
Smokey Robinson denies claims of sexual assault, attorney says
An attorney for Smokey Robinson on Wednesday called accusations of sexual assault against the Motown legend false and said that the 'You've Really Got a Hold on Me' singer will respond in the coming days.
Four former housekeepers of Robinson's in a lawsuit filed Tuesday accused him of sexually assaulting them, which was alleged to have gone on for years. The lawsuit seeks no less than $50 million in damages.
Robinson's attorney, Christopher Frost, in a statement late Wednesday called the lawsuit "simply an ugly method of trying to extract money from an 85-year-old American icon."
"Through this process we have seen the bizarre theatrics of yesterday's news conference, as the plaintiffs' attorneys outlined vile, false allegations against Mr. and Mrs. Robinson, trying to enlist the public as an unwitting participant in the media circus they are trying to create," Frost said in the statement.
Frost also said that "in time Mr. Robinson will respond in his own words."
The lawsuit filed against Robinson in Los Angeles County Superior Court alleged that the assaults largely occurred at Robinson's home in Chatsworth, a Los Angeles neighborhood in the far northwestern section of the city.
The women who sued are identified in the lawsuit as Jane Does 1-4. Three of them appeared Tuesday at a news conference in Los Angeles wearing masks, and a fourth appeared virtually.
One of their attorneys, John Harris, said at that event that the women 'were Hispanic women employed as housekeepers earning below minimum wage."
"As low-wage workers in vulnerable positions, they lacked the resources and options to protect themselves," Harris said.
The suit alleges that Robinson assaulted one woman at least 23 times from May 2014 to February 2020, often in places in his home without security cameras.
The suit alleges that he assaulted another former employee at least 20 times during the 12 years she worked for him, beginning in 2012. According to the suit, Robinson would force her into his bedroom and perform a 'ritual' of leaving his bathroom naked or nearly naked.
According to the suit, Robinson would then place a towel on his bed so the linens would not be soiled 'for what was about to occur.'
The suit says he subjected two other plaintiffs to the same behavior. One of the former housekeepers worked for Robinson for 13 months, during which, she alleges, he assaulted her at least seven times.
All of the plaintiffs accused Robinson's wife, Frances Robinson, who is also named as a defendant, of perpetuating a hostile work environment by screaming at them and using ethnically pejorative language.
Robinson was a pioneer for Motown Records, founding the vocal group the Miracles in the 1950s and later releasing albums as a solo artist and working as a record executive for the label. He was inducted into the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame in 1987.
Frost, Robinson's lawyer, said they will seek to have the lawsuit dismissed. He also criticized the lawyers for the women over the press conference, saying that they "have reached beyond the bounds of liberties that even lawyers are typically allowed in this context."
"We will have more to say on this matter, as we fiercely defend our clients against these false allegations and work to protect their good names," Frost said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
31 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Inside the BBC Hunting the Whisky Bandits
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... If, like me, you are a whisky fan, you'll no doubt have seen some interesting adverts on social media promising amazing returns on investing in whisky casks. The trading of casks has been around for decades, but it's becoming more common these days as the industry faces one of the biggest boom times. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Many of these cask companies have hit the headlines for being fraudulent. One of the biggest was the case of Casey Alexander, 26, who scammed $13m [£10.4m] out of American pensions, with buyers thinking they were investing in Scotland's lucrative whisky trade. There is no official or published record of the buying and selling of whisky casks and no established legal process for the trade. According to the Scotch Whisky Association (SWA), exports of the drink in 2022 grew by 37 per cent by value to £6.2 billion. The membership organisation, regarded for its work representing the Scotch whisky sector, does not offer advice to private investors. While these fraudulent investments have been sporadically reported, it has taken the BBC's Disclosure programme to showcase just some of the people who have been scammed - as well as confronting some of the businesses doing so. The programme and podcast came out in late March. Last month whisky writer and Keeper of the Quaich Felipe Schrieberg , independent whisky broker, market analyst and consultant Mark Littler - who set up educational tool Protect your Cask last year - and one of the producers on the show, Laurence Cook, hosted an online webinar to discuss how the programme was made and gave their thoughts on what can be done. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nomad_Soul - Mr Schrieberg said there should be little trust in any business advertising sales of whisky casks . He said: 'The way that most of these firms work is they're either selling something that doesn't exist or they're selling something that does exist, but the prospective client or investor is massively overpaying for it.' He added: 'We think that the current wave of what we're seeing is many orders of magnitude larger than the last scammer wave of 25 years ago and it's our opinion, based on what we've seen and researched, that the industry response to the problem has been fairly lacklustre.' Mr Cook, a freelance audio/visual BBC producer, said he was not sure this investigation would be as good as his former work on Donald Trump's golf course in Aberdeen, but then quickly changed his mind once he saw the scale of the problem. He said: 'Sam Poling, who's the reporter on it [the show], gave me a PowerPoint presentation, which detailed just a slither of the findings and just that little kind of amuse bouche was enough to let me know that this world of cask whisky investment fraud and the people behind it was just as mad and just as bad as as any other story that I'd worked on. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'But also it was ongoing. This is not a historical story, this is something that's happening right now. So there was a real public interest angle to this, which was about catching the baddies right, it was about proving that these people are doing what victims were saying that they were doing. 'I think it's probably quite important that this was made by people who could look at whisky as a commodity rather than as something kind of holy - not to characterise people in the industry too much in that direction. But it was useful to look at it as basically a criminal commodity, a thing that you can use to extract money from people.' Mr Cook said many people had been broken in the aftermath of being scammed. He said: 'We found people who hadn't told their families the true scale of the loss. We found people who had contemplated taking their own lives. 'We found people who would talk to us for background conversations, but wouldn't talk on air because of the shame that they felt beyond the financial. And I should say that that nobody that we spoke to could afford to lose money, nobody we spoke to wasn't massively affected by this. But beyond the financial, there are massive massive human costs here, which are also about a lack of trust. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'There are lots of people out there left in the dark as to whether their asset exists or not, or if it ever did or if it sold multiple times and it consumes people's lives. It totally occupies their mind all the time. 'It's a horrendous thing. To be burgled is the invasion of your space, but to be defrauded, there is no locale. It's just all in your head and your heart. There's a lot of people that are really broken by this.' As for what can be done? Mr Schrieberg said the Scotch Whisky Association needs to do more, adding: 'Great whisky relies on honesty, integrity and transparency. The best stories come from this, the reason we fell in love with the industry comes from this. 'The best distilleries work very much valuing these principles and all of a sudden we're seeing something that undermines it on every single one of these fronts. Because the SWA's remit is to protect the values that make Scotch whisky great and therefore keep it as a valuable product held in high esteem around the world, they should be weighing in - that's my opinion. There is a good debate to be had about that, but the industry's got to do more.' Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Independent bottler the Whisky Baron has launched a petition calling on better regulation of the Scotch whisky market. A spokesperson said: 'Despite whiskey being Scotland's national drink and a key part of the UK economy, HMRC have done nothing to protect or regulate the cask industry. 'The Scotch Whisky Association continues to protect and advocate for Scotch as a category, but they have done very little with their position to make tangible changes in the cask market. 'Distilleries are hands-off with the issue and even societies within the whisky world like the Keepers of the Quaich have remained quiet. Tens of millions of pounds of fraud has already been uncovered and as a hands-on trader entrenched within the industry I can assure you we have only scratched the surface. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'Please act now so that we can put an end to this madness. Scotch is a drink of the people and we the people need to protect it from these rogue traders.' In response to whisky investment companies recently going bust, and whisky cask investment in general, a spokesperson for the Scotch Whisky Association said: 'We are aware of the dissolution this week of two companies who deal in personal cask investment. This is obviously of significant concern to those who have invested in these companies, and we are signposting those who have been impacted to the appointed administrators for queries on cask purchases. The Scotch Whisky Association (SWA) is a trade association which represents its members on a range of issues, but we are not involved with, nor do we regulate, the cask investment trade. The SWA is not involved with the companies that have entered administration, and they are not members of the SWA.


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Third teenager arrested over death of 16-year-old
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.


Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Queen Elizabeth's 'bemusing' two-word comment about Archie and Lilibet on final visit
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Prince Harry and Meghan Markle are set to celebrate the fourth birthday of their daughter, Lilibet, with private celebrations expected in her honour. The duo, who exchanged vows in 2018, welcomed their second child on June 4, 2021, making her a younger sibling to six year old Archie. Since opting out of their senior Royal duties in 2020, the Sussex family has made their home across the pond in America. READ MORE - BBC Strictly Come Dancing legend reveals reason she quit show and career change READ MORE - Edinburgh stars as Netflix unveils 'sneak peek' into chilling Frankenstein adaption Just two years into their American life, Harry's grandmother, Queen Elizabeth II, Britain's longest-reigning monarch, passed away at 96. Prince Harry shared insights from his children's "final visit" with the Queen, revealing to the Scottish Daily Express that she appeared "bemused" by the little ones, reports the Mirror. In his tell-all memoir 'Spare', Harry delved into the events surrounding the Queen's funeral and their subsequent return to the US: "For days and days we couldn't stop hugging the children, couldn't let them out of our sight, though I also couldn't stop picturing them with granny, the final visit." (Image: undefined via Getty Images) (Image: undefined via Getty Images) He described how "Archie was making deep, chivalrous bows, his baby sister Lilibet cuddling the monarch's shins." Harry recalled the Queen's reaction, noting she called them the "sweetest children" while seeming "bemused". "She'd expected them to be a bit more... American, I think? Meaning, in her mind, more rambunctious," he concluded. Upon returning home, I was over the moon to resume daily routines like taking the kids to school and reading Giraffes Can't Dance, but memories kept flooding back. King Charles III and Queen Consort Camilla ascended to their new roles after the Queen's passing. It is reported that the Royal couple have had limited interactions with their grandchildren, Archie and Lilibet, meeting the latter only once during the Platinum Jubilee celebrations for Queen Elizabeth II in June 2022. Prince Harry acknowledged the distance between himself and his family in a recent interview. In a conversation with the BBC, the Duke of Sussex expressed his desire to reconcile, stating: "There's no point continuing to fight any more, life is precious." A disagreement over security arrangements led to a rift, with Harry revealing that his father "won't speak to him". Earlier this year, Harry was defeated in a court case relating to the downgrading of his personal security level. Commenting on the verdict, he said: "I'm devastated - not so much as devastated with the loss that I am about the people behind the decision, feeling as though this is okay. Is it a win for them?". "I'm sure there are some people out there, probably most likely the people that wish me harm, W.H.O. consider this a huge win." Prince Harry has chosen not to pursue further legal action, as the judgement has shown that a court victory would be unattainable. He further expressed that the decision has led him to a point where he "can't see a world in which I would bring my wife and children back to the UK at this point".