
Lebanon seizes $2.5M destined for Hezbollah after stopping man at airport in 'unprecedented' bust
"The detainee and the seized funds will be handed over to the investigation division at the General Directorate of General Security," Lebanon's finance ministry said in a statement obtained by Reuters, which cited sources saying that the man had been traveling from Turkey.
"The $2.5 million dollar seizure is unprecedented," David Daoud, a senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital.
"We haven't seen anything like this. Now, this does track though the fact this money is coming in from Turkey, this does track with Israeli claims that Turkey is being used as a conduit by the Iranians to get more funds to Hezbollah," Daoud continued.
"Plausibly, this is one thing that got caught – how many cash transfers are getting through the dragnet?" he also said.
The money the individual was carrying was bound for Hezbollah, which has been weakened recently by Israel's military, sources told Reuters.
"While Hezbollah's military capabilities were significantly reduced during the war, they are now attempting to regain strength and rearm with the assistance of Iran," Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon was quoted by Reuters as telling the U.N. Security Council last month.
There was no immediate reaction from Hezbollah on Friday.
Since the onset of Israel's war against Hamas, the Israel Defense Forces engaged in cross-border skirmishes with Hezbollah – including ground operations on Lebanese soil – until a ceasefire deal was struck late last year.
Former Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah was killed in Lebanon by an Israeli airstrike in September.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
38 minutes ago
- New York Post
Australia will recognize a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Albanese says
Australia will recognize a Palestinian state, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Monday, joining the leaders of France, Britain and Canada in signaling they would do so. His remarks followed weeks of urging from within his Cabinet and from many in Australia to recognize a Palestinian state and amid growing criticism from officials in his government over suffering in Gaza, which Albanese on Monday referred to as a 'humanitarian catastrophe.' Australia's government has also criticized plans announced in recent days by Israeli leader Benjamin Netanyahu for a sweeping new military offensive in Gaza. 4 Australia's Prime Minister Anthony Albanese speaks during a press conference in Canberra on Aug. 11, 2025. AFP via Getty Images Albanese told reporters after a Cabinet meeting Monday that Australia's decision to recognize a Palestinian state will be formalized at the United Nations General Assembly in September. The acknowledgement was 'predicated on commitments Australia has received from the Palestinian Authority,' Albanese said. Those commitments included no role for Hamas in a Palestinian government, demilitarization of Gaza and the holding of elections, he said. 'A two-state solution is humanity's best hope to break the cycle of violence in the Middle East and to bring an end to the conflict, suffering and starvation in Gaza,' Albanese said. 'The situation in Gaza has gone beyond the world's worst fears,' he said. 'The Israeli government continues to defy international law and deny sufficient aid, food and water to desperate people, including children.' Ahead of Albanese's announcement, Netanyahu on Sunday criticized Australia and other European countries that have moved to recognize a Palestinian state. 4 Palestinians wait to get free food in the west of Gaza City, on Aug. 10, 2025. Xinhua/Shutterstock 'To have European countries and Australia march into that rabbit hole … this canard, is disappointing and I think it's actually shameful,' the Israeli leader said. Australia has designated Hamas a terrorist entity and Albanese repeated Monday his government's calls for the group to return Israeli hostages held since Oct. 7, 2023. The Australian leader last week spoke to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, whose authority administers parts of the occupied West Bank, supports a two-state solution and cooperates with Israel on security matters. Abbas has agreed to conditions with Western leaders, including Albanese, as they prepared to recognize a Palestinian state. 4 This picture taken from a position on the Israeli border with the Gaza Strip, shows smoke rising during an Israeli strike on the besieged Palestinian territory on Aug. 10, 2025. AFP via Getty Images 'This is an opportunity to deliver self-determination for the people of Palestine in a way isolates Hamas, disarms it and drives it out of the region once and for all,' Albanese said. He added that Hamas did not support a two-state solution. Nearly 150 of the 193 members of the United Nations have already recognized Palestinian statehood, most of them decades ago. The United States and other Western powers have held off, saying Palestinian statehood should be part of a final agreement resolving the decades-old Middle East conflict. Recognition announcements are largely symbolic and are rejected by Israel. 4 Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu gives a press conference at the Prime minister's office in Jerusalem on Aug. 10, 2025. POOL/AFP via Getty Images A two-state solution would see a state of Palestine created alongside Israel in most or all of the occupied West Bank, the war-ravaged Gaza Strip and annexed east Jerusalem, territories Israel seized in the 1967 Mideast war that the Palestinians want for their state. Albanese dismissed suggestions Monday that the move was solely symbolic. 'This is a practical contribution towards building momentum,' he said. 'This is not Australia acting alone.' Albanese had discussed Australia's decision with the leaders of Britain, France, New Zealand and Japan, he said. He also had a 'long discussion' with Netanyahu this month, he added. In neighboring New Zealand, Foreign Minister Winston Peters said Monday his government 'will carefully weigh up its position' on recognizing a Palestinian state before making a formal decision in September. 'New Zealand has been clear for some time that our recognition of a Palestinian state is a matter of when, not if,' Peters said in a statement.


Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Could Somerville mayoral hopeful Willie Burnley fairly represent Zionist constituents?
Councilor Willie Burnley Jr.'s seat was empty except for a keffiyeh while constituent Daniel Engel spoke at a Somerville City Council meeting on March 27. Courtesy David Lichter Burnley told me he left not to insult Engel but to protect the protesters after council chair Judy Pineda Neufeld threatened to have police remove them if they continued chanting. 'I stood up to use my presence as a city councilor to potentially protect many residents who were expressing their political beliefs,' Burnley said. (According to Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Advertisement To Engel, Burnley's actions epitomized his approach. 'My experience with him has been he wants to pander to his people and doesn't necessarily want to work with anybody who disagrees with him,' Engel said in an interview. Burnley is running for Somerville mayor against incumbent Mayor Katjana Ballantyne and Councilor Jake Wilson in the Sept. 16 preliminary election. Burnley's been compared to New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani. Both are democratic socialists. Both are raising fears among many Jewish, Zionist constituents who worry that amid Advertisement In a recent Burnley said he would implement the ballot question if it passes. Many Jews see the measure as discriminatory against Israel and local businesses with Israeli ties. How broadly it applies would depend on interpretation, but there are concrete impacts. For example, divestment supporters Two photographs of Burnley at pro-Palestinian protests amplify some voters' fears. In one, which Burnley posted on social media, Burnley poses at a Washington, D.C., rally while in the background, someone holds a sign with a Nazi swastika flag next to an Israeli flag. In another, at a 2024 Tufts University encampment, Burnley poses in front of posters reading 'Glory to the martyrs,' 'Zionist tactics were used to kill Eric Garner, George Floyd … ' and other victims of police violence, and a picture of American and Israeli flags on fire. Advertisement Burnley has a right to protest. But those signs are offensive. A swastika represents the Nazi regime that killed 6 million Jews and millions of others. 'Glory to the martyrs' extols political violence, since Islamist terrorist groups Burnley said he didn't create the artwork or know who was holding the swastika sign. He removed the swastika photo from his social media last year, after some people asked him to. But he wouldn't disavow the sentiments. Because some US police officers have He suggested 'martyrs' could refer to 'all people murdered by Israeli genocide,' including children. Burnley said the swastika sign was a 'comparison about two governments' actions, two governments that many … view to have committed a genocide.' (The genocide accusation itself is Anti-Zionism isn't always antisemitism, and Burnley says he's I spoke to nearly a dozen Jewish Somerville residents, including some acquaintances from my time living in the area. Many moved there seeking a liberal, diverse, welcoming community. Now, they feel unwelcome and ostracized. Advertisement Brian Sokol, a Somerville human rights commissioner speaking for himself, said his pro-Israel lawn sign After the Somerville City Council Group members told me they often see anti-Israel graffiti in public spaces. Some expressed discomfort with protests that block access to public places. In a letter to the state's antisemitism commission, Shalom Somerville said an Israeli child had his locker vandalized with pro-Palestinian graffiti his first day at a Somerville public school. Teachers posted pro-Palestinian signs in classrooms, according to Shalom Somerville and a photograph one member emailed me. 'I don't want to live in a community where I have to worry if my mayor or city council will all of a sudden say if you're Israeli, you're not welcome here, or if you work for an Israeli company, you're not welcome here,' resident Bruce Kaplan told me. Elana Bloomfield, a Somerville physician, told me she feels like almost every public city event becomes a platform for pro-Palestinian signs and rallies, and she worries about electing a mayor who encourages that activism. 'It's really hard to live like that. It's not a comfortable environment,' she said. Advertisement I asked Burnley if he could represent Zionist constituents. Burnley said he has neighbors with different political views, and Zionist constituents 'might not always agree with my analysis, my decisions, my approach, but they will always know where I stand.' Somerville residents need to know their mayor will clean graffiti; enforce time, place, and manner restrictions on protests; take harassment seriously; and ensure events are welcoming to all residents, including Jews, Zionists, and Israelis. Voters must decide if they believe Burnley can. Shira Schoenberg can be reached at


Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
The 12-day war with Israel set back more than Iran's nuclear program
Advertisement But you'd be wrong. Bayat, a senior fellow at the 'I am afraid that the war has made the situation of Iranian opposition, which has really big potential support in Iran, worse,' he told me in a recent interview. Other opposition figures, like Advertisement But Bayat represents As one exiled analyst put it, 'You cannot try to save your homeland by standing behind enemy tanks.' Despite his dismay with the attacks, Bayat — an expert on Iran's nuclear program — believes that the Trump and Netanyahu governments are mostly right that Iran's nuclear weapons 'No centrifuge can work right now in Natanz or Fordow,' he said of the machines that turn uranium into the enriched fuel needed for a weapon. 'The shockwaves alone would have put them out of commission, and without electricity the centrifuge will be also damaged. Nothing runs.' He added that he believes a third facility at Isfahan has been effectively destroyed and that the entire program has been set back by several years at least. That assessment, informed by his vast experience and contacts, is Advertisement Bayat notes that although Iran could quickly enrich its stockpile of 60 percent to build a bomb. Turning even highly enriched uranium gas into bomb-ready metal demands complex metallurgical and chemical processes. 'Afterward, the uranium must be shaped carefully to avoid accidental detonation, and sophisticated trigger systems — both conventional explosives and a nuclear neutron source — must be developed and precisely integrated. Finally, the assembled device would need to be tested and made deliverable,' he explains. Yet for all its successes, the attack wasn't needed, he asserts. He is convinced that Iran's nuclear program was really all about deterrence: That is, the regime believed the mere threat that it could acquire a nuclear weapon would prevent Israel, the United States, or any other country from trying to overthrow it. He is convinced that the regime would have been willing to negotiate a deal to stop, or at least suspend, its nuclear program in exchange for the end of crippling economic sanctions. 'I am convinced that the Islamic Republic didn't want to make a bomb in order to attack somewhere,' he told me. 'Even if they had a bomb, the regime is not suicidal. They want to stay in power and enjoy the wealth they daily steal. They know that if they attack Israel via nuclear bomb, Israel has the capacity to strike back.' He is particularly concerned that Israel might still attempt to overthrow the regime by assassinating Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the nation's supreme leader, and his top deputies. Israel, which in Advertisement The only way to displace the regime, Bayat argues, is for 'Iranians from within' to stand up and bring about a peaceful transition. 'The recent history has demonstrated that with bombs and destruction you cannot introduce freedom, democracy, and prosperity. I think there is a good chance for the Iranian citizens to overcome the despotic clerical regime in the coming times.' 'The only viable path forward is negotiation with the Trump administration — and ideally, direct talks with Israel," he said. 'Iran should renounce uranium enrichment, as it serves no real purpose and there are no nuclear weapons in the country, making 'denuclearization' a misnomer.' He contends that ending the enrichment program should be easier now because enrichment activities have been badly damaged and all but halted. Permanently ceasing the program could pave the way for sanctions relief, which the regime badly needs to repair Iran's sickly economy. 'Of course, such policy has to be accompanied with the recognition of Israel,' Bayat added. His faith that those negotiations will happen were shaken by recent remarks from the Advertisement 'I hope that, as usual, there is a difference between the public statements of the regime and its real handling of issues,' he said.