IndyStar wins Indiana journalism awards: Check out some of our best work of 2024
IndyStar's coverage of sexual harassment in Indiana politics was recognized as one of the top investigative stories of 2024 at an annual competition honoring the state's best journalism.
Last year, IndyStar reporters reported on sexual misconduct allegations on three different elected or appointed officials in state and local government: state Rep. David Niezgodski, state Sen. Greg Taylor and Thomas Cook, former chief of staff to Indianapolis Mayor Joe Hogsett. Taylor was removed from his position as the Senate Minority Leader, and in December, the Indiana Democratic Party created an ethics committee and adopted a new code of conduct.
Hayleigh Colombo, James Briggs, Tony Cook and Kayla Dwyer took home second place for A-Mark Investigative Story of the Year at the state's Society of Professional Journalists ceremony on May 2.
IndyStar also took home nine first-place awards in categories including sports reporting, environmental reporting and news photography:
Coverage of government or politics, for statehouse reporter Kayla Dwyer's work, including stories about cuts to a family caregiver program and the gubernatorial race.
Coverage of children's issues, for reporting on failures in child welfare by Tony Cook and Caroline Beck.
Sports reporting, for Dana Hunsinger Benbow's coverage including stories about a dying 22-year-old's experience of watching the Final Four from the hospital and an FBI investigation at a racing facility.
Multiple picture group, for Mykal McEldowney's gallery of Avon High School's mascot.
Environmental reporting, for Karl Schneider's coverage of the beat, including stories about a new fish and wildlife area and the history of Indiana's buffalo.
News photography, for Christine Tannous' pictures showing the aftermath of a car crash that injured six children and two adults.
Newsletter, for the politics team's Checks and Balances.
Non-deadline story or series, for a story by politics editor Kaitlin Lange and Mirror Indy deputy managing editor Ryan Martin on a gubernatorial candidate's failure to repay $69 million of a development loan from the city of Indianapolis.
First Amendment award, for 20 media outlets including IndyStar that worked together to cover the trial of Richard Allen despite strict restrictions from the court.
Other top awards included:
Story of the year: Mirror Indy's Out of Options, by Mary Claire Malloy and Jenna Watson, which described firsthand accounts of widespread abuse and neglect at a mental health facility in Lawrence.
Journalist of the year: Indiana Capital Chronicle reporter Casey Smith, whose coverage of state politics and courts in 2024 included stories about Indiana's first execution in years and the felony arrest of congressional candidate Gabe Whitley.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NC doctors, legislators, and cancer survivors push for prostate cancer screening money
New Bern Alderman Victor Taylor speaks about his prostate cancer treatment at a news conference on a proposal to establish a statewide screening program for uninsured and underinsured men. (Photo: Lynn Bonner/NC Newsline) Offering prostate cancer screening to men who are uninsured or underinsured will save lives, legislators, doctors, advocates, and cancer survivors said at a news conference Tuesday. 'Prostate cancer is one of the most curable cancers if it is detected early,' said Rep. Rodney Pierce (D-Halifax), the bill's lead sponsor. But, too many North Carolinians are diagnosed too late. 'This legislation is about saving lives, about a higher quality of life, and giving our fathers, uncles, brothers, nephews and sons the fighting chance they deserve,' he said. House bill 128 would appropriate $2 million to establish a prostate cancer screening program modeled after the state's breast and cervical cancer screening program. Money for prostate screening is not in the House or Senate budget proposals, but Pierce hopes it will be funded. Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths among men in the state, according to the UNC Men's Health Program. The issue has gained increased attention in the last few weeks after former President Joe Biden was diagnosed with 'a more aggressive form' of prostate cancer. Men in North Carolina are diagnosed with prostate cancer at higher rates than men nationally, according to the National Cancer Institute, and North Carolina's mortality rate is higher, at 20.2 per 100,000 men. Black men are more likely to develop prostate cancer and more likely to die from it, according to the American Cancer Society. Legislators at the Tuesday news conference made direct appeals to Black men to be screened. A blood test is used to screen for and monitor prostate cancer. Rep. Abe Jones (D-Wake) said he's tested twice a year because his father had prostate cancer. 'It is a sneaky, nasty, tricky disease,' Jones said. 'It's ugly and it kills Black men at a higher rate.' 'It doesn't give you a warning, it just comes on you,' Jones said. 'I just encourage all my brothers out there to please get tested.' New Bern Alderman Victor Taylor, a prostate cancer survivor, said the screening bill would help men in rural areas. It's vital for men to talk about prostate cancer, he said. 'It's so important to talk, talk, talk and share,' he said. 'You don't know how many lives you've saved by talking and sharing.' The bill proposes free or low-cost testing for uninsured or underinsured men ages 40 to 70 who have a family history of prostate cancer. Men without a family history would be eligible for screening at ages 50 to 70. Recommendations for screening have a cloudy history. In 2012, the US Preventative Service Task Force, a group of independent experts, recommended against routine screening. The recommendation changed in 2018, with the group suggesting men 55- to 69-years old talk with their doctors about regular screening. The task force is in the process of updating its recommendation. Dr. Dan George, a member of the Duke Cancer Institute who specializes in prostate cancers, said there's a concern that prostate cancer is going under-treated. 'It's so vitally important for people to recognize that knowledge is power,' George said. 'Understanding your cancer status is an opportunity for you to prevent a leading cause of death in this state.' Rural residents would benefit from routine testing that residents with access to medical specialists can more easily obtain, he said. Former state Sen. Eddie Goodall, a Union County Republican, talked about his prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment. Goodall said he was diagnosed in 2005, just as his first term in the legislature was beginning. 'I was excited about being a freshman senator and being able to change the world,' Goodall said. Instead, he received a diagnosis that he kept secret from his mother because he didn't want her to worry about another son dying. Goodall said that five years before he was diagnosed, his brother died of cancer. Goodall said he talked and compared notes with another former senator who was diagnosed with prostate cancer at about the same time. Goodall decided against surgery. The cancer spread to his bones. Goodall said he started hormone therapy in 2018 and was told he had 18 months to two years to live. 'But it's been seven years, and I'm still here. So I'm very grateful for that.'
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Michigan, two Democrats are generating 2028 buzz
LANSING, Mich. — As she spoke Friday night in the high school gymnasium where Magic Johnson starred as a prep basketball player, Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., reached for a football analogy while wrestling with the existential questions facing the Democratic Party. 'We know the Lions are going to the Super Bowl this year because they have a good defense and a good offense, right?' Slotkin, referring to Detroit's NFL team, told an audience of roughly 400 people at a town hall forum. 'So we have to be able to do both,' Slotkin added. 'We have a strong defense, but then you've got to have a vision, an alternative vision, to what is being provided to us every day. And that is the charge of the next generation of leaders in the Democratic Party.' Slotkin narrowly won her Senate seat last year, prevailing in a competitive state that backed Donald Trump for president. Almost instantly, given her against-the-current victory and Midwest perch, Slotkin became a go-to voice for a party struggling with its identity. She delivered the Democratic response to Trump's joint address to Congress in March. She also has thrown herself into advocating for a robust takedown of the president's agenda. 'I wrote a war plan,' the former CIA analyst and Pentagon aide told her audience here last week, 'of how to contain and defeat Trump — a 17-page PowerPoint.' The town hall put Slotkin in her old congressional district, but the content was consistent with a message that she has been testing nationally. And by advancing her 'alternative vision,' Slotkin is establishing herself as another Democratic officeholder in Michigan who could emerge as a White House contender in 2028, along with Gov. Gretchen Whitmer. Whitmer, a subject of presidential speculation for years, remains popular with voters in a state that was placed near the front of last year's primary calendar. Unlike Slotkin, she has taken a less confrontational approach toward Trump in his second term. Those familiar with Slotkin's rise stress that her Senate campaign should not be viewed as some grand plan to quickly build a higher profile and set up a run for president. But a Democratic strategist who has worked on Michigan races believes that it's something she will at least consider. 'The way she thinks of it is, this party is on the precipice of full-on collapse,' said this person, who like others was granted anonymity to talk about a fluid situation and discuss sensitive intraparty dynamics ahead of 2028. 'Circumstances have just sort of pushed her into this.' Slotkin rolled her eyes and briskly sidestepped when asked in an interview if people have been encouraging her to consider running for president in 2028. 'I'm about to go out in front of 1,000 people who think that they're going to lose their health care,' she told NBC News before her town hall at Everett High School. 'I am focused on, literally, saving them from losing their health care and their food. And I get it. I know it's a good parlor conversation. It's just, honest to God, not where my head is focused right now. It's just not.' Whitmer was a finalist to be Joe Biden's vice presidential running mate in 2020, having positioned herself at the time as a prominent foil for Trump and a critic of his pandemic management. Whitmer also was on a short list of Democratic governors and senators who were seen as potential replacements for Biden on the ticket last year before then-Vice President Kamala Harris sewed up the nomination. Spokespeople for Whitmer did not respond to requests to interview the governor for this article. Two Democratic operatives who have worked with her said it is unclear to them what her intentions are for 2028 and would not be surprised if she were to pass on a run. 'I think it's a huge open question,' one of the operatives said. 'What people who don't know her miss is that she's a super-regular person who likes hanging out at the lake and drinking beer and hanging out with her dogs and husband.' Although the term-limited Whitmer has not made definitive plans, many of her recent moves as governor have been viewed through the prism of national politics. She has made public overtures to Trump, meeting with him at the White House and working with him on issues important to Michigan. Whitmer's way has been rewarded on one level. Trump announced a new fighter jet mission for an endangered air base in her state and committed his administration's support to combat Asian carp, a Great Lakes nuisance. On the latter issue, the White House even took a shot at Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, a potential Whitmer primary rival in 2028 whom the Trump administration characterized as a hindrance to mitigating the ecological impact of the invasive fish. But Whitmer's courtship also has put her crosswise with other Democrats who find her too accommodating of Trump. After one of her White House meetings in April, Whitmer joined Trump for a photo opportunity in the Oval Office, where the president announced investigations of two political adversaries and repeated his debunked claim that the 2020 election was stolen from him. Adding to Whitmer's political troubles that day was a New York Times photographer who documented the governor — who later acknowledged she did not want her picture taken there — hiding her face behind blue folders. Whitmer's team has taken comfort in internal and independent polling since then that has shown that a majority of Michigan voters approve of her job performance as governor. 'From her perspective, I think it's, 'I'm going to do as good a job as I can for the people in my state, and the political benefits will follow,' as opposed to others who are taking different approaches by showing up in New Hampshire and South Carolina,' two states typically at the front of the primary calendar, said another operative who has worked with Whitmer. 'Are they as focused on their states as they should be? Will they have a set of accomplishments?' In a presidential primary debate, this person added, 'all she has to do is throw in a couple of places where she's held Trump's feet to the fire and stood up to him. Yeah, she took some s---, but she's positioned herself well to make a pretty compelling argument that she got some really important stuff for her state that at the end of the day made her a great governor.' Michigan Democratic Party Chairman Curtis Hertel, who served in the Legislature during Whitmer's first term as governor, praised her for working across the aisle but also for championing new gun-safety laws and a repeal of the state's anti-union 'right-to-work' law. 'Too often we find labels and differences in places where there aren't,' Hertel said in an interview. 'It's incredibly important that we're pushing back and fighting back and all those things. That doesn't mean there aren't places of agreement where we can work with each other. That's part of being a successful public servant. … So I don't think it's a binary choice, and I think that our leaders in Michigan understand that, and I think that's how they're behaving.' Slotkin has used her bully pulpit as a newly elected senator to push back on Trump more. 'I think for me,' she said in the interview, reaching for another sports metaphor, 'it's just call balls and strikes on what he's proposing and what it's going to do to your business, your life, your family. You don't have to overhype what's happening, but don't underhype it, either.' Slotkin also has a calling card Whitmer doesn't: She has twice won tough elections — her first House re-election bid in 2020, and last year's Senate race — with Trump on the top of the ticket. (A third Michigan Democrat who could run in 2028, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, lives in the state but has never won an election there and is associated more with Indiana, where he was the mayor of South Bend.) 'Gretchen,' said the strategist who has worked on Michigan races, 'has only had to run statewide in two cycles good for Democrats, and never on the ballot the same year as Trump. It's a completely different dynamic.' One of the operatives who has worked with Whitmer characterized the differences between her and Slotkin as minor nuances. 'The No. 1 similarity, which is probably more important than all of those smaller discrepancies, is that they're tough women,' this person added. During Friday's town hall, during which members of a heavily Democratic audience read aloud questions they had submitted in advance, Slotkin shared a stage with Hertel and Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet, who won her seat last year in a competitive, neighboring district. Slotkin's old district, now represented by Republican Tom Barrett, is the type of place where they are hoping to rally discouraged Democrats. Questions ranged from concerns about spending cuts and Trump's massive domestic policy bill to a fear that the president could declare martial law to postpone future elections — an unsubstantiated theory percolating on the political left. Slotkin validated their worries with calls to action. 'The president has made comments that are real close to martial law,' she said. 'He's talked about sending the National Guard into our cities. We need to listen when he says things.' The next day, Trump deployed the National Guard to the Los Angeles area to counter protests against immigration raids, ignoring the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat. Slotkin also pressed the audience to engage Republicans, noting how she invited her township supervisor, a Republican, to join her at Trump's inauguration in January. 'We've got to have these conversations, not just with them, but with those folks who just kind of can't stand politics either way,' Slotkin said. 'It's hard to like politics right now. Most of you probably don't like it. You just do it because you love your country.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Prosecutors in Philippine VP's impeachment say trial must proceed
By Karen Lema and Mikhail Flores MANILA (Reuters) -Philippine prosecutors said on Wednesday there was no stopping the impeachment trial of Vice President Sara Duterte, expressing bemusement at why the Senate convened a court before swiftly returning the case to the lower house. The impeachment of Duterte, a likely contender for the 2028 presidency, has dominated headlines in the Philippines this year after a high-profile grudge match between her and President Ferdinand Marcos Jr that spiralled into a bitter battle for power and influence. The House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in February to impeach Duterte for betrayal of public trust and high crimes, referring the case to the Senate to convene a trial. Duterte insists the impeachment is politically motivated and denies wrongdoing. But the Senate on Tuesday sent the case back to the lower house, requiring it to certify that it was lawful, a move some critics said was a tactic to try to thwart the impeachment. The decision prompted wider outrage, including from legal and church groups, who said it was a betrayal of the constitution and a shirking of the Senate's responsibility to hold public officials accountable. Congresswoman Gerville Luistro, a member of the impeachment prosecution panel, said the lower house had fulfilled its duty and the Senate's issuance of a summons to Duterte to answer charges meant it already had jurisdiction over the case. "No one can stop this anymore," Luistro told a press conference, adding the prosecution's case was strong and backed by ample evidence. "We are certain that the complaint is strictly and fully compliant with the requirements of the constitution." POLITICAL MANOEUVRE The popular daughter of former President Rodrigo Duterte has been accused of budget irregularities, amassing unexplained wealth, and threatening the lives of Marcos, the first lady and and the house speaker. She faces a lifetime political ban if convicted. Senator Imee Marcos, the president's sister and now an ally of the Duterte, said there was justification in the Senate's decision and called the impeachment bid a political manoeuvre to keep Duterte out of the 2028 presidential race. Marcos has distanced himself from the impeachment and his office on Wednesday said the president was busy and not following the trial. Duterte's office did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Marcos, who is limited to a single term, is expected to groom a successor who can preserve his influence and legacy and defeat Duterte if she is acquitted and runs for the presidency. Outside the upper house on Wednesday, hundreds of protesters braved the rain, carrying banners demanding accountability from Duterte and calling the senators "cowards" and "traitors". The Catholic Bishops Conference of the Philippines, a prominent church group, said the decision was a betrayal of the public trust. "Allow the constitutional process to proceed without obstruction. If there is nothing to hide, there is nothing to fear," its president said.
