Trump's major U-turn after controversial name change to American holiday
President Trump said on Thursday that he wanted to rename the national holiday, which is celebrated on November 11, to celebrate the victory of World War I.
In a post to his Truth Social page, he said: 'I am hereby renaming May 8th as Victory Day for World War II and November 11th as Victory Day for World War I.
'We won both Wars, nobody was close to us in terms of strength, bravery, or military brilliance, but we never celebrate anything.
'That's because we don't have leaders anymore, that know how to do so! We are going to start celebrating our victories again!'
Trump's post was not accompanied with an executive order, and only Congress has the power to change or create federal holidays.
On Friday however, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told ABC News that the renaming wouldn't be happening in an official capacity.
She said: 'We are not renaming Veteran's Day. It will just be an additional proclamation that goes out on that day.'
President Trump said on Thursday that he wanted to rename the national holiday in a post to his Truth Social
It remains unclear what Leavitt means by 'additional proclamation'. It has been celebrated as a national holiday since 1918.
The date marks the official armistice that saw the end of World War 1, President Eisenhower saw it officially named 'Veterans Day'.
In branding May 8 as 'Victory Day for World War II', Trump would be aligning the US with Victory Day, which is already celebrated in Europe.
May 8 marks the day that the allied forces mark as the end of the war in Europe, after Germany's unconditional surrender. It is not the date officially recognized by the US as the end of the war.
American forces continued to fight the war until later that year when Japanese forces officially surrendered on August 15.
That fact has been highlighted by MSNBC host Keith Olbermann who branded Trump a 'moron'.
He posted on X: 'We won World War II on August 15, 1945 when the Japanese surrendered. Trump is a complete moron.'
The Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America group also told The New York Times that they would reject any name change.
Their CEO Allison Jaslow said: 'It is not the veterans' fault if we don't win wars. Veterans Day should be an acknowledgment of the ways that fellow Americans have served and sacrificed to protect and defend what we have in America.'
Left-leaning political action committee VoteVets also posted on X saying: 'Veterans Day began as Armistice Day, honoring the end of World War I — then it was changed to honor ALL who served. Now Trump wants to rename it.
'Reframe it. Twist it into a tribute to conquest. Veterans don't need rewritten history. They need respect — and the benefits they earned.'
It comes as Washington is preparing to celebrate the 250th year of the Army on June 14, the same day as Trump's birthday.
The large scale parade will feature marching troops, Bradley Fighting Vehicles, rows of howitzers, and other symbols of American might.
As many as 6,300 of the service members will march, with another 300 in support, in a demonstration of power and organization.
Trump, who curates his campaign play list, will also get to see as many as seven bands, assuming he attends the festivities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Secret Service and US military engineers face scrutiny over raising lake water level for Vance's birthday
The US Secret Service and US military engineers are facing scrutiny after Adam Schiff, the California senator, demanded they answer questions about the Trump administration's recent decision to change the water level of a lake in Ohio to facilitate a family boating trip for JD Vance on his birthday. The Secret Service has said that it requested the outflow of the Caesar Creek Lake in Ohio be changed shortly before the vice-president's 2 August trip so that his security detail could safely navigate the Little Miami River, which the lake feeds into. The story was first reported by the Guardian last week. The secret service also said that neither Vance nor his staff knew that it had made the request. In a letter to Pete Hegseth, the secretary of defense, and Army Corps of Engineers leadership, Schiff suggested the use of funds to alter the outflow of the lake for personal use may have been inappropriate, and said he wanted information on the process and documentation of the decision. 'The misuse of public water resources for the vice-president's family is particularly offensive considering this administration's cuts to federal agencies, cuts which are already harming outdoor recreation opportunities for American families,' Schiff wrote. The Guardian reported last week that is not unprecedented for military engineers in Louisville, Kentucky, who have jurisdiction over the area, to modify water outflows to accommodate public use – for example, for use in community river events and training for emergency responders. Regulations regarding requests for so-called 'deviations' – or any changes to normal practices – require approval and documentation that demonstrates why the deviation is justified. This process also ensures that risks associated with any deviation – including a flood risk or other environmental impact – is detailed. The USACE said in a statement last week that the Secret Service request 'met the operational criteria outlined in the Water Control Manual for Caesar Creek Lake and did not require a deviation from normal procedures'. But in his letter, Schiff accused the Army Corps leadership of improperly leveraging access to public services for personal use and waiving standard documentation that is required to identify and justify risks associated with the deviation. 'Accordingly, I request an explanation of this USACE action and a commitment to no longer using federal resources for such unjustified and frivolous purposes,' Schiff wrote. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The California Democrat also pointed to the Trump administration's 'frivolous release' of billions of gallons of water from California reservoirs as another instance in which the Army Corps executed 'questionable abuses'. The water was released following an executive order from the White House for the alleged purpose of helping to fight the Los Angeles fires, though the Army Corp allegedly and reportedly knew the release would not be delivered to southern California directly. JD Vance's communications director, Will Martin, has defended the canoe trip in an article on Breitbart, saying Democrats were trying to 'turn it into a story about elitism'. He accused Democrats who were critical of Vance for benefitting from public infrastructure for his birthday trip of having 'no clue how normal families operate' and that the idea of a family canoeing together is 'completely foreign to them'. 'The far-left media is desperate to smear Vice-President Vance and they've hit a new low by attacking him for enjoying his birthday with his wife and kids,' Martin said, referring to the Guardian.
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
UK's largest bioethanol plant to shut after blow from Starmer's trade deal with Trump
The UK's largest bioethanol plant is to close after being dealt a body blow by Keir Starmer's trade deal with Donald Trump. The owner of the Vivergo plant in Hull, owned by Associated British Foods (ABF), said it is to close with the loss of 160 jobs, just hours after the government said it would not fund an industry rescue package. The first redundancies will be made on Tuesday. The government's decision creates uncertainty over a further 4,000 jobs in the industry's supply chain including farmers and hauliers. Bioethanol is a petrol substitute produced from agricultural products. Vivergo opened a redundancy programme in June. At that point the government appointed talks with the company, more than a month after ABF warned that the US trade deal was an 'existential threat' allowing US producers, for the first time, to compete litre-by-litre under a new duty free agreement for American ethanol. ABF and Ensus, the owner of the other major bioethanol plant in the UK, said the US deal would have a huge knock on effect in farming for wheat farmers who supplied their plants, as well as the UK's lead in clean fuels. A spokesperson for ABF said on Friday: 'It is deeply regrettable that the government has chosen not to support a key national asset. We have been left with no choice but to announce the closure of Vivergo and we have informed our people. 'We have been fighting for months to keep this plant open. We initiated and led talks with government in good faith. We presented a clear plan to restore Vivergo to profitability within two years under policy levers already aligned with the government's own green industrial strategy.' ABF had warned the US trade deal, hailed as a triumph for Starmer, was a killer blow because it scrapped tariffs on a quota of 1.4bn litres of imports from the US, the exact size of the UK production, as part of the agreement with Trump in May. The US trade deal was a victory for the car industry which had tariffs slashed from 27.5% to 10%. The steel industry is still facing 25% tariffs but the UK government is hoping these will be scrapped through ongoing negotiation. Government sources said they had to prioritise the 320,000 jobs in auto, steel and aerospace and added that the ethanol plants had faced financial problems before the US deal. Sources in the National Farmers' Union believe that Trump's negotiators had said that in exchange for slashing tariffs on cars and steel it wanted US farmers to have access to either the British pork or ethanol industries. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion A spokesperson for the department for business and trade said it had taken 'the difficult decision not to offer direct funding as it would not provide value for the taxpayer or solve the long-term problems the industry faces'. ABF said the decision was 'deeply regrettable' accusing the government of having 'thrown away billions in potential growth in the Humber' and the opportunity to 'lead the world' on clean fuels. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham said: 'This is a shortsighted decision that totally disregards the benefits the domestic bioethanol sector will bring to jobs and energy security.'
The Guardian
a few seconds ago
- The Guardian
Democrats introduce joint resolution to end Trump's ‘lawless' DC takeover
Democratic lawmakers have introduced a joint resolution aimed at ending what they call Trump's unlawful and unprecedented move to federalize the Metropolitan police department (MPD) in Washington DC. Representative Jamie Raskin, the ranking member of the House judiciary committee, DC's non-voting House delegate, Eleanor Holmes Norton, and representative Robert Garcia, ranking member of the House committee on oversight and government reform introduced the resolution on Friday, invoking the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973. The resolution states that Trump has not demonstrated the existence of any special emergency conditions that would warrant the federalization of the police force. In the Senate, Chris Van Hollen of Maryland will sponsor the resolution. 'The only emergency here is a lawless president experiencing a growing public relations emergency because of his close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein and his stubborn refusal to release the Epstein file despite his promise to do so,' said Raskin in a statement shared with the Guardian. The Home Rule Act of 1973 states that DC residents have the authority to govern their local affairs, including by electing a mayor and local council members. But because DC is considered a 'federal district' rather than a state, the president and Congress (where DC residents have no voting representatives) are given the legal ability to manage local laws and local tax dollars. Under the act, the president has limited power to temporarily take over the DC police department for 'federal purposes' under 'special conditions of an emergency'. On Monday, Trump signed an executive order granting himself direct control of the MPD in a highly controversial and suspected premeditated move. But lawmakers argue that the special conditions have not been met and that Congress has the authority to end such emergency control through a joint resolution. According to the joint resolution's sponsors, the president has attempted to rationalize his decision to place local police under federal control and increase militarization of the city by pushing a misleading account of DC's crime rate, which has actually declined for two consecutive years and recently hit its lowest point in three decades. 'President Trump's incursions against DC are among the most egregious attacks on DC home rule in decades,' said Norton. 'DC residents are Americans, worthy of the same autonomy granted to residents of the states … No emergency exists in DC that the president did not create himself, and he is not using the DC Police for federal purposes, as required by law.' Lawmakers say that his actions have worsened public safety by blocking DC's access to $1bn in locally generated funds intended for police, fire, emergency services and other safety programs. Additionally, the resolution notes that Trump has removed or reassigned many of DC's prosecutors, creating a backlog in criminal cases and delaying justice for victims. He also pardoned or granted clemency to nearly 1,600 people involved in the January 6 attack on the US Capitol in 2021, including hundreds found guilty of assaulting law enforcement officers.
