Why coffee is more expensive
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — Corey Gerlach, head roaster and co-owner at The Breaks in Sioux Falls, says coffee's rising price is not a new trend.
'This has been going on for years now in the coffee industry,' Gerlach said. 'It has consistently gone up in price.'
And when it comes to why the price for coffee beans might go up, he says there are several factors.
'The farmers, the producers don't set the prices; speculation in the market sets the prices,' Gerlach said. 'So, things for like, geopolitical tensions, climate change, plant diseases in coffee plants, those things also affect the price of coffee. Supply and demand. If a large producing country has a bad crop that year, that's going to shoot the market up.'
Coffee was expensive before the White House's tariffs of 2025. And Gerlach says tariffs aren't decisive in this equation right now.
'I wouldn't say tariffs is affecting the higher coffee prices directly at the moment,' he said. 'Over time, yes, they probably will.'
Per the consumer price index from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics on the average price of a pound of ground coffee, in January 2021 the cost was $4.59. By January 2023, it had jumped to $6.36, and it reached $7.02 in January 2025. The latest available data, for April 2025, lists the average price at $7.54 per pound.
Every business has to make its own decisions on what to do with prices they ask of their customers. For The Breaks, they have boosted prices to a degree.
'A little bit,' Gerlach said. 'For the most part, we've been absorbing those costs to not fully pass them on to our customer base and our clients. But we have in the past handful of months raised our wholesale pricing a little bit, our drink prices a little bit, our retail prices a little bit, but hopefully subtly enough to where people are okay with it.'
Gerlach says tariffs will more directly impact the cost of a coffee roaster or an espresso machine.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Coloradans spend more time working than people in most states: Study
DENVER (KDVR) — Coloradans spend more time on the clock than people in most states in the U.S., according to a new report. Qualtrics XM, a data tool for businesses, released a report in March analyzing what percentage of the past year people spent working. The study used data from the American Time Use Survey, conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, for all 50 states. Data: Income levels in Colorado among highest in the US, according to report A handful of states had fewer than 10 survey responses and were excluded from the main story, but were included in a separate list. According to the report, people in these states spent the highest percentage of their past year working: Utah: 25.17% Mississippi: 23.89% North Carolina: 23.51% Alabama: 23.44% Colorado: 22.95% According to the report, Utahns work an average of eight hours and 29 minutes per day, and their time on the clock accounts for over a quarter of the year. Utah and Mississippi were the only states where the average workday exceeded eight hours. Colorado ranked at No. 5, with an average workday lasting seven hours and 44 minutes. After a year with 260 workdays, Coloradans work an average of 120,617 minutes. Report: Colorado has one of the best economies in US despite shortfalls In the report, Qualtrics XM noted several reasons why people in some states work more hours than others. 'In states like Colorado, where housing and general cost-of-living expenses are high, workers may need to work more to afford their lifestyles,' the report states. Other contributing factors include low unemployment rates and a high demand for labor, low wages, industry influences and prevalence of part-time work. The full list and more data can be found in the full Qualtrics XM report online. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Rhoden tours Israel with South Dakota Trade
SIOUX FALLS, S.D. (KELO) — Gov. Larry Rhoden is in Israel. The Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar posted a photo on X with Rhoden and said, 'Great to host @GovLarryRhoden in Jerusalem and thank him for South Dakota's support for Israel. We spoke about Iran's nuclear ambitions and regional aggression, which are dangerous for Israel, regional stability and world order,'. Rescue at Hippie Hole in the Black Hills In a news release, Rhoden's office said he is leading 'a business-driven trade mission to Israel alongside South Dakota Trade'. 'This mission is 100% business-driven,' said Jesse Fonkert, President & CEO of South Dakota Trade, in a news release. 'We had a successful mission in November of last year and are back because our businesses are generating real opportunities that have already produced millions in sales and a robust pipeline for even more expansion.' Rhoden also visited the Gandel Rehabilitation Center at Hadassah's Mt. Scopus Hospital to meet with recovering soldiers who have been injured since the start of the war. This stop was coordinated by South Dakota Jewish community leader Carol Rosenthal, who serves as the Chair of Hadassah International. Trade missions to the UK/Ireland and Canada are also currently being planed for 2025. Interested businesses should reach out to Rachael Weiland with South Dakota Trade. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump loyalty is now part of job application
More than six million Americans are still looking for work, according to the latest data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Amid ongoing economic uncertainty, the federal government remains one of the country's most active employers, with open roles for nurses, actuaries, physicists, engineers and IT professionals listed at But prospective applicants may notice something different about the application process in 2025. Alongside typical questions about experience and qualifications, some federal job forms now ask about an applicant's alignment with presidential policy priorities, raising concerns about political screening in what are supposed to be nonpartisan civil service roles. Under guidance issued by the Chief Human Capital Officers Council (CHCOC), part of a broader federal hiring overhaul, applicants may be asked to explain how they would help implement specific executive orders or initiatives. One question currently being used reads: 'How would you help advance the President's Executive Orders and policy priorities in this role? Identify one or two relevant Executive Orders or policy initiatives that are significant to you, and explain how you would help implement them if hired.' This directive is connected to an executive order President Donald Trump that emphasizes 'merit-based' hiring over previous diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) considerations. The administration stated that these changes are intended to root out political bias and ensure a more ideologically aligned workforce. Critics argue that these practices resemble loyalty tests, particularly as questions of commitment to the Constitution and the President's policies appeared in job applications. Earlier this year, multiple government agencies experienced layoffs of employees who were seen as insufficiently aligned with current leadership, even in traditionally apolitical roles. Historical parallels have been raised. During the McCarthy era in the 1950s, public servants and private citizens alike were pressured to prove their loyalty to the U.S. government to root out suspected communists. Accusations and investigations often targeted personal beliefs rather than actions, leading to widespread firings, blacklisting and surveillance. Civil service roles in the U.S. were originally designed to serve the Constitution and the public, not individual officeholders. Federal employees take an oath to uphold the Constitution, a foundational distinction meant to separate American governance from monarchic or authoritarian systems. Whether the latest hiring guidelines are a temporary shift or a lasting transformation of the federal workforce remains to be seen. For now, job seekers interested in federal positions may want to prepare answers not just about their skills but about their stance on presidential policy.
