
SBI completes fatal shooting probe
Guilford County District Attorney Avery Crump decided to let the N.C. Conference of District Attorneys handle the decision on whether to prosecute anyone in the death of Hasson Williams, 32, of Greensboro, Senior Assistant District Attorney Cyrus Brown told The High Point Enterprise on Friday.
Crump 'felt that our office had a conflict, which is why she made her decision,' Brown said. 'It was her decision to make a formal request for the Conference of District Attorneys to review the incident and any findings so that they could make a determination on how it should be handled.'
One of the roles of the N.C. Conference of District Attorneys is to step into cases where there's a possible conflict of interest in a local jurisdiction, according to the association's website. The Raleigh-based conference was established as a state agency in 1983 by the N.C. General Assembly to assist county district attorneys with the administration of their offices.
The SBI was brought in to take over the case in October at the request of the High Point Police Department because of the potential conflict of interest with Jefferson. Relatives of the mayor included Williams and other people at the house in the 400 block of Ridgebrooke Drive where the shooting took place Oct. 19.
The Enterprise reported in October, based on the initial incident report and a 911 call by a woman in the residence, that Williams died in an apparent accidental shooting while handling a 9 mm Glock pistol with another person.
The incident report, developed by the High Point Police Department before the SBI received the case, said that several other people inside the house reported that the pistol went off while the two were handling it. Williams was shot in the head.
The woman who called 911 told an emergency dispatcher that the shooting was a 'mistake.'
The residence on Ridgebrooke Drive is in the Davidson County part of the city of High Point, but Davidson County District Attorney Garry Frank told The Enterprise earlier this week that the area of the city around Ridgebrooke Drive falls under the oversight of the Guilford County District Attorney's Office.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Kroger's CEO mysteriously resigned. An unrelated lawsuit involving Jewel could reveal why
A Cincinnati judge has ordered former Kroger CEO Rodney McMullen to explain—in writing—why he unexpectedly resigned in March, forcing him to confront what his attorneys call 'completely irrelevant' and 'embarrassing' questions in a lawsuit involving singer Jewel. McMullen, who led the Cincinnati-based grocery giant for more than a decade, resigned following what Kroger described as an investigation into his 'personal conduct.' As part of his departure, McMullen forfeited all of his unvested equity and bonuses—a total of $11 million, according to an SEC filing. That decision raised eyebrows for Eric Chaffee, a corporate law professor at Case Western Reserve University. 'Usually a CEO has downside protection if they leave,' he told Fortune. 'The fact that he was willing to give that up may provide some insight that what went on here was something he did not want revealed.' Kroger offered no further explanation at the time, sparking speculation in business circles. However, the mystery is now back in the spotlight due to an unrelated lawsuit filed against Kroger by singer-songwriter Jewel, and one of her business partners, over Kroger's annual Wellness Festival. The plaintiffs claim they played a key role in launching the festival and are seeking damages over alleged contractual disputes. Their attorneys argue that questioning McMullen about the reasons for his resignation could be relevant to his credibility as a trial witness, and could shed light on the 'allegedly corrupt corporate culture at Kroger.' McMullen's legal team has fought the request, but earlier this month, Hamilton County Common Pleas Court Judge Christian Jenkins ordered him to submit a written explanation by Aug. 8, including the names of those involved. Whether the public ever sees that document is still uncertain. If Jenkins decides the information is relevant, it could be kept under seal. If it's not deemed relevant, it won't be entered into the record at all. While prying into a CEO's exit is 'somewhat invasive,' Chaffee noted the court could find it justified, especially since Kroger itself tied the resignation to 'business ethics.' In litigation, he explained, 'If the other side offers a witness, you want to test that individual's credibility… to figure out whether they behave in an ethical manner.' That relevance test weighs heavily against another legal principle: the risk of unfairly embarrassing a witness. But Chaffee noted that in the U.S., there's a 'strong preference that the public has access to judicial proceedings—not just to be nosy, but because transparency makes for a fairer legal system.' That principle may prevail. However, for Kroger, keeping the reason private could protect its brand and stave off shareholder lawsuits or regulatory scrutiny. 'There's a cloud that's left by his departure,' Chaffee said, 'but companies sometimes decide that's better than the damage that could come from disclosure.' McMullen likely has his own reasons for staying quiet, Chaffee added. 'It might be something embarrassing to him personally, to a family member, or something that could have future repercussions for his career,' he said. 'If you're a CEO and there are news reports out there that you've done something you shouldn't have, getting another top job can become very, very difficult.' While Chaffee doesn't expect the case to set legal precedent—'this is probably more factually interesting than it is legally interesting'—he said the stakes are still high. The plaintiffs' strategy, he noted, is a common but effective pressure tactic: 'Seeking information that may potentially be damaging to Kroger… may incentivize them to settle this case.' This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio


Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Treasury sanctions 'brutally violent' cartel for timeshare fraud in tourist destination, warns Americans
FIRST ON FOX: The Treasury Department sanctioned a network of individuals linked to a "brutally violent" cartel for hundreds of millions of dollars of timeshare fraud targeting Americans in popular tourist destination Puerto Vallarta, Mexico, Fox News Digital has learned. The Treasury Department is now warning current U.S.-based owners of timeshares and those considering the purchase of a Mexico-based timeshare, to conduct "appropriate due diligence." Officials warn that the scams often target older Americans who can lose their life savings. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control imposed sanctions on four Mexican individuals and 13 Mexican companies linked to timeshare fraud led by the Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion (CJNG). The individuals linked to the fraud are based in or near Puerto Vallarta. "We are coming for terrorist drug cartels like Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion that are flooding our country with fentanyl," Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent said in a statement. "These cartels continue to create new ways to generate revenue to fuel their terrorist operations. At President Trump's direction, we will continue our effort to completely eradicate the cartels' ability to generate revenue, including their efforts to prey on elderly Americans through timeshare fraud." The three senior CJNG members most involved in timeshare fraud sanctioned Wednesday are Julio Cesar Montero Pinzon (Montero), Carlos Andres Rivera Varela (Rivera), and Francisco Javier Gudino Haro (Gudino). Additionally, Puerto Vallarta native Michael Ibarra Diaz Jr. (Ibarra) was sanctioned. Treasury says Ibarra is "engaged in timeshare fraud on behalf of CJNG." The companies sanctioned are Akali Realtors, Centro Mediador De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Integral De La Costa, S.A. de C.V., Corporativo Costa Norte, S.A. de C.V., and Sunmex Travel, S. de R.L. De C.V. They "explicitly acknowledge their involvement in the timeshare industry." Another company involved in timeshare-related transactions that was sanctioned is TTR Go, S.A. de C.V. They claim only to be a travel agency. Three additional companies were sanctioned for their alleged real estate activities: Inmobiliaria Integral Del Puerto, S.A. de C.V., KVY Bucerias, S.A. de C.V., and Servicios Inmobiliarios Ibadi, S.A. de C.V. "This diverse corporate network also includes tour operators (Fishing Are Us, S. De R.L. de C.V.; Santamaria Cruise, S. de R.L. de C.V.), an automotive service company (Laminado Profesional Automotriz Elte, S.A. de C.V.), and an accounting firm (Consultorias Profesionales Almida, S.A. de C.V.). Cartel de Jalisco Nueva Generacion is a U.S.-designated Foreign Terrorist Organization. Officials said the cartel is increasingly supplementing its drug trafficking proceeds with alternative revenue streams like timeshare fraud and fuel theft. "Treasury has taken a series of actions targeting the diverse revenue streams benefitting the cartels, including fuel theft, human smuggling, extortion, and fraud," the Treasury Department said. "As Treasury and its partners seek to disrupt the cartels' revenue streams, it is important to remind current owners of timeshares in Mexico: If an unsolicited purchase or rental offer seems too good to be true, it probably is." Treasury added: "Those considering the purchase of a timeshare in Mexico should conduct appropriate due diligence." Officials said Mexico-based cartels have been targeting U.S. owners of timeshares through call centers in Mexico staffed by telemarketers in fluent English. Officials said that beginning in 2012, CJNG took control of timeshare fraud schemes in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco, Mexico, and the surrounding area. The scams often target older Americans "who can lose their live savings," officials warned, adding that the lifecycle of the scams can "last years, resulting in financial and emotional devastation of the victims while enriching cartels like CJNG." Officials said the cartels typically obtain information about U.S. owners of timeshares in Mexico from "complicit insiders at timeshare resorts." "After obtaining information on timeshare owners, the cartels, through their call centers, contact victims by phone or email and claim to be U.S.-based third-party timeshare brokers, attorneys, or sales representatives in the timeshare, travel, real estate, or financial services industries," the Treasury Department said. Officials explained that the fraud may include timeshare exit scams, or resale scams, timeshare re-rent scams, and timeshare investment scams. "The common theme is that victims are asked to pay advance 'fees' and 'taxes' before receiving money supposedly owed to them," officials warned. "This money never comes, and the victims are continuously told to send these 'fees' and 'taxes' via international wire transfers to accounts held at Mexican banks and brokerage houses." After initial scams, officials warn that "re-victimization scams can occur." In July 2024, Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network and the FBI issued a joint-notice on the timeshare fraud associated with Mexico-based cartels and criminal organizations. In the six month period following that notice, FinCEN received more than 250 Suspicious Activity Reports, and filers reported approximately 1,300 transactions totaling $23.1 million, sent primarily from U.S. based individuals to counterparties in Mexico. Based on FinCEN's analysis, U.S. fraud victims sent an average of $28,912 and a median amount of $10,000 per transaction to the suspected scammers since July 2024. The FBI says approximately 6,000 U.S. victims reported losing nearly $300 million between 2019 and 2023 to timeshare fraud schemes in Mexico. But officials said that figure "likely underestimates total losses, as the FBI believes the vast majority of victims not report the scam due to embarrassment, among other reasons."

Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
US sanctions Congo militias, Hong Kong exporters over smuggled minerals
The United States has sanctioned an armed group aligned with Congo's military, a Congolese mining company, and two Hong Kong-based exporters over alleged links to violence and illegal mining. The United States imposed sanctions on groups and companies linked to violence and illegal mining in Congo. These actions target the exploitation of conflict minerals in the region. Sanctioned entities include PARECO-FF, a Congolese miner, and Hong Kong-based exporters. The United States has sanctioned an armed group aligned with Congo's military, a Congolese mining company, and two Hong Kong-based exporters over alleged links to violence and illegal mining. Officials described the action as part of efforts to curb the exploitation of conflict minerals in the region. The measures are the latest by President Donald Trump's administration to push for peace in eastern Congo, where Rwanda-backed M23 rebels launched a rapid offensive earlier this year, triggering violence that has killed thousands. The Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced penalties against PARECO-FF, a successor to an armed faction accused of 'destabilising activities' in the DRC. According to the Treasury, the group has carried out forced labour and civilian executions in mining areas under its control. Sanctions entities The sanctions, which bar trade with U.S. entities and individuals, also target Congolese miner Cooperative des Artisanaux Miniers du Congo (CDMC). The U.S. Treasury said the company sold critical minerals smuggled from areas controlled by the PARECO-FF armed group. Hong Kong-based exporters East Rise Corporation Limited and Star Dragon Corporation Limited were also sanctioned for allegedly purchasing those minerals. The sanctions focus on activities in Rubaya, a mineral-rich area in eastern Congo that is one of the world's largest sources of tantalum ore, a critical material used in electronics.