Glasgow pushes forward with plan for Clyde Tunnel tolls for drivers who don't live in city
Glasgow is pushing forward with a controversial plan to charge drivers who don't live in the city to use the Clyde Tunnel.
Council chiefs are frustrated the cash-strapped local authority has to pay for the upkeep of the underwater crossing as it is not classed as being part of the national road network.
The tunnel is not a designated A road which means Transport Scotland has no responsibility for its management.
Councillors have now been told a regulatory check must be carried out before a toll scheme for non-city residents can be introduced - but that's unlikely to be completed before the next Scottish Parliament election in May.
Glasgow is run by a minority SNP administration with support from the Scottish Greens. But there is unhappiness among Nationalists in the city at Holyrood's refusal to help with the rising cost of maintaining the tunnel.
Funding received for the tunnel's operation and maintenance is the same amount per kilometre as for a standard stretch of road, which it has been estimated leads to an annual shortfall of around £820,000.
Councillor Angus Millar told a recent full council meeting: "The council has no specific proposals to introduce any road user charging in Glasgow.
"However, members will be aware that the council has repeatedly stated its interest in further exploring possibilities around a boundary congestion charge and potential tolling at the Clyde Tunnel – both with exemptions for Glasgow residents."
The council's transport convenor added: "Council officers continue to engage with Transport Scotland and COSLA, particularly in relation to national commitments to reduce car vehicle mileage and the potential roll out of road user charging as a travel demand management tool.
"Transport Scotland has expressed interest in Glasgow and Edinburgh taking a lead role in exploring road user charging and we anticipate further discussions with City of Edinburgh Council in establishing their interest."
The SNP councillor continued: 'We welcome the recent commitment from Transport Scotland and the Scottish Government to undertake legislative and regulatory review to establish how the process can be clarified for local authorities to take forward and this is a matter I have engaged with officials and other councils on via COSLA.'
He added: 'We will engage in the coming legislative review to ensure Glasgow is well positioned to consider any developments.'
Councillor Ricky Bell previously told the Record he wanted the Scottish Government "to adopt the tunnel into their national portfolio".
The City Treasurer said: "The Clyde Tunnel is a piece of national infrastructure in every sense, other than how it is paid for. It is maintained by Glasgow's council taxpayers – regardless of whether they can even drive, let alone use the tunnel.
"Despite our efforts to lobby the Scottish Government to adopt the tunnel into their national portfolio, we have been unsuccessful so far. Consequently, we must explore all possible funding options to maintain the services relied upon by hundreds of thousands of Glaswegians and others."
But critics of the idea have branded it a "tunnel tax" and claimed it would be unfair on drivers from across the west of Scotland.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
an hour ago
- Daily Record
Disabled people being left in limbo following 'chaotic' Commons vote on welfare reforms claims Lanarkshire MSP
The Bill initially proposed to slash eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP Motherwell and Wishaw's MSP slammed Labour MPs for showing 'appalling disregard for sick and disabled people' following a 'chaotic' night in the House of Commons prior to the vote on the Bill for welfare reforms. The SNP's Clare Adamson claims that the Westminster chaos over Labour's proposed Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill was the result of dismissing disabled people. The Bill initially proposed to slash eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a move which the government's own analysis showed that 800,000 people would lose support by the end of the decade. After months of backlash from disability and anti-poverty groups, an eleventh-hour change to the bill threw the vote into 'chaos and confusion', and resulted in The UK Government promising a review of PIP to be concluded by autumn 2026, which Ms Adamson says is leaving disabled people in limbo. A revolt by Labour MPs led to 49 of them voting against the motion but that number would have been far higher but for the government making a number of eleventh-hour adjustments to gain support for the Bill. SNP MPs voted against the plans, but only four Labour MPs out of 37 in Scotland eventually voted against the watered-down Bill following a five-hour debate in the House of Commons. Pamela Nash, MP for Motherwell, Wishaw and Carluke, who previously criticised the Tories when they were in government over cuts to disability support, was among those to vote in favour of the Bill. According to the DWP's own figures the undiluted plans would have driven 250,000 people – including 50,000 children – into poverty. The bill had initially proposed to slash eligibility for Personal Independence Payment (PIP), a move which the government's own analysis showed 800,000 people would lose support by the end of the decade. The Scottish Government committed to shield disabled people from Labour cuts by protecting the Adult Disability Payment, Scotland's equivalent of PIP, from any reductions. Adamson has pointed out that any Labour cuts would have a knock-on impact on Scotland's budget. Ms Adamson said: 'Labour has shown an appalling disregard for sick and disabled people whose lives will be affected by their plans. I cannot imagine how it felt for a disabled person to watch as their life and livelihood was bartered in real time. 'Shame on the Scottish Labour MPs who did nothing, those who backed the Bill when it would push 250,000 people in poverty, those who backed the 'deal' which would push 150,000 into poverty and create a two-tiered system. 'And then those who sat on their hands amidst the chaos last night. Chaos which was the direct result of Labour's refusal to meaningfully engage with disability groups; the people who said these plans were wrong from the start. 'The SNP Scottish Government confirmed that Scotland would not follow Labour's lead and would protect Adult Disability Payments. But the message being sent at Westminster matters - as do the spending implications for Scotland. 'These changes were going to be made before a review even took place. That is no way to run a country. Keir Starmer rushed through a deal in order to save his skin. It's indefensible. 'This saga has been characterised by cruelty, at worst, and indifference at best, for the real people affected. Sick and disabled people have been sidelined and now Labour MPs have voted to continue the uncertainty. 'It's time for meaningful engagement with the people affected by these proposals. That should have been done in the first place. This Labour administration is unfit to govern and Scottish Labour MPs showed they are not at the decision table. 'The SNP will always stand up for Scotland. And with the limited powers available to the Scottish Parliament, we will protect sick and disabled people in Motherwell and Wishaw, and across the country. But we need independence to be free of this for good.' *Don't miss the latest headlines from around Lanarkshire. Sign up to our newsletters here.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
SNP MP warns of authoritarian slippery slope after Palestine Action vo
The Terrorism Act 2000 (Proscribed Organisations) (Amendment) Order 2025 is now expected to be debated and voted on by the House of Lords on Thursday before it becomes law. The SNP and the LibDems abstained, while 87 Tories and 275 Labour MPs supported the effort. READ MORE: MPs' 'hypocrisy' blasted as Suffragettes celebrated while Palestine Action banned Questions had been raised as to why the SNP abstained, to which MP Brendan O'Hara responded to in an opinion piece for The National. He said that the SNP did not want to be seen to vote against proscribing other the three other groups in the vote: the "Maniacs Murder Cult", a Moldovan neo-Nazi group, the Russian Imperial Movement – a far-right group aiming to rebuild the Russian Empire – and its paramilitary wing the Russian Imperial Legion. He wrote: "Despite being asked, the UK government, in a disgraceful, cynical, manipulation of parliamentary procedure, refused to separate these groups and allow MPs to make individual decisions on whether each of them met the threshold for proscription – forcing an all or nothing vote. "And that decision to lump all three groups together in the way that they did should lead any reasonable person to conclude that this was a grubby political decision to proscribe a group that the government simply don't like, and not what the government claim was an issue of vital national security."
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
SNP talk about indy in the abstract, not as an urgent national goal
What we're seeing is a slow, painful truth settling in: independence is dead in the water, not because the people have abandoned it, but because the leadership has. We've had every kind of democratic mandate imaginable, and nothing has changed. The SNP continue to speak about independence in abstract terms, like it's an aspiration for the distant future – never an urgent national goal. We're told to believe that a plebiscite election will be the turning point, but let's be honest: it won't. Westminster has already said it won't recognise the result. And without negotiation, nothing is transferred – not powers, not pensions, not currency, not sovereignty. READ MORE: Lesley Riddoch: Zohran Mamdani is showing how a progressive left vision can succeed Meanwhile, groups like Salvo are pushing for international legal recognition through the UN decolonisation route – doing serious, credible work. But the SNP doesn't support it, and most Scots have never even heard of it, because the broader movement – and yes, the media, including The National – continues to centre all attention on party politics while ignoring the more radical, lawful options right under our noses. Why am I writing now? Because I don't want to sit and watch this movement bleed out while we pretend everything's fine. Because I see people in your comments – angry, frustrated, calling for leadership – and I want to say: stop waiting for someone to save us. If the SNP won't lead, then the people must. We need to start building what Westminster refuses to give — a shadow infrastructure. A people's assembly, built by the movement, not party bosses. Independent Scottish media that breaks free from the BBC's framing. Local civic resistance to defend Holyrood powers and disrupt hostile Westminster laws. A national campaign to elevate Scotland's case at the UN – with billboards, street action, and international allies behind us. None of that needs permission. READ MORE: Scotch whisky wins protected status in Argentina in 'global first' We've been trained to think independence only comes after Westminster agrees. That's not how freedom works. Real independence movements create a crisis of legitimacy, not a paper trail of unanswered requests. The SNP's time as leader of this movement is up unless they change course – fast. Their job was to carry the torch. They've dropped it. We either pick it up and light the way ourselves, or we let the fire die for good. To The National, I say this: be bolder. Cover the people who are building. Don't just react to the party line – help us redefine it. This paper should be the voice of a living movement, not just a waiting room for the next SNP press release. To your readers: stop waiting for the next election. It's not coming. We are. James Murphy Bute THE latest Labour government fiasco concerning the welfare bill would suggest they have forgotten their roots. They have attacked the most vulnerable in society. In recent years we have all come through two seismic events – Brexit and the pandemic – which have impacted so negatively on our communities. Karl Marx many years ago suggested that each time there were such seismic changes, the impact of the change hugely increased the number of vulnerable people that get left behind. We are witnessing this now and at the same time the gap between rich and poor is increasing, ie the rich are continually getting richer! READ MORE: Rachel Reeves breaks silence on crying in the Commons It is abhorrent that Labour support the idea of making savings from welfare benefits – all part of the mythical trickle-down economy that does not work! Unbelievable that Labour should ignore the gravy train of: the Lords, the royals, the billionaires and millionaires, the corporate tax evaders and avoiders. All of them wheel and deal at the expense of thee and me! Labour ignored the money men and went for the vulnerable who are struggling week to week. Thankfully in Scotland our SNP government fight every day for all folks in Scotland, and that's with one hand tied behind their back. Labour offer Scotland nothing – there is no interest, empathy or connection towards us. Our choice in 2026 is to embrace independence or continue to be at the mercy of a Westminster government that regards Scotland as a region 'up north'. John Swinney must be courageous and make independence centre stage of the SNP manifesto and in each and every future policy. Jan Ferrie Ayrshire WE all witnessed a government in crisis in the House of Commons on Tuesday. In the midst of the debate on welfare reforms the government suddenly crashed, pulling the plug on parts of their proposals. Quite incredible. However, the plug was not pulled in an effort to support the disabled and vulnerable, it was pulled to stave off a government defeat by the Labour rebels. Shame on Labour. Catriona C Clark Falkirk REGARDING 'Poverty levels in Scotland track below UK' (Jun 30); that's all well and good, but if we had a citizens' income (long advocated by the Greens), poverty would be virtually ended. It should, however, be funded from publicly created site values (mainly due to infrastructure investment) and not from working people. The Scottish Government has the power to recover these values, and was even urged by a Holyrood committee to do so, back in 2021. Why hasn't it done so? George Morton Rosyth
