
Hang seng slides as US-Iran conflict weighs on Asian markets; brent crude spikes 5%, OPEC warns of supply risk
(Image credits: ANI)
Brent Crude prices spiked as much as 5% on Monday following the US airstrikes on Iran's key nuclear facilities on Sunday. The move ended days of speculation over whether the US President Donald Trump would join Israel in its confrontation with Iran.
While prices surged initially, they soon pared gains. The attacks on Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan had led to expectations of a sustained oil rally. Iran is the third-largest producer in the OPEC+ bloc and accounts for around a third of global oil output.
Last week, Brent Crude futures rose 11%, touching $80 per barrel before retreating. Prices rebounded again as Trump kept markets guessing on the US's involvement, but hopes of a ceasefire and ample supply from OPEC+ capped further gains.
Analysts noted that demand remains weak, giving little reason for oil to hold elevated levels.
OPEC+ is scheduled to meet on July 5 to discuss another output hike for August, after already increasing supplies by 4.11 million barrels per day in June and July.
Saul Kavonic, an energy analyst at MST Marquee, said, 'Much depends on how Iran responds in the coming hours and days, but this could set us on a path toward $100 oil, if Iran responds as they have previously threatened to,'
Iran claims it reserves the right to respond to the US attacks.
Local media reports its parliament has approved the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, though the final call rests with its National Security Council. The US has urged China to discourage Iran from taking that step.
T
he Strait of Hormuz is a critical oil chokepoint, more than 20 million barrels per day, or 20% of the world's oil supply, passed through it last year, according to the US Energy Information Administration.
Goldman Sachs has warned that a closure of the strait could push oil prices above $100 per barrel. However, JPMorgan views the possibility as low, saying such a move could be seen by the US as an "act of war."
Rising crude prices could hurt India's economy, particularly oil marketing companies like HPCL, BPCL, and Indian Oil, along with industries like aviation, paints, and tyres that rely heavily on oil.
Goldman Sachs' Santanu Sengupta told CNBC-TV18 that a rise in crude to $75 per barrel would hurt India's macroeconomic stability.
A $10-per-barrel increase could raise the cost burden by 30–40 basis points.
Samiran Chakraborty, chief India economist at Citi, also noted that supply chain disruptions could raise inflation risks, but said India may still be able to manage slightly higher prices due to its limited exposure to Iranian oil.
US officials said no further strikes are planned for now, but warned that any retaliation from Iran would invite an even more forceful response.
'This is the big one,' said John Kilduff of Again Capital, pointing to a possible $8-a-barrel risk premium. 'The market default on this development is higher. How high depends on Iran's response, or the realistic prospects of a meaningful response, which may not be there.'
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iran warns of ‘consequences' of silence and inaction over US strikes on nuclear sites
Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday said that silence and inaction over the US strikes on the country's three nuclear sites 'will have widespread consequences'. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, during an event recently.(REUTERS) In a conversation with his French counterpart, Jean-Noël Barrot, Araghchi condemned the US strikes on the Fordow, Isfahan, and Natanz nuclear facilities, calling the military action a violation of all international laws and regulations, including the United Nations Charter. According to a statement issued on his Telegram channel, Abbas Araghchi stated that the 'silence and inaction' of countries in the face of the aggression will have widespread consequences and outcomes for all countries. The Telegram release added that Barrot expressed regret over the US strikes and denied any involvement in their planning and execution. The French foreign minister expressed his concern about the escalation of tensions in the region after the strikes and called for the continuation of talks between Iran and Europe. Iran considering bill to suspend cooperation with IAEA According to state media, a parliamentary bill to suspend Iran's cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), is under consideration. The reports were confirmed by Ruhollah Motefakerzadeh, a member of parliament's praesidium. Iranian media also reported Parliament Speaker Mohammad Baqer Qalibaf stating that the proposed bill would suspend the country's cooperation with the IAEA until Tehran got objective guarantees of professional behaviour from the agency. "We in the parliament are seeking to pass a bill that would suspend Iran's cooperation with the IAEA until we have objective guarantees of the professional behaviour of this international organisation," Qalibaf said about the bill. The speaker added that Tehran was not looking to develop any sort of nuclear weapons. "The world clearly saw that the Atomic Energy Agency has not fulfilled any of its obligations and has become a political tool," he added.


New Indian Express
38 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump's go-it-alone strategy on Iran risks dividing an already split Congress
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's decision to launch a military strike on Iran's nuclear sites without fully consulting the US Congress layered a partisan approach onto a risky action, particularly because the White House briefed top Republican leaders beforehand while leaving Democrats with little information. While House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Republican leader John Thune and the GOP chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee all were briefed before the action, their counterparts were not. Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer was given a perfunctory heads-up by the White House shortly before the strikes were made public. And House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries' office received a 'courtesy call' before Trump announced it. The so-called Gang of Eight congressional and intelligence leaders were not notified before the mission, according to two people familiar with the situation and granted anonymity to discuss it. One, Rep. Jim Himes, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said he learned of the strikes on social media, which he said 'is an uncomfortable thing for the ranking member of the Intelligence Committee.' 'Bad enough that we weren't informed,' Himes, of Connecticut, said Sunday on CNN, 'but unconstitutional that we didn't have the opportunity to debate and speak, as the representatives of the people, on what is one of the more consequential foreign policy things that this country has done in a long time.' It's a highly unusual situation that is complicating the difficult politics ahead for the president and his party as the U.S. enters an uncertain national security era with the surprise military attack on the nuclear facilities, an unprecedented incursion in Iran.


News18
40 minutes ago
- News18
‘Violated Sovereignty': China Condemns US Airstrikes On Nuclear Sites In Iran
Last Updated: China warned that the airstrikes have 'exacerbated tensions in the Middle East and dealt a heavy blow to the international nuclear non-proliferation regime.' China issued a sharp condemnation of the United States on Sunday over its military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities in Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan, calling the actions a violation of international norms and a threat to global security. The statement came during an emergency session of the UN Security Council, following the U.S. attack on the three nuclear sites. 'China strongly condemns the US attacks on Iran and the bombing of nuclear facilities under the safeguards of the IAEA," said Fu Cong, China's permanent representative to the United Nations, according to a statement posted on the website of China's Permanent Mission to the UN. Fu added that the strikes 'seriously violate the purposes and principles of the UN Charter and international law, as well as Iran's sovereignty, security, and territorial integrity." China also said that the US strike on Iran's nuclear facilities has undermined Washington's credibility and expressed concern that the escalating situation 'may go out of control," according to a report by the country's state broadcaster, following Sunday's UN Security Council emergency session. The response came after President Donald Trump declared that the U.S. had 'obliterated" Iran's key nuclear sites, describing the operation as a decisive show of force. The coordinated offensive, carried out alongside Israel, marks the largest Western military action against the Islamic Republic since the 1979 Iranian Revolution. First Published: June 23, 2025, 13:32 IST