Architects appointed for Sheffield Town Hall restoration
In 2022, urgent work had to be carried out after a council report found serious risks including fire safety, Legionella from water supplies, no ventilation in the council chamber and leaks from an old large diesel tank.According to the council, the restoration plan would address key issues such as accessibility, fire safety, structural repairs and the preservation of historical features.
The firm chosen to lead the project is known for schemes such as the transformation of the Shrewsbury Flaxmill Maltings and Brighton Dome Corn Exchange and Studio Theatre.Council leader Tom Hunt said he was delighted the project was moving forward so that the town hall could "continue to serve everyone" and be a "modern, accessible workplace".He said: "Our iconic and historic town hall is at the heart of Sheffield's democracy and public life."From weddings to citizenship ceremonies, council meetings and elections, this special building has a unique place in the lives of Sheffield residents."
Geoff Rich, partner and director of heritage and creative reuse at Feilden Clegg Bradley Studios, said the firm felt "hugely honoured" to have been appointed.He said: "The project represents an exciting opportunity to complement the building's unique heritage with inclusive and sustainable design, and to ensure the town hall meets the future needs of Sheffield's communities."An initial feasibility study in 2022 outlined potential restoration costs and safety works could range from £20m to £50m.The council said it aimed to secure funding through "innovative strategies", balancing the needs of heritage preservation with financial sustainability.
Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Work from home to soon become a legal right for millions of Victorians
The Victorian government is set to enshrine the right to work from home in law, with sweeping reforms that will apply across both the public and private sectors. Premier Jacinta Allan will unveil the landmark policy at the annual state Labor conference, describing it as a progressive move to modernise the workforce and support families. 'Working from home works for families, and it's good for the economy,' she will say. 'Day after day, unions are being contacted by workers who have been denied reasonable requests to work from home. 'Across the country, Liberals are drawing up plans to abolish work-from-home and force workers back to the office, and back to the past. 'That's why the Allan Labor government is acting. Enshrining work from home in law means this life-changing practice isn't something you or your loved ones have to politely ask for. It's a right you'll be entitled to.' The proposed legislation would give workers a legal right to request remote work two days a week if they can 'reasonably' perform their duties from home. Employers would be required to give the requests proper consideration, with a formal consultation process set to begin soon as the legislation is introduced later this year. Ms Allan also pointed to the cost of living relief the policy would offer, estimating it could save workers around $110 per week, or more than $5,300 a year in commuting and related expenses. 'Work from home supports women with children, carers, and people with a disability to work,' she said. 'Thanks to work from home, workforce participation is 4.4 per cent higher than before the pandemic.' Opposition Leader Brad Battin has dismissed claims the Liberals opposed the laws, telling Daily Mail the party supports work-from-home flexibility. 'The Victorian Liberals and Nationals recognise that working from home has become a valuable option for many workers and families,' Mr Battin said. 'We support measures that help Victorians enjoy a better work-life balance and will review any legislation closely, to ensure it supports flexibility, productivity, and personal choice.' His comments contrast with those of former federal Opposition Leader Peter Dutton, who was forced to retreat from a policy limiting work-from-home rights for public servants after widespread backlash during the last election campaign. In addition to the proposed work-from-home reforms, Victorian Labor will also debate a raft of controversial policy ideas at the state conference on Saturday, including new taxes and major social reforms. More than 600 party delegates, including MPs, grassroots members and union representatives, will vote on a series of proposals that could shape the ALP's platform ahead of the 2026 state election. Among the most contentious items is a push to raise taxes on Victorian residents, despite the state already being the most heavily taxed in the country. Other proposals include introducing a super profits tax on land sales and legalising cannabis for recreational use. The outcomes of the weekend's debate will play a critical role in defining Premier Jacinta Allan's policy agenda over the next 18 months, with an election set for November next year.
The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Going to waste: two years after REDcycle's collapse, Australia's soft plastics are hitting the environment hard
Two years on from REDcycle's collapse, 94% of Australia's soft plastics are still headed for landfill. Collection has restarted at supermarkets, and 42 warehouses of plastics have been cleared, but experts say the packaging industry must take responsibility for the mess. By July, supermarkets had mostly cleared the stockpiles, which by November 2022 reached 11,000 tonnes of soft plastics at 44 sites across the country, hoards accumulated as collections outstripped available recycling capacity and export restrictions increased the amount of plastic waste in Australia. The remainder – 3,500 tonnes at two sites, in Victoria and in South Australia – is due to be processed in the first half of 2026, according to the supermarket members of the Soft Plastics Taskforce. But as more than 100 new collection points have been rolled out since June in selected Woolworths, Coles and Aldi stores across New South Wales and Victoria, taskforce members have been careful not to collect more than can be processed. 'The biggest challenge still remains that there is simply not enough soft plastic recycling capacity in Australia to support full, nationwide collections,' a spokesperson for the taskforce told the Guardian. Soft plastic is defined by its ability to be scrunched into a ball, unlike 'rigid' plastics, which are moulded to hold their shape. Even at the peak of its operations in 2022, REDcycle was collecting about 7,500 tonnes – less than 2% of the 538,000 tonnes of plastic bags, food wrappers, bubble wrap and other 'flexible' plastic waste produced in Australia each year. 'We still have a real problem in that we consume too much [soft plastics], we discard too much and we don't buy back anywhere near enough,' says Gayle Sloan, the chief executive of the Waste Management and Resource Recovery Association of Australia. While recyclers are increasing their capacity to process the material, Sloan says other problems remain: the vast quantities produced, design packaging that is too complex to recover and the lack of demand from packaging companies and other consumers for Australian-made recycled plastic. She says the onus should be on plastic manufacturers to invest in facilities to take back their own material. 'We've got to stop putting it on consumers to solve the problem.' Despite national packaging targets set by governments in 2018 for 70% of plastic packaging to be recycled by 2025, only about 6% of used and discarded soft plastics were being baled, sorted, shredded, washed, melted – or chemically processed – and turned into new products, according to data published in December by Soft Plastics Stewardship Australia. The rest has headed to landfill. Consumer plastics collected by households, while the most visible, are only one part of the story. Soft plastics are embedded in so many aspects of modern life, says David Hodge, the managing director of recycling company Plastic Forests. The material is widely used, for example, in sectors such as agriculture for storing grain and preventing weeds, and in transport for wrapping pallets. Consumer materials, particularly those used for foods – frozen produce bags, cereal liners or bread bags – are 'tremendously hard to recycle, some of them impossible', he says. They are often 'super technical', comprising different types of plastic, and contaminated by inks used for advertising, or food residues. While there is value for recyclers in processing plastics, such as PET (or polyethylene terephthalate) in drink bottles collected in container deposit schemes, Hodge says 'the economics is broken in soft plastics' because the energy, labor and transport required to collect, process and recycle them costs more than importing new materials. The lack of incentives or mandates for products made from recycled content – such as fence posts and garden edging, electrical cable cover and plastic sheeting – mean they often struggled to compete with non-recycled products. 'There has to be support for the purchase of products. That will create the pull through,' Hodge says. 'Bunnings needs to be given a federal government mandate to support Australian made recycled products,' he says as an example. Jennifer Macklin, a researcher at Monash University's Sustainable Development Institute, says the solutions to the soft plastics problem are similar to other material and waste challenges. They include designing plastic packaging so it can be more easily recycled (while retaining its function, such as keeping food fresh), developing recycling infrastructure capable of turning large volumes of soft plastic waste into a usable material and – crucially – reinforcing demand for the recovered material. 'That's the big chicken and egg that we have with recycling,' Macklin says. 'We're quite good at collecting and reprocessing but not very good at buying it to turn it into new things.' Consumers have a role to play, she says, but as a general principle producers and importers of plastics should be responsible for the material's entire lifecycle. In late 2024, the federal government consulted on options for reforming plastic packaging. According to its summary, 80% of stakeholders supported regulation, and 65% supported an extended responsibility scheme that would make plastics producers responsible for the entire product lifecycle. The government is now 'working with industry and state and territory governments to deliver fit-for-purpose packaging regulations as part of Australia's transition to a circular economy', a departmental spokesperson said. Sloan says voluntary approaches have failed. 'We need to have clear design standards and they need to be enforceable, and we actually need those who make this to be held accountable and invest in facilities to take it back,' she says. 'We've got to stop putting products out on the market that have no home and can't be recovered.'
The Guardian
16 hours ago
- The Guardian
Victorians could soon have the right to work from home two days a week under Australian-first laws
Victorians could soon have a legal right to work from home two days a week, under proposed Australian-first laws to be introduced to parliament by the state Labor government in 2026. The Victorian premier, Jacinta Allan, will use Labor's state conference on Saturday to announce the proposal, which, if passed by parliament, would make the state the first in the country to legislate the right to work remotely. Allan will tell party faithful if a job can reasonably be done from home, employees would have the legal right to do so for at least two days a week. The law would apply to both public and private sector workers, though how it would be enforced and other specifics were not outlined ahead of her speech. In a statement, the premier said that working from home was popular, it saved families money, cut congestion and allowed greater workforce participation, particularly among women with children, carers and people with a disability. Sign up: AU Breaking News email 'Work from home works for families and it's good for the economy,' Allan said. 'Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit.' The announcement sets the stage for a political fight in the lead-up to the November 2026 state election, given the Coalition opposition has previously signalled plans to return the public service to the office full-time. The shadow treasurer, James Newbury, told the Herald Sun in February that the government 'should be requiring public servants to work from the office' but stopped short of confirming whether the Coalition would enforce a mandate. The issue was also a flashpoint at the recent federal election, with Peter Dutton forced mid-campaign to reverse a policy to restrict work from home arrangements for public servants due to public backlash. Allan's statement said consultation on the legislation would be led by the Department of Premier and Cabinet and would cover the types of businesses and the size of businesses that would be included, as well as the definition of remote work and who was able to do it. Sign up to Breaking News Australia Get the most important news as it breaks after newsletter promotion It stressed the consultation process 'won't determine whether working from home should be a right' as that position had already been decided. Instead, it would focus on 'the appropriate laws to reflect it'. It said 'several legislative options were available'. Allan will be left to rally the room of 600 Victorian Labor delegates, with the prime minister, Anthony Albanese, unable to attend as he will be at the Garma festival in the Northern Territory. It will mean the deputy prime minister, Richard Marles, will be the most senior party figure at the two-day event and placed in an uncomfortable position as delegates vote on a review of the Aukus submarine deal he has strongly backed. Other urgency resolutions up for debate include a call for the federal government to immediately recognise a Palestinian state and impose sanctions on Israel, rejection of the Allan government's proposed protest laws – described as 'anti-democratic and regressive' – and for all 44 public housing tower sites slated for redevelopment to remain in public hands.
