Today in Chicago History: Hit man Harry ‘The Hook' Aleman acquitted — after Judge Frank J. Wilson was bribed
Here's a look back at what happened in the Chicago area on May 24, according to the Tribune's archives.
Is an important event missing from this date? Email us.
Weather records (from the National Weather Service, Chicago)
High temperature: 93 degrees (1950)
Low temperature: 34 degrees (1992)
Precipitation: 1.62 inches (1927)
Snowfall: Trace (1955)
1879: The Chicago Academy of Fine Arts (later renamed Art Institute of Chicago) was incorporated.
1977: Reputed Chicago mob hit man Harry 'The Hook' Aleman was acquitted in the Sept. 27, 1972, slaying of Teamster William Logan. Evidence later surfaced that Judge Frank Wilson had been bribed.
The Dishonor Roll: Judges
Aleman became the first defendant in U.S. history to be retried on murder charges after having been acquitted at trial. He was convicted in 1997 at the second trial and sentenced to 100 to 300 years in prison, where he died in 2010.
1985: The first 31 miles of the Deep Tunnel, or the Tunnel and Reservoir Plan, was completed. Still under construction, it's the largest public works project in Chicago's history and one of the biggest in the U.S. The tunnel system is expected to be 130 miles long and cost $3.6 billion when completed.
The Deep Tunnel is intended to 'bottle a rainstorm' by channeling storm water that overflows from sewers into the system's tunnels that connect with massive reservoirs.
1988: Michael Jordan became the first NBA player to be named league MVP and defensive player of the year in the same season after averaging 35 points, 5.5 rebounds, 5.9 assists and 3.2 steals.
1993: Jordan sparked controversy by gambling with his father in Atlantic City, New Jersey, casinos the night before Game 2 of the Eastern Conference finals against the New York Knicks. He was criticized the next night for shooting 12-for-32 in a 96-91 loss, but the Chicago Bulls still won the series.
'He's a competitor,' James Jordan, Michael's father, told the Tribune in late May 1993. 'Losing $10,000 to him would be like me losing 10 cents. … If he was playing for matchsticks or straws, he'd have the same level of competition.
'He certainly doesn't have a gambling problem. He wouldn't be doing that if he couldn't afford it. He isn't that stupid. He has a competition problem. He was born with that. And if he didn't have a competition problem, you guys wouldn't be writing about him. The person he tries to outdo most of the time is himself.'
1995: The Illinois General Assembly approved the Chicago School Reform Amendatory Act, which gave Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley the ability to appoint school board members directly and replace the superintendent with an appointed chief executive officer.
Subscribe to the free Vintage Chicago Tribune newsletter, join our Chicagoland history Facebook group, stay current with Today in Chicago History and follow us on Instagram for more from Chicago's past.
Have an idea for Vintage Chicago Tribune? Share it with Kori Rumore and Marianne Mather at krumore@chicagotribune.com and mmather@chicagotribune.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
23 minutes ago
- USA Today
3 smart decisions the Pacers made to get to the 2025 NBA Finals
3 smart decisions the Pacers made to get to the 2025 NBA Finals The Indiana Pacers have surpassed expectations by winning the Eastern Conference to earn a spot in the 2025 NBA Finals. But how did they get here? Many basketball fans know about the trade that sent Domantas Sabonis to the Kings in exchange for Tyrese Haliburton. Their move to sign Bruce Brown and then trade him for Pascal Siakam was incredibly savvy as well. However, since then, the Pacers have only continued to ascend in the East. Rick Carlisle is a wildly clever coach who has maneuvered very well during his time leading NBA franchises, and explaining exactly what decisions they have made to get here would take quite a long time. But here just a few notable examples. 1. Playing with Pace This is an objectively funny place to start considering that "pace" is literally in the team name for Indiana's franchise. But playing fast is something that is very important to the identity of the Pacers and it's part of why their offense is so successful. They averaged 2.65 seconds per touch in the regular season, which was the quickest of any team in the league. Here is more from Dan Devine (via Yahoo Sports): "The Pacers like to push the ball up the court after makes or misses, hunting leakouts and hit-aheads at every opportunity. When they can't advance the ball with touchdown passes, they just sprint with the dribble, looking to get into their first action as early as possible." Indiana is going to move fast and they are going to make you pay for it. 2. Efficient shot selection The Pacers are not one of the teams that shoot the most 3-pointers in the NBA. But in the postseason, they are the most accurate and are thus far the only team shooting better than 40.0 percent from beyond the arc. They have several players who are unafraid to fire it from deep including Aaron Nesmith, Tyrese Haliburton, Andrew Nembhard, Pascal Siakam, and Myles Turner. That allows them to spread the floor and play five-out in the Rick Carlisle-led offense, which makes them difficult to beat. 3. Andrew Nembhard defending the best opposing player Indiana's Andrew Nembhard leads the league in opposing matchup difficulty, per BBall-Index. Already in the playoffs he has had the task of attempting to slow Donovan Mitchell as well as Jalen Brunson and Damian Lillard, via Mitchell was just 3-of-18 on 3-pointers when Nembhard was credited as the primary defender in the postseason. Brunson was 1-of-7 from beyond the arc while Lillard was 1-of-7. While he was not even considered a defensive presence when he was in college at Gonzaga, he is now one of the most important players in the league on that end of the floor.
NBC Sports
2 hours ago
- NBC Sports
Panthers endure uncharacteristic playoff collapse in losing Game 1 of Stanley Cup Final to Oilers
For nearly three full years under coach Paul Maurice, the defending Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers were unbeatable in the playoffs when holding a lead through either of the first two periods. Until Wednesday night. After a 4-3 overtime loss to Edmonton in Game 1 of the Stanley Cup Final, the Panthers blamed themselves for playing too conservatively in allowing the Oilers to score three straight goals as Florida squandered a 3-2 advantage entering the third. 'Just not let up. Don't sit back,' said Sam Bennett, who scored twice — including his franchise-record 12th goal of this postseason. 'We've been really good all year at not sitting back with the lead, and for whatever reason we sat back tonight.' It was an uncharacteristic collapse for a Florida team that had won 31 consecutive playoff games under Maurice when holding the lead at an intermission break. Worse yet, the Panthers actually blew a two-goal lead in a game Leon Draisaitl sealed by converting Connor McDavid's centering pass 19:29 into overtime. The winning goal came on a power play, 72 seconds after Tomas Nosek was penalized for delay of game after lifting the puck over the glass. Maurice was more concerned with how the Panthers performed well before Nosek went into the penalty box. Florida was outshot 24-8 from the beginning of the third period on. 'I think we had some real good pressure. They get it back and then there were some plays we didn't compete,' Maurice said. 'I thought we were a little safe with the puck.' Florida dropped to 8-3 on the road this postseason and trails a series for the first time since losing the first two games of its second-round meeting with Toronto, which the Panthers rallied to win in Game 7. Game 2 of the Stanley Cup Final is in Edmonton. As for Nosek's penalty, Maurice called it a tough break, and made a point to remind the player how valuable he was in helping the Panthers rally against Toronto. Nosek didn't make his playoff debut until Game 3 of the Maple Leafs series. 'That line came in and changed everything for us. We're not here without Tomas Nosek,' Maurice said. 'He's got lots of people sitting at his table and reminding him how good he's been.' The question for the Panthers is how they appeared to wear down as the game progressed in a rematch of last year's final, which Florida won in seven games. Just when it appeared Florida had grabbed the momentum by building a 3-1 lead on Bennett's second goal two minutes into the second period, Edmonton responded with Viktor Arvidsson's goal 1:17 later. And the Panthers looked gassed in the third when Mattias Ekholm converted McDavid's centering pass to tie the score at the 6:33 mark. The 46 shots allowed were the most permitted by Florida in the playoffs since giving up 65 in a 3-2 win over Carolina that took four overtimes in Game 1 of the 2023 Eastern Conference final. And they came a game after the Panthers allowed 52 shots in Game 5 of a second-round series-clinching 3-2 OT win over Toronto. Draisaitl's power-play goal was just the eighth allowed by Florida in 62 chances this postseason. Maurice remained calm in assessing how evenly matched the teams are in a series he believes has a chance to go the distance. 'It has the potential to be just a spectacular seven-gamer,' Maurice said. 'It was honest, it was hard, it was fast and it was tight. It was an overtime game.'
USA Today
3 hours ago
- USA Today
NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers?
NBA Wire Roundtable: Who will win 2025 NBA Finals between Thunder, Pacers? The Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers will square off in the 2025 NBA Finals. The championship series will feature a historic juggernaut and a team that caught fire at the right time. The Thunder enters as a heavy favorite. Shai Gilgeous-Alexander has translated his MVP season to the playoffs. Meanwhile, Jalen Williams and Chet Holmgren have played better as the postseason has progressed. Meanwhile, Tyrese Haliburton has headlined an unlikely run. The Pacers have utilized late-game heroics and hot outside shooting to get to this point. Before Game 1 begins, Thunder Wire conducted an NBA Finals roundtable with other NBA Wire site managers. Here's who they predicted will win the championship: Clemente Almanza, Thunder Wire: Laying everything out, it's very easy to understand why the Thunder are viewed as the title favorite. They had one of the greatest regular seasons ever with a 68-14 record. That dominance has carried over to the playoffs, besides a couple of hiccups. The Thunder are just on another level. That's been the case all season long. The Pacers deserve credit for getting this far. They got hot at the right time. But OKC is a machine. It made the bloodbath Western Conference look like a swimming pool. They're in the same company as some of the greatest teams ever and should join that NBA pantheon with a championship, barring one of the most surprising upsets in sports history. Prediction: Thunder in 5. Robert Marvi, LeBron Wire: This championship series could be a bit more competitive than some are expecting it to be. The Indiana Pacers surprised plenty of people with the ease with which they got past the New York Knicks in the Eastern Conference finals. They have the ideal offensive style to overcome the Thunder—a hard-core fast-breaking offense that looks to push the pace consistently, even after made baskets. But as good as Tyrese Haliburton has been—and he is a very dangerous player—the Pacers don't have a true superstar. The Thunder, on the other hand, have the regular-season MVP in Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, a borderline All-Star in Jalen Williams and plenty of depth. They also have a defense that many are starting to call historically great. There will be times when the Pacers seriously challenge Oklahoma City. But Oklahoma City should win it all without a ton of difficulty. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Justin Quinn, Celtics Wire: This series is the NBA version of the philosophical thought experiment of which will win, the immovable object vs. the irresistible force. In this finals matchup, we have the best transition offense in the league facing off with the best transition defense. We have a pair of ball clubs that can play several ways with versatile lineups and aesthetically pleasing styles of play. It may not be in big markets, but do we really believe that matters in this digital age? When it comes to the on-court product, it would be a shocker of historic proportions for the Pacers to win this series and hang a banner, but they have also done little else besides shock us in every round of the postseason to date. For that reason, I think Carlisle et al. will find a way to push this series to six or maybe even seven games, but until my eyes are shown evidence to the contrary, I just don't see how Indy will find a way to defend SGA AND keep from being turned over at a fatal rate, even as good as they may be at that wrinkle of the game. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Tommy Call III, Warriors Wire: The Thunder have been the best team in the NBA for a reason. They won 68 games fueled by the rightful MVP and a nasty defensive group in a tough Western Conference, and throughout the playoffs, they've appeared to answer any question you could possibly have about their experience, taking out the likes of Nikola Jokic, Anthony Edwards and others on the way to the NBA Finals. The Thunder deserves to be in this position, and deserve to be the favorite. However, they're running into an opponent that might be just as hot as them. Similar to the Thunder, the Pacers can send five different players at you who can score 20+ points on any evening. The Pacers feel like they have the pieces to match the Thunder in a lot of ways. Yet, what separates the Thunder in this series is that defensive trio ot Lu Dort, Alex Caruso and Cason Wallace. How do the Pacers solve that puzzle? Is Tyrese Haliburton's heroics enough? Maybe for a game or two, but in a seven-game series? It seems unlikely. While this series has all the different moving parts for a fun and exciting series, the Thunder just feel like too much for any team to handle right now, including the Pacers. Prediction: Thunder in 6. Sharif Phillips-Keaton, Nets Wire: To start off, it should be clear that this is the Finals matchup that we may not have predicted, but it's the one we deserve. The Thunder have been the NBA's best team throughout the season and the Pacers have been one of the best teams in the league since the All-Star Break. Much has been made about whether the league is best-served in this series, but it's important to note that the Finals will have the league MVP (Shai Gilgeous-Alexander) in it and will also have an Indiana team that plays at one of the fastest paces in the NBA. With that being said, this matchup will come down to which team can impose their will on the other. The Thunder are arguably the most dominant team in the league on both ends of the floor and the Pacers appear to be in the next tier when it comes to offensive and defensive rating. Ultimately, this series will come down to if Tyrese Haliburton and/or Pascal Siakam can raise their game to match what Gilgeous-Alexander is going to do. Prediction: Thunder in 7.
