logo
Herb Chambers, numerous of his companies, agree to pay $11.8 million for PPP loan fraud allegations

Herb Chambers, numerous of his companies, agree to pay $11.8 million for PPP loan fraud allegations

Yahoo09-04-2025

In an agreement to resolve False Claims Act allegations, Herb Chambers, several of his companies, and an officer of one of his companies are paying $11.8 million for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan fraud allegations.
In 2020, the United States Small Business Administration (SBA) passed an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that stated businesses apart of a single corporate group could not receive more than $20 million in PPP loans.
The U.S. argues that the SBA's IFR applied to Chambers' companies and states that eight of the companies were not eligible for PPP loans because the SBA had already given $20 million to other businesses owned by Chambers.
'The Paycheck Protection Program was created to provide a financial lifeline to small businesses struggling to stay afloat during the unprecedented COVID crisis – not to serve as a funding mechanism for companies that sought to evade program limits,' said United States Attorney Leah B. Foley.
In a settlement agreement, the eight companies applied for the PPP funding but had not yet received it by April 30, 2020 (when SBA published the IFR). A bank then canceled the unfunded loans due to the $20 million cap by the IFR. Several months later, the eight companies once again applied for the loans with a different bank, which funded the loans.
'When fraudulent applications wrongly drain a program set up to offset economic upheaval, it's a blow to the folks who truly need help. The FBI will continue to work with our partners to identify and investigate anyone who tries to defraud federal government programs in this way.' Said Jodi Cohen, Special Agent in Charge of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Boston Division
Mr. Chambers and the companies cooperated during the investigation, taking Voluntary Disclosure, Cooperation, and Remediation into Account in False Claims Act Matters.
Read the full settlement agreement here:
Usa v. Herb Chambers - Settlement Agreement by Boston 25 Desk
This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available.
Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts.
Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

CT-based Otis Elevator agrees to pay $616K to resolve False Claims Act allegation in Tennessee
CT-based Otis Elevator agrees to pay $616K to resolve False Claims Act allegation in Tennessee

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

CT-based Otis Elevator agrees to pay $616K to resolve False Claims Act allegation in Tennessee

Otis Elevator Company has agreed to pay more than $500,000 to resolve allegations tied to the False Claims Act. The settlement was announced Friday by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Under the terms of the settlement, Otis will pay the government $616,987, federal officials said. Otis, which is headquartered in Farmington, agreed to the settlement to resolve allegations related to invoices for preventive maintenance services submitted to the Tennessee Valley Authority 'that were not rendered pursuant to the terms of a contract,' federal authorities said. 'A contractor, like Otis, has an obligation to submit invoices and seek reimbursement solely for work and services that have been performed as claimed,' U.S. Attorney Francis M. Hamilton III for the Eastern District of Tennessee said in a statement. 'This settlement with Otis demonstrates that the United States Attorney's Office and federal partners like TVA's Office of the Inspector General are using all tools available to address fraud, waste and abuse and protect public funds.' The investigation focused on an August 2017 contract between Otis and TVA. Authorities contend that the contract required Otis to provide turnkey modernization and specified monthly preventative maintenance services related to certain elevators in the TVA Knoxville Office Complex. Federal officials said 'certain civil claims' against Otis arose from its performance of the contract. 'Specifically, the United States contended that Otis submitted false claims for payment to TVA for preventive maintenance services that were not rendered,' the U.S. Attorney's Office wrote in a statement The settlement was the result of a coordinated effort between the U.S. Attorney's Office and the TVA Office of the Inspector General – Office of Investigations (TVA-OIG). 'The TVA Office of the Inspector General is committed to identifying and investigating instances where vendors fail to fulfill contractual obligations as well as false claims and overpayments that negatively impact ratepayers throughout the Tennessee Valley. We would like to thank the United States Attorney's Office for their dedicated support of such efforts,' Assistant Inspector General, Investigations D. Eric Beals of the Tennessee Valley Authority Office of Inspector General, said in a statement.

BU responds to sexual harassment allegations made by Alex Cooper
BU responds to sexual harassment allegations made by Alex Cooper

Yahoo

time12 hours ago

  • Yahoo

BU responds to sexual harassment allegations made by Alex Cooper

Days after the 'Call Her Daddy' podcast host, Alex Cooper, alleged she was sexually harassed by her soccer coach while at Boston University, the school has issued a response. The University issued the following statement: Boston University has a zero-tolerance policy for sexual harassment. We have a robust system of resources, support, and staff dedicated to student wellbeing and a thorough reporting process through our Equal Opportunity Office. We encourage members of our community to report any concerns, and we remain committed to fostering a safe and secure campus environment for all. This comes following the first episode of Cooper's Hulu Documentary, 'Call Her Alex', where she said that ex-coach Nancy Feldman had become fixated on her and engaged in uncomfortable, and sometimes sexual, conversations both in private and in front of teammates. Cooper said that she went to the school with her claims and was listened to, but was brushed off. This is a developing story. Check back for updates as more information becomes available. Download the FREE Boston 25 News app for breaking news alerts. Follow Boston 25 News on Facebook and Twitter. | Watch Boston 25 News NOW

USAID Official, Three Executives Plead Guilty In $550M Bribery Scheme
USAID Official, Three Executives Plead Guilty In $550M Bribery Scheme

Yahoo

time14 hours ago

  • Yahoo

USAID Official, Three Executives Plead Guilty In $550M Bribery Scheme

A USAID contracting officer and three corporate executives have pleaded guilty to orchestrating a decade-long bribery scheme that secured over $550 million in federal contracts, the Justice Department announced on Thursday. Two companies involved, Apprio, Inc., and PM Consulting Group LLC (doing business as Vistant), admitted criminal liability and entered deferred prosecution agreements. Roderick Watson, 57, of Woodstock, Maryland, a former USAID contracting officer, admitted to accepting bribes to manipulate contract awards. Walter Barnes, 46, of Potomac, Maryland, owner and president of Vistant, and Darryl Britt, 64, of Myakka City, Florida, owner and president of Apprio, both pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit bribery. Britt also pleaded guilty to securities fraud. Paul Young, 62, of Columbia, Maryland, president of a subcontractor to both companies, pleaded guilty to bribery conspiracy. Starting in 2013, Watson allegedly accepted bribes from Britt to steer USAID contracts to Apprio, a certified small business under the SBA 8(a) program, which aids disadvantaged firms with exclusive contracting opportunities. After Apprio graduated from the program in 2018, the scheme shifted, with Vistant becoming the prime contractor and Apprio a subcontractor on contracts Watson influenced through 2022. Britt and Barnes funneled bribes to Watson, often through Young, including cash, laptops, NBA suite tickets, a country club wedding, mortgage down payments, phones, and jobs for Watson's relatives. These were disguised via false payroll entries, shell companies, and fake invoices. Watson allegedly received over $1 million in bribes, using his position to recommend Apprio and Vistant for non-competitive awards, leak sensitive bidding information, provide favorable evaluations, and approve contract decisions. 'The defendants sought to enrich themselves at the expense of American taxpayers through bribery and fraud,' said Matthew R. Galeotti, Head of the Justice Department's Criminal Division. 'Their scheme violated the public trust by corrupting the federal government's procurement process.' In 2022, Barnes and Watson defrauded a small business investment company (SBIC) by securing a $14 million loan for Vistant, allowing Barnes a $10 million dividend. At Barnes' request, Watson endorsed Vistant's performance to the SBIC, omitting the bribery scheme and inducing the loan agreement. In 2023, Britt misled a private equity firm, also an SBIC, into purchasing a 20% stake in Apprio's parent company for $4 million and extending a $4 million loan, concealing his bribes to Watson. Apprio and Vistant admitted to bribery and securities fraud, agreeing to three-year deferred prosecution agreements. Both companies must cooperate with the Justice Department, implement compliance programs, and report on remediation efforts. The Justice Department determined that Apprio will pay a $500,000 civil settlement and Vistant $100,000 due to their inability to afford higher penalties without threatening their viability. 'Watson exploited his position at USAID to line his pockets with bribes in exchange for more than $550 million in contracts,' said IRS-Criminal Investigations Chief Guy Ficco. 'IRS-CI works to protect taxpayer dollars and ensure government funds are awarded based on merit — not corruption.' Watson faces up to 15 years in prison and is scheduled for sentencing on October 6. Barnes, Britt, and Young each face up to five years, with sentencing dates set for October 14, July 28, and September 3, respectively. 'Public trust is a hallmark of our nation's values, so corruption within a federal government agency is intolerable,' said U.S. Attorney Kelly O. Hayes for the District of Maryland.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store