
Inside the shadowy, lucrative business of ‘superfake' luxury handbags
'As I was walking through the restaurant she stopped me and said, 'I love your bag, it's the perfect size. It probably cost you a fortune.'"
When the woman asked if he would consider an offer for it, Walkup, a TikTok influencer, leveled with her: 'Ma'am, the bag is a fake." The woman was surprised at how convincing the Birkin was and asked where she could buy one for herself. So he gave her the details of a private dealer who sells top-notch fakes.
Counterfeiters have perfected the knockoff handbag—and it is disrupting the economics of the luxury industry. Fake purses have always been around, but they were the cheap and plasticky kind that could be picked up for a few bucks from a sidewalk seller.
A new generation of 'superfakes," as they are known in the industry, look as good as the real thing and cost anywhere from $500 to $5,000. Counterfeiters take your order through encrypted services such as WhatsApp or Telegram, give real-time customer service and deliver the goods straight to your door in a branded box.
They pay social-media influencers to promote illicit goods directly to American and European consumers. The technique is proving so good at sanitizing counterfeiters' shady image that the language used to talk about the bags is changing. The word 'fake" isn't used anymore. Instead, fans call the purses replicas, mirror bags, superclones or 1:1s ('one to ones").
In a red flag for luxury brands, young shoppers are embracing the superfakes. A social-media storm erupted in April when Chinese counterfeiters posted videos claiming that major luxury brands are secretly manufacturing their handbags for next to nothing in China. In most cases, the claims made in the videos are bogus.
But the posts reinforced doubts in the minds of Gen Z consumers about the industry's steep markups and whether people who buy genuine luxury goods are getting a raw deal. Popular handbags such as a Lady Dior sell for up to 15 times what they cost to manufacture, according to Bernstein, a brokerage.
Buying a replica is becoming a way 'to give big brands the middle finger," says Marian Makkar, a luxury marketing expert based in Australia who has researched the superfake phenomenon.
There are early signs that young shoppers' cooling attitude toward authentic luxury is hitting the industry's top line. Last year, Gen Z shoppers spent roughly $5 billion less on luxury brands than they did in 2023, data from consulting firm Bain & Co. shows. This might simply be a sign they are feeling pinched by rising bills, or that they are defecting to fakes in high numbers.
The attitude shift about superfakes is a gift to counterfeiters who now market their goods as a financially savvy alternative to overpriced luxury brands: Why pay $11,000 for an authentic Chanel classic flap purse when you can get a near-identical $600 replica from a Chinese factory that claims to source its leather from the same European supplier as the Parisian brand?
People in the secondhand-luxury business first noticed a new strain of counterfeits around five years ago. Some of the superfake handbags were so good that they couldn't be spotted with the naked eye.
Luxury resale website Fashionphile has a counterfeit Louis Vuitton handbag on display alongside a real one at its New York flagship store—an 'authenticity challenge" to see if shoppers can spot the real from the fake. The company's founder Sarah Davis says people who work as sales assistants for top luxury brands haven't been able to tell the bags apart.
Rival reseller The RealReal had to invest in XRF technology to test the metal composition of handbags' buckles to spot the new fakes. The company also bought X-ray machines to examine their innards. Counterfeiters have perfected the outside of the bags, but might still leave a trace on the inside, according to Hunter Thompson, director of authentication at The RealReal. 'It could be a tiny detail such as how a nail head is hammered in."
Anticounterfeit professionals have theories about how the fakes got so good. One is industrial theft. Luxury brands store the instructions about how to make authentic handbags on digital templates known as tech packs.
These master manuals contain an excel spreadsheet with the purse's exact measurements, a technical drawing, details of the threads, trimmings and leather used, and even the precise number of stitches per seam. If a brand's tech pack falls into the wrong hands, counterfeiters can easily make a carbon copy. The risk that this information leaks out of a factory has risen as brands outsource more production.
Counterfeiters also try to poach workers from genuine factories to get inside knowledge. People who stitch luxury handbags for a living earn a decent but not extravagant wage, so might have their head turned by an offer from an illicit manufacturer.
Hermès pays its France-based handbag artisans the equivalent of $40,000 a year including bonus payouts, based on Glass Door salary reviews. That is less than what the brand charges its U.S. customers for a single crocodile Birkin handbag. Some of the company's former employees were convicted in 2020 for running a counterfeit ring outside their day job.
Most fakes are still made the old-fashioned way: A counterfeiter buys an authentic bag, rips it apart to see how it's made and then reverse engineers a fake.
The best superfake purses are often produced in factories in China that run legitimate businesses for mass-market fashion retailers during the day, according to James Godefroy, a Guangzhou-based investigator with brand-protection agency Rouse. By night, a ghost shift produces knockoffs.
Counterfeiters boost demand by paying social-media personalities to review fake handbags. The feed of one Instagram account, @davidslifestyle, is full of videos of counterfeit unboxings. Followers can click a link to the influencer's direct.me page, where they will find affiliate links to more than 150 fake goods including Louis Vuitton Neverfull totes and Hermès Birkin bags.
The links lead to a Hong Kong-based website called Save Bullet. The influencer earns 10% from any sale his videos generate, based on information about Save Bullet's affiliate program. So in the case of a $789 fake yellow Hermès Birkin, the influencer pockets nearly $80 for every bag his followers order.
@davidslifestyle said that he reviewed real as well as replica luxury goods on his channel, and bought authentic products until a year-and-a-half ago, when he felt the quality went down.
Counterfeiters' new online-distribution model is a nightmare for luxury brands. Fake handbags once arrived at customs ports in big shipments, making them easier to intercept. Now that counterfeiters sell directly to consumers, a tide of individual packages is overwhelming customs authorities and slipping past checks.
Luxury brands pay private investigators to gather information about what counterfeiters are up to. They open fake accounts on online forums where counterfeiters do business and go undercover in factories.
Investigators like to watch a freewheeling Reddit community called RepladiesDesigner that has over 200,000 members. Fans of the fake bags share China or Hong Kong-based WhatsApp numbers for recommended sellers and post photos of their latest purchases. Reddit said in a statement that it may ban any subreddit where it is clear the community is 'dedicated to violative content."
Counterfeiters are moving to private Instagram or invite-only Telegram groups that are harder for luxury brands to track. 'It is like joining a golf club now," says Jak Cluness, vice president of intelligence and investigations at brand-protection company Corsearch. 'You have to be recommended by another member to get in." He is tracking a WhatsApp group that uses a subscription-based model charging members $98 a month to get access to the best-quality fakes.
A counterfeit dealer who goes by Heidi said in a text interview that she works for several factories that each specialize in a different brand. A fake Hermès Birkin 25 in Togo leather from a place she called the Hidden Star factory will set you back $1,800. Prices for counterfeit Birkins in exotic skins such as crocodile start at $4,000 compared with more than $50,000 for the genuine bag.
For a counterfeit Chanel classic flap purse, the seller recommended the 187 Factory. Its $575 fakes have proven so popular that there are even 'fake" 187 superfakes. Rival counterfeiters pose as the factory but send an inferior knockoff.
Online sellers are usually freelance operators who reel in customers with details such as the accuracy of the stitching and whether the seams line up properly, according to Cluness. They even send quality-control videos of the counterfeits to make sure the shopper is satisfied with their bag before it ships. A busy freelance seller can make anywhere from $5,000 to $20,000 a month in commission.
Counterfeit factories also make fat profits. A top-quality fake costs around $150 to produce in China, including labor and materials. Operating margins can be 50% or higher if the factory handles its own sales directly. Genuine luxury brands are lucky to make a 40% operating margin on handbags, as they have to spend on fancy stores, living wages and multibillion-dollar advertising budgets.
A Guangzhou-based counterfeit factory owner who goes by the surname Li says he makes a profit of $450 per fake Hermès bag, and sells roughly three hundred a month. He recently spent more than $70,000 to acquire three genuine purses as templates—a Birkin 30 bag, a Mini Kelly II, and a Himalayan Birkin 25. He is disassembling them on a cutting table to create patterns for fakes.
He calls people who pay full price for genuine luxury goods 'stupid and vain." His own customers can be high-maintenance. 'A person who buys a knockoff is often very thin-skinned and very nitpicky," he said.
Brands sometimes see counterfeits as a gateway drug that will eventually lead shoppers to buy the genuine article. Briege Elder, a London-based PR manager with Hunt & Gather agency who used to work as a sales assistant at Louis Vuitton and Gucci, said people regularly came to the brands' stores carrying fake handbags.
It was an unspoken rule not to call out a knockoff. 'We would never address a fake product, ever. Not if it was the worst fake in the world or the best." People carrying a fake were treated as aspiring customers. 'They have a counterfeit today, but they might become a customer in future," Elder says.
Brands' relatively small anticounterfeit budgets suggest they aren't yet seriously worried about the superfake phenomenon. LVMH, the biggest luxury company in the world, spent more than $11 billion on advertising last year but only $45 million on anticounterfeit efforts. That seems skimpy. Superfakes counterfeiters are becoming real competitors.
Write to Carol Ryan at carol.ryan@wsj.com Produced by Alexandra Citrin-Safadi
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Blood on campus: ‘Kon hain, kya karlega tu?' Screenshots of murder accused's chats go viral
1 2 3 4 5 Ahmedabad: Screenshots of WhatsApp chats between the accused in the murder of Class 10 student Nayan Satani and his friend have gone viral on social media, shedding light on the aftermath of the crime. In the chats, written in Hindi but typed in English, the accused allegedly admitted to stabbing Nayan. When asked by his friend if he had attacked the victim with a knife, the accused replied, "Haan to" (yes, so). He also identified the victim by name. One of the chats reportedly showed the accused saying, "Are meko bolra tha ki kon hain kya karlega tu" (he was saying who are you, what will you do). The friend, in response, abused him and told him he should not have attacked Nayan with a knife. You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad | Gold Rates Today in Ahmedabad | Silver Rates Today in Ahmedabad Nearly six screenshots of the exchanges have circulated widely. In the messages, the friend advises the accused to delete the chats and go underground, saying, "Jo hua so hua" (whatever has happened, has happened). Police are examining the authenticity of the viral chats as part of their ongoing investigation into the case. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
MNC exec loses Rs 1.6 cr in online stock trading scam
Hyderabad: A 45-year-old senior executive working for an MNC in the city lost 1.6 crore in an online stock trading scam. The victim, a resident of Khajaguda, is working as a director of finance at the company. In her complaint, the victim alleged that on June 7, she received a WhatsApp message from an individual who introduced himself as Abhishek Ummat, a financial assistant, claiming to deliver high returns through intraday trading. On his advice, she joined a WhatsApp group titled 'B13 ASBPL VIP ELITE COMMUNITY'. She clicked a weblink shared by the fraudster and installed an app on her iPhone, which resembled a genuine brokerage company's interface. "The app displayed real-time market feeds, customer-service icons, and posts by investors. On the WhatsApp group, members often posted messages celebrating hefty profits," the victim claimed. Convinced by its 'authenticity', the victim first transferred 50,000 on June 10, followed by another 4.5 lakh over the next three days. On June 16, the fraudsters credited a little over 76,000 into the victim's account to build her trust. Between June 16 and July 3, she went on to transfer an additional 42.6 lakh. As the fake app showed her total earnings as 22 crore, she continued investing and, until Aug 7, transferred about 1.2 crore through RTGS and IMPS into multiple accounts shared by the fraudsters. You Can Also Check: Hyderabad AQI | Weather in Hyderabad | Bank Holidays in Hyderabad | Public Holidays in Hyderabad | Gold Rates Today in Hyderabad | Silver Rates Today in Hyderabad When she tried to withdraw funds, the accused demanded 30 lakh as processing fees. Suspecting foul play, she cross-checked the details of the app and discovered she had been duped. Cyberabad police registered a case under Sections 318(4) (cheating and dishonestly inducing delivery of property), 319(2) (cheating by personation), 336(3) (forgery for purpose of cheating), 338 (forgery of valuable security, will, etc.), and 340(2) (using as genuine a forged document or electronic record) read with 3(5) (common intention) of the BNS, besides Section 66-D of the IT Act. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.


Economic Times
2 hours ago
- Economic Times
Who was Jean Pormanove? The eerie tale of a French streamer's collapse after days of live humiliation
French streamer Jean Pormanove's death during a 10-day livestream has sparked a criminal probe and national outrage French authorities have launched a criminal investigation into the death of livestreamer Raphaël Graven, better known by his online name Jean Pormanove, after the 46-year-old collapsed and died during a marathon broadcast in an extended livestream on Kick. Graven, who lived in the village of Contes near Nice, had built an audience of more than one million followers across platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, and Kick. His streams, often featuring extreme endurance challenges, attracted both fascination and controversy. Graven died on August 18 during a live stream that had stretched on for more than 10 days. Local media, including BFMTV, reported he had been subjected to repeated bouts of humiliation, physical violence, and sleep deprivation by other participants in the broadcast. At one point, the stream showed attempts to wake him before abruptly cutting prosecutors confirmed an autopsy has been ordered and that a judicial investigation is underway. The Nice prosecutor's office said it is examining whether 'deliberate violent acts' were committed against a vulnerable person, a line of inquiry that had already been under review for months after French outlet Mediapart documented similar abusive broadcasts. The death has provoked widespread outrage in France. Clara Chappaz, the French minister delegate for artificial intelligence and digital affairs, called the case an 'absolute horror.' She said Graven had been 'humiliated and mistreated for months live on the Kick platform' and emphasized that platforms are legally accountable for failing to stop illegal El Haïry, France's High Commissioner for Children, described the streamer's death as 'horrifying', warning parents to remain vigilant and urging platforms to prevent young audiences from being exposed to violent have also referred the case to Arcom, the French media regulator, and Pharos, the government system for reporting harmful online the streaming platform where the fatal broadcast took place, said it was 'urgently reviewing' the circumstances. In a statement to AFP, the company added: 'We are deeply saddened by the loss of Jeanpormanove and extend our condolences to his family, friends, and community.'The company stressed its community guidelines are designed to protect creators and said it was committed to enforcing them more began streaming several years ago and cultivated a loyal following under the alias Jean Pormanove. His broadcasts frequently pushed boundaries, long-duration challenges, stunts involving physical strain, and collaborations with fellow streamers that often drew criticism for appearing the controversy, he amassed a strong community. On Instagram alone, he had 148,000 followers, while Kick streams regularly reached tens of thousands of live creators, including Owen Cenazandotti, known online as Naruto, paid tribute on Instagram, calling Graven his 'brother, sidekick, [and] partner' and urging the public not to circulate videos showing his final death comes amid increasing scrutiny of livestreaming services, which critics say have struggled to prevent harmful or exploitative content. In France, the case has already triggered political debate about stronger oversight of digital platforms and the need for real-time moderation of abusive streams.