Ohio senators propose changes to harmonize House, Senate energy bills
Transmission towers that carry high-voltage electricity are shown on March 8, 2025, in East China Township, Michigan. Ontario, Canada Premier Doug Ford put a 25 percent tariff on electricity that the province provides to Michigan, Minnesota, and New York beginning March 10 as a response to the tariffs President Donald Trump imposed on goods from Canada. (Photo by)
Ohio lawmakers appear to have a deal on a wide-ranging energy bill meant to increase power production in the state. They're returning from a two-week recess with an amendment sanding off the differences between House and Senate proposals approved last month.
The Senate Energy Committee meets Tuesday to introduce the changes and likely put them to vote. Both chambers will be in session the following day and could presumably vote on final passage in back-to-back sessions.
The proposal offers tax breaks for companies investing in power plants and retools the ratemaking process for energy distribution companies. To further encourage new entrants, the measure reinforces barriers keeping the regulated monopolies running distribution out of the production market.
From the outset, House and Senate lawmakers have worked along parallel tracks advancing similar, although not identical, versions of the same bill. Several core ideas have persisted throughout, like eliminating the coal plant rider from 2019's HB 6.
Along the way, lawmakers proposed a few sideline initiatives. The House bill included a pilot for small cooperative power generation facilities; the Senate added in a program loaning schools money for renewable energy improvements. The Senate's idea survived. The House's didn't.
For other provisions, the chambers offered different responses to the same question. The proposals incentivize investment with a tax break. Tangible personal property tax gets levied on the equipment used to generate electricity. The House proposed reducing the rate from about 25% to 7%. Senators meanwhile suggested eliminating it altogether for equipment brought online after 2025.
The amendment goes with the 7% mark and includes provisions to discourage companies from claiming the reduced rate after making modest changes or upgrades to existing facilities.
Another major element of the legislation has to do with the regulatory timeline. Critics argue Ohio's ratemaking process takes longer than most other states, so lawmakers proposed a 'shot clock' for those decisions. The House set the ceiling at 360 days, but the Senate's 320-day deadline is the one carried forward in the amendment.
A last-minute change to what qualifies as a 'major' facility isn't included in the amendment. House lawmakers lowered the cut-off for electric transmission lines to put more of them under the Ohio Power Siting Board's authority. Critics argued those investments get very little oversight and offer a path for utilities to over-charge customers for the upgrades.
Ohio Consumers' Counsel Maureen Willis is urging lawmakers to 'reconsider' a different provision related to consumer refunds.
'When we say 'reconsider' we mean delete it,' her written testimony states.
If the state Supreme Court determines a charge was unlawful, the legislation allows consumer refunds for any of those charges collected after the court decision. Willis questioned the idea of barring refunds on charges determined to be illegal.
What's more, she argued 'it may have the unintended effect of interfering with consumer refunds in pending appeals where charges have been collected 'subject to refund.''
One such case against Dayton-area AES Ohio is currently working through the appeals process. Because state regulators approved a $76 million charge — subject to refund, the Consumers' Counsel case could return more than $300 to each customer. But if the amendment's cut off is in place, those refunds would be in jeopardy.
'The current refund provisions risk perpetuating past injustices where consumers bore the cost of unlawful utility charges without remedy,' Willis wrote.
Follow Ohio Capital Journal Reporter Nick Evans on X or on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump orders troops to Los Angeles to combat violent protests against immigration enforcement
President Donald Trump ordered thousands of National Guard troops to help quell violent protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, where helmeted police in riot gear clashed with concrete-hurling protesters who opposed tougher federal actions against undocumented immigrants. The clash spanning June 6 and 7 marked one of the most serious confrontations yet between agents carrying out Trump's directives on mass arrests and deportations, and local officials who oppose the stricter enforcement measures. Some protesters hurled large chunks of broken concrete at officers, slashed tires and defaced buildings, according to the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Police declared an unlawful assembly and responded by firing tear gas, pepper spray and flash-bang concussion rounds toward the crowd. Trump signed a memo June 7 deploying 2,000 National Guardsmen to address the lawlessness that has been allowed to fester, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. The Trump administration has a zero tolerance policy for criminal behavior and violence, especially when that violence is aimed at law enforcement officers trying to do their job, she said. "Left-wing radicals waving foreign flags are viciously attacking ICE and Border Patrol agents and obstructing official law enforcement activities in Los Angeles," Leavitt said in a statement. "The mob violence will be quelled, the criminals responsible will be brought to justice, and operations to arrest illegal aliens will continue unabated." The clash enflamed an ongoing feud between federal and state officials. Trump said on social media June 7 that federal authorities needed to step in because of the inaction of California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. "If Governor Gavin Newscum, of California, and Mayor Karen Bass, of Los Angeles, can't do their jobs, which everyone knows they can't, then the Federal Government will step in and solve the problem, RIOTS & LOOTERS, the way it should be solved!!!" Trump said. Newsom criticized the military deployment on social media, saying local police are available at a moment's notice. 'That move is purposefully inflammatory and will only escalate tensions,' Newsom said. 'This is the wrong mission and will erode public trust.' The Department of Homeland Security said 118 undocumented immigrants were arrested during the week in Los Angeles, including five alleged gang members and others with criminal records for smuggling, drug trafficking and assault. Todd Lyons, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, said agents were outnumbered June 6 for hours as more than 1,000 rioters surrounded the federal building. 'What took place in Los Angeles yesterday was appalling,' Lyons said in a statement June 7. Lyons, who vowed to continue the enforcement action, accused Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass of taking 'the side of chaos and lawlessness over law enforcement.' Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDonnell said city policy since 1979 has barred officers from initiating police action based solely on trying to determine a person's immigration status. He said the department 'will not assist or participate in any sort of mass deportations.' 'I'm aware that these activities cause anxiety for many Angelenos, so I want to make it clear: the LAPD is not involved in civil immigration enforcement,' McDonnell said in a statement June 6. Bass said she was 'deeply angered' about the enforcement actions and that she would coordinate with immigrant-rights organizations. 'These tactics sow terror in our communities and disrupt basic principles of safety in our city,' Bass said in a statement June 6. 'We will not stand for this.' "We will," FBI Director Kash Patel replied on social media June 7. Border Patrol Chief Michael Banks highlighted on social media how a rock pierced the windshield of an agent's vehicle and injured him. "Imagine if more had followed," Banks said. "This incident is a stark reminder of the real dangers our agents face every day. Thankfully, it wasn't worse − but it easily could've been." FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino asked for the public's help in identifying a helmeted protester who threw rocks at police cars. "And yes, multiple arrests have already been made for obstructing our operations. More are coming," Bongino said on social media. "We are pouring through the videos for more perpetrators. You bring chaos, and we'll bring handcuffs. Law and order will prevail." One of the skirmishes involved the arrest of a union leader, David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California, who was injured and detained by ICE at one site. The union said Huerta was arrested "while exercising his First Amendment right to observe and document law enforcement activity." "We all collectively have to object to this madness because this is not justice,' Huerta said in a post on social media. 'This is injustice." U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli accused Huerta of deliberately obstructing federal agents at a worksite. Huerta will be arraigned in federal court June 9, Essayli said. 'Let me be clear: I don't care who you are – if you impede federal agents, you will be arrested and prosecuted,' Essayli said in a post on social media. 'No one has the right to assault, obstruct, or interfere with federal authorities carrying out their duties.' Federal authorities said they would continue their enforcement actions despite the protests in Los Angeles and across the country. ICE announced June 6 that nearly 1,500 undocumented immigrants were arrested in Massachusetts during a monthlong Operation Patriot. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump orders troops to LA as agents, protesters clash over immigration
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Borderlands Mexico: Renegotiating USMCA may boost North American trade
Borderlands Mexico is a weekly rundown of developments in the world of United States-Mexico cross-border trucking and trade. This week: Renegotiating USMCA may boost North American trade; Automotive supplier opens manufacturing facility in Guanajuato; Humanscale expands manufacturing operations in Nogales; and New import cold storage facility slated for Texas border city. The United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement will mark its fifth anniversary on July 1. The importance of the USMCA cannot be overstated as it governs trade between the U.S. and its two most significant trading partners, supporting over $1.5 trillion in annual commerce. Since taking office for his second term, President Donald Trump has indicated a desire to renegotiate or possibly terminate the USMCA, after previously touting the agreement as a significant economic USMCA faces a critical juncture as it approaches its first six-year review in 2026, though negotiations are already underway. Mexican senior officials have been making regular visits to Washington since early 2023. Jorge Gonzalez Henrichsen, CEO of The Nearshore Co., said accelerating renegotiations of the USMCA may bring much-needed certainty to investors. 'What makes me the most happy about it being revised earlier … is that it will bring certainty, because the Trump administration has created such a level of uncertainty that investment really froze from November [2024] to April [2025] companies that were thinking of going to Mexico,' Henrichsen told FreightWaves in an interview. He said while it's unclear what the Trump administration will do with the USMCA, the trade agreement has been a success in terms of creating more commerce among the three was the top U.S. trade partner for the second consecutive year in 2024, totaling a record-breaking $840 billion. Canada ranked No. 2 for trade with the U.S. in 2024 at $761 billion, and China ranked third at $582 billion. The Nearshore Co., based in Brownsville, Texas, is an international trade and development firm that helps companies set up shelter operations in Mexico. 'The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed in 1994, and the USMCA was 2020, so after 26 years, the economy changed a lot, and I do think that moving from NAFTA to USMCA was positive,' Henrichsen said. 'I think for everyone, it was positive.' One of the biggest changes from NAFTA to the USMCA involved automotive content rules. Under NAFTA, regional automobile content requirements stood at 62.5%, but USMCA raised this threshold to 75% with new wage requirements. It meant that 75% of the vehicle's parts must be sourced from the U.S., Canada or Mexico, or all three. 'One of the drivers for nearshoring to Mexico during COVID was that a lot of these automotive suppliers and original equipment manufacturers were from Asia,' Henrichsen said. 'So you had these OEMs saying, 'I have to move from 62.5% to 75%. You have got to relocate to North America.' It was basically driven by that change, to comply with the local concept.' Labor rights provisions in Mexico were substantially strengthened in USMCA, driving labor reforms in the country that aimed to improve worker protections.'One of the other big changes between USMCA and NAFTA is the labor rights. We had a new labor reform, and now we have unions that are more democratic,' he said. The USMCA also introduced entirely new elements that were not part of NAFTA, including provisions on digital trade and e-commerce and a dispute resolution mechanism, Henrichsen noted. While he views the USMCA as a positive change from NAFTA, there is still room for improving the agreement, Henrichsen said. 'One of the things that I would like to see discussed is how the three countries can deepen the supply chain resilience and the North American competitiveness as a trade bloc,' Henrichsen said. 'I would say the No. 1 driver by far of companies that reach out to us is that they cannot find labor at competitive costs and in large numbers in the U.S. So they're looking to Mexico to find this labor.' While Mexico may have lower labor costs than the U.S. and Canada, it still faces challenges with infrastructure and security. If the U.S., Mexico and Canada can work together as a trade bloc, then all three countries could benefit, Henrichsen said. 'Mexico has big challenges on infrastructure, for example … power, electricity generation and transmission. And so why don't we work as a team,' Henrichsen said. 'Like Mexico says, 'Guys, we can provide labor in Mexico for U.S. companies, for Canadian companies. But, we need support … for infrastructure, bridges to cross to the U.S.' All that kind of nearshoring supply chain thinking as a bloc … is on my wish list.' With an investment of $50 million, China-based TYW Manufacturing recently opened a plant in Irapuato, Mexico. The facility will generate about 500 jobs and manufacture electronic dashboards for Kia and Stellantis targeting markets in South Korea and the U.S., according to a news release. Irapuato is in central Mexico in the state of Guanajuato, a hub for automotive manufacturing in the country. TYW Manufacturing is a subsidiary of Heilongjiang TYW Electronics, a company based in Suihua, China, according to Mexico Business News. New York-based Humanscale recently completed a $30 million expansion of its operation in Nogales, Mexico. The expansion creates 300 jobs and adds a 3,000-square-foot facility that will produce metal components – work previously performed in Asia. Humanscale is a high-end office furniture manufacturer. The company has four factories, including in the U.S., Ireland and Mexico. The company has been in Nogales since 2017. The Mexican city is directly across the border from Nogales, Arizona. Public officials and business leaders recently held a groundbreaking to inaugurate construction of a fresh produce cold storage warehouse along the Texas-Mexico border. Known as the 'From Mexico Cold Storage Warehouse,' the facility will feature 10 high-efficiency loading docks and temperature-controlled storage rooms. It will be designed to support growing demand in cross-border produce distribution,' according to a news release. 'This new facility will bring innovation, efficiency, and opportunity to our produce district, and we are proud to welcome From Mexico as a valued partner to our thriving city as we continue to invest in cold storage infrastructure,' Victor Perez, president and CEO of the Pharr Economic Development Corp., said in a statement. Officials did not provide a timeline for the facility's construction. The Pharr-Reynosa International Bridge handles over 65% of the nation's fresh produce imports from Mexico, contributing to more than $47 billion in annual trade. The post Borderlands Mexico: Renegotiating USMCA may boost North American trade appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hamilton Spectator
40 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Athletes express concern over NCAA settlement's impact on non-revenue sports
Sydney Moore and Sabrina Ootsburg were surrounded by hundreds of college athletes at AthleteCon when news broke that the $2.8 billion NCAA settlement had been approved by a federal judge. In a room full of college athletes, they felt like the only two people who understood the gravity of the situation. 'I'm about to get paid,' Moore said a Division I football player told her. 'Yes, you are about to get paid, and a lot of your women athlete friends are about to get cut,' she responded. Moore acknowledged that her response might be a stretch, but the sprawling House settlement clears the way for college athletes to get a share of revenue directly from their schools and provides a lucky few a shot at long-term financial stability, it raises genuine concerns for others. Schools that opt int will be able to share up to $20.5 million with their athletes over the next year starting July 1. The majority is expected to be spent on high-revenue generating sports, with most projections estimating 75% of funds will go toward football. So what happens to the non-revenue-generating sports which, outside of football and basketball, is pretty much all of them? It's a query that's top of mind for Ootsburg as she enters her senior year at Belmont, where she competes on track and field team. 'My initial thought was, is this good or bad? What does this mean for me? How does this affect me? But more importantly, in the bigger picture, how does it affect athletes as a whole?' Ootsburg said. 'You look at the numbers where it says most of the revenue, up to 75% to 85%, will go toward football players. You understand it's coming from the TV deals, but then it's like, how does that affect you on the back end?' Ootsburg asked. 'Let's say 800k goes toward other athletes. Will they be able to afford other things like care, facilities, resources or even just snacks?' Moore has similar concerns. She says most female athletes aren't worried about how much – if any – money they'll receive. They fear how changes could impact the student-athlete experience. 'A lot of us would much rather know that our resources and our experience as a student-athlete is going to stay the same, or possibly get better, rather than be given 3,000 dollars, but now I have to cover my meals, I have to pay for my insurance, I have to buy ankle braces because we don't have any, and the athletic training room isn't stocked,' Moore said over the weekend as news of Friday night's settlement approval spread. One of the biggest problems, Ootsburg and Moore said, is that athletes aren't familiar with the changes. At AthleteCon in Charlotte, North Carolina, they said, perhaps the biggest change in college sports history was a push notification generally shrugged off by those directly impacted. 'Athletes do not know what's happening,' Ootsburg said. 'Talking to my teammates, it's so new, and they see the headlines and they're like, 'Ok, cool, but is someone going to explain this?' because they can read it, but then there's so many underlying factors that go into this. This is a complex problem that you have to understand the nuances behind, and not every athlete truly does.' Some coaches, too, are still trying to understand what's coming. Mike White, coach of the national champion Texas softball team, called it 'the great unknown right now.' 'My athletic director, Chris Del Conte, said it's like sailing out on a flat world and coming off the edge; we just don't know what's going to be out there yet, especially the way the landscape is changing,' he said at the Women's College World Series in Oklahoma City. 'Who knows what it's going to be?' What about the walk-ons? Jake Rimmel got a crash course on the settlement in the fall of 2024, when he said he was cut from the Virginia Tech cross-country team alongside several other walk-ons. The topic held up the House case for weeks as the judge basically forced schools to give athletes cut in anticipation of approval a chance to play — they have to earn the spot, no guarantees — without counting against roster limits. Rimmel packed up and moved back to his parents' house in Purcellville, Virginia. For the past six months, he's held on to a glimmer of hope that maybe he could return. 'The past six months have been very tough,' he said. 'I've felt so alone through this, even though I wasn't. I just felt like the whole world was out there – I would see teammates of mine and other people I knew just doing all of these things and still being part of a team. I felt like I was sidelined and on pause, while they're continuing to do all these things.' News that the settlement had been approved sent Rimmel looking for details. 'I didn't see much about roster limits,' he said. 'Everyone wants to talk about NIL and the revenue-sharing and I mean, that's definitely a big piece of it, but I just didn't see anything about the roster limits, and that's obviously my biggest concern.' The answer only presents more questions for Rimmel. 'We were hoping for more of a forced decision with the grandfathering, which now it's only voluntary, so I'm a little skeptical of things because I have zero clue how schools are going to react to that,' Rimmel told The Associated Press. Rimmel is still deciding what's best for him, but echoed Moore and Ootsburg in saying that answers are not obvious: 'I'm just hoping the schools can make the right decisions with things and have the best interest of the people who were cut.' ___ AP Sports Writer Cliff Brunt contributed. ___ AP college sports: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
