Ontario to table new bill aimed at speeding up development of homes, roads and transit
Ontario's housing minister has announced a plan to speed up new home construction while lowering costs for developers through new legislation set to be tabled on Monday.
The legislation, aimed at solving Ontario's housing crisis, would also fast-track road and transit projects in the province, and comes as the Ford government struggles to meet its goal of building 1.5 million homes.
"Through our proposed legislation, we plan to cut red tape, speed up approvals and reduce charges," said Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing Rob Flack at a news conference in Vaughan Monday.
"And most importantly, make it more affordable to build and buy a home in Ontario."
The Ford government's target goal of building 1.5 million homes by 2031 was not mentioned in the news release Monday. Asked why, Flack admitted the province isn't currently on track to meet its goal.
"It's a goal, but frankly I'm more focused and our team is focused more on the next 12 to 24 months because if it stays the way it is now, we'll never get there," he responded.
"But is it forgotten? No way."
Flack said Ontario needs to make "immediate changes" to home building rules and his focus is on the next two years in order to spur development.
If passed, the bill would reduce the scope and number of studies municipalities can require for new developments, speed up certain minor variances and standardize and streamline fees developers pay that municipalities use to fund housing-enabling infrastructure such as water and sewer lines.
As well, the bill would standardize construction requirements, provide clarity that municipalities can't create construction standards beyond the building code and would cap the number of affordable units a municipality can require in certain residential developments.
WATCH: How modular housing could help solve Ontario's housing crisis:
Flack announced the new bill Monday alongside Finance Minister Peter Bethlenfalvy, Infrastructure Minister Kinga Surma, Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria, Mississauga Mayor Carolyn Parrish and Vaughan Mayor Steven Del Duca — days before the Ontario government is set to release its provincial budget.
The Ontario Home Builders' Association welcomed the announcement Monday, saying builders have long advocated for addressing issues of development charges as well as permitting and approval delays.
"This legislation is a strong step towards boosting supply, restoring affordability, and protecting jobs in the residential construction sector," said CEO Scott Andison.
Concern over controversial MZO powers
Last week, Flack hinted at the bill, garnering skepticism from opposition leaders including NDP Leader Marit Stiles, who said she is concerned about reports from Global News that the bill could extend the controversial MZO (Minister's Zoning Order) powers to Surma.
Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie said expanding the use of sweeping zoning orders does not guarantee housing will be built faster in Ontario, calling it "government overreach."
Flack says the legislation responds to recommendations from municipal leaders and will help both lower housing costs and keep workers on the job in the face of economic uncertainty.
The government also announced Monday that it will add $400 million to two funds that municipalities use to build housing-enabling infrastructure.
In 2022, Premier Doug Ford pledged to build 1.5 million new homes by 2031, a target Ontario would need to build 100,000 homes a year to hit. But as recently as last October, the government's own fall economic statement showed the province is not on track to hit that level in 2025, 2026, or 2027.
"We've got headwinds in our economy," Flack told reporters at Queen's Park last Thursday. "We need bold initiatives, and we have to build faster. We're looking at the cost of housing today. It takes too long and it costs too much to get shovels in the ground."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Goldman Sachs Leads Simetrik Series B Extension to $85 Million
Simetrik, a financial and accounting services startup, raised $30 million in fresh funding led by a unit of Goldman Sachs Alternatives. The funding adds to a series B round that the company disclosed in February 2024. At that point it had already pulled in $55 million from investors led by the growth equity team at Goldman Sachs Asset Management's alternatives platform.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
DA Davidson Keeps Buy Rating on Shift4 Payments (FOUR)
On June 5, DA Davidson analysts maintained a Buy recommendation on Shift4 Payments, Inc. (NYSE:FOUR) with a $124 price target. The company has shown solid momentum, and the analysts' decision comes in light of Global Blue's financial results for the fourth fiscal quarter and full-year 2025. Shift4 announced the acquisition of Global Blue for $7.50 per common share in cash back in February 2025. A business person using a mobile point of sale device outside of a retail store. Global Blue disclosed a 20% year-over-year boost in total revenue, coming in at €508 million. The company's adjusted EBITDA grew 36% year-over-year and reached €202 million. However, even with these encouraging financials, DA Davidson analysts mentioned that they do not foresee notable changes to their initial forecasts of Shift4 numbers. Meanwhile, the Buy rating reflects steady confidence by analysts in the company. Shift4 Payments, Inc. (NYSE:FOUR) delivers end-to-end commerce solutions, combining modern POS systems with omnichannel payment processing across industries. With a growing footprint in hospitality, retail, and e-commerce, Shift4 is scaling through tech-forward solutions like SkyTab and Shift4Shop. The company was established in 1999 and is headquartered in Pennsylvania. While we acknowledge the potential of FOUR as an investment, our conviction lies in the belief that some AI stocks hold greater promise for delivering higher returns and have limited downside risk. If you are looking for an extremely cheap AI stock that is also a major beneficiary of Trump tariffs and onshoring, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 High-Growth EV Stocks to Invest In and 13 Best Car Stocks to Buy in 2025. Disclosure: None.

Wall Street Journal
5 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
How the Cybertruck Came to Embody Tesla's Problems
The bromance between Elon Musk and President Trump is ending at a difficult time for Tesla TSLA 3.67%increase; green up pointing triangle. The electric-vehicle maker lost roughly $150 billion of market value Thursday—its biggest ever drop—after the Tesla CEO and Trump traded insults. Sales of Teslas have slumped this year. Tariffs could disrupt the supply of key components. The sprawling Republican tax-and-spending bill would end tax credits for EV buyers. And Tesla's Cybertruck has been a disappointment. Musk set high expectations for the Cybertruck, telling investors it would be Tesla's 'best product ever.' The angular, stainless steel pickup was supposed to generate buzz for Tesla by showcasing new technology and unlocking the lucrative truck market. Instead, it has become synonymous with Musk's polarizing stint in politics, exposing some owners to graffiti or middle fingers from other drivers. And its reputation has been tarnished among Tesla fans because of a spate of recalls and manufacturing issues that have resulted in cycles of repairs. In the U.S., the company sold fewer than 40,000 Cybertrucks in 2024—well below Musk's ultimate goal of 250,000 a year. In the first quarter of 2025, Tesla sold around 7,100 Cybertrucks in the U.S., according to registration data from S&P Global Mobility. Ford's F-150 Lightning pickup outsold it. In an effort to boost sales, Tesla has rolled out lower-price versions of the truck and started offering buyers incentives such as 0% financing and free upgrades. Almost as soon as the $100,000 Cybertruck hit the road, quality problems began to multiply. Reports on social media cited cracked windshields and spotting from so-called rail dust, orange discoloration similar to rust. In its first year, Tesla recalled the truck seven times to fix dangerous defects. In March, with large metal panels falling off the trucks, the tally rose to eight. Some of the quality problems were known and documented internally before the truck went on sale, including issues with the accelerator pad and windshield wiper that later triggered recalls, said former employees who worked on the Cybertruck. But there was pressure inside Tesla to get the truck to market quickly, according to these employees. Tesla didn't respond to requests for comment. 'Elon Musk will tell you the biggest professional mistake was the falcon doors on the Model X,' said David Fick, a longtime Tesla owner who got his Cybertruck in March. He referred to the complex door design that opens upward and hinges at the roof. 'I believe that the Cybertruck is going to go down as an even bigger corporate stumble.' The retired banker in Boynton Beach, Fla., chose to wait more than a year to buy his Cybertruck, hopeful that many of the biggest issues would be identified before he drove his off the lot. 'They do a lot of bleeding-edge stuff where they rush to the market and then you're a beta tester as an owner,' Fick said. He paid about $72,000 for the car, plus $7,300 for window tinting and a custom wrap for exterior trim panels known as cant rails, covering his new car in a metallic maroon color. Soon after, Tesla recalled cant rails because they could become unglued. 'I've had tons of recalls on my Teslas over the years,' said Fick, who added that the cars are worth the hassle. 'Eighty percent were fixed by [software] updates, but these are physical things we are dealing with now.' Musk unveiled the prototype for the Cybertruck in 2019. At the time, he said it would cost $39,900, with a battery range of up to 500 miles—an ambitious combination that would be a stretch for any EV maker. Work on the vehicle was delayed a couple of years, leaving engineering and manufacturing teams with only a few months to do final testing before the trucks went to customers, former employees said. Musk tried to temper expectations around how quickly Tesla could increase production, given its unique design. 'There is always some chance that Cybertruck will flop, because it is so unlike anything else,' he wrote on social media in July 2021. Still, he promoted some of its most unusual features, including his dream of making the car amphibious. Former employees said they took Musk's social posts as orders, but the engineering proved difficult. By 2022, it was clear internally that Cybertruck wouldn't be able to meet all Musk's criteria, so engineers scrapped an early design and started over—developing a smaller, landlocked version of the truck, the people said. After about a year and a half of testing, Tesla delivered the first Cybertrucks to a dozen or so customers in late November 2023. An early version of the truck started at $100,000 and had an estimated range of 318 miles. Two months later, Tesla issued its first recall on the vehicle: a software update that required the company to increase the size of the font on a warning system used across its fleet. It was the first of three recalls that Tesla addressed on the Cybertruck through over-the-air updates to its software. Cybertruck's problems couldn't be fixed by software updates alone. In April 2024, Tesla issued a recall for the accelerator pedal. The company had received a notice from a customer complaining that the accelerator had gotten stuck. Tesla found that the pad attached to the long pedal could dislodge and get stuck in the trim above the pedal, causing the car to accelerate. An internal investigation found the issue was the result of an 'unapproved change,' in which Tesla employees used soap as a lubricant to attach the pad, according to the recall notice. Inside Tesla, the accelerator pad had been a known issue starting with the prototype, according to an employee who worked on the part. The manufacturing team also identified the part as problematic, this person said. Tesla also had problems with the Cybertruck's expansive windshield, which measured nearly 6 square feet. Sometimes the heavy glass would break, two employees said. The glass either arrived cracked from the supplier in Mexico or from handling at the Austin, Texas, facility, they said. Some owners took to social media to describe the glass cracking as soon as they drove off the lot, or while they wiped the inside of their windshield. The windshield required a large windshield wiper measuring 50 inches long. In June 2024, Tesla issued a recall on the wipers, whose motors Tesla found had been overstressed by testing. The wiper had been flagged nearly a year before, two people who worked on the Cybertruck said. It was one of the first issues identified on the vehicles, at which point it was classified as a 'gating issue,' which meant that it needed to be resolved before production could move forward. Reid Tomasko, a 25-year-old YouTube creator, took his Cybertruck on a cross-country trip, during which it performed perfectly, he said. Then came winter in New Hampshire. He was driving near his home in Lebanon, N.H., in February when a metal panel flew off the side of his truck. In March, Tesla issued a recall affecting most of the Cybertrucks it had produced—more than 46,000. The problem involved adhesive that could become brittle in extreme weather, causing exterior trim panels called cant rails to dislodge. Inspecting his truck, Tomasko said he found loose connections on almost every panel that used the adhesive, including the large pieces of stainless steel over the rear wheels, the front fender and the front doors. 'I was wondering, why are they not recalling the other panels?' Tomasko said. After replacing several panels, Tesla offered to buy back Tomasko's truck for nearly all of the $102,000 that he paid, he said. He accepted. 'I am planning on getting a newer one for cheaper soon,' he said. Write to Becky Peterson at