
Roku Stock Is Beaten Down Now, but It Could 10X
It's been a frustrating past four years for patient Roku (NASDAQ: ROKU) shareholders. While the ticker's pullback from its pandemic-prompted 2021 peak wasn't exactly surprising (lots of stocks suffered a similar fate), what is surprising is that this one hasn't budged a bit since that slide.
Shares of the company are still down more than 80% from their 2021 high despite continued growth during this time. Blame a lack of profitability, maybe.
Just remain patient. Roku's day in the sun is coming. And it could be big once the ball finally gets rolling.
What Roku actually is
Roku is one of North America's favorite brands of streaming video players; it makes branded smart televisions as well. Indeed, industry researcher Pixalate reports that as of the fourth quarter of last year, Roku accounted for 39% of the United States' streaming device market, edging out Amazon, Apple, and Samsung. It's doing similarly well in Canada, and is absolutely crushing it in Mexico with control of 74% of the country's connected TV business.
And the rest of the world? While it's got pockets of respectable presence elsewhere, let's just say that -- for the time being anyway -- Roku isn't exactly a force to be reckoned with ... yet. (More on this in a moment.)
Roku's business, however, isn't quite what it seems to be on the surface.
While it's clearly a key seller of streaming technology, devices themselves are only a means to an end that account for about 14% of the company's total revenue, and don't produce any actual profit.
Rather, Roku's core business is monetizing its role as a middleman between streaming services and their subscribers. This revenue can come in the form of advertising one might see on the home screen or screen-saving "crawl" when using its hardware. The bulk of this business, however, is just a small recurring piece of streaming service providers' monthly fee charged to their subscribers.
On the order of 90 million households streamed 35.8 billion hours' worth of digital video during the first quarter of this year. That's roughly 400 hours of TV per household, most of which subscribe to more than one streaming service. At least within the United States, The Motley Fool's own in-house research arm reports the typical household subscribes to about four such services.
That being said, recognize that Roku isn't just a middleman. It also operates its own stand-alone ad-supported streaming service. It's no slouch either. Television-ratings agency Nielsen reports The Roku Channel delivers as much digital video to U.S. consumers as Paramount 's flagship streaming service Paramount+ does, and is nearing Amazon Prime's impressive domestic streaming reach.
The bullish case
This reach doesn't necessarily seem to be enough to catapult Roku shares 10 times above their present price -- especially without any actual profit production yet. After all, the streaming industry's growth is seemingly slowing, stymied by a very real "streaming fatigue" headwind. Branding and marketing consultancy Kantar, in fact, argues that paid streaming reached its domestic peak in the latter half of last year.
The streaming business isn't as much peaking, however, as it's entering a period of refinement and evolution. At the same time as consumers are culling subscriptions they don't use all that often, they're optimizing their streaming spending. This includes more usage of ad-supported services, and in a growing number of cases, free-to-watch ad-supported services.
The key nuance for interested investors to understand is that this evolution doesn't work against Roku -- the company is still a (very) necessary middleman, and still collects a bit of revenue simply for allowing consumers to access any given streaming service. Indeed, with The Roku Channel making inroads as a destination within the ad-supported/free-to-watch sliver of the streaming market, this company enjoys a slight competitive edge due to the industry's current evolution.
The crux of the reason to wade into a stake in lethargic Roku stock, however, is rooted in its potential for growth in overseas markets.
As was noted, this company isn't much of a player outside of North America. While Pixalate adds that Roku's share of the United Kingdom's streaming device market is a respectable 20%, its intended reach into Europe doesn't go any further than that. It's not exactly proliferating anywhere else on the planet, either.
This isn't an indication of a lack of marketability, though. It's by design.
See, Roku hasn't forced its way into markets much beyond U.S. borders largely because those markets weren't quite ready yet. The company also wanted to focus on North America at a time when that market was ready to explode.
Now those other opportunities are finally opening up. And Roku is capitalizing. Last year, it partnered with established TV manufacturers to introduce Roku television sets in Brazil, Colombia, Chile, and Peru, plugging it into a South American free/ad-supported streaming video market that Omdia expects to swell from last year's $231 million to $569 million by 2029. Separately but simultaneously, Ampere Analysis predicts Latin America's entire video entertainment market will grow by $6 billion for the same time frame, with two-thirds of that growth driven by subscription-based streaming services that Roku's technology makes easy to access.
For perspective, Roku did a little less than $4 billion worth of business last year.
And once this South American opportunity starts cooling, don't be surprised to see the company then turn its attention to yet another pocket of opportunity. There's certainly going to be enough of it. Precedence Research predicts the worldwide direct streaming business is set to grow at an average annualized pace of 24% through 2034, led by the Asian-Pacific region.
Far more potential than is being priced in
It won't necessarily be easy for Roku to win a significant share of this growth. U.S. consumers and their nearby neighbors were receptive to the domestic company's brand name. That may not quite be the case in all overseas markets. Things could prove particularly challenging in and around China, especially if the tariff-fought trade war becomes the new norm.
Roku is also going to bump into a saturation ceiling within the all-important U.S. market sooner or later, where average per-user revenue figures tend to be higher than anywhere else.
On balance, however, not nearly enough of Roku's long-term potential upside -- and eventual profitability -- is reflected in the stock's present price. Even analysts may be underestimating the company's potential, with a one-year consensus price target of $86.25 that's only about 17% above the stock's current price.
Don't be discouraged by that ho-hum target, though, or for that matter, by the stock's lethargic go-nowhere performance since tumbling in 2021 and 2022. Most everyone seems to be waiting for someone else to stick their neck out first, or perhaps waiting for clear hope of future profits.
Just don't tarry if you're a believer. Once Roku shares finally start crawling out of its rut, the right-pricing rally could be a speedy one that doesn't offer many great entry opportunities. The hard part will be remaining patient enough in the meantime, for whenever that strength finally materializes.
Should you invest $1,000 in Roku right now?
Before you buy stock in Roku, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Roku wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $668,538!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $869,841!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is789% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to172%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. James Brumley has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Amazon, Apple, and Roku. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
26 minutes ago
- CTV News
What is a Fire Boss? The agriculture aircraft that doubles as a water bomber
Dave Frisch, of Fire Boss Technology, explains how Canada can fight fires faster and cheaper with the nimble Fire Boss aircraft.


CTV News
28 minutes ago
- CTV News
Barrie expecting to recoup the majority of its $25 million in storm damages
Barrie is now expecting to recoup the majority of its $25-million-dollars in damages from downed power lines to fallen trees and affected infrastructure.


CTV News
41 minutes ago
- CTV News
Five more days of strikes planned at SÉPAQ between June 20 and 24
The Syndicat de la fonction publique et parapublique du Québec (SFPQ) has announced five more strike days later this month at several sites operated by the Société des établissements de plein air du Québec (SÉPAQ). The strike will take place from June 20 to 24, the union said Friday. While wildlife reserves were affected during previous strike days in mid-May, this time will be different: most SÉPAQ establishments will be impacted. 'All bargaining units will be affected, except for the wildlife reserves and one lodge. So that means campgrounds, parks, the Montmorency Manor, the Chic-Chocs mountain lodge, and all tourist centres will be impacted,' said SFPQ president Christian Daigle. The dispute centres mainly on wages. Daigle said many workers earn about $17 an hour and noted that the vast majority are seasonal employees. The union is calling for a 17.4 per cent wage increase over five years—the same deal that was granted to all government employees. 'This has a major impact on the people we represent. When you only work four or five months a year, missing five days of work is a serious financial hit. So it's not something they do lightly—but people are tired of being taken advantage of and not being offered a fair financial agreement by their employer and, especially, by the Quebec government,' Daigle said. SÉPAQ responds 'The union has the right to strike and is free to choose its timing,' said Simon Boivin, SÉPAQ's media relations officer. He said SÉPAQ submitted 'a third monetary offer' last Tuesday and remains open to negotiating daily to preserve the long weekend for Quebecers. The strike days coincide with Quebec's Fête nationale holiday. 'We want to improve employees' wages with a competitive offer for the tourism industry—one that takes into account the pension plan and other benefits. We're aiming for a balanced agreement that satisfies employees, respects the organization's ability to pay, and doesn't shift extra costs onto visitors. It's worth remembering that 85 per cent of SÉPAQ's revenue comes from its own activities and customer services,' Boivin added. This report by The Canadian Press was first published in French on June 6, 2025.