Miami's lifetime term limits proposal advances. Carollo mayoral run still possible
On Thursday, the Miami City Commission green-lighted a proposal to limit elected officials to two four-year terms as mayor and two four-year terms as a commissioner during their lifetime. It passed 3-2, with Commissioners Damian Pardo, Miguel Angel Gabela and Ralph Rosado voting in favor. Commissioners Christine King and Joe Carollo voted against.
The proposed change will now go to Miami voters as a ballot question in a special election in November.
Pardo, the item's sponsor, said at Thursday's meeting that the proposed term limit change 'creates more focus' for elected officials to accomplish their goals in office during a fixed time frame.
'It also opens the door for other people, more innovation, other ideas, to come into those seats,' Pardo said.
But King, the commission chairwoman, said restricting term limits takes away choice from voters who may want to reelect someone who's already served eight years in a particular seat. She noted that as it stands now, after serving two terms, an elected official must sit out of office for one term before returning.
'Four years out of office is a lifetime in politics,' King said Thursday.
The special election will cost the city several hundred thousand dollars, according to the city clerk, but the exact amount won't be known until a later date.
When Pardo first announced the item in the spring, the reform measure promised to block career politicians who've spent years, if not decades, in City Hall, from returning to office.
But a recent change to the proposal included a loophole that could pave the way for certain legacy politicians to return.
The proposal still limits elected officials to two terms in each role, but it now comes with a carve-out that excludes 'any time served as a result of having been elected to fill a vacancy' — meaning that candidates who win a special election could still serve two additional four-year terms.
Under the earlier version, Carollo, a former mayor, could have been blocked from seeking elected office in Miami again, since he has served two terms as mayor and multiple stints as city commissioner, dating back to 1979.
However, Carollo won his first term as mayor in a special election to fill the vacancy created by the death of Mayor Stephen Clark in 1996. That means that under the new version of the term limits proposal, Carollo would be eligible to run for mayor again — an idea he has been teasing for months.
READ MORE: Dynasty city: How three Miami families may extend their decades of political power
The odds of Pardo intentionally creating any sort of benefit for Carollo are slim, seeing as the pair are political adversaries who've consistently sparred over city issues for the better part of a year. Pardo said the change was made in effort to be fair to candidates who are elected in a special election, filling in for the remainder of a term.
'The concept was all about equity, fairness and democracy,' Pardo said Thursday. He added that the city attorney advised him that counting a shortened term that was won through a special election as a full term 'leaves us open to legal challenges.'
'In the drafting process, these legal issues came up about what is a term and what is fair,' Pardo said.
The first version of Pardo's proposal also didn't define the length of a term, meaning that, in theory, even serving one day in office could count as a term. But the legislation now restricts elected officials to two four-year terms specifically.
That might seem like a minor change, but it could open the door for former Mayor Xavier Suarez to return to City Hall — something he also has been considering and has yet to rule out. Suarez has served three terms as mayor — seemingly disqualifying him under the earlier version of Pardo's term limits proposal — but only one of those terms was a four-year term.
In a text message last week, Suarez said he was still 'considering' running for mayor and that he doesn't think the proposed term limits change will affect him.
The change also benefits Rosado, a newly elected commissioner who won a special election last month to replace the late Commissioner Manolo Reyes.
Rosado's term was supposed to run through November 2027, but a City Commission vote last month extended his term to 2028.
If voters pass the new version of the term limits proposal, Rosado will be allowed to run for two more four-year terms after he finishes his current one, allowing him, in theory, to be a Miami city commissioner for 11 years.
Under other circumstances, the term limits proposal would have gone on the ballot in the November 2025 general election, where residents were slated to vote on a new mayor and two city commissioners. But in a 3-2 vote last month, the City Commission postponed the upcoming November election to 2026.
That measure, also sponsored by Pardo, achieved the goal of moving the city from odd- to even-year elections, when voter turnout is higher. But it came with the side effect of giving the city's elected officials an extra year an office, including Carollo and Mayor Francis Suarez, who are both termed out in November.
The change has spurred outrage among residents, as well as criticism from Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis and Attorney General James Uthmeier, who has threatened legal action against the city but has yet to take formal action.
Pardo has argued that the decision to move the election back to 2026 'cures' a flaw in his term limits proposal. If the general election had taken place in November 2025 and the term limits question was included on the same ballot as candidates who could be affected by the term restrictions, that could set up the city for a legal challenge.
So in a roundabout way, moving the election date back gave the city a safer legal avenue for putting the term limits proposal to voters.
But it's still up in the air whether Miami's next general election will take place this November or next.
Following last month's City Commission vote to postpone the election, mayoral candidate and former City Manager Emilio González filed a lawsuit against the city. He's asking the court to determine that the ordinance the city passed is 'unlawful and invalid,' effectively reverting the election date back to 2025.
The parties are scheduled to have a hearing on the matter in Miami-Dade Circuit Court on Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Just 35 complaints of debanking cite political bias despite Trump order
By Ross Kerber (Reuters) -Less than one percent of customers who filed detailed complaints about checking or savings account closures with the U.S. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau over the last 13 years accused banks of acting for political or religious reasons, even as the White House mounts a campaign to stamp out "systemic abuses" in the financial system that it says have wronged conservatives, a review of the agency's data shows. U.S. President Donald Trump earlier this month signed an executive order requiring banks not to discriminate against clients on political or religious grounds, a practice known as debanking, after citing what Trump called discrimination against conservatives. The White House said the order was targeting "systemic abuses by financial institutions that undermine free expression and economic opportunity." But few customers who have been denied access to banking products cite their political affiliation as a chief concern. Out of the 8,361 detailed complaints about closed bank accounts filed with the CFPB since the agency began taking them in 2012, only 35 include the terms 'politics,' 'religion,' 'conservative' or "Christian," a review by Reuters shows. "It's not a real issue. 'Debanking' is an excuse for political attacks," said Amanda Jackson, a director for Americans for Financial Reform, a coalition of progressive-leaning groups. The group and others say a bigger problem is making sure U.S. banks provide services to poorer consumers. Financial institutions have tried to balance fair access with steps to combat a wave of fraud, and say they have not cut customers over their political views. Rachel Cauley, communications director for the White House's Office of Management and Budget, whose leader Russell Vought is also CFPB's acting director, did not directly address questions about the small number of complaints. She repeated claims that members of the Trump family and others have been cut off from banking services on the basis of political or religious beliefs. The actions, Cauley said, amount to "an Orwellian censorship tactic that is antithetical to the American way of life. The Trump Administration believes access to the financial system is a fundamental right for all Americans." The CFPB data does not identify filers. While none of the 35 complaints provided proof that their accounts were closed for political or religious reasons, filers said they suspected that was the case. "I believe this is discriminatory actions based on race, religion and/or political views," according to a 2023 complaint filed against JPMorgan over account closures. A JPMorgan representative, Lauren Bianchi, said via email that "We do not close accounts for political or religious reasons, full stop." The bank supports a national prohibition on account closures for political or religious reasons, and for regulators to allow more transparency in those cases, she said. Brian Knight, senior counsel for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which calls itself a Christian law firm and is supportive of Trump's executive order, said the small number of complaints citing politics or religion could reflect that banks are not required to disclose much detail to consumers they drop. "There's no information-sharing mechanisms" short of litigation to force banks to be more open about their thinking, Knight said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Fox News
23 minutes ago
- Fox News
WATCH LIVE: Will Cain breaks down Trump's pivotal peace talks with Zelenskyy
Senator Eric Schmitt also joins the show to discuss his new book, Governor Newsom's identity and the latest locker room debate.


Washington Post
24 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Air Force's top uniformed officer is retiring early in latest Trump military shake-up
WASHINGTON — The Air Force's top uniformed officer is set to retire early in the most recent shake-up of military leadership during President Donald Trump's second term. Gen. David Allvin will continue serving as the service's chief of staff until a replacement is confirmed by the Senate, the Air Force announced Monday. He expects to retire around Nov. 1, two years into his four-year term, it said in a statement.