logo
Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Liberal Justice During Supreme Court Hearing

Amy Coney Barrett Sides With Liberal Justice During Supreme Court Hearing

Newsweek22-04-2025

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett appeared to side with her liberal colleagues while hearing arguments in a case that will determine the future of no-cost preventive care under the Affordable Care Act.
Why It Matters
The case, Kennedy V. Braidwood challenges the legal authority of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (PSTF), created by the Affordable Care Act, known as Obamacare. The task force recommends services insurers must cover at no-cost measures including cancer screenings and HIV prevention drugs like PrEP. But the conservative Christian employers in Texas who brought the case, argue that the 16 members of the task force, who are appointed by the HHS secretary, are unconstitutionally appointed.
The case will be consequential for the future of American health care. If the justices uphold a New Orleans-based fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in 2024, treatments that are now cost-free may become subject to payments.
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett testifies during the third day of her confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2020.
Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett testifies during the third day of her confirmation hearings before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Oct. 14, 2020.
Andrew Caballero-Reynolds/Pool via AP
Coney Barrett, who was nominated by Trump in 2020, has emerged as a centrist judge in Supreme Court cases and has been criticized by Trump supporters for voting against her conservative colleagues in the past.
What To Know
The Court's three liberal members, Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson have all appeared to side with the task force while conservative justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch appeared sympathetic to the challengers, with Thomas suggesting Congress had never designated authority to run the task force.
Conservative lawyer Jonathan Miller, who is representing the plaintiffs, argued that PSTF members are meant to be independent from political pressure. He said they could not simultaneously retain independence while being subject to supervision by the health secretary.
But Coney Barrett said Mitchell's interpretation of the word "independent" was "maximalist" and pointed to the doctrine of "constitutional avoidance" which argues that if a statute is open to interpretation, the Court should pick an interpretation that raises the least constitutional problems—i.e. the Court should not interpret the word "independent" in a way that renders the PSTF unconstitutional.
It is the latest in a string of decisions and comments by Coney Barrett which put her on a different path to her more conservative colleagues. In March, she expressed concerns about reviving the non delegation doctrine, as suggested by conservative judge Clarence Thomas. This doctrine, which hasn't been used since the 1930s, puts a cap on the amount of money federal agencies and other nonelected officials can raise through tax dollars. Coney Barrett said it would be ineffective and could weaken the power of government agencies.
In April, Coney Barrett joined liberals as the sole conservative in opposing the Court's majority decision to allow the administration to continue deporting alleged gang members under the Alien Enemies Act of 1798.
What People Are Saying
Matthew Mangino, a former district attorney in Lawrence County, Pennsylvania told Newsweek: "It may be a bit premature to suggest that Justice Amy Coney Barrett will vote against an attack on the Affordable Care Act, although her questions during oral argument seemed to imply her disagreement with former Trump lawyer Jonathan Mitchell's argument.
"Coney Barrett has shown her independence. She has voted against Trump on key issues including his hush money sentencing, presidential immunity and cancellations of USAID contracts. As a result, she is already experiencing the wrath of the MAGA movement."
Arthur Caplan, head of the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Langone Medical Center, told NBC News: "This is a really crucial case. The price will be paid in dead bodies if the court rules against it."
Daniel Grabowski, a lawyer with Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal advocacy group supporting the plaintiffs told ABC News: "Americans have the constitutionally protected freedom to live and work according to their religious beliefs, and governments exist to defend that freedom. We urge the Supreme Court to restore this accountability within the federal government and to the American people."
Wayne Turner, a senior attorney at the National Health Law Program, a nonprofit group that advocates for low-income communities told ABC News: "The ACA's preventive services requirement has been a game changer, providing access to evidence-based preventive care and early detection of serious medical conditions. The ACA's coverage and cost-sharing protections are especially important for low-income persons, who will be harmed most if the Supreme Court refuses to allow the ACA provision to stand."
What Happens Next
A decision in the case is expected by the end of June.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization
HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization

CNN

time22 minutes ago

  • CNN

HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization

Federal agencies Health care policyFacebookTweetLink Follow The US Department of Health and Human Services is reinstating more than 450 employees at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who were fired as part of a massive reorganization in April, including workers focused on HIV, lead exposure and workplace safety. More than 200 employees had their firings rescinded at the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention, along with 158 at the National Center for Environmental Health, an HHS spokesperson confirmed. Another 71 were brought back in the Office of the Director and two dozen more at the Global Health Center. The reinstatements represent almost 20% of the 2,400 CDC employees who HHS said it was dismissing in a mass Reduction in Force, or RIF, in April. The cuts also affected employees across the US Food and Drug Administration, the US National Institutes of Health and the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, but an HHS spokesperson said Wednesday's reinstatements applied only to employees at the CDC. 'Under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective,' HHS Director of Communications Andrew Nixon said in a statement. 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services – whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases. 'HHS is streamlining operations without compromising mission-critical work,' he continued. 'Enhancing the health and well-being of all Americans remains our top priority.' The cuts had wiped out the CDC's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Surveillance Branch as it was in the midst of helping the city of Milwaukee address a lead exposure crisis in its public schools. The firings meant the CDC had to deny a request from the city for specialists to help.

I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point.
I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point.

USA Today

time25 minutes ago

  • USA Today

I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point.

I told you GOP would come for marriage. Southern Baptists just proved my point. | Opinion The majority of Americans support marriage equality for LGBTQ+ people. Republicans don't seem to care about that. Show Caption Hide Caption Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue celebrating Pride Organizers say political pressure is motivation to continue organizing and celebrating Pride, although some corporate support dwindles. The Southern Baptist Convention, the largest Protestant denomination in the U.S., passed a resolution opposing same-sex marriage and transgender rights. This resolution aligns with efforts by some Republicans to overturn the Obergefell v. Hodges Supreme Court decision that legalized same-sex marriage. While public support for same-sex marriage remains high overall, support among Republicans has declined in recent years. Southern Baptists are officially taking a stand against LGBTQ+ rights, sending a concerning signal about where the country could be headed. On June 10, thousands of pastors and members of the nation's largest protestant denomination voted on a resolution to support efforts to overturn same-sex marriage. Along with opposing gay marriage, the resolution calls for the defunding of Planned Parenthood, rails against 'transgender ideology,' and opposes commercial surrogacy. That's a lot of animosity packed into one declaration. But it's one that Republicans seem increasingly interested in supporting. What's scary is that there are currently efforts to bring same-sex marriage back to the Supreme Court with the intention of overturning Obergefell v. Hodges. Republicans in the Idaho House of Representatives passed a resolution earlier in 2025 to ask the Supreme Court to overturn the decade-old ruling. Eight other state legislatures introduced similar measures affecting the legality of same-sex marriage. It's not just outrageous that so many legislative officials are trying to do away with gay marriage. It's terrifying to the LGBTQ+ people you know. The Southern Baptist resolution is a harrowing sign of the legal fight that could be around the corner. Opinion: A trans athlete won in California. Her peers cheered – and exposed the truth. Polling says gay marriage is popular. Do Republicans care? Same-sex marriage still has majority support in the United States, according to polling. Gallup conducted a survey in May 2025 that found that 68% of respondents believed that same-sex marriages should have the same rights as traditional marriages, compared with 29% of people who disagreed. While that's a hopeful number, there are some caveats. Support for gay marriage has decreased from 71% in 2023. Republican support has dropped to 41% from 55% in 2021 and 2022, and is now the lowest it's been since 2016. Opinion: Republicans are going after marriage. LGBTQ+ people like me tried to warn you. Now that a denomination with nearly 13 million members is coming out against gay marriage, I fear that we will continue to see a decline in support. Even if gay marriage retains support, the Supreme Court already went against popular opinion when it overturned Roe v. Wade. In his opinion on that issue, Justice Clarence Thomas said he believed the court should reconsider Obergefell. He said the quiet part out loud. What happened to 'love thy neighbor'? Guess not if they're LGBTQ? While I grew up within a different denomination, my childhood in North Carolina was spent around Southern Baptists. I have attended their services; I have been to their funerals. I know LGBTQ+ people who were raised in their churches, and my heart breaks for them and their families. While Christianity has become burdened by dogma and interpretations, the most important lesson, the one that is universal, regardless of your denomination, is that you're supposed to love your neighbor as you love yourself. To me, this means wanting them to have the same rights as you have, including in your marriage. It is shameful that Southern Baptists have lost sight of this message and instead want to advocate for fewer rights for LGBTQ+ people. But it's not surprising given where Trump's Republican Party is trending on the topic. Follow USA TODAY columnist Sara Pequeño on X, formerly Twitter, @sara__pequeno

HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization
HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization

CNN

time29 minutes ago

  • CNN

HHS reinstates more than 450 CDC employees fired in April reorganization

Federal agencies Health care policyFacebookTweetLink Follow The US Department of Health and Human Services is reinstating more than 450 employees at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention who were fired as part of a massive reorganization in April, including workers focused on HIV, lead exposure and workplace safety. More than 200 employees had their firings rescinded at the CDC's National Center for HIV, Viral Hepatitis, STD and Tuberculosis Prevention, along with 158 at the National Center for Environmental Health, an HHS spokesperson confirmed. Another 71 were brought back in the Office of the Director and two dozen more at the Global Health Center. The reinstatements represent almost 20% of the 2,400 CDC employees who HHS said it was dismissing in a mass Reduction in Force, or RIF, in April. The cuts also affected employees across the US Food and Drug Administration, the US National Institutes of Health and the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, but an HHS spokesperson said Wednesday's reinstatements applied only to employees at the CDC. 'Under Secretary Kennedy's leadership, the nation's critical public health functions remain intact and effective,' HHS Director of Communications Andrew Nixon said in a statement. 'The Trump Administration is committed to protecting essential services – whether it's supporting coal miners and firefighters through NIOSH, safeguarding public health through lead prevention, or researching and tracking the most prevalent communicable diseases. 'HHS is streamlining operations without compromising mission-critical work,' he continued. 'Enhancing the health and well-being of all Americans remains our top priority.' The cuts had wiped out the CDC's Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention and Surveillance Branch as it was in the midst of helping the city of Milwaukee address a lead exposure crisis in its public schools. The firings meant the CDC had to deny a request from the city for specialists to help.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store