logo
Air India crash rekindles debate over cockpit video recorders

Air India crash rekindles debate over cockpit video recorders

Yahoo16-07-2025
By Dan Catchpole
SEATTLE (Reuters) -The deadly Air India crash last month has renewed a decades-old debate in the aviation industry over installing video cameras monitoring airline pilot actions to complement the cockpit voice and flight data recorders already used by accident investigators.
One of the industry's most influential voices, International Air Transport Association head Willie Walsh, a former airline pilot, said on Wednesday in Singapore there was a strong argument for video cameras to be installed in airliner cockpits to monitor pilot actions to complement voice and flight data recorders already used by accident investigators.
Aviation experts have said a preliminary report from India's Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) raised questions over whether one of the pilots of Air India flight 171 cut off fuel to the Boeing 787's engines seconds after takeoff, leading to an irrecoverable situation.
The crash in Ahmedabad, India, killed 241 of the 242 people aboard, as well as 19 people on the ground.
As of now, "based on what little we know now, it's quite possible that a video recording, in addition to the voice recording would significantly assist the investigators in conducting that investigation on the issue of mental health," Walsh said.
Advocates for cockpit video cameras say the footage could fill in gaps left by the audio and data recorders, while opponents say concerns about privacy and misuse outweigh what they argue are marginal benefits for investigations.
Video footage was "invaluable" to Australian crash investigators determining what led to Robinson R66 helicopter breaking up in mid-air in 2023, killing the pilot, the only person aboard, according to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau's final report, which was released 18 days after the Air India crash.
The video showed "the pilot was occupied with non-flying related tasks for much of this time, specifically, mobile phone use and the consumption of food and beverages," the report said.
The ATSB commended Robinson Helicopters for providing factory-installed cameras and said it encouraged other manufacturers and owners to consider the ongoing safety benefits of similar devices.
In 2000, U.S. National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) Chairman Jim Hall urged the Federal Aviation Administration to require commercial airliners be equipped with cockpit image recorders.
Hall's recommendation came in the wake of 1999's Egyptair Flight 990 crash, when the first officer intentionally crashed the Boeing 767, according to the NTSB, killing all 217 people on board.
"In the balance between privacy and safety, the scale tips toward safety, unequivocally," air safety expert and former commercial airline pilot John Nance said. "Protecting the flying public is a sacred obligation."
Another aviation safety expert, Anthony Brickhouse, said that as an accident investigator, he is in favor of cockpit video, but acknowledged that commercial pilots have real concerns.
Video on Air India flight 171 "would have answered lots of questions," he said.
Air India declined to comment. India's AAIB, which is expected to release a final report within a year of the crash under international rules, did not reply to request for comment.
PILOT OBJECTIONS
U.S. pilots' unions such as the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) and Allied Pilots Association (APA) say the voice and data recorders already provide enough information to determine the cause of a crash and that the cameras would be an invasion of privacy and could be misused.
Calls for cockpit cameras are an understandable reaction to "the stress of not knowing what happened immediately after an accident," said APA spokesperson Dennis Tajer, an American Airlines pilot.
"I can understand the initial reaction of the more information, the better," but investigators already have enough data to adequately determine an accident's cause, leaving no need for cameras, he said.
To make flying safer, current safety systems should be enhanced to record higher-quality data, rather than adding video cameras, an ALPA spokeperson said.
There are also concerns the footage could be used by airlines for disciplinary actions or that video could be leaked to the public after a crash, said John Cox, an aviation safety expert, retired airline pilot and former ALPA executive air safety chairman.
A pilot's death being broadcast on "the 6 o'clock news is not something that the pilot's family should ever have to go through," he said.
If confidentiality can be assured around the world, "I can see an argument" for installing cameras, Cox said.
Cockpit voice recordings are typically kept confidential by investigators in favor of partial or full transcripts being released in final reports.
Despite that, International Federation of Air Line Pilots Associations said it was skeptical that confidentiality could ever be assured for cockpit videos.
"Given the high demand for sensational pictures, IFALPA has absolutely no doubt that the protection of (airborne image recorder) data, which can include identifiable images of flight crewmembers, would not be ensured either," the organization said in a statement.
Boeing declined to disclose whether customers are able to order cockpit video recorders, while Airbus did not reply to request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Dozens injured, including child, in Russian strikes using new type of bomb being tested on civilians
Dozens injured, including child, in Russian strikes using new type of bomb being tested on civilians

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Dozens injured, including child, in Russian strikes using new type of bomb being tested on civilians

KHARKIV, Ukraine — Thirty-three civilians — including a 10-year-old and two teenagers — were wounded in strikes Thursday in Kharkiv, where Russian forces are testing out a new type of 'glide bomb' on innocent people. The Post was on scene as war crimes investigators, firefighters, humanitarian and emergency services arrived just minutes after the back-to-back strikes, which hit a residential apartment building and a textiles factory around 11:15 a.m. local time. 'I was just coming from my kitchen when I heard the bomb,' building resident Svetlana Shevcheko said. 'I never thought about leaving Kharkiv before, but I am thinking now.' 5 Thirty-three civilians were wounded in strikes in Kharkiv, where Russian forces are testing out a new type of 'glide bomb.' Edoardo Marangon/ZUMA Press Wire / 5 Residents leave the site of a Russian air strike. REUTERS The northeastern Ukrainian city is just 15 miles from the Russian border, so bombs and missiles can strike into the city before residents are alerted to an incoming air raid. The strike used a new kind of glide bomb, which is a repurposed Soviet-era weapon outfitted with aerodynamic wings for more targeted precision and range. The new bombs used in Kharkiv have a range of somewhere between 90 and 100 km — an increase of about 10 to 20 km — allowing Russia to strike further into the city. 5 The new bombs used in Kharkiv have a range of somewhere between 90 and 100 km, allowing Russia to strike further into the city. Edoardo Marangon/ZUMA Press Wire / 5 The glide bomb is a repurposed Soviet-era weapon with more targeted precision and range. REUTERS 5 The back-to-back strikes hit a residential apartment building and a textiles factory around 11:15 a.m. local time. REUTERS 'They are testing this out on civilians,' chief war crimes prosecutor for the Kharkiv district Spartak Borisenko told The Post. 'Patriot [air-defense systems, made by the US] are the only way to strike them down. The bombs carried 250 kg worth of explosives, he said, creating a blast radius of 500 meters.

Russian attacks kill two in east Ukraine, 33 hurt in Kharkiv
Russian attacks kill two in east Ukraine, 33 hurt in Kharkiv

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Russian attacks kill two in east Ukraine, 33 hurt in Kharkiv

Russian attacks kill two in east Ukraine, 33 hurt in Kharkiv KHARKIV, Ukraine (Reuters) -Two people were killed in a Russian strike on eastern Ukraine on Thursday and at least 33 were wounded when Russian glide bombs struck a residential neighbourhood in the northeastern city of Kharkiv, regional officials said. The Donetsk regional prosecutor's office in eastern Ukraine said the two deaths were in the city of Kostiantynivka, where 12 people were also wounded. In Kharkiv, regional governor Oleh Syniehubov said a 10-year-old child and a month-old infant were among those hurt when Ukraine's second-largest city was hit by two glide bombs - air-launched munitions fitted with wings and satellite-aided navigation to extend their range and precision. "These are utterly senseless strikes with no military purpose whatsoever," President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on X. Thick black smoke billowed above the northern district of Kharkiv where a local business and an apartment bloc were damaged. Stunned residents fled, with some clutching children and flames engulfing parked cars. "I looked around and everything was smashed," said Yevhen Hanushchak, holding a crate with his cat outside a damaged apartment building. "Tons of smoke, people running and screaming, grabbing their things." Russia, which denies targeting civilians, has stepped up airstrikes on Ukrainian towns and cities since talks aimed at securing a ceasefire in its nearly 3-1/2 year-old-war in Ukraine stalled this year. Glide bombs have been particularly devastating in areas closer to the battlefield. The regional prosecutors said Thursday's attack was launched nearly 100 km (62 miles) away. (Additional reporting by Yuliia Dysa, Writing by Dan Peleschuk, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

Donald Trump told in May his name appears in Epstein files
Donald Trump told in May his name appears in Epstein files

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Donald Trump told in May his name appears in Epstein files

Donald Trump was told in May that his name appears multiple times in justice department files related to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, according to the Wall Street Journal. The American has come under fire for not releasing the documents - breaking a campaign promise - with some questioning his ties to Epstein. Now the newspaper Mr Trump is aware his name is included in the files, along with many other high-profile figures. Being mentioned in the records is not a sign of wrongdoing, and Mr Trump has not been accused of anything. The White House initially described the report as "fake news", but Reuters news agency said an official told them the administration isn't denying Mr Trump's name is there. Attorney General Pam Bondi and her deputy Todd Blanche issued a statement that does not directly address the Wall Street Journal's report. "Nothing in the files warranted further investigation or prosecution, and we have filed a motion in court to unseal the underlying grand jury transcripts," they said. "As part of our routine briefing, we made the president aware of the findings." The Journal reports officials told the president the files contained what they felt was unverified hearsay about many people, including Mr Trump. The president was friendly with Epstein in the 1990s and early 2000s, and he appears multiple times on flight logs for his private plane in the 1990s. Mr Trump has said their friendship ended before Epstein's legal troubles first began two decades ago. Officials also told Mr Trump the Justice Department didn't plan to release more documents, because they include child pornography and victims' personal information, the Journal added. Last week, Trump began legal action against the Journal, after it alleged he sent a suggestive birthday message to Epstein in 2003. The US president said he was seeking at least $20 billion in damages and said the report regarding the message was "fake". Among those named in the legal action is the Journal's parent company and owner Rupert Justice Department said earlier this month there is no basis to continue probing the Epstein case. This sparked anger among prominent Trump supporters who demanded more information about wealthy and powerful people linked to Epstein. Material had been released in the criminal case against Epstein's former associate Ghislaine Maxwell, who was sentenced to 20 years in prison for child sex trafficking and other crimes. During her trial, Epstein's pilot testified Mr Trump flew on Epstein's private jet multiple times - although Mr Trump has denied being on the plane.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store