
Holyhead Port to reopen fully after Storm Darragh damage
"It's the busiest time of year and is really important and timely," said Wales' First Minister Eluned Morgan.It comes as schoolchildren in Wales will finish their term within the next few days while most Republic of Ireland schools have already closed for the summer.More than 1.5m people pass through Holyhead every year making it the most popular sea route between the UK mainland and the Republic of Ireland.
Why did Holyhead Port close?
Holyhead's operators have said its closure was after successive ferries made "contact" with berthing terminals at the port just before the height of Storm Darragh in December 2024.The incidents shut both of Holyhead's terminals because of the "interconnecting nature" of the support structures as the terminals run parallel to each other.It blocked the busiest and shortest route between the UK mainland and Republic and Ireland over the busy Christmas and new year period.The 40-day closure, before one berth reopened on 16 January, caused chaos for passengers and truck drivers using the four daily services of both Stena Line and Irish Ferries as people and freight had to find alternative routes over the Irish Sea.
A boss of Stena Line, which runs the port, gave evidence to a Welsh Parliament committee and said berths were designed to "take contact but very slow-speed contact"."These contacts, maybe of a different magnitude, happen all the time," Stena's head of UK Ports Ian Davies told the Senedd's Economy and Trade Committee.The port or ferry companies say they would not elaborate on how these specific contacts closed the port despite both the Welsh and UK governments asking."Those incidents are now subject to an insurance claim and I can give no further details without prejudicing that insurance claims at this time I'm afraid," Mr Davies told the UK Parliament's Welsh Affairs Committee earlier this year.Committee chair Ruth Jones MP replied: "That is very frustrating for us but, obviously, we understand where you are coming from." When Mr Davies was before the Welsh Parliament's economy committee, he was asked by chair Andrew RT Davies was it "not necessarily the storm caused the damage, but the actual seamanship?"Mr Davies replied to the Senedd committee: "All we can say is there's an ongoing investigation into the actual cause, and part of that is a claim going on."
Ferries that use Holyhead include the 50,000-tonnes Ulysses, which was the world's largest car ferry when it launched in 2000.Holyhead's terminal five reopened on 16 January and the port has been able to operate its normal daily number of sailings - eight arrivals and eight departures.But to accommodate that, both Irish Ferries and Stena Line had to adjust their timetables to synchronise arrivals and departures at the only operational berth.Stena told the Senedd the damage had happened to part of terminal three, which is "predominantly" used by Irish Ferries.Neither the port operators or the ferry companies would confirm who was taking action against whom. Both Stena Line and Irish Ferries have both declined to comment.The berthing incidents happened during Storm Darragh - but before the red weather warning for wind kicked in at 03:00 GMT on 7 December.According to Met Office data, three of the UK's five strongest gusts during Storm Darragh were in north Wales.That included wind speeds of 79mph (127km/h) at Valley - about eight miles (13km) inland from Holyhead - which is the highest recorded gust on Anglesey for 27 years.
The Health and Safety Executive did not investigate the incidents, while the Marine Accident Investigation Branch made some "preliminary enquiries" into the "maritime aspects" of the crash.But added in a statement: "The information gathered does not indicate any significant safety issues that would necessitate further investigation at this time."Mr Davies said there was a "onward-going investigation" about the incidents and the port and ferry operators would review what happened once Holyhead was fully reopened.
Why has it taken so long to fully reopen Holyhead?
Seven months may seem like a long time without half of its berthing capacity but port bosses explained replacing Holyhead's damaged infrastructure was complex."The berths are a series of very large steel pile structures... roughly 2m (6ft 7in) in diameter and 50m (164 ft 1in) in total length and driven into the seabed," Mr Davies of Stena explained in his Senedd evidence.
He said the affected structure on terminal three "partially collapsed and had fallen at an angle" so engineers needed to charter specialist barges to get to the site and remove the fallen 120-tonne pile.Stena needed to design, order, check and fit their new pile and its associated mechanisms."It was hoped we could replace the pile in the same pile socket, like replacing a false tooth, but that was not possible," added Mr Davis.Engineers have had to drive the new pile into the sea bed and test before declaring the berth ready for passenger ferries."To be frank, seven months is a short amount of time," said maritime expert Dr Stavros Karamperidis.
"The analogy is having a car accident, insurance companies investigate and might offer money, the other company might dispute that and it goes back and forth."I'm sure the authorities have all the information but you can't give that publicly," added Dr Karamperidis, head of Plymouth University's maritime transport research group.
How important is Holyhead Port?
At just over 100 miles (161km) between Holyhead and Dublin, the three-hour and 15 minute crossing from north Wales is the quickest route between the UK mainland and the Republic of Ireland.With more than 400,000 lorries and 400,000 cars a year using it every year, Holyhead is the second busiest passenger ferry port to Dover.It is Wales' biggest international transport hub with almost double the amount of annual passengers of Wales' only major airport in Cardiff.
"It is one of the large corridors that connects Wales and the UK to Ireland because of the shortness and frequency of the crossing," Mr Davies told Parliament."It adds a dynamic, especially to the just-in-time logistics industry, which perhaps other corridors do not have. I cannot overemphasise how important it is. It is critical."He added night ferries could create freight lorry convoys of up to three miles (5km) long, such is the strategic importance to both the UK and Republic of Ireland."Holyhead is a huge economic driver for us here in Ireland because so much of our exports by sea go through Holyhead into the UK," said Irish government Minister Sean Canney.
He said more than a third of roll-on, roll-off traffic traffic to the Republic of Ireland came through Holyhead, emphasising the importance part of another country is to his nation."Both countries rely on Holyhead for stuff coming in and out between the UK and Ireland, it's a huge vein across the Irish Sea," added Canney.Experts estimate the economic impact of Holyhead Port and its supply chain in north Wales is more than £100m a year with 1,000 jobs locally relying on it.
Bangor University's senior economics lecturer Edward Jones also told Parliament an "additional 1,600 to 1,700 jobs at a national level is dependent" on Holyhead.A Senedd Committee heard in April the value of trade going through Holyhead during the complete closure was almost £500m less than the year before.Both the Welsh and Irish government also hoped everyone involved could "learn lessons" on how they react to incidents like this.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
15 minutes ago
- The Independent
Liverpool complete signing of Hugo Ekitike after seeing off late Man United interest
The Frenchman, whose fee could rise to £79m depending on bonuses, has signed a six-year contract at Anfield after passing a medical. Liverpool saw off late interest from Manchester United for the 23-year-old, while Newcastle had offered £70m for Ekitike, which Eintracht rejected. The former Paris Saint-Germain forward, who told United he had no interest in joining them when director of recruitment Christopher Vivell contacted Frankfurt, was a long-term target for Liverpool, who had been in contact with his representatives for six months, while Arne Slot spoke to him at the end of the season. Ekitike becomes Liverpool's fourth major summer signing and takes their spending to £250m – and up to £300m, including potential add-ons and the deal for Giorgi Mamardashvili, which was sealed last summer. and full-backs Milos Kerez and Jeremie Frimpong. Liverpool had also made an inquiry for Alexander Isak, who Newcastle did not want to sell, but believe they were pursuing Ekitike before the Carabao Cup winners turned to him after failing in attempts to sign Liam Delap and Joao Pedro, who both joined Chelsea instead. But they were reluctant to get involved in an auction and waited before making a late move, as they had when they took the Tottenham target Luis Diaz from Porto in 2022. Liverpool see Ekitike as a multi-functional forward who, though largely a No 9, can also play in deeper and wider roles and think that only Erling Haaland and Kylian Mbappe have shown more potential among strikers of such age. Ekitike scored 22 goals for Eintracht last season, though Liverpool believe his impact was greater than that and he has the potential to become more prolific.


Daily Mail
15 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Liverpool confirm £79m signing of striker Hugo Ekitike as Reds' summer spending passes £290MILLION
Liverpool have confirmed the £79million signing of striker Hugo Ekitike. The Eintracht Frankfurt No 9 is expected to join up with the squad in Hong Kong in the next 48 hours for training sessions but is unlikely to play in Saturday's fixture against AC Milan. Ekitike, 23, joins on a six-year contract and has been on Liverpool's radar for some years, with Mail Sport first revealing in March that he was a top target. Liverpool have been in contact with Ekitike since January and Arne Slot informed the Frenchman of his intention to sign him at the end of the season just gone. The Reds' data tests showed that no one other than Erling Haaland and Kylian Mbappe scored higher in their data tests for No 9s. Slot's men do see him as a central striker but acknowledge that he can play off the wings too. The package is a £69m base fee plus £10m in add-ons which are based on team and player performance. The Frenchman has joined on a six-year deal and underwent his medical on Tuesday. Sporting director Richard Hughes has remained in the UK for now to finalise this transfer after Arne Slot's squad departed for the Far East on Sunday night after beating Stoke 5-0 in a behind-closed-doors game at the AXA Training Base in Kirkby. The champions played two different starting line-ups before and after half-time and Florian Wirtz, the club record addition, got his first competitive action for the club following his £116million move from Bayer Leverkusen. The likes of Jeremine Frimpong, Milos Kerkez and Giorgi Mamardashvili have also featured, having joined for £29.5m, £40m and £29m respectively. Those four signings have taken the Reds' summer spending past £290m as they continue to splash the cash and look to improve on a season that saw them become Premier League champions for a second time. Last week, Newcastle had an offer of £70m rejected for Ekitike, which fell £16m short of his release clause. Liverpool have also been linked with a move for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak but that move remains in question, especially after the major outplay for the France Under 21 international. Last season Ekitike scored 22 goals in 48 games for Frankfurt in all competitions, with 15 of those strikes coming in the Bundesliga. He was also named in the Bundesliga team of the season following a hugely impressive campaign. Ekitike was previously at Paris Saint-Germain, initially on loan from Reims before joining permanently. However, he only made 33 appearances for PSG in total and scored four goals. Liverpool have already been heavily active in the transfer market this summer, with several familiar faces leaving Anfield in a summer of churn. Trent Alexander-Arnold joined Real Madrid, while Jarell Quansah signed for Bayer Leverkusen and Caoimhin Kelleher made the switch to Brentford. The Reds are also expected to sell a number of stars before the window closes, with the likes of Darwin Nunez, Luis Diaz and Harvey Elliot all heavily linked with moves away.


Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Wise's U.S. move proposals face fresh opposition from shareholder advisers
July 23 (Reuters) - A shareholder adviser group, Glass Lewis, expressed new concerns about UK-based money transfer company Wise's plans to change its primary listing to the U.S., just days before a shareholder meeting, and another adviser, PIRC, said that it opposed the plans. In a statement made public on Monday, Wise's (WISEa.L), opens new tab second-biggest shareholder, Skaala Investments, urged other shareholders to vote against proposals to move the company's primary listing to the U.S. from London, because the plans also included an extension to its dual share structure, which it said was "buried" in the proposals. On Tuesday, shareholder adviser Glass Lewis updated its report in light of Skaala's statement, and added its own concerns about the proposed extension of the dual share structure, according to a copy of the report seen by Reuters. Glass Lewis said in its report that share structures with unequal voting rights are "typically not in the best interests of common shareholders" and that it was "concerned" by the structure being extended. But, it said, the governance issue alone was not enough for it to recommend voting against Wise's U.S. move proposal overall, which it still supported. Skaala had said that the changes to the shareholder structure would entrench "disproportionate power in the hands of a few", including Wise's CEO. A spokesperson for Wise said on Monday that shareholders were "overwhelmingly in favour" of the proposal and that its process was fair. Wise cited the backing of proxy advisors including ISS, Glass Lewis and PIRC, and said that the dual-class share structure is essential for the company's success. On Wednesday, a spokesperson for PIRC said that Wise's statement was incorrect, and that it had expressed its opposition to Wise's plans in a report on July 15. PIRC's report recommends voting against the proposals, on the grounds that the move "raises concerns about a reduced commitment to UK corporate governance standards." "UK listing regime offers strong shareholder protections, disclosure requirements, and board accountability. Relocating to jurisdictions with less stringent oversight may weaken these safeguards," said PIRC's report, which was seen by Reuters. A spokesperson for Wise said that the company only became aware of PIRC's opposition on Wednesday, and that it maintains that shareholders are still "overwhelmingly in favour" of the plans. ISS did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Shareholders are voting on the issue ahead of a meeting on Monday 28 July.