pakistan, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Somalia, Sudan, Sryia, Turkey, UAE, Yemen, the Secretary-General of the League of Arab States, the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, and the Secretary-General of the Gulf Cooperation.
Muscat Daily
a day ago
- Muscat Daily
New working group to oversee halal food compliance in Oman
Muscat – Following a ministerial decision (No 215/2025) issued by H E Dr Saud bin Hamoud bin Ahmed al Habsi, Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Water Resources, the ministry has established a dedicated working group to regulate halal foods in the country. Chaired by Director of Department of Food Specifications and Conformity at the ministry, the group will include representatives from Ministry of Endowments and Religious Affairs. It will set controls and requirements for halal foods, review and update technical regulations, and re-examine approvals granted to food establishments exporting meat and poultry to Oman. The working group will also coordinate overseas inspections of exporters certified by authorised halal bodies, conduct field visits to local producers and develop a framework for accrediting foreign establishments. Additionally, it will look into governance reforms by creating a system for appointing authorised halal-certification bodies in line with international standards. Halal food – 'permissible' in Arabic – follows dietary guidelines in the Quran that emphasise cleanliness, animal welfare and hygiene. Certification involves auditing preparation practices to ensure the supply chain – from slaughtering to packaging – complies with Islamic law. The decision generated reaction from citizens on social media. Dr Ahmed al Mahrouqi welcomed the move, calling it 'a vital step towards ensuring Omani consumers have complete confidence in the religious and hygienic integrity of what they eat'. He added that aligning certification with global practices would also strengthen Oman's position in international food trade. Another citizen, Khalid al Hinai, said the move reflected 'a strong commitment to Sharia-compliant food standards' and would ensure both imported and locally produced meat products meet the highest religious requirements. 'This will not only boost consumer trust but also strengthen Oman's position as a leader in the halal sector,' he said. Hinai added that hygiene is one of the key reasons many prefer halal food. 'From slaughtering animals to packaging products, hygiene is paramount. This means fewer chances of contamination, resulting in safer food for consumption.'
